Jews and Arabs: one big happy Abrahamic family?

The past twenty years have seen a rise in Israel-related spiritual focus among enthusiastic believers. Concepts like the “One New Man,” the “Restoration of David’s Tabernacle,” and the “Isaiah 19 Highway” have all come into their own, and are currently in vogue. New concepts are exciting, yet sometimes need gentle tweaking to come into godly balance.

In Ephesians 2:14-3:6 Paul teaches on the One New Man, the unique fellowship of Jews and Gentiles in one Messianic body. For many this is a wonderfully rich revelation. At the same time some have not sufficiently grappled with other biblical teachings regarding Israel specifically, that the Jewish people have an irrevocable calling and gifts (Romans 11:28-29), some of which require the Jewish people (including Messianic Jews) to remain “a people who dwells alone, and is not numbered among the nations” (Numbers 23:9). A balanced view on the One New Man requires serious grappling with God’s strategy behind the Jewish distinctive.

The “Restoration of David’s Tabernacle” movement focuses on the heart of David in worship, often with a 24/7 emphasis. The burning renewal of passionate worship and Bible based intercession is a real work of God. Yet the passage often used to bolster this awakening (Amos 9:11) does not refer to worship and intercession at all, but to a physical regathering of Israel to her ancient land, and the restoration of Davidic political government out of Jerusalem extending over the entire globe (see https://davidstent.com/words/, “A Messianic Perspective on the Restoration of David’s Tabernacle”). A balanced view on David’s tabernacle here needs to focus on speeding God’s last-days restoration of His Jewish people.

A third example concerns the “Isaiah 19 Highway” – a prophecy which describes ultimate (but not present) peace between Egypt, Israel and Assyria. A clear reading of that text describes upcoming agony and chaos in Egypt, with Israel somehow involved in that event (Isaiah 19:16-17). Peace is not quite ready to break out in the Middle East, in spite of what seems to be a birth of democracy in Egypt. The opposite is actually true (see “The Bad News from Egypt,” Barry Rubin, www.jpost.com/Features/FrontLines/Article.aspx?id=208741). A balanced view on the Isaiah 19 highway needs to discern that much turmoil is still yet to come in the Middle East, and that the prophesied peace will only happen after all nations mentioned in that chapter turn to the God of Israel and His anointed Messiah Yeshua.

The Middle East: one big happy Abrahamic family?

The focus in this newsletter is a fourth subject that needs tweaking, Suggestions are rising in various circles that:

For many believers the Middle East is a faraway, romantic and dangerous region. Camels and date palms morph into Armageddon-tinged colors and Shi’ite cruise missiles. Political intrigues, shifting alliances, Arab street riots and the rising price of oil confuse even the most earnest observers.

Many see Arabs and Jews as the original dysfunctional family, one which has perversely devolved into internecine warfare. “Arabs and Jews deserve each other,” is the PC wisdom, “and we really don’t want to get involved.”

For Bible believers neither rose-colored spectacles nor spiritual apathy are the safest response at this time! In order to touch biblical bedrock on this Arab/Abraham/Isaiah 19 issue, we need to remind ourselves of some basic Middle Eastern realities. Three questions need to be asked, and the answers will help us to find our way through the Abrahamic minefield:

“Muslim” is a religious and not an ethnic definition

A Muslim is someone who believes in the principles of Islam, either by virtue of having been raised in a Muslim religious culture or a Muslim country, or who has converted to Islam by having spoken aloud the shahada declaration (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shahada) confessing Allah as deity and Muhammad as Allah’s anointed messenger. A Muslim can be of any ethnic background; his primary identity involves a confession of Islamic faith.

Most Muslims are not Arabs

The Muslim world (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divisions_of_the_world_in_Islam#Dar_al-Islam_.28House_of_Islam.29) includes a belt of predominantly Islamic countries stretching from Western Sahara to Bangladesh and from Sudan to Kazakhstan. Many followers of Islam are also found in Western Europe, in England and in the former Soviet Union. The biggest Muslim countries in the world are not populated by Arabs.

