Ersatz coffee, ersatz hope

The German word ersatz is commonly used around the world today to refer to an “artificial and inferior substitute or imitation.” During WWI, the shortage of coffee in Germany catalyzed the development of over 11,000 ersatz products, including a coffee substitute using roasted acorns, chicory and beechnuts. Thousands of U.S., British soldiers, primarily airmen, captured in Europe by Nazi forces during World War II. were given Ersatzkaffee, an inferior Getreidekaffee or ‘grain coffee,’ as a coffee substitute by their German captors.

The original German word ersatz is accurately translated as ‘substitute’ or ‘replacement.’ The theological term Replacement Theology (when theologians substitute Gentile Christians for Jews when interpreting positive prophetic promises for Israel, leaving the Jewish people out of the picture) is usually translatedersatztheologie’ in modern German.

Real prophetic promises to David

I recently was privileged to teach a week of meetings in the former East Germany, near Count von Zinzendorf’s Herrnhut (‘the watch of the Lord’) community. One of his most famous quotes was “There can be no Christianity without community.” Under his ministry, a movement of 24/7 intercessory prayer caught fire, new worship music was penned, and a worldwide evangelistic outreach surged out, affecting notables like John Wesley.

My theme that week revolved around Yeshua’s declaration, “May Your kingdom come, and may Your will be done on earth as it is in Heaven” (Matthew 6:9-10). What is the Father’s will? What is His kingdom? How is this connected with the pearl-like promises of the kingdom nestled away in the Davidic covenant? What will this look like when it is realized on earth, beginning in Jerusalem?

Messiah Yeshua declared to the twelve Jewish apostles: “You are the ones who have stood by Me in My trials. And just as My Father has granted Me a kingdom, I grant you that you may eat and drink at My table in My kingdom, and you will sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel” (Luke 22:28-30; also Matthew 19:28). These promises and this Jewish kingdom are part of the irrevocable gifts and calling on the Jewish people (Romans 11:28-29). We had a wonderful time in southern Germany considering these amazing days yet future.

Counterfeit Nazi promises

The common German translation of the Hebrew word for kingdom (‘malchut’) is Königreich or Reich (and less often, Königtum). The ancient Old High German sense of the word Reich involves riches, might or royalty (it’s also related to the Sanskrit ‘Raj’). The Hebrew word ‘malchut’ does not have the meaning of riches, but rather focuses on the ‘ruling’ aspect. The German word Reich can also refer to an ‘Empire.’

Standard Christian interpretation of Yeshua’s reference to the kingdom is 100% Replacement Theology, pickled in an ersatz understanding of the Davidic kingdom. In a similar fashion, Adolph Hitler’s pervasive use of the term ‘Drittes Reich’ (the Third Reich) is a venomous flowering of this poisonous plant of Replacement Theology, a pagan “boasting against the branches” (see Romans 11:18 KJV). That dark Hitlerian vision looked toward a counterfeit anti-Semitic kingdom, a black Nazi substitute for the light and life of God’s Jewish kingdom flowing out of Mount Zion (Isaiah 2:1-4).

Origin of the term ‘the Third Reich’

Arthur Wilhelm Ernst Victor Moeller van den Bruck, born in Westphalia, was deeply influenced by the writings of Friedrich Nietzsche. A German cultural historian and writer, van den Bruck was best known for his controversial 1923 book Das Dritte Reich (‘The Third Reich’), which promoted German nationalism and strongly influenced both the Conservative Revolutionary movement and the Nazi Party. Surprisingly, van den Bruck was opposed to Hitler and anti-Semitism, and initially stated in the preface to his book: “The Third Reich is but a philosophical idea and not for this world, but for the hereafter. Germany could well perish dreaming the Third Reich dream.” Nevertheless, the Nazis made use of some of van den Bruck’s ideas, including appropriating his catchy book title for their regime and his (and Nietzsche’s) use of the ‘Germanic Übermensch’ philosophy for their racism.

Van den Bruck postulated a development of the Holy Roman Empire in three stages:

First Reich: from 962 A.D. (the East Francian Otto I) to 1806 A.D. On February 2, 962, Otto I was solemnly crowned Emperor by Pope John XII. In the 13th century, the Empire was called ‘Sacrum Imperium Romanum’ in Latin, the ‘Heiliges Römisches Reich’ in German, and later, the ‘Holy Roman Empire’ in English.

Second Reich: from 1871 (the unification of Germany) to 1918 (the November Revolution leading to the Weimar Republic). This entity was given the name ‘Deutsches Reich’ (the German Empire). Its leader was Kaiser (or Emperor) Wilhelm I, King of Prussia from the House of Hohenzollern.

Van den Bruck saw the coming Third Reich as an ideal state, the only way by which the scattered German people would achieve common purpose and destiny: Otto von Bismarck’s Second Reich had been an imperfect empire, since it did not include Austria, van den Bruck stated. “Our Second Empire was a Little-German Empire which we must consider only as a stepping stone on our path to a Greater German Empire.” A new revolution from the right, embracing both Prussian socialism and nationalism, a unique form of German fascism, was what van den Bruck thought was needed. He chose Nietzsche’s vision over that of Karl Marx. The one contemporary politician that he praised above all others was Benito Mussolini.

The prophet Daniel ‘translated and improved’

Van den Bruck and his later Nazi camp-followers were walking an already well-tread path. Christian Replacement Theologians had for centuries been charting how David’s coming kingdom (the one prophesied both by Daniel [2:39-40] and by Yeshua [Luke 22:28-30]) had undergone ‘replacement’ and ‘spiritualization,’ morphing into a Gentile-Roman ‘Reich of our Lord and of His Christ” (to paraphrase Revelation 11:15). 

Medieval writers described the process by which royal and Roman imperial succession (translatio imperii - ‘transfer of rule’) moved forward through the centuries:

Many far-fetched theories were created to shore up the fanciful roots and authority of individual countries looking for a higher hierarchical pecking-order on the imperial food-chain.

In nearly all of these scenarios, the earthly and spiritual Jewish apostolic and Davidic kingdom authority gets transferred to Gentile Christian kings in various and sundry lands. Yeshua’s prophesied hope for Jewish kingdom restoration was scorned or ignored. But while Jewish physical kingdom hopes were mocked, Gentile physical kingdoms were celebrated as the ‘real and spiritual fulfilment’ of Jewish prophetic promises. And to this day, that is where the majority of the body of Messiah’s theologians still stand. YHVH’s Messianic and Davidic kingdom has suffered painful plastic surgery at the hands of Christian doctors of theology, and the result is a horridly scarred ‘kingdom face.’

Russia and Moscow – the Slavic ‘Third Reich’

In 1472 Ivan III of Russia married Sophia Palaiologina, a niece of the last Byzantine Emperor Constantine XI, and styled himself Tsar (Царь /‘Caesar’/ Emperor). In 1492, the Russian Orthodox Metropolitan of Moscow Zosimus, in his foreword to Presentation of the Paschalion, called Ivan “the new Tsar Constantine of the new city of Constantine – Moscow.”  The Russian monk Philotheus (1500’s A.D.) later proclaimed:

The spiritual foundations of the Russian Orthodox church are deeply rooted in ersatz Replacement Theology, for Moscow sees itself as a Third Roman-Russian ‘Reich’ or Kingdom. As well, the ‘succession’ is based on a shaky foundation of uneasy competition with Rome, Constantinople, Kyiv and the West.

A Reformation of Real Hope

The history described above is dark and depressing. This is because the theological foundations of much of Christian theology and history stand at quite a distance from Messianic, apostolic and biblical truth. Luther, for all his faults (both in character and as regards his anti-Semitism), stood as a champion for many important foundational and scriptural truths. In our day, similar courage is needed among followers of Messiah Yeshua, both among young men and women, and among sages and prophetic leaders, if there are to be breakthroughs in the proclamation of Yeshua’s kingdom.

The time has passed for God’s spokesmen to be focusing on peace, prosperity and party-time. King Messiah is at the door. He is focusing more strongly, minute by minute, on:

Repentance also means a change of direction

C.S. Lewis once said in his ‘God in the Dock:’ “We all want progress, but if you’re on the wrong road, progress means doing an about-turn and walking back to the right road. In that case, the man who turns back soonest is the most progressive.”

The worldwide body of Messiah needs to once again be preaching the gospel of the kingdom (Matthew 4:23), giving honor and priority to its clear emphasis on Jewish restoration ‘on earth as it is in Heaven.’

This will require courage and willingness to suffer and sacrifice, for that will be the cost when Christians stand alongside of the Jewish people at the time of their national re-birth.

The fierce opposition of the Islamist and anti-Semitic world to Israel’s restoration (both to YHVH and to their Promised Homeland of Israel) is a given. What has not yet been manifested is how Gentile followers of Yeshua will act – and on which side of the fence they will stand.

How should we then pray?

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal) through: www.davidstent.org

Joseph's prophetic bones

The last three verses of the Book of Genesis have a prophetic glow to them:

Joseph the prophetic dreamer (Genesis 37:19; 40:8; 41;38) was the great-grandson of the first man ever to be called a prophet – Abraham son of Terah (Genesis 20:7). All the sons and daughters of Jacob have that same prophetic calling (Psalm 105:15; Numbers 11:29; Romans 11: 29). The son of a lion is also a lion, and the son of a prophet is also a prophet (Acts 3:25).

“By faith Joseph, when he was dying, made mention of the exodus of the sons of Israel, and gave orders concerning his bones” (Hebrews 11:22). Joseph “died in faith, without receiving the promises, but having seen and welcomed them from a distance” (Hebrews 11:13). As we approach the Feast of Passover, what can we learn from Joseph’s visionary faith?

Prophetic touchdown

Joseph’s oath was remembered and honored by the people of Israel throughout their 400 years of slavery in Egypt (Genesis 15:13). When it came time to leave in the great Exodus, Moses tells us:

The Jewish people wandered for forty years in the desert before they found rest in their Promised Land. Only then would Joseph’s bones also find rest:

Genesis 33:18-20 gives us that background:

That burial ground was known is Yeshua’s day. Messiah met and conversed with the Samaritan women close to that burial plot: So Yeshua “came to a city of Samaria called ‘Sychar,’ near the parcel of land that Jacob gave to his son Joseph” (John 4:5).

The location of both Jacob’s well and Joseph’s burial plot are today found in the suburbs of modern Nablus. God has watched over His covenant promises and guarded the principle He established in the Mosaic Covenant: “You shall not displace your neighbor’s boundary marker, which the ancestors have set, in your inheritance which you will inherit in the land that YHVH your God is giving you to possess” (Deuteronomy 19:14).

Palestinian daggers and Captain Hook

In one of the final scenes of Steven Spielberg’s cinematographic Peter Pan remake ‘Hook,’ Captain Hook threatens Peter that, unless Peter consents to fight to the death, Hook will come back in every generation to harm and kill Peter’s children and grandchildren: “Peter, I swear to you, wherever you go, wherever you are . . . I vow there will always be daggers bearing notes signed ‘James Hook.’ They will be flung at the doors of your children’s children’s children . . .”

In the Passover Seder’s recounting – the Hagaddah – the same dynamic is described in the song ‘V’hi sheh’amda’. Throughout history murderous enemies of the Jewish people “have risen up against us to annihilate us, in every generation . . .  yet the Holy One, Blessed be His name, rescues us from their hand.”

The dynamic enunciated by both the Hagaddah and Hook is very much active in the Palestinian community who currently live on the land promised by YHVH to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. One of the most explosive flashpoints is the area traditionally known as ‘Joseph’s Tomb.’ For the past 26 years, this site holy to Orthodox Jews has continually been desecrated with swastikas, burnt, and attacked with sledgehammers by Islamist mobs. Any Jewish connection to the site (and to the whole land of Israel, for that matter) has been strongly denied by Palestinian spokesmen, and terror attacks on Jewish holy sites justified by these sources. United Nations infrequent condemnations of the attacks simultaneously heap compliments on the very same Palestinian authorities who encourage those attacks.

In the past week Joseph’s Tomb has been attacked Palestinian rioters. On Sunday April 10, the tomb’s gravestone was shattered and the rooms were set ablaze by approximately 100 rioters. One day later, rocks were thrown, and one of the rioters proclaimed on a video clip taken that evening, “There is no Joseph’s Tomb anymore!” On Wednesday, 31 Palestinian rioters were injured at the site while attacking Israeli security forces and one rioter was killed.

Also on Wednesday, the IDF entered Joseph’s Tomb to repair the damages. Colonel Ro’i Zweig, Brigadier-General of the IDF Samaria Brigade, spoke to his troops before entering the site, quoting Genesis and Exodus:

Symbols also have symbolic value

The Scriptures describe an event during King Saul’s reign where he flatly disobeyed the clear command of YHVH. When Samuel proclaimed the God of Israel’s judgment on the Jewish king, Saul grabbed his cloak, tearing it in the process. Samuel spoke out the prophetic interpretation of what had now become a ‘prophetic action:’

Symbols play a significant role in Scripture. The destruction of Jerusalem speaks of divine judgment. Droughts are understood to be God’s discipline. When the Philistines seized the Ark of YHVH, both sides in the battle understood that that event had huge significance (1 Samuel 4:3-21). Today Palestinian Islamists see the humiliation of the Jewish people, the destruction of Jewish holy sites and Jewish presence in the Land to be a victory for Islam’s armies and for jihad. The desecration of Joseph’s Tomb is seen by Nablus’ population as a decisive symbol of Palestinian victory.

