Iron and clay, whirlwind and Jews

The leader of the world’s greatest superpower was awakened by a disturbing dream. Nebuchadnezzar’s “spirit was troubled and his sleep left him” (Daniel 2:1).  The dream was burning with significance, but its interpretation was hidden from him. The whole matter filled the king with foreboding. Nebuchadnezzar was going through a meltdown with no one to help him.

The king gave his advisors a choice – get supernatural revelation about the dream and its meaning or be put to death! With a probable sentence of death hanging over Babylon’s political and spiritual counsellors, Daniel and his friends interceded before YHVH. The God of Jacob gave Daniel the revelation he needed in the nick of time. Daniel went to Nebuchadnezzar and declared, “As for the mystery about which the king has inquired, neither wise men, conjurers, magicians nor diviners are able to declare it to the king. However, there is a God in heaven who reveals mysteries, and He has made known … what will take place” (Daniel 2:27-28).

God’s wake-up call to the king of Babylon began with the truth that the God of Israel is sovereign even over the affairs of superpowers and super-kings. “Let the name of God be blessed forever and ever, for wisdom and power belong to Him. It is He who changes the times and the epochs. He removes kings and establishes kings. He gives wisdom to wise men and knowledge to men of understanding. It is He who reveals the profound and hidden things. He knows what is in the darkness, and the light dwells with Him” (Daniel 2:19-22).

Whatever the challenges, whatever the shakings, the God of Jacob already knows the answer. He already has the solution.

A brittle state of the union

The top-secret revelation Daniel had received was future in scope. A list of empires would arise after mighty Babylon’s demise. The fourth in line (verse 40) was described as having toes made of a mixture of iron and clay (verse 33), referring to the partly strong /partly brittle nature of that kingdom (verses 42-43). That empire would suffer from a lack of internal unity and cohesion. At one point this kingdom would even undergo a painful division (verse 41).

But that fourth kingdom would also fade. Only after that would the final kingdom be inaugurated. The Messianic throne of David’s Greater Son would be established in Jerusalem and would reign over all nations. “In the days of those kings the God of heaven will set up a kingdom which will never be destroyed, and that kingdom will not be left for another people. It will crush and put an end to all these kingdoms, but it will itself endure forever” (Daniel 2:44; see also Isaiah 2:1-5).

Inherit the whirlwind

The biblical history of humankind continues to emphasize one consistent point: when mankind abandons God and His principles, the result is the collapse of society. From Cain to the corruption of Noah’s day, from the one-world false unity of Babel’s Tower to Sodom and Gomorrah’s fiery end – the Scriptural record drives home the message that “righteousness exalts a nation but sin is a reproach to any people” (Proverbs 14:34).

In 1190 AD a cleric in the medieval court of Philippe of Alsace (the Count of Flanders) is quoted as having said “Rome ne s’est pas faite en un jour” (Rome was not built in a day). The construction of that mighty city and the zenith of its empire took place over a thousand year period. But Rome’s collapse happened rather quickly, as charted in Edward Gibbon’s masterpiece The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.

One could add other empires to this list – like the British Empire. England had been granted a golden opportunity to bless and protect the Jewish people in 1917. Yet the divine invitation was spurned at the highest levels of its political and military command structure. Britain repeatedly violated Genesis 12:3, which proclaims that the blessing or cursing of the Jewish people is the international key to divine favor or judgment. Within approximately thirty years the British Empire was no longer.

The prophet Hosea spoke a similar warning to his own people. His words have relevance to each of our countries today.

When a country abandons God’s ways and word to establish its own – when materialism, secularism, rebellion, hatred and violence characterize its populace – these sad choices bring on traumatic shaking and agonizing barrenness. When a nation mocks the biblical principles regarding the shedding of innocent blood (Genesis 9:6; Numbers 35:33; Deuteronomy 19:10) or the divine foundations of marriage and sexual identity (Genesis 1:27; Matthew 19:4-6; Leviticus 18:22: 20:13; 1 Corinthians 6:9-10; 1 Timothy 1:9-11), the result is a spiritual ‘termite infestation’ which leads to social and spiritual collapse of a country’s foundations.

A house divided against itself

In civil war, a nation turns on itself. It is similar to how cancerous cells attack and destroy healthy cells in a human body.

Israel’s Messiah Yeshua Son of David once said, “If a kingdom is divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand. If a house is divided against itself, that house will not be able to stand” (Mark 3:24-25).

Many people in the Western world in general, and in the United States of America in particular, are horrified to witness the quickly widening cracks in their national foundations. The bedrock of biblical principles has been mocked and jettisoned. In their place the hydra-like heads of idolatrous materialism, sexual uncleanness, spiritual rebellion and anti-Semitism are rising up in preparation for a fateful battle royal.

A violent spirit of division

In late February 1848 a small booklet by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels was published in London’s Bishopsgate. Destined to become one of the world’s most influential political documents, its German title was Manifest der kommunistischen Partei (‘The Communist Manifesto’).

Its two opening sentences were riveting: “A specter is haunting Europe – the specter of communism. All the powers of old Europe have entered into a holy alliance to exorcise this specter” (“Ein Gespenst geht um in Europa  ‐ das Gespenst des Kommunismus. Alle Mächte des alten Europa haben sich zu einer heiligen Hetzjagd gegen dies Gespenst verbündet”). Marx and Engels presented their German revolutionary proposal following on the heels of the French Revolution’s Reign of Terror  – “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.” This small manifesto would create earthquakes of division in both Europe and in Russia.