The top ten Islamic countries in size are Indonesia, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Egypt, Turkey, Iran, Nigeria, Ethiopia, Morocco (https://pewforum.org/Muslim/Mapping-the-Global-Muslim-Population(18).aspx). Only one of these countries – Egypt – can be considered only partly Arab. Other ethnic streams in Egypt include Copts (Egyptian Christians who lived in Egypt prior to the Islamic conquest in 640 AD) and Black Sudanese.

The conservative estimation is that between 12%-15% of all Muslims are Arabs (https://islam.about.com/od/muslimcountries/a/population.htm). This means that 85-88% of all Muslims are not Arabs.

Only some Arabs are descended from Abraham

The modern term ‘Arab’ is rarely used and not defined in the Scriptures. Instead, tribes associated with specific regions are described. For example, one tribe could be called “the Arameans of Damascus” (2 Samuel 8:5), while another as “the Amorites who reigned in Heshbon” (Numbers 21:34).

The linguistic origin of the term Arab may be related to the word Arava or Arabah – an uncultivated desert wasteland (Deuteronomy 1:1). If that is the case, then the term ‘Arab’ would mean someone who dwells in a desert wasteland (see Genesis 16:12; 25:18; 27:39-40; Isaiah 42:11; Jeremiah 9:26; 25:24; 2 Chronicles 21:16).

The term ‘Arab’ appears in the Bible for the first time in 1 Kings 10:15 to describe Arabian kings who paid tribute to Solomon. In Isaiah 21:13 a prophetic word is spoken against Arabia.

The first extra-biblical use of the word ‘Arab’ is found in an Assyrian inscription from 853 BCE, where Shalmaneser III mentions King Gindibu of mtu arbi (Arab land) as among the people he defeated at the Battle of Karkar (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_North_Arabian). This king was a contemporary of Ahab King of Israel.

Ezekiel 27:21 mentions Arabs living in Kedar (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qedarite), an area in Saudi Arabia.  Ezekiel 30:5 distinguishes between Arabs and the people of Egypt, referring to them as two different ethnic groups.

Some Arab tribes pre-date Abraham

The original Syrians (the Arameans of Paddan Aram) were a pre-Abrahamic group that many would call Arabs (Genesis 25:20; Deuteronomy 26:5). These Arameans lived in Syria a long time before Abraham was born. The Arameans were pre-Abrahamic Arabs (www.english.globalarabnetwork.com/201102048893/Related-news-from-Syria/syrian-archaeologists-3000-year-old-aramean-gods-go-on-show-in-germany.html).

Biblical Egypt was not an Arab country

A dear Egyptian pastor friend told me something that most Egyptian Christians only discuss freely in the privacy of their homes – that the original Coptic Egyptians were actually not Arabs at all. The Bible backs up my friend’s assertion, calling that area ‘the land of Ham.’ “Then Israel entered Egypt; Jacob resided as a foreigner in the land of Ham” (Psalm 105:23, 27; Psalm 78:51).

Ham was one of Noah’s three sons, the others being Shem (father of the Semitic peoples) and Japheth. The land of Ham/Egypt is where some descendants of Noah’s second son Ham dwelt (“The sons of Ham: Cush, Egypt, Put and Canaan” - Genesis 10:1, 6-20). Modern Ethiopia is Cush. Modern Libya is Put. Canaan refers to the Canaanites who settled temporarily in Israel until YHVH sent Joshua in to drive them out (Genesis 15:21; 17:8; Exodus 23:23; Joshua 3:10).

According to the Scriptures Egypt was not an Arab land, but a land given to the sons of Ham. The word ‘Copt’ (used to described these original Egyptians) is most probably an Egyptian mispronunciation of the Greek word for ‘Egyptian’ (the GPT morphing into KPT or Kupti). Egyptian Copts believe that they are the descendants of the original native Egyptians (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copts).