Joseph’s dying oath was a prophetic declaration: The Jewish people would be powerfully set free from Pharaoh’s slavery, and would return to the Land promised by YHVH to His Jewish people, accompanied by signs and wonders (1 Chronicles 17:21). We celebrate this mighty deed each and every Passover.  But there is more to the promise. YHVH declares to David in 1 Chronicles 17:19-20 that Israel will return to the Land and will not be terrorized or slaughtered by their enemies:

As we celebrate today’s Passover, let us remember that a future Passover is coming (Ezekiel 45:21) when all Israel will live in peace, and when the nations of the world will no longer buck against God’s gifts and calling on the Jewish people (Romans 11:28-29). Foreign kings and diplomats will lick the dust from Israel’s feet (Isaiah 49:23), as will nations who are at present mortal enemies of Jacob’s people (Micah 7:16-17).

 How should we then pray?

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal) through: www.davidstent.org

Russia’s propaganda wars: Neo-Nazism and Ukraine - Part Three: Ukrainian history and the Jews – bumps on the road

This is the third of a three-part newsletter investigating Russia’s stated reasons for invading and destroying Ukraine. President Putin and Russian media repeatedly stress that Ukraine is a fascist country run by neo-Nazis and anti-Semites. Is there any truth to these charges? This third newsletter weighs Ukraine’s history regarding anti-Semitism, fascism and neo-Nazi movements, and then offers some helpful conclusions and suggestions.

My Ukrainian Jewish family and the pogrom

My grandmother (in Yiddish, my bobbeh) Rivka was born in 1888 in Yasnohorodka, a small shtetl/village just west of Kyiv. She departed from Ukraine by ship in 1912 and came to Montreal, Canada (where my mother and I were born). One of her younger sisters, Raizl, remained behind in Kyiv and was murdered there in July 1919. During that pogrom, White Cossack bands ransacked and raped their way through the Jewish quarter of the city. One Cossack cut off Raizl’s arm with his sabre, and she bled to death on the pavestones. Rivka told me at another time how Orthodox priests had led a procession though their village, carrying a huge brass crucifix, setting off another pogrom against the Jews there. Ukrainian hatred of Jews was something that my family knew first-hand.

British author and Jewish leader Israel Zangwill described those days in the following wry quote – Jews were getting massacred from all sides, while being blamed by all sides for belonging to all sides:

Hetman on the move

Jews first moved into the area now known as Ukraine over 1,000 years ago, settling south of the Dnieper River in Crimea and Volhynia. Later on, Jews living in Germany fled anti-Semitic rioters who were accusing Jacob’s children of spreading the Black Death plague. These marauding bands pillaged and murdered Jewish communities in the Rhine Valley, stampeding a mass exodus of Hebrew people toward Poland and Ukraine.

Ukraine fell under Polish occupation with the Union of Lublin in 1569, and remained so until 1648-49, when the Cossack and Hetman (leader) Bohdan Khmelnytsky led the Khmelnytsky Uprising against the Polish Crown. In 1654 Khmelnytsky signed the Treaty of Pereyaslav Agreement, bending the Ukrainian Cossack knee in ‘autonomous’ submission to the Tsar of Moscow.

Before that uprising, the Jewish population in Ukraine had served as middlemen for the Polish nobility. They ran inns, operated distilleries, and collected rent and taxes from Ukrainians (the arenda system). Ukrainians considered this doubly objectionable – their Polish Catholic conquerors were considered heretics by the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, while the Jews were considered infidels for not accepting Christianity, as well as hated collaborators with the Poles. The Jewish population in Ukraine had turned into a lightning rod for popular discontent, which would occasionally explode in murderous fashion. When Khmelnytsky revolted against the Polish overlords in 1648-49, his Cossack deputy Maksym Krivonis oversaw the horrendously sadistic torture, rape and massacre (approximately 18-20,000 murdered) of Ukraine’s Jews. For most Jews, Khmelnytsky’s massacres of the Jewish people is still considered one of the most terrible events in Jewish history.

Today Khmelnytsky is considered by Ukrainians to be their most important historical figure, yet his submission to Moscow is also regarded by Ukrainians as their second greatest historical disaster. In 1863 the sculptor Mikhail Mikeshin designed a Khmelnytsky statue, to be erected near Kyiv’s St. Sofia cathedral. The sculptor had to remove from the final bronze inscription the beloved lines of a Ukrainian folk song: “Oh, it will be better, Oh, it will be more beautiful, when in our Ukraine there are no Jews, no Poles, and no Union (of Polish-Lithuanian control).”

Haidamak and two centuries of pogroms

The Haidamak were Ukrainian peasants who fled from Polish landlords toward the eastern regions beyond the Dnieper River. They made a living ambushing travelers or attacking small farms and villages, strongly emphasizing Jewish targets. In the years 1734, 1742, 1750 and 1768 many murderous attacks occurred, and upwards of 20,000 Jews and Poles were massacred.  A sobering historical illustration of that situation: in 1768 in the Ukrainian village of Lysyanka, a Jew, a Polish priest and a dog were hanged side by side.  In 1841 the Ukrainian national poet Taras Shevchenko wrote Haidamaky, in honor of the Haidamak brigands. In that work he portrayed Jews as agents of Polish landowners, and the bandits who killed Jews as national heroes.

Between 1764-1783 Catherine the Great of Russia annexed Ukraine and Crimea from the Polish Crown, a situation that lasted until October 1917, when the Pale of Settlement was abolished and Russia’s Tsar was overthrown by Lenin’s Bolsheviks. At that time some Jewish people supported the Bolsheviks, hoping that Communists might treat the Jews better than Cossacks, Haidamak or the Tsarist police had done up to that point.

Pogrom is a word of Russian origin, defined as an organized massacre for the destruction or annihilation of an ethnic group, primarily referring to attacks on Jews. A partial list of Ukrainian pogroms includes Odessa, Ukraine (1821, 1859, 1871, 1905); Elisavetgrad (Kirovgrad) in Kherson oblast (1881, on the week following Easter); Kiev (May 1881);  Kishinev in Russia-controlled Bessarabia, neighboring Ukraine (on Easter 1903).

As a child, I was not aware that between March 1917 and 1921, the largest and bloodiest anti-Jewish massacres (prior to the Holocaust) occurred in Ukraine – the death toll was between 50,000 to 200,000. A further 100,000 Jews were permanently disabled or died of their wounds, and 200,000 Jewish children were orphaned.  The Kiev pogroms of 1919 were typical in this regard, and those were the ones in which my relative Raizl was murdered. Some scholars see these pogroms as a foreshadowing prelude to the Holocaust.

In November 1918 part of Ukraine declared itself an independent nation, free from colonialist imperialism. That situation lasted for eight months until July 1919. By August 1920 Ukraine was swallowed up into the Soviet Union, the fine details ratified in March 1921 with the Treaty of Riga. In 1954, on the 300th anniversary of the Treaty of Pereyaslav, Crimea was transferred from Russia’s control back to the Ukrainian SSR by Soviet First Secretary of the Communist Party Nikita Khrushchev (a Ukrainian by birth). Finally, on August 24, 1991 Ukraine’s parliament adopted the Act of Independence, becoming a sovereign country. Thirty-two years have passed since that event.

Ukrainian fascism

In 1913 Ukrainian fascist writer Dmytro Dontsov spearheaded a controversial program championing Ukraine’s separation from Russia and integration into Europe. In 1926 he published a pamphlet Nationalism,’ anticipating a world conflict which the Germans would win and, as a result, the Russian Empire would be dismantled. He called this political philosophy ‘active nationalism.’ Dontsov advocated the totalitarian practices of Italian fascism and German national socialism, drawing on Nazi racial theory and anti-Semitism. He also translated the works of Benito Mussolini and Adolf Hitler into Ukrainian. Dontsov is considered the intellectual Godfather of modern Ukrainian ultra-nationalism.

In the late 1920’s Dontsov said, “Jews are guilty, terribly guilty, because they helped consolidate Russian rule in Ukraine, but ‘the Jew is not guilty of everything.’ Russian imperialism is guilty of everything. Only when Russia falls in Ukraine, will we be able to settle the Jewish question in our country in a way that suits the interest of the Ukrainian people.”

The Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists, or OUN, was founded in 1929 (based on Dontsov’s teaching) as an ‘integral nationalist’ movement – explicitly totalitarian, endorsing political violence, racism, and an aggressive anti-Semitism.  It cultivated close ties with Fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, the Spanish Falange, and the Croatian Ustaše. Its goals included driving Polish landowners and officials out of eastern Galicia and Volhynia. There was no need, wrote an OUN ideologist in 1929, to list all the injuries that Jews had caused Ukrainians. “In addition to a number of external enemies, Ukraine also has an internal enemy . . .  Jewry and its negative consequences for our liberation cause can be liquidated only by an organized collective effort.”

The first leader of OUN was Roman Shukhevych, who began his career with the assassination of a school principal (1926). A few years later in 1934 he murdered the Polish Minister of the Interior. In 1938 Shukhevych underwent training as an officer at the Nazi Military Academy in Munich, and in 1940 he and 120 other Ukrainians trained at a secret Abwehr Nazi espionage school in Zakopane.

After the OUN went through a succession split, Shukhevych’s inner circle included Stepan Bandera, one of the authors of the 1941 OUN-B blueprint ‘Struggle and Activities of the OUN-B at Times of War.’ That document called for the removal of all ‘non-Ukrainians’ living on Ukrainian territory and the liquidation of ‘Polish, Muscovite, and Jewish activists.’

Prior to the Nazi invasion of Russia, in Cracow on March, 2, 1941 German military intelligence established two Ukrainian military groups – the Sonderformation Nachtigall (Nightingale), and Battalion Ukrainische Gruppe Roland. Its members received Wehrmacht training at Neuhammer, Silesia, were given German uniforms and weapons, and were attached to the 1st Battalion of Regiment Brandenburg-800.  Shukhevych was the highest-ranking Ukrainian officer in the Nachtigall Battalion, and had the greatest standing among its Ukrainian members. As company commander, Shukhevych and Nachtigall participated in the June, 1941 capture and pogrom-massacres of the Jews of Lviv, as well as massacres of the Jews of Vinnytsia (both areas in Ukraine). On June 29, 1941, the day when German troops occupied Lviv, Bandera’s OUN proclaimed a Ukrainian fascist state. Hitler immediately voided that short-lived declaration, as he had other plans for the Ukrainian fascist movement.

The Ukrainian People’s Militia under the OUN’s command immediately carried out pogroms in Lviv, massacring 6,000 Jews. OUN-B (‘B’ for Bandera) members trumpeted a slogan during that massacre (the slogan was recorded in Nazi documentation – the July 16, 1941 Einsatzgruppen report) which went as follows: “Long live Ukraine without Jews, Poles and Germans; Poles behind the river San, Germans to Berlin, and Jews to the gallows.” Documentary evidence relating to the first few days of the Wehrmacht’s advance reveals that approximately 140 pogroms were perpetrated in western Ukraine, in which 13,000 to 35,000 Jews were murdered, all with full Nachtigall participation.

The Nazis used Ukrainian collaborators to commit murders and acts of brutality that were too disturbing even for crack SS units. For example, SS task force 4-A in Ukraine confined itself to “the shooting of adults while commanding its Ukrainian helpers to shoot children.” Citing the Polish historian Grezegorz Motyka, Rossoliński-Liebe says that the UPA killed close to 100,000 Poles and thousands of Jews between 1943 and 1945, and that Orthodox priests blessed the axes, pitchforks, scythes, sickles, knives, and sticks that the peasants used to murder Jews and Poles. UPA also brutally tortured and executed those Ukrainian peasants who wanted to join the Soviet Union. The UPA (Ukraïns’ka Povstans’ka Armiia; Ukrainian Insurgent Army) went on to kill some 20,000 Ukrainians before its insurrection was completely crushed by the Soviets in 1953.

In May 1953 Soviet Deputy Chairman Lavrentiy Beria read out at a meeting of the Praesidium of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, a detailed description of the number of Ukrainians crushed by the Communists: “Between 1944-1952 in the western oblasts (regions) of the Ukraine, as many as 500,000 people were subjected to various forms of [Soviet] repression. In particular, more than 134,000 [Ukrainian] people were sent to the Gulag; more than 153,000 were killed; and more than 203,000 persons were deported from the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic for life.” The Soviet crushing of the Ukrainian fascist movement took nine years. It was bloody and brutal. In Russia today many continue to view Ukraine with suspicion – as a potentially fascist country and inveterate enemy of Moscow.

Ukraine – the flowering of Yiddish and Zionism

Before the explosion of murderous fascism in the three-year period of 1941-1944, Ukraine witnessed an amazing flowering of Jewish creativity, extending over a period of nearly 300 years. This include the Hasidic movement and the Ba’al Shem Tov, the Hovevei Zion and BILU Zionist movements, Am Olam, as well as many top Yiddish writers and Zionist thinkers like Sholem Aleichem (whose Anatevka village in Fiddler on the Roof is located in Ukraine), Vladimir Jabotinsky, Golda Meir, Natan Sharansky, etc.