Classical Marxism (Communist political theory) prophesied that European nations would eventually be ripped in two, divided by the revolutionary spirit of Communism.

Violence was seen by these political architects as a foreordained means of establishing a Communist society.

Fascist violence in Germany

Street violence in pursuit of revolutionary social change was to become a very European phenomenon. The rise of violent gangs whose goal was to ‘reclaim the streets’ was one of the main expressions of the mounting struggle between Communists and Nazis for the soul of Germany.

Here are quotes from Hitler himself and from the official pamphlet of the SA (Sturmabteilung – storm troopers, often known as ‘brownshirts’) along with the Nuremberg Trials file numbers (https://archive.org/stream/naziconspiracyag02unit/naziconspiracyag02unit_djvu.txt; https://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/chap15_part04.asp):

The present-day torch processions, thuggish marching and anti-Jewish/anti-Black threats of Nazis, neo-Nazis, KKK white supremacists and alt-right supporters in Charlottesville, Virginia shows that Hitler’s vision of fascist revolution through control of the streets lives on in the evil thoughts of these movements’ activists.

Communist violence in Germany

At the same time as the Nazis were rising to dictatorial power in Germany, the Communists also saw street fighting as a key to the triumph of their own cause. Under the leadership of Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg, the KPD (Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands – the Communist Party of Germany) was committed to spearheading a violent revolution in Germany, and during 1919 and 1920 violent attempts were made to seize control of the government.

The Roter Frontkämpferbund (Alliance of Red Front Fighters, also known as Rotfront – www.dhm.de/lemo/kapitel/weimarer-republik/innenpolitik/roter-frontkaempferbund.html) was formed in 1923 and was active until 1933 when it was banned (https://libcom.org/history/beating-fascists-german-communists-political-violence-1929-1933-eve-rosenhaft; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roter_Frontk%C3%A4mpferbund). The Communist youth street fighting Roter Jungsturm (Red Youth Storm) was renamed as Rote Jungfront (Red Youth Front) in 1925. These groups provided security for Communist events and also participated in active agitation. But since the Nazis’ street violence was more brutal and their movement more popular, most of the Red Fighters’ work involved fighting off Nazi and police attacks.  Street clashes between Communists and Nazis were commonplace during that time, when Nazi flags clashed with red flags on the streets of Germany.

Violent clashes erupted when Nazi shock troops and Communist shock troops fought for control of the German streets.

The most popular slogan of the Roter Frontkämpferbund was “Beat the fascists wherever you encounter them!” The SA would chant, “The red front – break them to pieces!” or “The red front - beat them to a pulp!” After the Nazis completed their takeover of Germany, the Red Front Fighters were jailed, tortured and many were murdered. Others escaped to fight in the Spanish Civil War or in the Soviet Army.

Modern radical violence in Europe

Street fighting received a PR boost through Mick Jagger and Keith Richard’s hit song “Street Fighting Man” of 1968. The song was inspired by violence Jagger had seen while attending the anti-Vietnam War demonstration at London’s Grosvenor Square across from the US Embassy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protests_of_1968; www.theguardian.com/world/2008/may/21/1968theyearofrevolt.antiwar) as well as by media reports concerning the Paris Student riots (www.nytimes.com/2008/05/11/world/europe/11iht-paris.4.12777919.html?mcubz=3; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/May_1968_events_in_France). The Rolling Stones’ catalytic anthem reflected the return of street riots to the Western world.

Anarchist-led riots at the G7, G8 and G20 summit meetings like Genoa in 2001 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/27th_G8_summit) and Hamburg in 2017 (www.dw.com/en/hamburg-g20-riot-damages-run-into-millions/a-39745157; https://edition.cnn.com/2017/07/08/europe/g20-protests/index.html) as well as other major world cities are one of the metastasized results of these expressions. Up to 200,000 participants were involved in these demonstrations. Rioters threw Molotov bombs, attacked police and armed forces, destroyed property as well as other acts of violence. The anarchistic and Communist nature of these riots and demonstrations shows no sign of letting up in days to come.

Modern radical violence in the USA

Americans have witnessed anarchist/leftist riots at the World Trade Organization and ‘G’ summits (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_bloc; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_Seattle_WTO_protests). Recent anarchist attacks have focused on the President of the United States (www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/20/anti-donald-trump-activists-try-block-access-inauguration/; https://edition.cnn.com/2017/01/19/politics/trump-inauguration-protests-womens-march/; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DisruptJ20).

One striking manifestation of violent civil unrest is connected to the movement known as Antifa (www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2017/08/economist-explains-11). Its name refers to its self-designation as anti-fascistic. This amorphous movement attacks targets which they define as connected to capitalism, racism, authoritarianism, patriarchal organizations, ‘heteronormals’ and white supremacists. Their loose self-definition seeks “the elimination of racism, sexism, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, homophobia, transphobia, and discrimination against disabled people, the oldest, the youngest, and the most oppressed people” as well as the creation of “a free [and] classless society.”