When jihadi forces conquered Egypt in 640 A.D. they forcibly converted many Copts to Islam, and Copts had to adopt the Arabic language. The Coptic Church continued to use the ancient Coptic language in their liturgies. Centuries of Islamic oppression involved rape of Coptic women as well as forced intermarriage (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Decline_of_Eastern_Christianity:_From_Jihad_to_Dhimmitude). As a result modern Egyptians are a mixed blend – part-Copt, part-Arab and part-Sudanese.

Biblical Assyria was not an Arab country

According to the biblical Table of Nations in Genesis 10:11, Assyria was founded by Nimrod, a descendent of Ham (though see 1 Chronicles 1:17, which suggests a Semitic but pre-Abrahamic origin for Assyria). Nimrod was the son of Cush and the grandson of Ham.

Only part of the Arab nation is descended from Ishmael

The Scriptures tell us that Ishmael’s descendants would become twelve Ishmaelite tribes (Genesis 17:20; 25:13-18). Their dwelling place would be east of Egypt toward Assyria (the area between the Sinai desert, the Great Syrian Desert, the Hejaz and modern Mosul in northern Iraq). They are part of what is today called the Arab nation.

In Genesis 25:1-4 other Arab tribes are mentioned who are not descended from Ishmael but claim Keturah as their matriarch.

Only part of the Arab nation is descended from Esau

The descendants of Esau are listed in great detail in Genesis 36. These tribes are of course descendants of Isaac and not descendants of Ishmael. But since they are not descended through Jacob, they have no claim on the promises to Jacob.

Genesis 36:6 says that Esau moved some distance away from his brother Jacob, to another land called Se’ir (which is southern Jordan today, known as Edom or Idumea is the past).

Many Arabs are descended from Shem and not Abraham

First Chronicles 1:17-27 says that one of Shem’s sons was Aram (perhaps the father of the Arameans) while another was Arphaxad (whose grandson was Eber). Eber had two children – Peleg and Joktan. Joktan is described as the patriarch of many Arab tribes, many of whom can be traced to the Saudi Arabian Hejaz (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hejaz) and Hadramaut (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadhramaut) peninsula today.

The Arabic language as a form of linguistic colonialism

When the jihadi forces of Muhammad conquered the Middle East, North Africa, parts of Asia and Central Europe, they enforced a slave status on all those who would not convert to Islam – the dhimmi class (www.dhimmitude.org/). The Arabic language was forced on millions in conquered nations. That is how the whole Middle East came to be predominantly Arabic speaking. Today many confuse Arabic speakers with Arab ethnicity.

Though PC wisdom accepts that Morocco, Algeria, Tunis, Libya, Lebanon, Syria and Iran are all Arab countries, historical realities are quite different.

The original peoples west of Egypt were mostly Berbers, a non-Semitic ethnic group which had been conquered by the Romans and had embraced Christianity. Saint Augustine of Hippo was their most famous son (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berber_people).

Lebanese Christians proudly affirm their origin as a non-Arab and non-Semitic people – as descendants of the great Phoenician culture  (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenicia). Genetic chromosomal markers tie these people in to ethnic groups in Malta and Spain.

The original Syrians, as mentioned above, are Arabs who existed before Abraham, probably descended from Shem through Aram.

The Iranians (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_peoples) are a non-Semitic Indo-European people group which settled in Persia (modern Iran). They are predominantly Shi’ite Muslim, but have no Semitic or Abrahamic connection.

A plea for greater biblical care

This short study has a purpose: it is a plea for believers to move up into greater accuracy and discernment when handling the prophetic Scriptures, especially concerning Israel and the Arab world.

Preserving God’s heart for Jews and Arabs

God’s heart for healing in the Middle East

Isaiah 19:23-25 is one snapshot of many that the Scriptures present regarding future international relationships in the Middle East. In this passage land routes between the two countries of Egypt and Assyria (present-day northern Iraq) will buzz with activity. Of course, these roads will go straight through Israel, as did the ancient Via Maris (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Via_Maris).