As had transpired in Poland, where the Jewish people had grown to three million souls before being shot or gassed by the Nazis – so in Ukraine this incredible blossoming of Jewish culture flowered just before it was cruelly burnt to ashes by an unholy alliance of Nazi Germans and Ukrainian fascists.

Soviet-Ukrainian ‘friendship years’

In the 1930’s, Stalin’s decision to starve millions of Ukrainians to death in the ‘Holodomor’ (‘death famine’ in Ukrainian) brought about demographic devastation. All Ukrainians knowledgeable of their own history are aware that millions of their people were killed and terrorized in the 20th century by Europe’s two most murderous totalitarian regimes – the Soviets and the Nazis. At the same time, it is also true that hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians were active collaborators with both of these killing machines.

One of the fathers of the Russian Revolution, Leon Trotsky, wrote in 1939: “In the Ukraine, matters were further complicated by the massacre of national hopes. Nowhere did restrictions, purges, repressions and in general all forms of bureaucratic hooliganism assume such murderous sweep as they did in the Ukraine in the struggle against the powerful, deeply-rooted longings of the Ukrainian masses for greater freedom and independence.”

The democratic Euromaidan revolution (also called the Maidan Uprising; November 2013 – February 2014) had two core aspirations: Ukraine’s integration into liberal democratic Europe; and Ukraine’s independence from Russia. Both of these desires are still very active among Ukrainians, and both of these aspirations are considered anathema by the ruling powers in Moscow.

Ukrainian ultra-nationalism

President Putin justifies his present imperialistic aggression against Ukraine and his 2014 invasion of Crimea by leveling accusations that Ukraine is a hotbed of anti-Semitism and neo-Nazism. In part two of this three-newsletter package, the evidence clearly shows that it is actually Russia which is the outstanding Slavic country manifesting a modern surge of highly visible neo-Nazi and fascist movements. But there is more to the story.

Ukrainian fascist survivors of WWII and their spiritual descendants (modern ultra-nationalist Ukrainians) have for years tried to side-step, deny or ignore the terrible crimes committed by pro-Nazi Ukrainian forces. Certainly, it is true that these fascists also had bitterly resisted the brutal take-over of Ukraine by Stalin’s Communists. And it is clear that many Ukrainians today see it as a badge of patriotism to honor ‘their’ ultra-nationalists, even if they are war criminals. Many Ukrainians have never been taught accurately about the great evils committed by people like Bandera or Shukhevych, or fascist organizations like the OUN, the UPA, Nachtigall Battalion, and the SS 1st Galician Division. Many Ukrainian patriots have the simple attitude, “Right or wrong, they are still our freedom-fighters and they will be honored!’

Some Ukrainians feel the need to defend and champion the reality of Ukrainian suffering at Russian hands, and as a result they unwittingly end up ‘competing with the Holocaust’ – on the one hand ignoring Jewish suffering, and on the other hand limiting the discussion to Ukrainian Gentile suffering. The OUN and the UPA are often portrayed in Ukrainian media as victims of oppression but rarely as perpetrators of oppression. The ultra-nationalist narrative of Ukrainian history is often presented as ‘the only true history,’ in contrast to what is called ‘false Soviet history’ or ‘Jewish history.’

In 1992, Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko designated the fascist leader of the OUN Roman Shukhevych as a ‘Hero of the Ukraine’ in a public ceremony.   This populist step certainly did not improve the status of Ukrainian-Jewish relations.  Moshe Kantor, the head of the European Jewish Congress, responded by describing Shukhevych as a ‘Nazi collaborator’ and refused to accept a posthumous Order of ‘Hero of Ukraine’ from Yushchenko on behalf of Major Anatolii Shapiro, a Soviet Jewish commander who was one of the liberators of Auschwitz in 1944.

During President Yuschenko’s State visit to Israel the following month, he was sharply criticized for his decision to honor Shukhevych. At Israel’s Holocaust Museum Yad Vashem, Yushchenko was confronted by the Chairman of its Council, Tommy Lapid, a Holocaust survivor and former deputy Israeli Prime Minister. Lapid upbraided the President, stating that ‘sometimes you can be both a hero of Ukrainians and a murderer of Jews.’

One percent may be small, but it’s still problematic

Though part two of this three-part newsletter has clearly shown that the most anti-Semitic movements in the Slavic world are actually found in Russia and in Russia-occupied Crimea, it is also true that there are a handful of neo-Nazi and ultra-nationalist movements operating in Ukraine. At the same time, over the past thirty years, most of these groups have faded off the scene.

During the Euromaidan protests, two far-right Ukrainian groups rose to prominence. The first, Pravy Sektor (or Right Sector), a nationalist group, manned barricades and clashed with riot police in Kiev’s Independence Square over the course of the uprising against Yanukovych. This militant organization failed to win any seats in the latest 2019 elections.

The second group was the nationalist Svoboda (Freedom), a political party founded in 1991, which draws upon the ideology of Yaroslav Stetsko, one of Bandera’s OUN allies during the war. It once held 37 seats in Ukraine’s 450-seat parliament, but today has nearly dropped out of existence, retaining only one parliamentary seat.

Matt Ford, former associate editor at The Atlantic, notes: “Russian officials are exaggerating both groups’ size, strength, and support. International news organizations, including the Associated Press, have reported no evidence of hate crimes committed after Yanukovych’s downfall, and Ukrainian rabbis have also denied Russian claims that anti-Semitic acts had taken place since the revolution. Ukraine’s UN ambassador, Yuri Sergeyev, pleaded with the international community earlier this month not to make generalizations about his people, stressing that ‘millions of Ukrainians in the West are normal European citizens.’” These matters take on heightened importance in light of Putin’s aggressive and skewed justification of his invasion of Ukraine.

Of wolves and angels

Between 2014 and 2016, a new political-military group named Azov came on the Ukrainian scene, formed from two neo-Nazi groups – Patriot of Ukraine, and Social-National Party. Its far-right leader Andriy Biletsky declared in 2010 that the nation’s mission was to “lead the white races of the world in a final crusade… against Semite-led sub-humans.” Azov’s official logo is the Nazi Wolfsangel rune of the ‘Das Reich’ division of the Waffen-SS, as well as the Black Sun (Schwartze Sonne) symbol, first employed by Heinrich Himmler, Reichsführer of the Schutzstaffel (SS), at Wewelsburg Castle in Germany.  Azov’s recruitment videos feature young recruits with shaved heads and beards marching in torchlit neo-pagan ceremonies behind a Black Sun shield.

While Azov has had little electoral success thus far (less than 1% of the popular vote), the toleration given to such groups (which are connected to hatred and violence) can create a dangerous precedent. Ukraine’s Interior Minister, Arsen Avakov – the second most powerful person in the state – does have close ties to the Azov group through Biletsky.

Is the neo-Nazi tumor metastasizing?

A massive Russian media campaign is actively manipulating the subjects of anti-Semitism and the extreme right in support of Moscow’s imperialistic strategies in Ukraine. The response of some has been: if the Russian media say that there is a problem, there can’t possibly be one! But a balanced response requires a more careful answer.

Modern Ukraine is not a country of anti-Semites. The Euromaidan revolution was not run by fascists. Russia has its own burgeoning problems with anti-Semitism and right-wing extremism. All these points are true. But it is necessary to ask other questions as well: How is Ukraine doing in extinguishing neo-Nazi poison, or in coming to terms with its fascist past and pro-Nazi collaborationists? What are the possible dangers lurking here?

In the middle of a cruel and destructive Russian military anschluss targeting Ukrainian civilians with verified war crimes, it is difficult to strike an accurate balance: How can one consider Ukrainian neo-fascism in a way which does not play into the Kremlin’s hands? Honest study and careful reflection are needed.

Vyacheslav Likhachevscholar and head of the National Minorities Rights Monitoring Group, points out that “the worst years for acts of anti-Semitic violence were from 2005 to 2007, where there was a wave of dangerous street attacks. In 2005, 13 people were victims of such violence, while in 2004, and in both 2006 and 2007 there were eight victims.  The number fell to five in 2008, then to one in 2009 and 2010 and none at all in 2011.  In each of the following three years there were four victims, with this number falling to one in 2015 and 2016, and then none in 2017 and 2018.” 

Based on his evidence, Likhachev concludes that there is little anti-Semitic violence in Ukraine and that, for the most part, Ukrainian Jews are not being confronted with direct physical danger. The main anti-Jewish crimes occurring in Ukraine involve “anti-Semitic propaganda in the public discourse, vandalism against Jewish sites such as cemeteries, Holocaust commemoration sites and communal institutions.” At the same time, Likhachev’s group noted, in the study ‘Two Years of War: Xenophobia in Ukraine 2015’ that, beginning in 2016, a dangerous increase in xenophobia occurred, specifically in Russian-occupied Crimea. 

So, yes, there is anti-Semitism in Ukraine. The movement is small, yet outspoken. Most of its poison is spread by relatively small acts of violence, and by trying to influence the public debate. Canadian historian John-Paul Himka asks a sobering question for us to ponder: “Is it possible to adopt the [fascist] nationalist legacy as the national legacy and just forget about its dark side?”

Political scientist Andreas Umland points out that the anti-Semitism of the OUN and other Ukrainian fascist groups in WWII “were not only a result of German inspiration, initiation and instigation. They were also driven by home-grown Ukrainian prejudices against Jews, in particular by the crypto-racist conspiracy theory of ‘Judeo-Bolshevism’ – the obsession with the Jewish family background of some communist leaders.”

Kyiv’s emerging ‘official historical narrative’ whitewashed both Ukrainian WWII pro-Nazi fascism as well as murderous anti-Semitic and anti-Polish atrocities. It is flatly unacceptable to three significantly related countries: Poland cannot accept a denial or justification of the OUN/UPA’s massacre of tens of thousands of Polish civilians in Western Ukraine in 1943-1944. That is non-negotiable. Germany cannot accept that Nazi collaborators (including Ukrainians like OUN/UPA leader Roman Shukhevych – a Wehrmacht and Nachtigall Nazi officer) can be celebrated as war heroes. Israel and the Jewish world will not tolerate Ukraine honoring and exalting explicitly anti-Semitic pro-Nazi organizations and leaders as guiding examples for modern Ukraine.

Ukrainian Replacement Theology/History

Ultra-nationalist Ukrainian historians have created an Ersatzgeschichte – a false historical narrative – in a Cain-like attempt to conceal the blood of Jews and Poles shed on the soil of the motherland. They doggedly move the focus away from the murder of Jews and Poles, and instead focus on Ukrainian suffering. Not the Holocaust but Stalin’s Holodomor (enforced famines) takes the spotlight. Not the Nachtigall massacres and Babi Yar are considered, but the Russian NKVD (pre-KGB) slaughter of Ukrainian nationalists and fascists, is being emphasized. This ‘New Ukrainian Martyrdom’ is a cesspool for ethical historical researchers. It must be uncompromisingly challenged and rejected in the cold light of historical truth. Putin has neither the honesty, the scholarship nor the integrity to take on such a task. Nor does he have the international credibility to be accepted as a ‘high-school teacher’ who can freely hand out demerits or administer the strap to Ukraine’s leaders and innocent civilians.

Ukraine is not a perfect or even well-functioning liberal democracy. Yet, at the same time, a comparison study presented by the non-profit human rights advocacy/analysis group Freedom House gives Ukraine a ‘partially free’ rating, and a ‘global freedom score’ of 62 out of 100. Russia’s 2021 freedom score is 20 (‘not free’), while Russian-occupied Crimea (Eastern Donbas) received a score of 4 out of 100.

Fascists in the White House and at the Bundes­nachrichtendienst

Toward the close of WWII, the intelligence services of Russia, U.S.A, and England were all looking to recruit or kidnap Nazi intelligence leaders and scientists. The rocket and atomic programs of these countries stood to gain much, if only the top Nazis in these fields would help their new masters win the Cold War. Rat Lines (Rattenlinien) were established by the Allies to help Nazis and fascists flee Axis countries and find professional restoration in Western countries.

Stepan Bandera, top Ukrainian ultra-nationalist fascist, made it to Munich, Germany, where he lived very close to the Bundes­nachrichtendienst, West Germany’s Foreign Intelligence Service. Many ex-Nazis were actually employed by the BND at that time. Bandera was eventually located by the KGB and assassinated in 1959. His fascist co-worker Yaroslav Stetsko also lived in Munich, dying there of old age in 1986.

Stetsko was honored by President Reagan during his 1983 White House visit. Reagan proclaimed that Stetsko the Ukrainian fascist mass murderer was a true ‘freedom fighter’: “Your struggle is our struggle. Your dream is our dream.” The history of OSS (later, CIA) collaboration with ex-Nazis and Ukrainian fascists is a sordid page of bipartisan American political history, exposed in three excellent books: ‘The Secret War against the Jews’ and ‘Unholy Trinity,’ (both by John Loftus and Mark Aarons), and ‘Blowback’ (by Christopher Simpson).