Though Antifa tends to be strongly against fascist and anti-Semitic public events, Mark Bray (a lecturer on human rights and politics at Dartmouth College and author of the forthcoming book “Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook”) notes in a recent Jewish Telegraph Agency article:

“The threat posed by the ‘alt-right’ in the context of empowerment through Trump made a lot of people concerned about fascist, neo-Nazi, white supremacist violence, They turned to the Antifa model as one option to resist it. The option of physically confronting these groups has spread among the left and been normalized” … “Bray said that while anti-Zionism is not a focus of Antifa, many members tend to be anti-Zionist as part of their far-left activism. Anti-Racist Action groups, he said, had taken part in anti-Zionist events in the past” (www.jta.org/2017/08/16/news-opinion/united-states/what-you-need-to-know-about-antifa-the-group-that-fought-white-supremacists-in-charlottesville)

The Berlin Jewish branch of Antifa would actually be classified as within the anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist stream:

“We believe that anti-Zionism … has no anti-Semitic aspects…We see the ‘Jewish State’ as a racist and discriminatory term…We express solidarity with the BDS movement…We express solidarity with For Palestine. Their uncompromising stand and vision for the decolonization of Palestine and toward a democratic and secular one state solution which includes the right of return for all Palestinian refugees and their families is an inspiration for us…The Palestinian struggle for liberation, freedom and justice should be the center of discussion in the Left around the world and in Germany specifically” (https://jewishantifaberlin.wordpress.com/about-us/)

Summing up street violence in the USA

Street violence in recent American history include events related to:

The widening cracks and growing fault-lines within American society show potential for civil war. We live in sobering times.

“Then I saw when the Lamb broke one of the seven seals, and I heard one of the four living creatures saying as with a voice of thunder, “Come.” I looked, and behold… (w)hen He broke the second seal, I heard the second living creature saying, “Come.” And another, a red horse, went out. And to him who sat on it, it was granted to take peace from the earth, and that men would slay one another. And a great sword was given to him” (Revelation 6:1-4)

Satanic strategies and anti-Semitism

“I have come to cast fire upon the earth; and how I wish it were already kindled! But I have a baptism to undergo, and how distressed I am until it is accomplished! Do you suppose that I came to grant peace on earth? I tell you, no, but rather division; for from now on five members in one household will be divided, three against two and two against three. They will be divided, father against son and son against father, mother against daughter and daughter against mother, mother-in-law against daughter-in-law and daughter-in-law against mother-in-law” (Luke 12:49-53).

The quickly approaching day of Yeshua’s return will not be accompanied by an amazing outbreak of world peace, rose-colored glasses and positive confession. Yeshua Himself speaks of division reaching even into the sacrosanct family unit. The Day of His Coming will not be a day of peace but a day of war. And most followers of Yeshua are spiritually not yet prepared.

The Jewish people have a heightened sense of history and an attenuated sensitivity to anti-Semitic manifestations. The 20th century has made it clear to the Jewish nation that the greatest sources of anti-Jewish actions and atrocities have come from three wellsprings – Nazism, Communism and Islamism.

In 1993 my wife Rachel had a troubling dream. The scene of the dream was in rural Kansas, in the dark of night. Rachel found herself standing in a convenience store whose shelves were nearly empty of food. There was the feeling that great evil was afoot, that economic collapse had happened, and that it was not safe to wander around. Many people had guns, and heavily-armed gangs roamed through the land. There was no government. The atmosphere was full of danger and death. A dark shadowy figure said to Rachel, “All this chaos, breakdown and no food in the stores is because of the Jews. They are the ones to blame.”  In her dream Rachel needed to find me (I am of course a Jewish man) and get me away from there. In that dream it was not safe to be a Jew in America.

Intense intercession to counteract the curse of Genesis 12:3

The Nazi and KKK marched through the streets of Charlottesville, Virginia, cursing and threatening the Jewish people. Their smirks conjured up images from Hitler’s Europe. Anti-Jewish words and deeds trigger the powerful protective blessing and cursing which YHVH spoke over Abraham and his Jewish descendants in Genesis 12:3. “Those who bless you, I will bless” says YHVH. “And the one who mocks/disdains you, him I will curse.” The Hebrew verb here meqalelecha refers to mocking, disdaining or treating the people in question (i.e., the Jewish people) as insignificant. Speaking curses, mockery and condemnation of the Jewish people by any group activates this covenantal clause.

How should we then pray?

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal) through: www.davidstent.org

Pickin’ up the pieces on the Temple Mount

Jerusalem’s Temple Mount is once again in the headlines.

On July 14 a four-man Islamist terror squad smuggled sub-machine guns and knives onto the Mountain where Solomon’s and Herod’s Temple once stood – a religious site holy to Judaism and Islam. Three of the four then attacked and murdered two Israeli police officers of Arab Druze origin who had been guarding the entrance gates and insuring safe passage for Muslim, Christian and Jewish pilgrims. The terrorists were Arab Muslims from the Jabarin family in Umm al-Fahm, an Arab municipality within Israel located between Haifa and Jenin. They had been radicalized by virulent anti-Israeli Islamist agitation in their home-town madrasa (Islamic religious school). The three terrorists who carried out the attack were taken down by an IDF rapid response team.

The smuggling of weapons onto a religious site and the murder of peace officers would be considered  a severe terror attack for any country – unless (from the jihadi perspective) the smugglers are jihadi and those being attacked are Jewish or Israeli citizens. Such a double standard is par for the course in fundamentalist Islamist circles (like Taliban, ISIS and Hamas) but it is also de rigeur in what are considered ‘moderate’ and pro-Western Muslim states like Jordan.