Egypt and Assyria were once the two main Middle Eastern superpowers, especially at the beginning of the first millennium BC. Isaiah prophesies that there will not only be travel between these two countries who were once at loggerheads, but they will also worship YHVH together. This indicates a latter-day revival in both countries.

At the same time Isaiah 19 refers to Egypt going through a future period of oppression and suffering under cruel dictators. The text refers to an Egyptian city which will suffer unusual destruction (verse 18), as well as a very real terror that Egypt will have concerning the Jewish people (who will be used by YHVH to severely discipline the country of Egypt – verses 16-17).

After these severe mercies, there will be peace in the western Middle East. The whole world will acknowledge a worldwide blessing that will flow from these three countries (verse 24). God blesses the three countries of Egypt, Assyria and Israel jointly (verse 25), declaring that Egypt is His people, Assyria is the work of His hands, and Israel His special inheritance and His first-born nation (see Exodus 4:22)!

Isaiah’s vision and God’s heart for the Middle East are huge. They encompass strategic nations in this region. But they also fiercely maintain the distinctive gifts, calling and land borders of Israel, and insist that the entire Jewish people will be regathered home, to be the exclusive and sovereign possessors of their own Promised homeland.

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do!

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN  37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal) through: www.davidstent.org

Tampering with Abraham’s Last Will and Testament

Even as Egypt was shaking in the throes of revolution last week, spokesmen for Western powers insisted that the real danger to Middle East peace had nothing to do with the numerous demonstrations raging throughout the Arab world (either targeting military dictatorships or advocating Islamist dictatorships) in Tunisia, Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, Kuwait and Iran. The real danger, said some influential Western politicians, lay in the holding up of the so-called ““peace process” – the one dealing with shrinking Israel’s borders and establishing a Judenrein Palestinian state.

Some voices among believers in Messiah Yeshua are sounding amazingly in tune with the above trends. One group in Israel sees no conflict between true biblical reconciliation (between Jews and Arabs) and advocating the establishment of a Palestinian state.  The numerous Scriptures dealing with God’s judgment on those who divide the land are casually dismissed as simply differing theological and political opinions – and not unchanging guidelines in God’s word.

It is certainly true that the issue of ownership of the land of Israel is the world’s hot button today, and the Scriptures declare that this button will turn molten red in the days immediately preceding the return of Israel’s Messiah Yeshua, the Son of David to Jerusalem.

Perhaps the Scriptures can help us move to a biblical solution, What were Abraham’s own intentions for the future of the land of Israel? Did he intend for his different children to share that land, or that only one of his children would receive the promise of  the land as an inheritance? If we discover Abraham’s intentions, does that mean that Jews and Arabs will be willing to carry out Abraham’s last will and testament concerning the land of promise?

In the name of the Father?

Recent comments by President Obama’s former National Security Advisor, Marine General James Jones, at the annual IDC Herzliya Conference (www.herzliyaconference.org/Eng/) show a curious theological slant, even if spoken by the mouth of a Western secular politician.  Jones said, “I’m of the belief that had God appeared in front of President Obama in 2009 and said if he could do one thing on the face of the planet, and one thing only, to make the world a better place and give people more hope and opportunity for the future, I would venture that it would have something to do with finding the two-state solution to the Middle East” (www.jpost.com/MiddleEast/Article.aspx?id=207259). General Jones added that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the “knot that is at the center of mass.”

With all due respect to the theological convictions of the USMC General on this matter, a military man knows that no one can speak in the name of the Father – in the name of the Lord of Armies – without properly delegated authority. An appeal to Presidential political power or even to chic and fashionable words like “reconciliation” – none of these can substitute for real spiritual authority, the kind that can only be found in the word of God.

Go East young man!

When a man is about to die, in most cases his mind is surprisingly focused. His paramount desire is to make absolutely sure that his last will and testament will be carried out to the letter. No fudging, no compromise, no playing favorites (Romans 2:11; 9:7-14). Genesis 25 describes Abraham’s impending death and his preparations for departure (verse 8). It notes that “Abraham left everything he owned to Isaac.  But while he was still living, he gave gifts to the sons of his concubines and sent them away from his son Isaac to the land of the east” (Genesis 25:5-6).