Hidden truths in Paris

Many years ago, I was invited to be one of the main speakers at a Christian conference in Paris titled ‘Embrace Nos Coeurs’ (Embrace our hearts!). As I began to do research on my subject – France’s historical relationship with the Jews – I came across unexpected information. I had always seen France as a country of good food, amazing art, wonderful songs, and libertéégalitéfraternité’ – the national motto from the French Revolution. To my horror, I discovered that France’s treatment of the Jews (historically speaking) had as many anti-Semitic elements in it as did Germany’s history – just minus the gas chambers. There were French pogroms, riots, forced conversions, torture, exile and ghettos – an inglorious aspect of French history.

The same dynamics are true of many other countries as well – England, Spain, Poland, Russia, Ukraine, etc. And it bears remembering that both America and Canada closed their gates to Jews fleeing Nazi Germany, as pointed out in ‘While Six Million Diedby Arthur D. Morse, and ‘None Is Too Many: Canada and the Jews of Europe, 1933 – 1948’, by Irving Abella and Harold Troper.

It is easy to point a finger, as some do, in accusation of another country and its anti-Semitic past or future. Unfortunately, there are few countries which can be classified as so free of sin, that ‘they can cast the first stone’ on this subject, as per John 8:7. Vladimir Putin has no spiritual authority or ethical integrity when he brings false and murderous charges against Ukraine. But Ukraine also has some business to do before the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. There is a need for repentance regarding the horrific treatment of the Jewish people by both Russia and Ukraine. And, without blinking or averting ones’ eyes, many other countries near and far could be added to this list as needing to respond to this ‘altar call to repentance.’

Following the Euromaidan revolution, Jews have been appointed to some of the top positions in the Ukrainian government, including Prime Minister Volodymyr Groysman and President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. If Ukraine is being run by a ‘neo-Nazi junta’ as Putin maintains, it is the first such junta in history to give key posts to Jews and to have strong support from both the Ukrainian Jewish community and the Israeli government. It is the height of absurdity for Russian spokespersons to define the ‘Kiev authorities’ as a “Judeo–fascist coup” installed by the West.

This very brief look at Ukrainian and Ukrainian Jewish history reveals a tangled web of relationships, simultaneously tragic and heart-warming. Our challenge is not to lose sight of either of these two feelings as we walk through the present rubble of Ukraine’s cities, considering the future in light of the past.

How should we then pray?

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal) through: www.davidstent.org

Russia’s propaganda wars: Neo-Nazism and Ukraine - Part Two: Surfing the wave of Russian anti-Semitism

This is the second of a three-part newsletter considering the subject of Russian propaganda and disinformation regarding their purported reasons for invading and destroying Ukraine. President Putin and state-controlled Russian media repeatedly stress  that Ukraine is being run by neo-Nazis and anti-Semites.
 
This second newsletter weighs Russia’s role (both in history past and present) in propagating and encouraging anti-Semitic theories and practices, including its use of terrorism and its strengthening of modern neo-Nazi movements.
 
 
An anti-Nazi invasion?
 
At dawn on February 24, 2022 Russian President Vladimir Putin announced:Focused on their own goals, the leading NATO countries are supporting the far-right nationalists and neo-Nazis in Ukraine . . . We will seek to demilitarize and denazify Ukraine.
 
On Friday February 25 Putin also described the leadership of Ukraine as “that gang of junkies and neo-Nazis that are holed up in Kiev and holding hostage the entire Ukrainian nation”
 
And on February 26, the state-run RIA news agency stated that Russia “for the second time in history will take on the burden of responsibility for the liberation of Ukraine from Nazism.”
 
In our upcoming third newsletter, an analysis of Putin’s claims regarding Nazism in Ukraine will be presented. For now, this second newsletter will examine Russian history – its own words and deeds regarding anti-Semitism, its own support for both neo-Nazi activities and anti-Jewish terrorism.  The question to be answered in this newsletter is: What is Moscow’s track record regarding its own moral behavior in these matters? Has Russia’s leadership convinced the Jewish people in recent history that Russia will protect Jewish culture, the Jewish language and Jewish national identity? If Russia fails at both these tests, then her justification for her invasion of Ukraine is both morally bankrupt and ethically fraudulent.
 
 
Putin is surfing on a wave he hasn’t created
 
In Russia, calling someone a Nazi is considered ‘fighting words’ – words which “by their very utterance, inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace.”. An estimated 24 million Soviet citizens died fighting Nazi armies in the Great Patriotic War, as World War II is called. When Putin’s ‘tag-team’ political partner Dmitri Medvedev (Deputy Chairman of the Security Council) accuses Ukraine’s Jewish President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of have betrayed his ethnic identity to serve neo-Nazis, and that he is acting like a Jewish Sonderkommando (those incarcerated Jews forced on pain of death to dispose of gas chamber victims during the Holocaust), Russia is once again playing its anti-Semitic card in all its putrid glory.
 
Yet the foamy wave of virulent anti-Semitism upon which Putin is surfing is not new; it goes back many centuries, as Senator Joe Biden said in his statement to the 106th Congress on February 24, 1999: “Over the centuries the phenomenon of anti-Semitism has become a sickening metaphor for man's inhumanity to man and, thus, a topic of universal significance. Sad to say, anti-Semitism has a long history in Russia.”
 
Vyacheslav Likhachev, world expert on the ideology and activity of far-right groups in Russia and Ukraine, political extremism, and the history of anti-Semitism, states clearly: “Anti-Semitism was a major feature of both late Tsarist and Stalinist as well as neo-Stalinist Russian politics . . . Anti-Semitism is alive and well in contemporary Russia, in general, and in her political life, in particular.” Likhachev’s book Political anti-Semitism in post-Soviet Russia is a ‘Who’s Who’ of Russian political anti-Semitism.
 
 
Pogroms and Protocols
 
Most of the world is not that aware of Russia or of her history. Winston Churchill expressed these sentiments well, when he said that Russia is a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma. Yet many English-speakers are acquainted with the word ‘pogrom.’ Pogrom is a Russian word meaning ‘to wreak havoc, to demolish violently.’ In 1908 Murray’s New English Dictionary defined the word: “Pogrom. Devastation. Destruction. An organized massacre in Russia for the destruction or annihilation of any body or class, chiefly applied to those directed against the Jews.”
 
The pogrom received international fame in the play/movie ‘Fiddler on the Roof,’ where the Gentile constable warns Tevye that there is soon going to be a ‘little unofficial demonstration’ – a pogrom in Anatevka. That violent tragedy occurred at the wedding celebration of Tevye’s daughter Tzeitl and Mottel the tailor. Senator Biden commented: “High ranking government officials blamed the Jews for the assassination of Tsar Alexander II in 1881, and in the succeeding decades officially tolerated, well-armed gangs called the Black Hundreds carried out murderous pogroms against the defenseless Jewish population.”
 
The Black Hundreds (Chernosotentsi - Черносо́тенцы) were reactionary, antirevolutionary, and anti-Semitic groups formed in Russia during and after the Russian Revolution of 1905. The most notable were the ‘League of the Russian People’ (Soyuz Russkogo Naroda), the ‘League of the Archangel Michael’ (Soyuz Mikhaila Arkhangela), and the ‘Council of United Nobility’ (Soviet Obedinennogo Dvoryanstva). Active from 1906 until 1914, they conducted pogroms against the Jews and attacks against various revolutionary groups – all with the unofficial approval of the government. Steven Zipperstein in his Pogrom: Kishinev and the Tilt of History, states “that no fewer than one hundred thousand Jews were murdered in these offhandedly brutal horrors, and at least that many girls and women raped and countless maimed between 1918 and 1920.”
 
The most famous pogrom was that of Kishinev, in the Bessarabia Governate of the Russian Empire. The riot was stirred up by false rumors that local Jews had killed a Christian youth and used his blood for demonic rituals. This anti-Semitic legend (called a blood libel’) has medieval roots, appearing in 12th century England, and then spreading to France, Germany, Austria, Italy, Hungary, and the Russian Empire.
 
On Easter Sunday, April 19, 1903, after Kishinev church services had ended, gangs of youths began attacking Jewish homes and shops amid shouts of “Kill the Jews!” Their two-day rampage ended with 49 people dead, many women raped, hundreds injured, and much destruction of property. Local police failed to intervene, and the violence ended only when Russian army troops began to patrol the streets and make arrests.
 
 
Protocols and paranoia
 
A literary spark to the highly flammable anti-Semitic tinder blowing across Europe was found in the pen of Pavel Krushevan, a journalist, publisher and official in Imperial Russia. Active in the Black Hundreds and in the Kishinev pogrom, he was known for his ultra-nationalist and stridently anti-Semitic views. He was also the first publisher (Fall of 1903) of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion in Saint Petersburg’s newspaper Znamya.
 
Krushevan’s booklet was a clumsy fabrication, with approximately 160 passages plagiarized from a French original that never mentioned Jews – the political satire Dialogue aux enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu, or The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu, authored by Maurice Joly in 1864. Ukrainian scholar Vadim Skuratovsky presents extensive literary, historical and linguistic analysis of the original text of the Protocols and traces influences of Fyodor Dostoyevsky’s prose.
 
The Protocols are a Russian staple of anti-Jewish propaganda to this day. The book ostensibly reports discussions among a secret group of Jewish elders, regarding plans to subvert Christian civilization and erect a world Davidic-Zionist state. According to the book’s worldview, the rise of liberalism has provided Jews with the tools to destroy Christian institutions – the nobility, the church, the sanctity of marriage. Their plan is to take control of the world as revenge against Christianity. The text focuses on supposed Jewish control of banking, media and elections. It is stated that a new world order will be seized by this cunning elite, who have purportedly schemed throughout the ages, planning to enslave humankind until the end of time. According to the authors of this anti-Semitic propaganda, the attempts to modernize Russia in the late 1800’s were actually a Jewish plot to control the world.
 
Eventually the Protocols became an instrument for blaming Jews for the Russian Revolution. The Bolsheviks were depicted as an overwhelmingly Jewish movement zealously dedicated to executing the Protocol’s ‘plan.’ Russian forces opposed to democratic parliamentarianism, urbanization, and capitalism drew encouragement from this booklet’s twisted perspectives.
 
 
Where Nazism and Communism meet
 
Both Communism and Capitalism are seen in the Protocols as evil means used by Jews in their drive to achieve world domination. And to complicate matters, in real life both Communism and Nazism saw the Jewish people, Judaism and Zionism as the greatest threat to the whole world. Hitler’s speeches and writings incessantly hammered on that theme. Below are some revealing quotes from both KGB and Russian Presidential sources on how seriously they believed in the reality of imaginary Protocol-like threats from all things related to the Jewish people.
 
According to KGB documents in the Mitrokhin archives (smuggled out of Russia and now safely stored in Cambridge, England), the KGB and Politburo heads saw the Zionist and Jewish movements as a clear and present danger to world peace and to the integrity of the Soviet empire – “a danger which is only second to the main enemy, the United States.” “Moscow Center was obsessed with the ‘Zionist subversion’ against the Soviet Union,” notes Professor Christopher Andrew, historian of the British intelligence community.
 
Vladimir Bukovsky, a prominent Russian dissident, came back to Moscow as a historian in the early 1990s and managed to photocopy documents in the Kremlin archive. He discovered a transcription of a top secret report that KGB head Yuri Andropov had submitted to the Politburo in March 1975, in which he stated that foreigners sending matzah to Russian Jews was clearly a dangerous counter-revolutionary act: “The delivery of these packages (of matzah) clearly intensifies the negative processes the Jewish population in the USSR is undergoing, strengthens their nationalist feelings and their support of emigration (to the West). The KGB believes the matzah arriving from abroad must be confiscated immediately.”
 
In 1982 all the top KGB brass met in Leningrad for a conference on Zionism. The Mitrokhin archives noted that the conference’s speeches stressed the “extensive subversive activity of the Zionist centers around the world and their infiltration into decision-making centers in different countries,” and claimed that “the Zionist organizations are affecting some countries’ foreign policy and aggravating conflicts around the world.” The conference further stressed that “there is not a single negative incident in socialist countries that Zionists are not involved in.”
  
In the Summer of 1982, Vladimir Kryuchkov (later appointed head of the KGB) issued a “work plan for fighting Zionism” stressed that “Zionism is the main threat to the USSR and to the Soviet bloc.”
 
 
Where Nazism, Communism and Zionism meet
 
The KGB saw the Jewish people, Judaism and Zionism as a devilish trident, the source of much of the world’s evil. Significant efforts were made to block Jewish cultural and religious expressions, and Jewish emigration from Russia. Strenuous efforts were also made to stir up Russian hatred against Jews in general and Zionism in particular.
 
The Anti-Zionist Committee of the Soviet Public (AKSO) was established on March 29, 1983 by the Secretariat of the Central Committee of the Soviet Communist Party. AKSO activities were supervised jointly by representatives of the Department of Propaganda of the Central Committee and by the KGB. AKSO depicted Zionism as a reactionary appendage of world imperialism. Two main themes of AKSO’s propaganda were:
 


In 1983, a Russian book On the Course of Aggression and Fascism detailed Zionism’s alleged ‘criminal alliance with the Fascists’ and blamed the Zionists for the extermination of non-Zionist Jews during the Holocaust.  In a 1983 a Pravda article announcing the launch of AKSO declared Zionism a concentration of ‘extreme nationalism, chauvinism, and racial intolerance, justification of territorial seizure and annexation, armed adventurism, a cult of political arbitrariness and impunity, demagogy and ideological sabotage, sordid maneuvers and perfidy.’ A 1985 TASS radio broadcast commenting on one of the committee’s English-language brochures announced: “Zionist leaders are responsible for the deaths of thousands of Jews annihilated by the Nazis. It is precisely the Zionists who assisted the Nazi butchers by helping them to make up the lists of the doomed inmates of ghettoes, escorting the latter to the places of extermination and convinced them to resign to the butchers.”