The Speaker of the Jordanian House of Representatives Atef Tarawneh spoke of the three terrorists in the July 16 session: “We pray for our martyrs, who have watered the pure soil of Palestine [with their blood]. We can raise our heads high because of the sacrifices of the Palestinian youths, who still struggle on behalf of our nation…Behold, the Palestinian youth form the necklace of martyrdom out of the beads of their lives and their great sacrifices. They are alive, sustained by their Lord. May Allah have mercy upon our youths from the Jabarin family, whose relatives are worthy of pride and glory, even if the occupation hates it and its oppression runs amok. My colleagues, the attacks by the Israeli occupation against the most holy place in Jerusalem – against al-Aqsa and against the holy Haram of Jerusalem – will remain cause for the continuation of the resistance, which will not subside in the face of injustice and tyranny” (https://www.memri.org/tv/jordan-parliament-prays-for-souls-jerusalem-terror-attack-perpetrators; footage from this session was posted on the Jordanian Parliament's YouTube channel on July 16, 2017 though later removed).

Terrorists against counter-terrorism

Israeli law enforcement’s rapid response included setting up surveillance cameras (CCTVs) and metal detectors close to the major entrances of the Temple Mount.

Such cameras and detectors are commonly found outside of many mosques in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Dubai, India and some areas of Russia. In Mecca all pilgrims to the hajj pass through metal detectors as well as past the watchful eyes of over 5,000 CCTV cameras. In Jerusalem all Jewish and Christian visitors to the Western Wall plaza, and all visitors in Hebron’s Tomb of the Patriarchs have been subject to metal detector and CCTV examination for years. The same is true for most airport travelers worldwide since 9/11.

But within a few hours of Israel’s counter-terrorism responses, Islamist terror spinmeisters kidnapped the world’s media: “Israel is violating the status quo and defiling the sacrosanct nature of an Islamic holy site,” they declared. “This is part of a sinister Zionist strategy to destroy Islam.”

These talking points instantly became the cause célèbre of the Muslim world and of media outlets from Al Jazeera to CNN. Attention was quickly turned away from the mosque-based jihadi murders of Israeli policemen. Instead the subject morphed into how Israel was supposedly violating sacrosanct Islamic grounds. This swift manipulation of mass media echoes a famous Arabic proverb, “First he hits me and then he cries!”

Never wasting an opportunity to waste an opportunity, the Hamas branch of the Muslim Brotherhood called on all Muslims to launch an intifada, a ‘day of rage’ against all Israelis everywhere in the world.

“May you be forever - Islamic!”

From the classic Muslim viewpoint, any territory once conquered by jihadi forces is considered forever Islamic, whether it be Jerusalem, Spain, Serbia or southern Russia. The jihadi take is that such areas must be controlled by Islam in perpetuity, and it is a religious travesty for non-Muslims to exercise any sovereignty over those regions. Osama bin Laden’s al Qa’eda descriptions of the 9/11 attacks as a justified Islamist response to the presence of American troops in the Arabian Peninsula is one of the better-known expressions of this mindset.

According to the Quran, the waqf principle is not limited only to Israel’s Temple Mount or Spain’s Toledo. The jihadi army must conquer the entire world and force it to bow the knee to Allah: “Fight then against them until there is no strife and the religion is entirely Allah’s” (see Quran, Surah 8:39-42). Though the flashpoint of the battle may today be Jerusalem’s Temple Mount, from a classical Islamic End of Days perspective the jihadi battle will spread to the whole world (America and Europe included) before coming back full circle to triumph in the Middle East.

Jihad, Jews and the Temple Mount

A brief historical background about Islamist perspectives concerning the Jewish Temple Mount:

Muhammad actually never set foot on the soil of the Promised Land, dying in Medina in 632 AD.  Sixty years later in 691-692 AD the now-golden Dome of the Rock came ‘on-line’ in Jerusalem, while the black-domed al-Aqsa mosque was completed in 701 AD.

During the centuries of Islamist rule in the Land of Israel (637-1099, 1187-1917), Jews were forbidden from going up onto the Temple Mount, but were allowed to gather in a small area near one of the retaining walls of the compound which later became known as the Wailing Wall (today, the Western Wall). The cramped area granted for Jewish prayer was to be physical proof of how totally the sons of Jacob had been vanquished by the army of Muhammad.

In later years an Islamist tradition developed that Muhammad rode a mythical horse named al-Buraq (which had wings and a beautiful female face) in the year 620 AD, taking his legendary ‘night journey and ascension’ (in Arabic  al-’Isrā’ wal-Mi‘rāj) to the ‘distant masjid or mosque’ (in Arabic  al-Masjidi 'l-’Aqṣá); Quran 17:1, Surat al-Isrā’).

But in 620 AD (the year of Muhammad’s purported flying visit to the Temple Mount), Islamist jihadi forces had not yet invaded any country. The initial jihadi battles were exploding in the region currently called Saudi Arabia. Only in 633 AD was Syria invaded. The land of Israel was not conquered until 638 AD. At that time the local population was not Arab, but made up of Jews and Byzantine Christians.  There were no Muslims in Israel and no mosques either. So the al-Aqsa mosque referred to in Quran 17:1 referred to a site perhaps in the Medina area. As to whether or not a mythological horse actually flew Muhammad to that location in Medina – this is a matter of Islamic belief.