Abraham had married another woman, Keturah, after Sarah had died. He had six sons through her, and yet the text calls them “the sons of the concubines.” Though they were physically descended from Abraham, Abraham distinguished between them and his son of promise Isaac. When he gave them parting inheritance gifts, he sent them “east of Eden” – far away from the land of Israel. That inheritance had been promised to Isaac alone.

Dedan and Sheba, Jokshan and Midian – these sons of Keturah settled as Arab tribes scattered across the deserts of Arabia.

Abraham’s purpose was clear – only Isaac and his children, the people of promise, would have Abraham’s blessing to live in the future land of Israel.  

Abraham’s blessings are Isaac’s

The Scriptures tell us that the choosing of Isaac as the sole inheritor of the land was not an accident. It was part of God’s original plan. God had told Abraham repeatedly that this would be so. Abraham believed God. And it was counted to him for righteousness.

The first recorded communication between YHVH and Abraham concerns the land as an inheritance to the Jewish people: “Go from your country, your people and your father’s household to the land I will show you…To your seed I will give this land” (Genesis 12:1,7).

Later YHVH said to Abram … “Look around from where you are, to the north and south, to the east and west. All the land that you see I will give to you and your seed forever. I will make your offspring like the dust of the earth, so that if anyone could count the dust, then your offspring could be counted. Go, walk through the length and breadth of the land, for I am giving it to you” (Genesis 13:14-17).

When YHVH cut the covenant with Abraham, the land as an exclusive inheritance to the Jewish people was again at the center of the revelation:

He also said to him, “I am YHVH, who brought you out of Ur of the Chaldeans to give you this land to take possession of it.”  But Abram said, “YHVH Adonai, how can I know that I will gain possession of it?” …As the sun was setting, Abram fell into a deep sleep, and a thick and dreadful darkness came over him. Then YHVH said to him, “Know for certain that for four hundred years your descendants will be strangers in a country not their own and that they will be enslaved and mistreated there. But I will punish the nation they serve as slaves, and afterward they will come out with great possessions. You, however, will go to your ancestors in peace and be buried at a good old age. In the fourth generation your descendants will come back here, for the sin of the Amorites has not yet reached its full measure.” When the sun had set and darkness had fallen, a smoking firepot with a blazing torch appeared and passed between the pieces. On that day YHVH made a covenant with Abram and said, “To your descendants I give this land, from the Wadi of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates – the land of the Kenites, Kenizzites, Kadmonites, Hittites, Perizzites, Rephaites, Amorites, Canaanites, Girgashites and Jebusites” (Genesis 15:7-8, 12-20).

No longer Canaan but Israel

The Scriptures tell us that the land promises to the Jewish people are for the whole people for time and eternity.  Even the name of the land will no longer be called “Canaan” and the previous Canaanite inhabitants will have no claim to the land or live there again. Those who are attempting to name parts of the land of Israel “Palestine” in honor of the Arab Palestinians (though the term actually comes from an ancient Roman attempt to curse the land by renaming the land after the Philistines, the biblical enemies of David) should consider YHVH’s prophetic precedent here.

“I will establish my covenant as an everlasting covenant between Me and you and your descendants after you for the generations to come, to be your God and the God of your descendants after you. The whole land of Canaan, where you now reside as a foreigner, I will give as an everlasting possession to you and your descendants after you; and I will be their God” (Genesis 17:7-8).

What about Ishmael?

The Scriptures tell us unequivocally that Ishmael and his seed will never inherit the land of Israel:

“Get rid of that slave woman and her son, for that woman’s son will never share in the inheritance with my son Isaac.” The matter distressed Abraham greatly because it concerned his son. But God said to him, “Do not be so distressed about the boy and your slave woman. Listen to whatever Sarah tells you, because it is through Isaac that your seed will be reckoned. I will make the son of the slave into a nation also, because he is your offspring” (Genesis 21:10-13).