In 1977 Soviet Weekly, a Soviet English-language outlet that targeted the United Kingdom, printed a piece titled ‘Why We Condemn Zionism,’ proclaiming Zionism to be a racist doctrine and characterized Israelis as ‘worthy heirs to Hitler’s National-Socialism.’

Where Nazism, Communism and Palestinian terror meet

The current President of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, was once a KGB agent whose operational name was ‘Krotov,’ according an internal KGB report. Abbas functioned as an authorized and undercover KGB spy within the PLO.

Abbas received his Ph.D. from Moscow’s Patrice Lumumba University/ Institute of Oriental Studies in 1982. The university's president at the time was Yevgeny Primakov, later head of the KGB First Chief Directorate. Primakov then served as Russia's Minister of Foreign Affairs and subsequently as Russia’s Prime Minister.

Abbas’s dissertation was published as an Arabic book in 2011 under the title The Other Side: The Secret Relationship between Nazism and Zionism. Passages from the book describe alleged Zionist collaboration with the Nazis during the Holocaust and cast doubt on the number of Holocaust victims. Abbas wrote that the Mossad abducted Adolf Eichmann in order to prevent the high-ranking Nazi from revealing the secret of Zionists’ role in the Final Solution.

One year after Abbas’ dissertation was approved, a speaker by the name of Yuri Kolesnikov claimed at a press conference of the Anti-Zionist Committee of the Soviet Public (Moscow, June 1983), that during the war the Zionists were “in league with the Gestapo and SS” and that the Israelis executed Eichmann years later “to prevent the ‘sacred secrets’ of this collaboration from becoming public.” From this, it seems that both Abbas and Kolesnikov were studying from the same KGB playbook.

Where Palestinian terror meets Russian training and weapons

Israeli intelligence reporter Ronen Bergman conveys that a former senior Fatah official once told him that the “Soviet Union and its intelligence services greatly and significantly aided the Palestinian struggle for independence.” This can be seen in three ways:

  1. The KGB targeted the Jewish state with deep-cover ‘illegals,’ whose job was to penetrate the highest echelons of Israeli political, military and intelligence worlds
  1. The KGB and related intelligence agencies (East Germany Stasi, Bulgarian and Polish intelligence, Syrian Air Force intelligence, as well as the West German Baader-Meinhof Gang and the Italian Red Brigades) trained terrorist operatives from:
  1. These KGB-trained and KGB-armed terrorists carried out many horrendous attacks against Jews and Israelis, including the few listed below:


 Russian cooperation with Nazis

Russian cooperation with the Nazi regime goes back to the Soviet Union’s Treaty of Non-Aggression between Germany and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (also known as the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact) – a non-aggression pact between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union that enabled those two powers to partition Poland between them, while delaying open war between Germany and the USSR. It was signed in Moscow on August 23, 1939 by German Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop and Soviet Foreign Minister Vyacheslav Molotov, and lasted until Nazi Germany invaded Russia on June 22, 1941. This pact should not be understood as signifying undying love and devotion between Russia and the Nazis. Today, however, it is dangerous to discuss this pact openly on Russian media, due to the threat of penalties (including fines and long jail terms).

Russian concealment of Nazi atrocities

Between September 29–30, 1941, 33,771 Jewish men, women and children were murdered in a massacre carried out by the Einsatzgruppe C, located at the Kyiv clay pits of Babi Yar. By November 1941, the number of Jews shot dead at Babi Yar exceeded 75,000, according to an official report written by SS commander Paul Blobel.

In the period after 1945 the Soviet Union refused to recognize Babi Yar as a Jewish Holocaust site, or that mass murder of Jews had occurred at Babi Yar. Victims were only described generically as Soviet citizens. Mention of their Jewish identity was not permitted, nor the mentioning of the participation of the local police. There were plans to turn the site into a park and a stadium. William Korey, Anti-Defamation League director, stated that “Soviet authorities suppressed any public discussion of the Holocaust and attempted to obliterate the Holocaust in the memories of Soviet Jews as well as non-Jews.” The Nazis obliterated Jews, while the Russians obliterated any memory of the victims’ Jewish identity.

In 1961, Yevgeny Yevtushenko published his poem Babiyy Yar in a leading Russian periodical, protesting the Soviet Union’s refusal to recognize Babi Yar as a Holocaust site. The poem’s first line is “There are no monuments over Babi Yar.”

Finally, public pressure resulted in a memorial placed at Babi Yar in 1976, but the inscription reads: “Here in 1941-1943, the German fascist invaders executed more than 100,000 citizens of Kiev and prisoners of war.” Despite the fact that more than 30 per cent of victims killed by the Nazis in Babi Yar were Jews, there was no reference to the uniquely Jewish component of this tragedy. Between 1.5 million and 2.5 million Soviet Jews were murdered in the Holocaust and about 200,000 more died in combat. That added up to 10% of all Soviet deaths, while Jews were only 2.5% of the total pre-war Soviet population.

On September 29, 1991 a menorah-shaped monument to specific remember the more than 75,000 Jews murdered there, was dedicated. It had taken the collapse of the Soviet Union to bring to pass an honorable memorial at that site.

Russian propagation of Nazi propaganda and backing of neo-Nazi activism

It is not common knowledge in the West that a startling rise of neo-Nazi speech, action and influence has been going on in Russia over the past 20+ years.

The first stage involved the repetition and dissemination of Nazi tropes about Jews and Judaism (going back to the 1960’s).

In 1963 Judaism without Embellishments was published by Trofim Kichko. Featuring Der Stürmer-like cartoons, the book stated that Judaism and the concept of Jews as a chosen people are inherently racist, Judaism being a religion linked to American imperialism and Israeli colonialism. One of the cartoons in the book showed a stereotypical Jewish capitalist licking a boot with a swastika painted on it. Though published in Russian and for Russians, the style and content of the book is pure Nazi.

In 1975 the Soviet Union was able to pass General Assembly Resolution 3379 declaring Zionism to be racism. Though it was later revoked just days before the onset of the First Gulf War on December 16, 1991, the this racist attack on Israel opened a Pandora’s Box of Nazi-like assaults on Israel, Zionism and Jews throughout the world.

The second stage involved Putin’s use of anti-extremism legislation to ‘counter the neo-Nazi threat,’ but in the end it was directed to crush democratic opponents in Russia (early 2000’s).

The third stage involved Putin’s use of ‘managed nationalism’ to co-opt popular neo-Nazi movements into a counterweight to a rising anti-Putin democratic and leftist opposition (early 2000’s).

Russian neo-Nazi movements
 
What follows are the neo-Nazi groups involved (past and/or present) either officially or unofficially with the KGB and the Russian government.
 
National Patriotic Front ‘Memory’ (NPF - Pamyat) - started in 1980, grew to 3,000 members and faded out in the early 1990’s. It was a neo-Nazi, neo-fascist, ultra-nationalist, anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist organization that identified itself as the ‘People's National-Patriotic Orthodox Christian movement.’ In 1991, the organization's newspaper had a print run of 100,000, and a radio station was launched.
 
The group claimed the existence of a so-called ‘Ziono-Masonic plot’ against Russia as “the main source of the misfortunes of Russian people, disintegration of the economy, denationalization of Russian culture, alcoholism, ecological crisis.” They blamed the Zionists for the triggering of the Russian revolutions of 1905 and 1917, for the death of millions in the course of the Russian Civil War and for Joseph Stalin’s personality cult. They taught that the Soviet government was infiltrated by ‘Zionists and freemasons’ working as ‘agents of Zionism’ who were subordinating the Soviet government to ‘Jewish capital.’
 
One of Pamyat's founders, Valeriy Yemelyanov,  was the author of the book ‘Dezionization’ (1980) which called on the Soviet Union to get rid of this alleged Zionist-Masonic conspiracy. Yemelyanov was later committed to an insane asylum after being accused of murdering his wife.
 
Rodina - In 2003 Rodina (‘Motherland’) was established as a coalition of 30 nationalist and far-right groups. Led by Dmitri Rogozin, Sergey Glazyev, Sergey Baburin and other nationalist politicians, the political ideas represented here ran the gamut from neo-Stalinism to ethno-nationalism, xenophobia and neo-fascism.
 
Russian March - An ill-calculated governmental attempt to ‘harness’ the far right movement was the so-called ‘Russian March’ in 2005. The event turned out to be an openly neo-Nazi action, initially extensively supported by Russian governmental officials. The gatherings embraced reactionary elements within Russian society, from neo-Nazis and monarchists, to neo-pagans and Cossacks.
 
Russkii Obraz (‘Russian Image’; ‘RO’) - In 2008-09, the Kremlin was threatened by Russian opposition activist Alexei Navalny’s efforts to build an anti-Putin coalition of democrats and radical nationalists in Russia. The Kremlin began to work with Russkii Obraz (‘Russian Image’/’RO’), a hardcore neo-Nazi group best known for its slick journal and its band, Hook from the Right.
 
In touch with its Kremlin supervisors, RO hosted a concert by the infamous neo-Nazi band Kolovrat in Moscow's Bolotnaya Square, within earshot of the Kremlin. RO’s leader, Ilya Goryachev, was a fervent supporter of the neo-Nazi underground, those skinheads who committed hundreds of racist murders in the second half of the 2000’s. In 2014, RO's Aleksandr Matyushin engaged in terrorism against pro-Ukrainians in the Donetsk region as a major field commander with Russian forces.
 
Dmitri Utkin and the Wagner Group - The Wagner Group was reportedly founded by Dmitri Utkin, a veteran of the First and Second Chechen War. Utkin served as lieutenant colonel and brigade commander of a unit of Special Operations Forces unit operating under Russia’s Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU), in the 700th Independent Spetsnaz Detachment of the 2nd Independent Brigade. The company’s name comes from Utkin’s own military call-sign ‘Wagner’ which he chose in honor of the German racist conductor Richard Wagner (Adolf Hitler’s favorite composer).  Utkin is thought to be a neo-Nazi; a reporter from The Economist reported seeing several Waffen SS Nazi tattoos on Utkin’s collarbone and chest. The Wagner Group and Utkin were first active in 2014 in the break-away Luhansk region of Ukraine, fighting on the side of Russia against the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
 
Autonomous Nationalists - This Russian neo-Nazi group has been filmed attacking foreigners and setting fire to buildings. They have ties with neo-Nazi groups in Germany and Europe. Members praise the Third Reich and advocate the supremacy of the white race and the superiority of the Russian people.
 
Neo-Nazi ‘Sparta Battalion’ - Russian warlord Vladimir Zhoga, who headed the Neo-Nazi ‘Sparta Battalion,’ was accused of brutal war crimes and the shooting Ukrainian POWs. Zhoga was shot and killed in Volnovakha, Ukraine fighting on the side of the Russia-instigated break-away Donetsk People's Republic.
 
Russian National Unity -  In August 1990, a split occurred in Pamyat, and Aleksandr Barkashov dubbed his new group Russian National Unity.  The group promoted the veneration of the swastika. The organization was unregistered federally in Russia, but nonetheless collaborated on a limited basis with the KGB’s successor FSB. They advocated neo-Nazism, anti-Semitism, the expulsion from Russia of Jews, as well as of Azeris, Georgians,  Armenians, Kazakhs, Uzbeks and Tajiks. Members wore black or camouflage uniforms, adopting a red and white swastika and expressing admiration for German Nazism. RNU was made illegal in 1999, and had a membership of around 20,000 - 25,000 members at that time.
 
Selected quotes from Russian political figures:
 

 

 

 


From Lenin to Pravda

In 1914 Vladimir Lenin declared, “No nationality in Russia is as oppressed and persecuted as the Jews.”

Seventy-six years later, in July 1990, the top Russian newspaper Pravda published an editorial admitting that Russia’s anti-Zionist campaign of the previous quarter century was in error. “Considerable damage was done by a group of authors who, while pretending to fight Zionism, began to resurrect many notions of the anti-Semitic propaganda of the Black Hundreds and of fascist origin. Hiding under Marxist phraseology, they came out with coarse attacks on Jewish culture, on Judaism and on Jews in general.”

Can it be said that Russia’s leadership has finally grasped the truth regarding its own toxic contributions to murderous attacks on the Jewish people, their religion, their culture and their national identity? Have the Russian people undergone the necessary heart changes that God is seeking for them to experience?

How should we then pray?

 

 

 
Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA


Donations can also be made on-line (PayPal or credit card) through: www.davidstent.org

Russia’s propaganda wars: Neo-Nazism and Ukraine - Part One: The Jonah paradigm

The word of YHVH came to Jonah, commissioning him to, “arise, [and] go to Nineveh, the great city, and cry out against it, because their wickedness has come up before Me.” But instead Jonah got up to flee to Tarshish from the presence of YHVH” (Jonah 1:1-3).