According to this later Islamic legend, Muhammad flew to Jerusalem and tied his horse to the area beside where the Jewish people prayed – the Wailing or Western Wall. That small alcove was ‘christened’ al-Buraq by later Muslims.

Islamist jurors eventually requisitioned that whole area as waqf as part of their attempt to replace and invalidate Jewish connections with the Temple Mount. The first historical description of the al-Buraq mosque on the Temple Mount comes from 1689 in the writings of Sufi scholar Abd al-Ghani al-Nabulsi after his visit to Jerusalem.

During the era of the Turkish Caliphate (1517-1917 AD) an absolute ban on non-Muslim access to the Temple Mount was in force.

After the British armies marched in to Jerusalem on December 9, 1917, General Allenby cabled the British War Cabinet stating, “The Mosque of Omar and the area round it has been placed under Moslem control…Orders have been issued that no non-Moslem is to pass this cordon without permission of the Military Governor and the Moslems in charge of the mosque” (https://filestore.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pdfs/small/cab-23-4-wc-296-70.pdf).

England established a Supreme Muslim Council (al-Majlis al-Islami al-A'ala) to administer the waqf and the Shari’a religious courts. But no revolutionary thoughts of religious ‘liberty for the Jewish captives’ would be drawn up by Whitehall, in stark contrast to what Napoleon I declared as he approached the Land of Israel in 1799:

Au contraire, Article 13 of the League of Nations Mandatory Charter given to Britain in 1922 denied the United Kingdom’s right to interfere with the Temple Mount site or with the administration of ‘purely Muslim holy places:’ “Nothing in this mandate shall be construed as conferring upon the Mandatory authority to interfere with the fabric or the management of purely Moslem sacred shrines, the immunities of which are guaranteed”  (https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/palmanda.asp#art13). The King's Order-in-Council issued by the government authorities of Mandatory Palestine in 1934 also confirmed the Ottoman religious status quo. Jews were forbidden from accessing the Temple Mount, which was now considered by Christians to be an exclusively Muslim holy place.

“Britain captured this holy site from the Ottoman Empire in World War I and received an international mandate to manage it and the rest of Palestine on behalf of its inhabitants. Britain’s goal in this overwhelmingly Arab land was to create both a self-governing state and a national home for the Jewish people. The inherent contradictions underlying this regime led to its ultimate collapse in 1948, when the British fled the country ‘amid bloodshed, chaos, recrimination and ignominy’” (Bernard Wasserstein, Divided Jerusalem: The Struggle for the Holy City, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008, page 82).

A contemporaneous British Christian writer expressed his anger at Britain’s realpolitik submissiveness to Islam. “To permit a false religion to hold sway in ‘the city of the Lord’ (Matt. 5:35), or any other portion of the Holy Land, would be to thwart and countermine God’s set purpose, and be altogether contrary to His plans regarding the earth and man upon it” (Frank G. Jannaway, Palestine and the World; London: Maranatha Press, 1922; pages 232-233).

Stampeding Islamist riots on the Temple Mount

Haj Amin al-Husseini had been a teacher at the Rashidiya school, near Herod's Gate in East Jerusalem, He was one of the instigators of the April 1920 Nebi Musa riots outside of Jerusalem, virulently renouncing the 1917 Balfour Declaration (which was favorable to the establishment of a Jewish national home).  That riot saw six Jews murdered and 216 Jews injured (of them 18 critically) by Arab mobs. About 300 Jews were evacuated from the Old City of Jerusalem at that time. Al-Husseini was charged by the British with inciting Jerusalem’s Arab crowds and was sentenced in absentia to 10-years imprisonment by a military court. He fled to Syria after the riots, but was welcomed back by the British and appointed as Grand Mufti of Jerusalem in 1921.

Here is a quotation from a 1922 Arabic leaflet penned by Sheikh Abd al-Qadir al-Muzaffar entitled Public Call to the Muslim People from your Brethren, the Muslims of Jerusalem and the Rest of Palestine: “The Zionist body which is trying to create a Jewish kingdom in Palestine, dreams of taking from us the al-Aqsa Mosque, built upon the ruins of Solomon’s temple, and of reconstructing their temple...”  (An Aesthetic Occupation: The Immediacy of Architecture and the Palestine Conflict, by Daniel Bertand Monk, Duke University Press, 2002, page 83).

On Yom Kippur, September 1928, the makeshift prayer area abutting the Western Wall was being used by religious Jews as an informal synagogue. The mushrooming Islamist movement insisted to the British that aged Jews were forbidden from bringing in folding chairs to sit on during times of prayer, that a mechitza or provisional dividing screen between Jewish men and women was not also allowed, and that the shofar or ram’s horn could not be blown at the Jewish High Holidays.

Islamist authorities described the screens as violating the Ottoman status quo that forbade Jews from making any ‘construction’ at the Western Wall area. British Commissioner for Jerusalem Edward Keith-Roach insisted on the screen’s removal due to these Muslim demands. When the Jewish shamash (beadle)  failed to remove the screen quickly enough, ten armed thugs were dispatched by Islamist leadership to attack the worshippers and destroy the screen. During that hooligan attack local Arab residents shouted out “Death to the Jewish dogs!” and “Strike, strike!”