Even the Angel of the Lord’s prophecy in Genesis 16 makes it clear that Ishmael’s seed will live “opposite from,” or “facing” or “in hostility to” the Jewish people – in common speech, not sharing the same land with Isaac, and not kindly disposed to Isaac either!

“The Angel of YHVH also said to her, ‘You are now pregnant and you will give birth to a son. You shall name him Ishmael, for YHVH has heard your misery. He will be a wild donkey of a man; his hand will be against everyone and everyone’s hand against him, and he will live in hostility toward all his brothers’” (Genesis 16:11-12).

What started out as the mocking of Sarah and Isaac by Hagar and Ishmael (Genesis 21:9; 16:4) ends up as hatred of the Jewish people. Yet God can even heal this in Messiah Yeshua! Nevertheless, this need for healing among Ishmael’s seed needs to be squarely confronted and resolutely handled.

Borders are God’s idea

The prophetic word known as the Song of Moses (Deuteronomy 31:30) transmits much important revelation. By the inspiration of the Holy Spirit Moses declares that “When the Most High gave the nations their inheritance, when He divided all mankind, He set up boundaries for the peoples according to the number of the sons of Israel. For YHVH’s portion is His people, Jacob His allotted inheritance. In a desert land he found him, in a barren and howling waste. He shielded him and cared for him; He guarded him as the apple of His eye” (Deuteronomy 32:8-10).

In this passage God makes it crystal clear that it is He alone who establishes national borders. He describes Israel’s borders in great detail in the Bible (e.g., Genesis 15:19-20, etc.).

Deuteronomy 32 teaches that He actually sets the borders for all nations based on His priority purposes for the Jewish people. There is even a mystical connection between the borders of all countries and the amount of Jewish people on the face of the earth!

To restate this point more clearly, it is not the Arab world, the EU, the USA, the Quartet or political chic that has any authority to pontificate about the borders of the Jewish state. According to YHVH, the matter is decided, the case is closed, and it is His theological and political opinions which win the debate. What will actually change is the borders of all other nations, based on their treatment of the Jewish people and their state (Genesis 12:3; Jeremiah 30:16-17, etc.).

Abraham’s blessings are mine

The Scriptures are clear regarding Ishmael. They are equally clear regarding Esau (also known as Edom or Se’ir), Isaac’s first-born son through Rebekah. Esau/Edom and his seed will never inherit the land of Israel.

Esau’s potential inheritance of the land was decisively blocked not once but twice – once through God’s prophetic word (Genesis 25:21-23) and the second time due to his apathy and unbelief concerning the promises – which led to his abdication of his own firstborn right of primogeniture (Genesis 25:29-34).

Ezekiel brings a prophetic rebuke to the Edomite people regarding their evil last-days attempts to claim the land of Israel as belonging to the Arab nations. Though the matter was closed as far as the promises of God are concerned, there remained (and remains) an active Arab movement attempting to violate God’s express will in the Bible, by attempting to wrest control of the Jewish state (in part or the whole) from the Jewish people.

In the last-days scenario of Ezekiel 36 the God of Israel calls the Edomite people “His enemies” – those who are attempting to “make the ancient heights their possession” (verse 2). YHVH declares that the heart motives behind these actions are “glee and malice” (verse 5), and that their treatment of the land of Israel has been to “ravage” and “plunder” it with “scorn” (verses 3, 5-7). He also faults the nations who stand with Edom’s claims, accusing them of “malicious talk, slander, ridicule and scorn” towards the Jewish people and their state (verses 3-7).

Ezekiel’s prophetic word is simply not what many would expect as being sufficiently “PC” or “politically correct.” Perhaps British Foreign Minister Hague might even call Ezekiel’s tone a trifle “belligerent” – a term he recently used to rebuke Prime Minister Netanyahu for questioning Egypt’s reliability in light of the civil disturbances (www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/8312527/William-Hague-calls-on-Israel-to-drop-its-negative-stance-on-Egypt.html).