Jonah was a bona fide prophet who had a spiritually sensitive awareness of Nineveh’s evil, both morally and in world politics. Yet for some reason he did not want to bring a message of repentance to that wicked country. He had even argued with YHVH at his original commissioning about agreeing to obey the call:

Assyria – an evil people

Although Jonah eventually preached God’s message of coming judgment and repentance to pagan Assyria, the text states that he didn’t want them to repent and avoid destruction. Jonah had anticipated that God would extend the scepter of mercy to a penitent Assyria, but he wanted no part of that.

Perhaps Jonah was spiritually aware of the great damage Assyria would soon do to the ten Jewish tribes barely one century later, cruelly carrying them away into Exile in the late 700’s B.C. (2 Kings 17:23-24; Hosea 10:14). The Assyrian siege of Lachish (depicted on the Lachish Bronzes in the British Museum and mentioned in 2 Chronicles 32:9) witnessed Judean soldiers crucified alive on Assyrian stakes, while other Jews had their flesh ripped apart with burning iron rakes.

Jonah could have had many reasons not to go to Assyria. That nation’s repentance lasted barely 100 years, and after that they brought murderous destruction to Israel. Why bring a message of God’s love and mercy to such a corrupt nation? Yet God still chose Jonah to ‘deliver the letter, the sooner the better.’

“A people who can’t discern between their right hand and their left” (Jonah 4:11)

Jonah had received a clear commission and message. Perhaps he even had the prophetic discernment to know that Nineveh’s repentance would end up being as stable as the morning mist. Yet Jonah missed out on grasping the love God had for these corrupt people. The aching of YHVH’s heart is revealed in Jonah 4:11 – He saw 120,000 people (whether children or adults) totally lacking in spiritual sensitivity and discernment. Therefor He was sending His prophet to them, to share His heart of mercy and forgiveness with that crooked nation, and to call them to repentance.

The first of a three part newsletter

This is the first of a three-part newsletter considering Russian propaganda and disinformation regarding their purported reasons for invading and destroying Ukraine. Their main supposed justification, repeatedly stressed by both President Putin and state-controlled Russian media, is that Ukraine is run by neo-Nazis.

The first newsletter (this one) looks briefly at some charges being propagated by Russian sources and even by some in the West who are not that well-informed about relevant history and biblical presuppositions. The second newsletter will deal with Russia’s historical and present role in officially and unofficially propagating anti-Semitic theories and practices. The third newsletter will consider Ukrainian anti-Semitism and fascist/neo-Nazi movements – their history, influence and threat. These facts are necessary for anyone who wants to draw accurate conclusions about this aspect of the propaganda war.

Do you want to have the heart of Jonah?

“Do you not know that we will judge angels? How much more matters of this life?” (1 Corinthians 6:3). The Apostle Paul assumes that healthy believers in Yeshua will continually be growing in maturity, able to discern matters from the perspective of the God of Jacob. That was a challenge for Jonah, and it is the same for us.

At this moment in Ukraine, it can be said that “her cities have become an object of horror” (Jeremiah 51:43). Hour by hour there are aerial bombardments and artillery barrages of cities. Civilians are penned in by enforced sieges at the hands of Russia’s armies, and famine is weakening and killing over a million people. The words of Isaiah the prophet cry to us: “And [God] was amazed that there was not one to intercede” (Isaiah 59:16).

While it is true that some are interceding, others are manifesting a self-satisfied judgementalism regarding the body blows raining down on the Ukrainian cities of Kyiv, Kharkiv, Mariupol, Kherson and Chernihiv. Some American cable TV personalities, some Evangelicals and charismatics, some (but not all) in the prophetic, apostolic and messianic Jewish movements, are declaring:

Others are proclaiming:

Here is a telling quote from an open letter penned by India’s advocate of non-violence Mahatma Gandhi, on July 2, 1940. In it he offered advice to Winston Churchill, the British King George VI, and everyone in between on how to deal with the Nazi menace:

Those who label Ukraine as ‘a corrupt state’ are probably not thinking in percentages: is Ukraine more corrupt that China, than Russia, than Yemen, than Syria, than the USA – and if so, by how much?  And what if the God of Israel decides to focus His divine rod of discipline on all the corrupt nations of the world, all at once? “If You, YAH, were to keep an account of crooked deeds, O YHVH, who could stand? But with You there is forgiveness, so that You may be feared” (Psalm 130:3-4).

Joshua the non-aligned general?

Over the years Christian pacifists have misinterpreted the meaning of Joshua’s encounter with the Angel of YHVH, mistakenly advocating that believers should not take sides in military conflicts.

The context of this passage concerns the military attack that YHVH the Lord of armies has commanded Joshua to prosecute on the morrow. Note the clear use of the phrase ‘the Captain of the army of YHVH’ here. King David refers to God by His military title – “YHVH of armies, the God of the armies of Israel” (1 Samuel 17:45). According to David, the armies of Israel are also YHVH’s armies.  At Jericho, Joshua is the acting general while YHVH is Joshua’s direct Commander. Make no mistake about it – the God of Israel is fighting on behalf of Joshua and against Canaan. God is explaining to Joshua that He is not simply another participant in a two-sided battle (that is the sense of the ‘no’ in Joshua 5:14), equal in stature to Jericho or Israel.  He is above both Jericho and the Jewish people, yet at the same time Israel is on YHVH’s side and under His command.  A ‘non-aligned’ interpretation of this passage owes more to a pacifistic worldview than to biblical exegesis or exposition.

At this point in history it is becoming progressively easier to fathom how, prior to WWII, so many refused to take a stand against the rising threat of fascist and communist dictatorships. In our day some people are looking straight into the face of 21st century totalitarian despots (whether in Moscow or in Tehran), but then blinking and quickly averting their eyes.

A non-aligned response to Hitler?

On September 1, 1939 the Nazi juggernaut crashed its tanks into Poland, and Stuka bombers dropped their blitzkrieg bombs onto defenseless Polish cities. How would we have responded on that day had we heard people commenting from the safety of foreign armchairs, that Poland ‘had it coming to them because they were a corrupt country’? How would we respond to hearing these ‘specialists’ stating that both sides (Nazis and Poles) are evil, so let us be content to simply pray for both sides – while Polish cities are being leveled and Jews are being herded into ghettos? No, reprehensible inactivity and cowardice never go over that well. Such pontifications would not stand the test of time, nor endure the unblinking gaze of the Holy One of Israel.

In the same way, I suggest that moral equivalencies between Russia’s evil and Ukraine’s evil are eminently unhelpful in terms of clearly understanding or pro-actively responding to the threats here. We need to grasp that Russian threats are not only coming against Ukraine – they apply immediately to the entire European theater, and their ramifications and blowback will affect the entire world.

We remember the words that Lutheran German pastor Martin Niemöller wrote after the defeat of Nazism: “First they came for the Communists, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn’t speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me, and by that time no one was left to speak up.” Now is the time to ask ourselves, “How shall we respond when they first come for the Ukrainians?”

How should we then pray?

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal) through: www.davidstent.org

When history repeats itself

Mark Twain was noted for the one-liner: History doesn't repeat itself, but it often rhymes.” As the world attempts to focus on recent events in Ukraine, let’s consider some sobering historical parallels from nearly thirty years ago.

Those events revolve around the September 1999 KGB false-flag bombings of Russian civilian apartments, which were then falsely ascribed to Chechen Islamic terrorists. This triggered the Russian army’s invasion of Muslim Chechnya and the massive artillery and aerial bombing destruction of Chechen cities (including the capital Grozny). And, of course, another important side-effect of that ‘special military operation’ was the rocketing of Vladimir Putin into the Kremlin, where he has since held the Presidency of modern Russia in his iron grip.

This above-noted history is an essential key to deciphering Russian realpolitik and present military strategies in Ukraine.

From unemployed spy to Tsar of Russia

Back in 1985 Vladimir Putin worked for four years as a young KGB spy in Dresden, GDR (Socialist Germany). After the collapse of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the disintegration of the USSR, Putin returned to Russia. He quickly found work at St. Petersburg’s City Hall, where his former law professor, Anatoly Sobchak, had just been elected Mayor. Within a brief time, Putin became both Deputy Mayor and Chair of the Committee on Foreign Economic Relations. This position afforded him significant financial benefit and political influence, eventually positioning him to be both Sobchak’s consigliere and his deliverer from serious corruption charges.

In March 1997, then-President Boris Yeltsin named Putin his Deputy Chief of Staff. In July 1998 Putin was made the chief of the Federal Security Service (FSB, the successor to the KGB). And in August 1999 Yeltsin appointed Putin to be his Prime Minister.

On December 31, 1999 Yeltsin unexpectedly resigned and, according to the Constitution of Russia, Putin became Acting President of the Russian Federation. The first presidential decree that Putin signed on 31 December 1999 was titled “On guarantees for the former president of the Russian Federation and the members of his family” This ensured that corruption charges against outgoing President Yeltsin and his relatives would not be pursued. This was most notably targeted at the Mabetex bribery case in which Yeltsin's family members were involved. On August 30, 2000 a criminal investigation in which Putin himself (who, as a member of the Saint Petersburg city government, was one of the suspects) was dropped. A case regarding Putin's alleged corruption in metal exports from 1992 was brought back by Marina Salye, but the case was silenced and she was forced to leave Saint Petersburg.

Putin became President of Russia in March 2000. But prior to becoming President, he intensified a scorched-earthspecial military campaign in Chechnya. His popularity ratings soared from 2% to 53% as a result. The once unemployed spy was about to become the beloved master of Russia.

Grozny means ‘fearsome’ in Russian

The country of Chechnya is located in the Eastern Europe’s North Caucasus, close to Georgia and the Caspian Sea. The majority of Chechens, though darker-skinned, could be described as the original ‘Caucasians.’ Between 1600 and 1800 A.D. the country was Islamized, with Iranian occupiers eventually giving way to Russian Tsarist control. Today many Chechens hope for an independent country free of Russian control. Other Chechens are Saudi-financed jihadis associated with al-Qa’eda or ISIS.

On April 17, 1999 Chechen jihadi leaders Shamil Basayev and Samir ibn al-Khattab met in Grozny and declared the formation of a jihadi army “the main purpose of which is the creation of the Independent Islamic State in the range of Chechnya and Dagestan.” On August 2, 1999 Basayev and Khattab launched an armed invasion by 2,000-3,000 jihadis into Dagestan from their bases in Chechnya. Their forces were pushed back into Chechen territory by August 26, 1999.

With Putin’s accession to the role of Russian Prime Minister on August 9, 1999, Chechnya-related events immediately moved into high gear. Intensive bombings (over 1,700 sorties) and missile attacks on Chechen cities and civilians began on August 25, 1999, leading to a wave of over 100,000 refugees.

Starting September 4, 1999, apartment buildings began to blow up in various places around Russia. Although Putin on September 23, 1999 blamed these on Chechen Islamist terrorists, an active KGB/FSB team had already been caught on September 22, 1999 having just placed such a bomb in the basement of a civilian apartment block in Ryazan, Russia. The bomb’s active ingredient was hexogen (RDX), a military explosive available only to Russian security services. False-flag KGB/FSB activities were the unofficial trigger for Putin’s invasion of Chechnya.

Russian accounts show that Putin’s plan for a crushing military crackdown on Chechnya had been drawn up months earlier than the campaign itself. Russian air strikes and artillery forced at least 100,000 Chechens to flee their homes. Neighboring Ingushetia appealed to the UN regarding over 78,000 refugees that had crossed their borders. Civilian refugees were later estimated to total between 200,000 to 450,000, out of the approximately 800,000 residents in the Chechen Republic.

On October 21, 1999, a Russian Scud short-range ballistic missile strike on the central Grozny marketplace killed more than 140 people, including many women and children, leaving hundreds more wounded. A Russian spokesman said the busy market was targeted because it was used by ‘separatists’ as an arms bazaar.

Human Rights Watch called on the Russian military at that time to stop using FAE, known in Russia as vacuum bombs, in Chechnya. Large number of civilian casualties were caused by what it called “widespread and often indiscriminate bombing and shelling by Russian forces.”

The Russian assault on Grozny began in early December 1999, ending on February 2, 2000 when the Russian army seized the city. Russian Defense Minister Igor Sergeyev said that 2,700 ‘separatists’ were killed trying to leave Grozny.  The siege and fighting devastated the capital like no other European city since World War II. In 2003 the United Nations called Grozny the most destroyed city on Earth.  The estimated total number of casualties: 80,000 killed in Chechnya; 40,000 - 45,000 civilians in neighboring regions.

Similar dynamics and tactics have been used by President Putin in other conflicts, such as Syria/Aleppo (2015), and at this present time in Ukraine (2022). History may not be exactly repeating itself but, as Mark Twain noted, there is a definite rhyme here.

Syrian Aleppo – history repeating itself

The Arab Spring protests in 2011 catalyzed a civil war in Syria, with Aleppo (ancient Halab) being a key rebel center. Many of these rebels were Western-friendly and opposed to Assad. Others were run-of-the-mill jihadis. And finally, some were full-blown ISIS jihadi Islamists. By the summer of 2015, it looked likely that Syrian President and dictator Hafez al-Assad was about to lose control of the country. Russia stepped in, sending bombers, attack helicopters, artillery and missiles, and many military advisors. Iran sent in paramilitary operatives as well as Lebanese Hezbollah fighters.