In September and October 1928 al-Husseini began to distribute leaflets throughout Mandatory Palestine and the Arab world claimed that the Jews were planning to take over the al-Aqsa Mosque. The leaflet stated that the British Mandatory Government was “responsible for any consequences of any measures which the Moslems may adopt for the purpose of defending the holy Buraq themselves in the event of the failure of the Government...to prevent any such intrusion on the part of the Jews.” A memorandum issued by the Moslem Supreme Council stated, “Having realized by bitter experience the unlimited greedy aspirations of the Jews in this respect, Moslems believe that the Jews’ aim is to take possession of the Mosque of al-Aqsa gradually on the pretense that it is the Temple.” and it advised the Jews “to stop this hostile propaganda which will naturally engender a parallel action in the whole Moslem world, the responsibility for which will rest with the Jews.”

In October 1928, the Grand Mufti began a provocative construction project on the Temple Mount platform, directly above and adjoining the Wailing Wall prayer area. Mules were deliberately driven through the Jewish area of prayer, often dropping excrement. Waste water was thrown down onto Jewish worshippers from the Temple Mount platform above. A muezzin (Muslim cantor) stationed himself straight above the Jewish prayer area to perform the Islamic call to prayer, timed to coincide exactly with Jewish prayers. These provocations increased tensions. According to Graham Harman (The Mufti and the Wailing Wall: A History of Palestine, Princeton University Press, page 230), “From 1929 onward, the Supreme Muslim Council intensified construction work on the Haram al-Sharif in order to demonstrate their exclusive claims to the Temple Mount… Not without reason, Jewish believers felt disturbed in their prayer.”

On Thursday August 15 1929, a commemoration of the Jewish Fast of the Ninth of Av occurred at the Wailing Wall, where declarations were made that the Wall was part of the history and birthright of the Jewish people. On Friday August 16 (the Islamic day of prayer), the mawlid (Arabic for the birth) or mawsin an-nabi (Arabic for ‘the feast of the prophet’) – that is, the birth of Muhammad – was celebrated on the esplanade of the Temple Mount, As the crowd came down from the Mount, they attacked the Jewish prayer area, burning prayer books, Torah scroll arks and cupboards, and destroying paper prayer notes left in the cracks of the Wall. Rioting quickly spread to the Jewish commercial area of town.

Starting on Friday August 23 (the Islamic day of prayer), thousands of Arab villagers who had been incited by bloodthirsty preaching in local mosques streamed into Jerusalem from the surrounding countryside to pray on the Temple Mount, many armed with sticks and knives. For five days violent Muslim mobs attacked Jewish communities in Jerusalem, Motza, Jaffa, Haifa and Safed. Approximately 135 Jews were murdered and 340 wounded during that period.

On Saturday August 24 Arab mobs attacked the ancient Jewish Quarter of Hebron killing and raping men, women and children and looting Jewish property. Over 65 Jews were killed and 58 were wounded. Many of the victims were mutilated, others were tortured. Most of the 116 Arab fatalities and 232 wounded throughout the British Mandate during those five days were as a result of military confrontation with British security forces.

The British Shaw Commission of Enquiry concluded, “The outbreak in Jerusalem on the 23rd of August was from the beginning an attack by Arabs on Jews for which no excuse in the form of earlier murders by Jews has been established…The fundamental cause, without which in our opinion disturbances either would not occurred or would not have been little more than a local riot, is the Arab feeling of animosity and hostility towards the Jews…” (Report of the Commission on the disturbances of August 1929, Command paper 3530; Shaw Commission report; 1930).

Islamists and Nazis – birds of a feather

Haj Amin al-Husseini later spearheaded the Arab Revolt (1936-39) which led to the death of over 300 Jews and the destruction of many Jewish farms and orchards. From the very beginning of his public life al-Husseini collaborated with:

On 30 June 1946, the Muslim Brotherhood paper al-Ikhwan al-Muslimin spoke glowingly of al-Husseini’s visit to Cairo, "The Arab hero and symbol of jihad and patience and struggle is here in Egypt.”

Haj Amin al-Husseini was a personal friend of some top Nazis:

Al-Husseini met Adolf  Hitler on November 28, 1941 (www.timesofisrael.com/full-official-record-what-the-mufti-said-to-hitler/). During that meeting Hitler clearly stated that “Germany’s objective would then be solely the destruction of the Jewish element residing in the Arab sphere under the protection of British power” (“Das deutsche Ziel würde dann lediglich die Vernichtung des im arabischen Raum unter der Protektion der britischen Macht lebenden Judentums sein”).

Assisted by Nazi Minister of Propaganda and Public Enlightenment Josef Goebbels, al-Husseini began Berlin-based Arabic-language radio broadcasts to the Middle  East in December, 1941, calling for acts of sabotage against the British as well as jihadi murder against the Jews. In one such broadcast al-Husseini urged his listeners, “Arabs! Rise as one and fight for your sacred rights. Kill the Jews wherever you find them. This pleases Allah, history and religion. This saves your honor. God is with you.”

This revealing quote is from the March 1, 1944 broadcast of Radio Berlin, quoted in Robert Wistrich, Muslim Anti-Semitism: A Clear and Present Danger. It is sourced from US Government Archives:

On June 1, 1941, during the Jewish Feast of Weeks, a pogrom (farhud – ‘violent dispossession’ in Arabic) broke out against the Jews of Baghdad, resulting in 200 Jews murdered and over 1,000 wounded. A joint Iraqi-British Commission of Enquiry concluded that al-Husseini and his Nazi propaganda radio broadcasts were the prime mover and instigator behind the slaughter.