To speak plainly, those who advocate for a Palestinian state to be set up on the land of Israel violate the spirit and letter of Ezekiel’s prophetic word. To advocate for a division of the land between Jew and Arab will ultimately bring down God’s burning zeal and judgment when He comes to judge the nations in Joel 3 and Zechariah 14.

May the Lord keep all of His beloved children far from such a fate! But may the Lord also help us to treat believers with whom we disagree with love and honor, even if they somehow behave like enemies.

One last thought – is it not ironic that the Arab nation, many of whom believe that they are descended from Abraham, take pride in that claim while simultaneously denying Abraham’s express will and testament – that he bequeathed the Promised Land to Isaac alone. To honor the father is to honor his will. And to honor the Father is to honor His will as communicated in His holy word.

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do!

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN  37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal) through: www.davidstent.org

“You say you want a revolution”

The year was 1968. The thought on everybody’s mind was revolution.

The Vietcong’s January Tet Offensive had triggered demonstrations throughout the United States and Britain. In March London’s Grosvenor Square hosted a riot across the street from the American Embassy. Paris was convulsed by general strikes and student riots in May ‘68. President de Gaulle had even been helivaced to Baden-Baden in Germany on May 29, fearing a storming of the Elysée Palace.

These events were the matrix which gave birth to two rock n’ roll anthems – “Revolution” by the Beatles, and “Street Fighting Man” by the Rolling Stones. Though communist revolution never went over in a big way in the West, one can easily agree that revolutionary vision was a heady drug that even today has the power to inspire mass movements.

Think the time is right for Palace revolution

Mick Jagger declared that everywhere he heard “the sound of marching, charging feet, boy!” Over the past few days the TV screens of the world have fixated on the streets and squares of Cairo and Alexandria. The West’s TV “talking head” news commentators – most who speak no Arabic, are ignorant of Middle Eastern history and who really are “new kids on the block” – have found themselves waxing eloquent about the meaning and direction of racing developments.

In a grand total of eighteen days, the leader of the Arab world’s largest country has been forced to resign the presidency and flee his palace in Cairo (Egypt’s capital city) for the Red Sea resort of Sharm el-Sheikh. From CNN to Al Jazeera, BBC to Sky News, there is universal agreement that this street revolution is rapidly whisking Egypt into the modern pro-Western democratic era. PC perspective is that Cairo is experiencing what the Thirteen American Colonies underwent in April 1775 during the Battles of Lexington and Concord, or what Paris experienced in May 1789 during the French Revolution.

The revolution that failed

There are other historical paradigms, though, and they are far less cheery.

The Russian February Revolution of 1917 (centered in Petrograd – modern Saint Petersburg) turned sour.  It achieved stunning short-term goals, including the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II, the collapse of Imperial Russia and the end of the Romanov dynasty. Yet the revolution (like the present Egyptian demonstrations) seemed to have no clear leadership or formal planning. Alexander Kerensky quickly became Chairman and Prime Minister of this Russian Provisional Government, until he was overthrown on November 6-7 1917 by the Bolsheviks in their Great October Revolution. The rise of a cruel Communist dictatorship led first by Lenin and then by Stalin insured that democracy and free elections would be banished from Russia for over 70 years.

The popular riots in Iran in 1978-79 led to a national referendum on March 29-30 1979, with 98.2% voting for the immediate establishment of an Islamic Republic, whose constitution would be determined at a later date. But the rise of a cruel Shi’ite dictatorship led by Ayatollah Khomeini insured that democracy and free elections would be banished for the foreseeable future.

Egypt – a long roster of military dictatorships

In 1881 Egyptian Colonel Ahmed Urabi attempted a national-military revolt against the British. His efforts were soundly defeated, but the successful Free Officers Revolt in 1952 looked to Urabi as their prophetic prototype.