By September 2015, Assad's forces gathered against Aleppo. On September 30, 2015 Russian bombers and attack fighters hit rebel forward military positions and supply lines, and by October 2015 up to 2,000 Lebanese Hezbollah, Afghan and Iraqi Shi’a militia fighters (led by Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps [IRGC] – Quds Force commander Major-General Qassem Suleimani) initiated their ground attacks.

By February 2017 Assad’s forces had nearly surrounded the city. In July 2017 Assad imposed an all-out siege of the city’s rebel-controlled eastern region, blocking even humanitarian assistance. With significant support from Iran, Assad cut off supplies to 320,000 people. Assad then had his forces systematically destroy the medical facilities in rebel-held parts of the city, killing or wounding many of its remaining doctors and nurses. These attacks are considered to be war crimes.

Russian forces used weapons in Syria that are currently being used in Ukraine as well, including the TOS-1A, a surface-to-surface rocket system that fires “fuel-air explosive” (FAE) thermobaric-type warheads. The Russian bunker-buster BETAB-500s was also used, able to take out entire buildings in one hit.

The UNHCR reported in July 2018 that 270,000 people in southern Syria had been displaced by a two-week escalation in fighting alone that erupted after a Russian-backed army offensive to recapture rebel-held southern Syria. By October 1, 2018 the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights claims that Russian air strikes and artillery shells killed 18,000 people (including nearly 8,000 civilians).

According to the Russian Ministry of Defense, by August 2017 Russia had carried out 28,000 sorties in Syria, with 90,000 air strikes. The graphic destruction of these airstrikes in Syria can be seen in this drone footage of Aleppo from Euronews. Such scenes were also commonplace in Grozny. They now are being repeated (and available on drone footage) throughout Ukraine in Kharkiv, Mariupol region, Kiev region, etc.

“A destroyer will come to every city” (Jeremiah 48:8)

The Bible is a comprehensive history book, a compendium of how evil dictators destroyed cities and countries before they were ultimately extinguished from the pages of antiquity. And today, as we watch Russian weapons level the apartments of Ukraine, we can ask ourselves the question: do we think that we are living in times which are so different from those of Assyria, Babylon, Rome and Hitler? This outbreak of a land war in Europe is a wake-up call for us all. Are we ready? Have we counted the cost of what is about to happen? Where does God want us to be, and what does He want us to be doing as we prepare for these challenging times?

Those who plot wickedness

The Scriptures speak strongly against those who shed innocent blood or who attack peaceful people:

Purim – from defeat to victory

The Scroll of Esther has recently been read aloud in synagogues across the world. We heard how Haman had purposed to destroy, kill and eliminate the entire Jewish people (see Esther 7:4). Yet the God of Abraham kept His protective covenant with the exiled sons of Jacob, and turned the tables on His murderous enemies at Purim: “In the letters, the king granted the Jews who were in each and every city the right to assemble and to defend their lives, to destroy, kill, and eliminate the entire army of any people or province which was going to attack them, including children and women, and to plunder their spoils” (Esther 8:11).

The prophet Ezekiel lets us know that the God of Jacob has commissioned Israel to be His mighty army (see Ezekiel 37:9-11). The Jewish nation has been called to be His secret weapon in the affairs of men.

As war slogs forward in Ukraine, as cruel and murderous dictators accelerate the speed of their chariots and tanks, and as they direct their cannons, missiles and bombs against civilian supermarkets, shopping centers, hospitals, schools and theaters, let us pray for God’s mercy, His justice and His breakthroughs both in men’s hearts and on the battlefield.

How should we then pray?

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal) through: www.davidstent.org

The Jewish Exile and the hidden face of God

As a little Jewish boy growing up in Montreal I used to sing a Yiddish Purim (Feast of Esther) song: “Haynt is Purim, kinder; S’iz der yontif groys!” (‘Today is Purim, children! It’s the great holiday!’). And once again, according to the Jewish calendar we have arrived at the yearly celebration of the Feast of Esther.

Nearly 2,500 years ago Persia/Iran’s leader Ahasuerus (Old Persian, Xšayāršā) signed off on a Holocaust decree (Esther 3:12) and initialed it with his signet ring: “Scrolls were sent by runners to all the king’s provinces to destroy, kill, and annihilate all the Jews, from the young to the old, the women and toddlers, all on one day (the thirteenth day of the twelfth month, the month of Adar) and to seize their possessions as war plunder” (Esther 3:13).

A Jewish bird in a gilded cage

The Scroll of Esther lays out the plot. The Jewish people had been exiled by God (Leviticus 26:14-39) to Babylon for 70 years (Jeremiah 25:11-12), and were now sheep without a shepherd (Jeremiah 50:6). Their Davidic dynasty was shattered. It would be millennia before it would be fully restored (Amos 9:11-12; Jeremiah 23:5-6). The new Persian conquerors took over from Babylon and in 539 B.C. King Cyrus issued a decree (2 Chronicles 36:22-23) allowing Jews to return to the Promised Land. But less than 50,000 Hebrews took up that challenge, wending their way back to Judea as pioneers and settlers. Most Jews preferred the gilded cage of Iranian and Iraqi Exile for the next 2,500 years. Today most Jewish people avoid the term ‘the Exile,’ but adopt a euphemistic and more ‘politically correct’ term ‘the Diaspora’ (διασπορά, Greek for ‘the scattering’).

Miss Tehran, Persian hit teams and narcissists galore

The Book opens in the middle of a royal Middle Eastern drinking party, MCed by the hot-tempered, impulsive and narcissistic King Ahasuerus. The story segues quickly into an Imperial beauty contest, where a ‘new and improved’ beauty queen (Esther 2:2-14) would soon become the new bride in the harem. Fast forward to an Iranian assassination squad led by two offended royal officials (Esther 2:21-23) whose plot is exposed by Esther’s Jewish cousin Mordechai (Esther 2:7). Nearly all the players are now stage front and center, except Haman, a bully and a high official whose ambitions are only outdone by his murderous bent.

Haman’s hatred for Mordechai sparked a demonic anti-Semitic hatred, and triggered his genocidal plans against all the Jews on planet earth (since all Jews were basically living under Persian control at that time – Esther 1:1; 3:10, 13). In David Pryce-Jones’ classic ‘The Closed Circle: an interpretation of the Arabs’, he explains that “acquisition of honor, pride, dignity, respect and the converse avoidance of shame, disgrace, and humiliation are keys to Arab motivation, clarifying and illuminating behavior in the past as well as in the present” (page 34). This dynamic is found throughout the Middle East, among non-Arab peoples as well, he adds. Pryce-Jones notes that “by definition, honor and shame involve publicity” (page 40).

The God who is hiding

The writer of the Book of Esther never mentions the name of God or His existence. YHVH’s sovereignty in protecting and rescuing His Jewish people is silently brooding over the book, even though it may seem that He is ignoring the clear and present dangers facing His people. God seems to be ‘hiding His face’ (‘hester panim’ in Hebrew, a word play on the Hebrew name ‘Esther’), but in no way is He sleeping or slumbering. He protects us, preserves us and will fulfil every prophetic promise over us to bring us back ­both to the Land of Israel and to Himself. Though in the Book of Esther the fate of the Jewish people seems to turn on something as capricious ­as the ‘purim’, the lot, the ‘toss of the dice’ – the Jewish people’s survival rests in very secure divine hands.

Even today, as the world nervously considers a similar scenario – the Islamic Republic of Iran’s nuclear conspiracy to destroy Israel (the Jewish state) and to wreak havoc on pro-Western forces and neighbors – we can draw encouragement that the same Rock of Israel is watching over His Jewish people.

De-nazifying Purim

Hitler and his fellow Nazis took demonic delight in twisting Jewish themes and traditions into murderous weapons to be used against the sons and daughters of Jacob. Here are some examples of how Nazis perverted the Biblical Purim account:

Two other historical events happened on Purim which have relevance here:

Purim – YHVH’s revolutionary feast

U.S. Corporal Sidney Talmud of Brooklyn was marching through Germany with the 38th Signal Construction Battalion in 1945 when a rare opportunity came his way. Schloss Rheydt, the Renaissance-era palace in Mönchengladbach had been use by Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels as a vacation home. The Allies called it ‘Goebbels’ Castle.’ Since Goebbels had played the key role in the attempted destruction of Europe’s Jews, Army brass thought that it would be poetic justice to use that newly liberated venue to commemorate Jewish holidays (Purim and Passover) celebrating the liberation of the Jewish people.

In the US Army Weekly ‘Yank’ on April 12, 1945, a photo was published from that unusual Purim: a Jewish Welfare Board flag with the Star of David laid out on a table. The Jewish chaplain’s symbol hangs on a flag in the window. The German swastika is left visible in the center, but surmounted by the Torah and the ark.  In the magazineit was written that the Jewish clergy “raised their voices in an ancient Hebrew hymn of jubilation sung at Purim to celebrate the deliverance of the Jews from an earlier Hitler–Haman of Persia, who long held the Hebrew in captivity in Biblical Times.”

The God of Israel has not changed His heart about His Jewish people, nor has He stopped protecting them from the Pharaohs, the Hamans, the Hitlers, the Hamasniks and the Ayatollahs of this world. As we remember the suspenseful victory brought about by the God who is hiding, let us redouble our prayers, intercession and proactive measures for the salvation and survival of the Jewish people!

How should we then pray?

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal) through: www.davidstent.org

Last Days discernment

“So it came about on the third day, when it was morning, that there were thunder and lightning flashes and a thick cloud over the mountain and a very loud trumpet sound, so that all the people who were in the camp trembled” (Exodus 19:16)

“It will come about also on that day that a great trumpet will be blown, and those who were perishing in the land of Assyria and who were scattered in the land of Egypt will come and worship YHVH on the holy mountain in Jerusalem” (Isaiah 27:13)

“And He will send forth His angels with a great trumpet blast, and they will gather together His elect from the four winds, from one end of the sky to the other” (Matthew 24:31)

“If any of your scattered countrymen are at the ends of the earth, from there YHVH your God will gather you, and from there He will bring you back” (Deuteronomy 30:4)

“And if those days had not been cut short, no life would have been saved. But for the sake of the elect those days will be cut short” (Matthew 24:22)

“For false messiahs and false prophets will arise and will provide great signs and wonders, so as to mislead, if possible, even the elect” (Matthew 24:24)

The days are getting more challenging. We are being confronted with scenarios that surprise and trouble us. Humanity is being called upon to ramp up our discernment and our powers of judgment. Especially for those of us who have had our eyes opened and our spirits made alive in Messiah Yeshua, there is an earnest longing for increased spiritual sensitivity, faithfulness and biblical accuracy. May the following thoughts be both a challenge and an encouragement for us, today and in the days ahead.

Discernment – the desire of our hearts

God’s heart yearns for us, that we would gain and exercise discernment: “If only they were wise and they understood this! If only they would discern their future!” (Deuteronomy 32:29)

Our earnest request of God is that He teach us discernment based on His Scriptures: “Teach me good discernment and knowledge, for I believe in Your commandments. Before I was afflicted I went astray, but now I keep Your word” (Psalm 119:66-67).

A wise and discerning person has a mind hungry for truth and knowledge: “The mind of the discerning acquires knowledge, and the ear of the wise seeks knowledge” (Proverbs 18:15).

Solomon was the wisest and most discerning of men in his day: “‘And Your servant is in the midst of Your people whom You have chosen, a great people who are too many to be numbered or counted. So give Your servant an understanding heart to judge Your people, to discern between good and evil. For who is capable of judging this great people of Yours?’ Now it was pleasing in the sight of YHVH that Solomon had asked this thing (1 Kings 3:8-10). Now God gave Solomon wisdom and very great discernment and breadth of mind, like the sand that is on the seashore. Solomon’s wisdom surpassed the wisdom of all the people of the east and all the wisdom of Egypt (1 Kings 4:29-30).

Hindrances to discernment

Each one of us struggles with internal stumbling blocks which prevent us from having clear discernment. The Scriptures call this dynamic ‘sin’: “Who can discern his errors? Acquit me of hidden faults” (Psalm 19:12). Yeshua tells us that our own sins can hold us back from clearly discerning what is going on around us. “When it is evening, you say, ‘It will be fair weather, for the sky is red.’ And in the morning, ‘There will be a storm today, for the sky is red and threatening.’ You know how to discern the appearance of the sky, but are you unable to discern the signs of the times?” (Matthew 16:2-3).

A central element in the dynamics of discernment – a man or woman who is obedient to God and to His word will have greater clarity here: “But a natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned” (1 Corinthians 2:14).

“For everyone who partakes only of milk is unacquainted with the word of righteousness, for he is an infant. But solid food is for the mature, who because of practice have their senses trained to distinguish between good and evil” (Hebrews 5:13-14).

The calling to help people distinguish right and wrong

The tribe of Levi has been gifted with a prophetic calling to strengthen Israel’s discernment: “Moreover, they shall teach My people the difference between the holy and the common, and teach them to distinguish between the unclean and the clean. (Ezekiel 44:23; see Deuteronomy 33:8, 10).

It is no small matter to help God’s people grow in discernment: “Do not become teachers in large numbers, my brothers, since you know that we who are teachers will incur a stricter judgment” (James 3:1).