An Islamist Auschwitz

In 1942, the same year that the Nazi High Command held its Wannsee Conference to implement the Final Solution, al-Husseini was readying Arab participation for the expected slaughter of the Jews that would accompany German victory. In close cooperation with Adolf Eichmann and an Einsatzkommando (Special Operations force and mobile killing squad) under the control of SS Obersturmbannführer Walther Rauff,  the Mufti planned to build crematoriums for the Jews in the Dothan Valley of Samaria. The testimony of Faiz Bay Idrisi, a senior Arab officer in the British Mandatory police, stated, “I remember what was said in police circles and among supporters of the Mufti in those months …Haj Amin al-Husseini’s master plan was to establish in the Dothan Valley, close to Shechem, giant crematoriums like Auschwitz, into which would be brought the Jews of Palestine, Iraq, Egypt, Yemen, Syria, Lebanon, and even North Africa, in order to slaughter them with the methods of the S.S. who operated in the death camps in Europe” (www.thetower.org/article/how-the-mufti-of-jerusalem-created-the-permanent-problem-of-palestinian-violence/).

“The Temple Mount is in our hands – kind of!”

For 19 years (May 1948 to June 1967), the Temple Mount was occupied by the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan. All Jews were exiled from Jordanian-controlled Jerusalem, while Arabs were settled in their place. Fifty-eight synagogues in the Old City were desecrated or demolished. 38,000 ancient Jewish graves on the Mount of Olives were systematically destroyed, and no Jewish burials were permitted there. The Old City of Jerusalem was now Judenrein (a Nazi term meaning ‘cleansed of Jews’). Last but not least, the Western Wall was transferred into an exclusively Islamic holy site associated with the al-Buraq legend. For more information see Jerusalem Divided: the Armistice Regime, 1947-1967, by Raphael Israeli, Psychology Press, 2002,  page 24.

On June 7, 1967 the IDF captured the Old City of Jerusalem. The Temple Mount was once again in Jewish hands after a hiatus of nearly 2,000 years. At a June 17 meeting on the Temple Mount between the then-Minister of Defense Moshe Dayan and Islamic religious authorities in Jerusalem, it was decided to permit the Jordanian Awqaf  (waqf) Ministry to continue to administer the site.

Jews and Christians were given the right to visit the Temple Mount provided that they respected Muslims' religious sensibilities, but they were not allowed to pray there. The Western Wall was to be recognized as the Jewish place of prayer. ‘Religious sovereignty’ within the Islamic compound was to remain with the Muslims while ‘overall sovereignty’ became Israel’s.  The status quo now meant that Israel would be responsible for security around the perimeter of the site, while the Jordanian-controlled Jerusalem Waqf would be responsible for events within the compound. Today, the Jerusalem Waqf controls the Temple Mount, schools, orphanages, Islamic libraries and museums, mosques, the Shari’a courts as well as many residential and commercial properties in greater Jerusalem.

In early October 1990 an announcement by a small Jewish extremist religious group (the ‘Temple Mount Faithful’) stated that the group was going to lay a cornerstone for a Third Jewish Temple on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.  On 8 October 1990, mosque loudspeakers in the Kidron Valley and on the Mount of Olives proclaimed that “al-Aqsa was in danger.” The immediate result was an Islamic riot where 17-20 Palestinians were killed and over 100 others injured (after they attacked Israeli Border Police on the Temple Mount).

According to the Israeli Report of the Commission of Inquiry into the Events on Temple Mount on 8 October 1990, “The members of the Waqf knew that the High Court had refused the Temple Mount Faithful petition to lay the cornerstone of the Third Temple, and did not respond to requests by Israel Police officers on the morning of the incident to calm the crowd. This, even after the police informed the Waqf that they would also prevent the Temple Mount Faithful, and anyone else, from visiting the area, though such visits are allowed by law… The incident itself began when, suddenly, violent and threatening calls were sounded over the loudspeakers "Allahu Akbar" [Allah is Greater], "Jihad" [Holy War], "Itbah al-Yahud" [Slaughter the Jews]). Immediately afterwards, enormous amounts of rocks, construction materials and metal objects were thrown at Israeli policemen who were present at the site. Many in the incited, rioting mob threw stones and metal objects from a very short range, and some even wielded knives. The actions of the rioters, and certainly the inciters, constituted a threat to the lives of the police, the thousands of worshippers at the Western Wall and to themselves. This was a serious criminal offense committed by masses who were incited by preachers over loudspeakers, and this is what led to the tragic chain of events ... Nineteen policemen were injured as well as nine Western Wall worshippers. According to Police statistics, 20 people were killed and 52 injured on the Temple Mount” (www.mfa.gov.il/mfa/foreignpolicy/mfadocuments/yearbook8/pages/165%20summary%20of%20a%20report%20of%20the%20commission%20of%20inqui.aspx).

Tunnel vision under the Temple Mount

On September 24, 1996 a new archeological exhibit called ‘the Rabbinic tunnel’ was opened to both the Israeli public and international tourists. It was the culmination of nearly 30 years of archeological excavations outside of the Temple Mount’s external buttress walls. A tunnel was dug outside of these supporting walls which had been constructed by Herod the Great in order to expand the workable surface of the Temple Mount. The tunnel and the retaining walls were not part of any Temple at any period in history.