In July 1952 a group of nine military officers led by Gamal Abd el-Nasser (including Lieutenant-Colonel Anwar al-Sadat) overthrew King Farouk I (a British puppet), abolished the constitutional monarchy and established a military dictatorship called a “republic.” Since 1952 Egypt has been ruled by military dictatorships. President Nasser died in 1970 and Sadat replaced him, yet the military dictatorship remained. When Sadat was assassinated on October 6 1981 by jihadi terrorists (whose movement was birthed out of the Muslim Brotherhood), he was replaced by Hosni Mubarak, a former Soviet-trained commander of the Egyptian Air Force. Yet once again the military dictatorship remained solidly in place.

What most newscasters have not figured out so far is that, at this moment, though the head of government has resigned, Egypt is still being controlled by a military dictatorship. Yet the world crows about the new democracy in Egypt. The present military junta may lead to real democracy. But it could even more easily lead to a Muslim Brotherhood (MB) takeover – as happened in Gaza with the MB group Hamas in January 2006.

“Pharaoh is dead!”

The Muslim Brotherhood is an Islamist underground organization dedicated to re-establishing the Islamic Caliphate world empire and shari’a law through jihadi revolution (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Brotherhood; also see https://davidstent.com/words , February 2006). It was founded in 1928 in the town of Isma’iliya Egypt by Hassan al-Banna. Its credo remains, “Allah is our objective; the Koran is our constitution, the Prophet is our leader; Jihad is our way; and death for the sake of Allah is the highest of our aspirations.”

During WWII the Muslim Brotherhood had extensive links with Nazi Germany, while planning for the overthrow of Egypt’s British-controlled government. In November 1948 the organization was banned while planning a military putsch. In response a Muslim Brotherhood agent assassinated Egypt’s Prime Minister Nukrashi Pasha on December 28, 1948.

Thirty three years later, on October 6, 1981 Egyptian Lieutenant Khalid al-Islambouli (a man strongly influenced by the MB offshoot Egyptian Islamic Jihad) assassinated Egyptian President Sadat during a military parade celebrating the October (Yom Kippur) War. As he threw grenades and fired his assault rifle, he yelled out, “Death to Pharaoh!” At his murder trial he again proclaimed, “I have killed Pharaoh and I do not fear death!”

On June 22, 1995 Islambouli’s younger brother Showki nearly succeeded in assassinating President Hosni Mubarak during a state visit to Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

According to Koranic thinking Pharaoh symbolizes a cruel and ungodly ruler, whose rule opposes that of God (www.mediamonitors.net/harunyahya40.html). According to Islamist thinking, secular-leaning military dictators who are not sufficiently committed to Koranic Islam are like the evil ruler Pharaoh. They may be overthrown or assassinated at will (https://meria.idc.ac.il/journal/1999/issue3/zeidan.pdf).

Egyptian Prime Minister Nukrashi Pasha and President Sadat were both assassinated by Islamists who believed that they were ridding the world of evil Pharaohs. This is the Islamist context that explains the meaning of the cries heard in Cairo’s Tahrir Square on Friday February 11, 2011 that, with Mubarak’s resignation, “the Pharaoh is dead.” Posters of Mubarak as either a dead Pharaoh or as an Egyptian mummy also abounded during these rallies.

Egyptian anchor Amr Nassef (once imprisoned in Egypt for Islamist ties) declared this Friday on al-Manar (Lebanese Hezbollah TV) with great emotion, “Allahu Akbar (Allah is great)! The Pharaoh is dead! Am I dreaming? I’m afraid to be dreaming!”

Islamist and Muslim Brotherhood adherents believe that their shock troops have managed to cut down three mighty rulers in Egypt (1948, 1981, and now 2011). They are greatly encouraged at recent developments, and see these events as a foretaste of total Islamic revolution in Egypt.

Pharaoh’s army got drownded?

In the old Black gospel hymn Mary is told to cease weeping “cuz Pharaoh’s army got drownded.” But that event at the Red Sea occurred more than 3,400 years ago. Today of course the Egyptian army is very much in the picture! It is not yet clear what role the Egyptian generals will play in upcoming and fast moving Middle Eastern events. As we pray for Egypt, its people and leadership, let’s remember:

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do!

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN  37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal) through: www.davidstent.org

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close