Even though the tunnel was more than two football fields away from the al-Aqsa mosque and totally outside the Islamic precincts, the head of the PLO Yasser Arafat declared that the opening of the tunnel was a “big crime against our religious and holy places.” Palestinian Authority spokesman Sa’eb Erekat declared, “Well, the thing is … it was the Israelis who announced that they will open this tunnel in order to build ... a new temple now in the place of the Al-Aqsa Mosque” (CNN, September 29, 1996).

On September 24, 1996 Voice of Palestine radio urged listeners to “move immediately and effectively to face this serious criminal scheme. We appeal to them all to shoulder their religious and national responsibilities in these serious circumstances and to confront these painful incidents and tragic dangers facing holy Jerusalem” (Voice of Palestine radio from Jericho monitored by BBC, September 24, 1996, 1050 GMT).

On September 25, the Palestinian Authority and Arafat's Fatah faction brought busloads of Bir Zeit University students to attack Israeli soldiers at a checkpoint outside Ramallah. Molotov cocktails and rocks were thrown at the IDF who initially repulsed them with rubber bullets and tear gas. Whereas at other times PA police had previously prevented crowds from approaching Israeli checkpoints, this time they stood aside. As the rioting spiraled out of control, PA police joined in, firing on Israeli soldiers.

In a speech in Gaza at that time, Arafat invoked Islamic references to war, reminding the crowd that “to the believers who fight for Allah, kill and are killed, heaven is promised” (quoted in The New York Times, Oct. 4, 1996).

The rise of Sharon

On September 28, 2000, then-opposition leader of Israel Ariel Sharon visited the al-Aqsa compound accompanied by a large number of armed security guards. After Sharon left, a violent Palestinian demonstration erupted with people throwing stones and other projectiles at Israeli riot police. Police fired tear gas and rubber bullets at the crowd, injuring 24 people.

On September 29, 2000, Israel deployed 2,000 riot police to the mosque. After Friday prayers Muslims hurled stones at the police and at Jewish worshippers gathered at the Western Wall. The police then stormed the compound, firing both rubber bullets and live ammunition at the rioting Palestinians (4 killed and 200 wounded).

Israeli Arab journalist Khaled Abu Toameh reported on September 19, 2002, that the rioting and the official reason behind it were planned and fabricated in advance by the Palestinian leadership:

“Imad Faluji, the PA Communications Minister, admitted on October 11, 2001, that the violence had been planned in July, far in advance of Sharon's ‘provocation.’ He said: ‘Whoever thinks that the intifada broke out because of the despised Sharon's visit to Al-Aksa Mosque, is wrong, even if this visit was the straw that broke the back of the Palestinian people. This intifada was planned in advance, ever since President Arafat's return from the Camp David negotiations…’

More than a year later, on the first anniversary of the intifada, West Bank Fatah leader Marwan Barghouti gave an interview on October 22, 2001 to the London-based Arabic newspaper al-Sharq al-Awsat in which he admitted that he had played a direct role in igniting the intifada. He said: ‘I knew that … when Sharon reached al-Aksa Mosque, this was the most appropriate moment for the outbreak of the intifada... The night prior to Sharon's visit, I participated in a panel on a local television station and I seized the opportunity to call on the public to go to al-Aksa Mosque in the morning ... We tried to create clashes without success because of the differences of opinion that emerged with others in al-Aksa compound at the time.... After Sharon left, I remained for two hours in the presence of other people, we discussed the manner of response and how it was possible to react in all the cities and not just in Jerusalem. We contacted all [the Palestinian] factions’” (How the war began, Khaled Abu Toameh, September 19, 2002; www.mafhoum.com/press3/111P55.htm).

Close to 3,000 Palestinians and 1,000 Israelis were killed in these clashes, which lasted five years.

To view how Islamists perceive these events, see: www.aljazeera.com/programmes/aljazeeraworld/2015/11/jerusalem-dividing-al-aqsa-151110154741523.html

In light of all the above…

The recent Islamist terror attack of July 14, 2017 occurred at the conclusion of the Muslim holiday of Ramadan and close to the Jewish fast of the Ninth of Av. Murder came out of the mosque compound, and two Israeli policemen were felled in the line of duty. Israel’s robust counter-terrorist responses were then parried by massive international Islamist threats and political pressure. The false charge of a ‘Jewish attack on the sanctity of al-Aqsa mosque’ was dusted off from the ash heap of history. It exploded like fireworks throughout the world’s media outlets. And once again the Islamist sleight-of-hand worked. Israel backed down from increased confrontation for reasons known only to her top decision-makers.

Those who love Israel and believe in God’s divine hand accomplishing her restoration in our day – need to be aware of these dark machinations on the part of those who oversee the waqf of al-Aqsa and those who stir up violence among Palestinian and Muslims worldwide.

As this newsletter was going to press, I received an excellent article by a favorite writer of ours, Melanie Phillips, considering the above subject from a complementary and helpful angle. It’s titled “Incitement, lies and the strange eclipse of the Dome of the Rock.” Check it out at:

https://www.melaniephillips.com/incitement-lies-strange-eclipse-dome-rock/

How should we then pray?

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal) through: www.davidstent.org

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close