A prophesied day is coming when the remnant of Israel will move naturally in spiritual and practical discernment: “So you will again distinguish between the righteous and the wicked, between one who serves God and one who does not serve Him” (Malachi 3:18).

Drawing incorrect conclusions based on faulty discernment

Messiah Yeshua was once interacting with some Jewish Galileans about the reason for two specific and recent tragedies – one in Galilee and one in Jerusalem. Some were blaming the victims of those tragedies, ascribing greater sin to them than to the unharmed bystanders.

Yeshua’s point was stark: those people who had suffered harm or death were not worse sinners than the ‘innocent’ bystanders. Actually, all were in need of heartfelt repentance, especially in light of the fast-approaching judgment on 68-80 A.D. – the destruction of the Second Temple and the Roman Exile.

Two sides of the same rod

The ten northern tribes of Israel had embraced other loves, other gods and other morality, rather than that of YHVH. The God of Jacob is a jealous God determined to win His bride back to His heart. In order to turn their hearts back to Him, He extended a severe mercy to His Jewish people, which involved drawing the cruel and heartless Assyrian empire (His ‘rod’) down to the Promised Land to wreak havoc and exile on the ten tribes.

Isaiah the prophet gives us insight into how Assyria’s leader understood his own calling, and how Assyria’s perspective was totally the opposite from YHVH’s.

God calls Assyria the rod of His anger, stretched out against His Chosen People who had embraced idolatry and grievous social sin. Yet this ‘divine rod’ intended to go far beyond his divine commission. Assyria would boast that their military success was due to the superiority of their national demonic gods and the strength of their armies and weapons. This hubris – Assyrian hutzpa – would bring the full curse of Genesis 12:3, the full wrath of Israel’s God, down upon their heads. But even in the midst of horrific judgment, Israel was encouraged to draw strength from the prophetic future, when God would wipe Assyria off the map:

YHVH’s burning judgment on Assyria in days to come would be significantly greater than the Assyrian judgment that fell upon Israel.

The destruction of the prideful destroyer

Another example of God’s fearful dealings with prideful and destructive empires is laid out in great detail in Ezekiel. Though the prophet recognizes that YHVH has allowed Edom/Esau to invade and wreak havoc on Judah’s cities, pastures and civilian population, the God of Jacob warns that He is always watching, and that He Himself will repay Edom for all the evil they have done against the Jewish people:

Talking heads and other experts

Yeshua once responded to some theologians in His day, “You are mistaken, since you do not understand either the Scriptures or the power of God” (Matthew 22:29). My life experience has underscored the truth of Yeshua’s words. Much of the body of Messiah is divided here – on one side are those who don’t know the Scriptures well, and on the other side those who have not experienced the Holy Spirit’s power (and therefor deny its charismatic reality). In the same way, there are some popular media ‘experts’ who, though they may be forceful speakers and fast talkers, nevertheless seem bereft of biblical compassion, historical perspective and godly discernment.

Someone has said that an expert is “somebody who is more than 50 miles from home, has no responsibility for implementing the advice he gives, and shows slides.” The greatest refugee crisis since World War II has now broken out in Ukraine. The destruction of Ukrainian cities, villages and essential infrastructure (replete with bone-crushing civilian casualties) continues with a cruelty that would bring a faint smile to Hitler’s lips. On a personal note, two days ago in the Ukrainian Jewish village of Yasnohorodka (west-south-west of Kyiv) where my grandmother was born in 1888, Russian troops attacked and murdered five civilians.

Yet I have been dumbstruck to hear some self-proclaimed ‘experts’ insist that this pre-World War III situation is no real tragedy, because of the following supposed reasons:

Hitler redux

On September 30, 1938 Prime Minister Chamberlain met with Adolph Hitler in Munich, signing away a portion of Czech Sudetenland to Nazi annexation. One year later, on September 1, 1939 the Nazi juggernaut blitzkrieged into Poland with tanks, mobile artillery and Stuka bombers, destroying cities and annihilating civilians. WWII had broken out, the Holocaust following close on its heels. Would Christians in those days have been apologists for Hitler, lamely bleating that there are two sides to every story, that righteous leaders exist in Germany, and that we need to make sure to focus equal time on the many other countries in Europe instead?

Russia illegally seized sections of Eastern Ukraine in February-March 2014. Eight years later, on February 24, 2022 it invaded Ukraine from the territories of Russia, Belarus, and annexed sections of Crimea, with over 190.000 troops attacking over 20 Ukrainian locations. This is Sudetenland revisited. Will the world act any differently than it did in 1939?

How should we then pray?

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal) through: www.davidstent.org

The Kremlin Statements

This is part two of a two-part newsletter. Here is the link for part one.

“There are decades where nothing happens, and there are weeks where decades happen” (Vladimir Lenin).

“They took counsel together to devise a plan, but it came to naught. They talked about a strategy, but it will not stand, for God is with us!” (Isaiah 8:10)

Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, the President of the Russian Federation, recently gave two addresses in the Kremlin, one on February 21, 2022 and one on February 24, 2022.

In the first address, he outlined what he sees as Ukrainian and Western threats to Russia. He then warned the West of measures Russia was about to take. At the end of his speech, he recognized the independence and sovereignty of the regions which broke away from Ukraine in Donetsk and Lugansk under Russian oversight and military support. The subsequent ratification of these two Treaties of Friendship and Mutual Assistance now paved the way for ‘legal justification’ of Russia’s planned invasion of the rest of Ukraine three days later, on February 24, 2022.

In Putin’s second address on February 24, 2022, he classified the current situation as a ‘clear and present danger’ to Russia’s security and survival. He then announced that Russia was invading Ukraine:

Putin has triggered a land war in the heart of Eastern Europe. Michael Kofman (Research Program Director in the Russia Studies Program at CAN, Fellow at the Kennan Institute, Woodrow Wilson International Center, Washington, DC) states: “This is not an operation limited to the Donbas. It is a military operation with maximalist war aims, whose aim is regime change.” A senior U.S. defense official said, “We haven’t seen a conventional move like this, nation-state to nation-state, since World War II, certainly nothing on this size and scope and scale.” “It’s our assessment that they have every intention of decapitating the government and installing their own method of governance, which would explain these early moves towards Kyiv.”

In light of the fact that President Putin has been both ‘telegraphing’ his moves and openly carrying them out, his other declarations and threats in these two speeches will now be considered. The following quotes are from the above-linked transcripts of Putin’s two addresses. 

“Russia’s enemies – sub-human and evil”

Western leaders possess “attitudes that are directly leading to degradation and degeneration, because they are contrary to human nature.” The West has “low cultural standards and arrogance.” “Where did this insolent manner of talking . . . come from, . . . this contemptuous and disdainful attitude?”

“A stable statehood has never developed in Ukraine. Its electoral and other political procedures just serve as a cover, a screen for the redistribution of power and property between various oligarchic clans. Corruption . . . has gone beyond the usual scope in Ukraine. It has literally permeated and corroded Ukrainian statehood, the entire system, and all branches of power.”

“Neanderthal and aggressive nationalism and neo-Nazism . . . have been elevated in Ukraine to the rank of national policy.” Ukrainian authorities are “radicals [who have become] increasingly brazen in their actions.”

Ukraine’s “nationalists who have seized power have unleashed a persecution, a real terror campaign against those who opposed their anti-constitutional actions . . . A wave of violence swept Ukrainian cities, including a series of high-profile and unpunished murders . . . But we know their names and we will do everything to punish them, find them and bring them to justice.”

“Ukrainian society . . . far-right nationalism . . . rapidly developed into aggressive Russophobia and neo-Nazism. This resulted in the participation of Ukrainian nationalists and neo-Nazis in the terrorist groups in the North Caucasus and the increasingly loud territorial claims to Russia.”

“The Kyiv authorities . . . have opted for aggressive action, for activating extremist cells, including radical Islamist organizations, for sending subversives to stage terrorist attacks at critical infrastructure facilities, and for kidnapping Russian citizens. We have factual proof that such aggressive actions are being taken with support from Western security services.”

“The Ukrainian authorities . . . began by building their statehood on the negation of everything that united us, trying to distort the mentality and historical memory of millions of people, of entire generations living in Ukraine. It is not surprising that Ukrainian society was faced with the rise of far-right nationalism, which rapidly developed into aggressive Russophobia and neo-Nazism.”

“The United States and other Western partners . . . immediately tried to put the final squeeze on us, finish us off, and utterly destroy us. This is how it was in the 1990’s and the early 2000’s . . .  before we broke the back of international terrorism in the Caucasus! We remember this and will never forget”

“The leading NATO countries are supporting the far-right nationalists and neo-Nazis in Ukraine . . . They will undoubtedly try to bring war to Crimea just as they have done in Donbass, to kill innocent people just as members of the punitive units of Ukrainian nationalists and Hitler’s accomplices did during the Great Patriotic War.”

“The purpose of this operation is to protect people who, for eight years now, have been facing humiliation and genocide perpetrated by the Kyiv regime . . . We had to stop that atrocity, that genocide of the millions of people who live there and who pinned their hopes on Russia, on all of us. It is their aspirations, the feelings and pain of these people that were the main motivating force behind our decision to recognize the independence of the Donbass people’s republics.”

“Russia is facing a life and death threat”

“The US-built Maritime Operations Centre in Ochakov makes it possible to support activity by NATO warships, including the use of precision weapons, against the Russian Black Sea Fleet and our infrastructure on the entire Black Sea Coast.”

“American strategic planning documents confirm the possibility of a so-called preemptive strike at enemy missile systems. We also know the main adversary of the United States and NATO. It is Russia. NATO documents officially declare our country to be the main threat to Euro-Atlantic security. Ukraine will serve as an advanced bridgehead for such a strike . . . The Pentagon has been openly developing many land-based attack weapons, including ballistic missiles . . .  If deployed in Ukraine, such systems will be able to hit targets in Russia’s entire European part. The flying time of Tomahawk cruise missiles to Moscow will be less than 35 minutes; ballistic missiles from Kharkov will take seven to eight minutes; and hypersonic assault weapons, four to five minutes. It is like a knife to the throat. I have no doubt that they hope to carry out these plans.”

“For the United States and its allies, it is a policy of containing Russia, with obvious geopolitical dividends. For our country, it is a matter of life and death, a matter of our historical future as a nation. This is not an exaggeration; this is a fact. It is not only a very real threat to our interests but to the very existence of our state and to its sovereignty. It is the red line which we have spoken about on numerous occasions. They have crossed it.”

“The showdown between Russia and these forces cannot be avoided. It is only a matter of time. They are getting ready and waiting for the right moment. Moreover, they went as far as aspire to acquire nuclear weapons. We will not let this happen.”

“I would like to be clear and straightforward: in the current circumstances, when our proposals for an equal dialogue on fundamental issues have actually remained unanswered by the United States and NATO, when the level of threats to our country has increased significantly, Russia has every right to respond in order to ensure its security. That is exactly what we will do.”

Russia threatens her enemies

“I reiterate: we are acting to defend ourselves from the threats created for us and from a worse peril than what is happening now.”

“If Ukraine acquires weapons of mass destruction, the situation in the world and in Europe will drastically change, especially for us, for Russia. We cannot but react to this real danger, all the more so since, let me repeat, Ukraine’s Western patrons may help it acquire these weapons to create yet another threat to our country.”

“Ukraine’s accession to NATO and the subsequent deployment of NATO facilities has already been decided and is only a matter of time. We clearly understand that given this scenario, the level of military threats to Russia will increase dramatically, several times over. And I would like to emphasize at this point that the risk of a sudden strike at our country will multiply.”

“The old treaties and agreements are no longer effective. Entreaties and requests do not help.”

“Those who then embarked on the path of violence, bloodshed and lawlessness did not recognize then and do not recognize now any solution to the Donbass issue other than a military one . . . We want those who seized and continue to hold power in Kyiv to immediately stop hostilities. Otherwise, the responsibility for the possible continuation of the bloodshed will lie entirely on the conscience of Ukraine’s ruling regime.”

“Today’s Russia remains one of the most powerful nuclear states. Moreover, it has a certain advantage in several cutting-edge weapons. In this context, there should be no doubt for anyone that any potential aggressor will face defeat and ominous consequences should it directly attack our country.”

“They did not leave us any other option for defending Russia and our people, other than the one we are forced to use today. In these circumstances, we have to take bold and immediate action.”

“I would now like to say something very important for those who may be tempted to interfere in these developments from the outside. No matter who tries to stand in our way or all the more so create threats for our country and our people, they must know that Russia will respond immediately, and the consequences will be such as you have never seen in your entire history. No matter how the events unfold, we are ready. All the necessary decisions in this regard have been taken. I hope that my words will be heard.”

“At the end of the day, the future of Russia is in the hands of its multi-ethnic people, as has always been the case in our history. This means that the decisions that I made will be executed, that we will achieve the goals we have set, and reliably guarantee the security of our Motherland.”

The plans of a Tsar

What does Putin mean when he says the following “We will seek to demilitarize and de-Nazify Ukraine, as well as bring to trial those who perpetrated numerous bloody crimes against civilians, including against citizens of the Russian Federation”?

Demilitarization means that Ukraine will no longer be allowed to have an army which can defend itself against Russia. That would turn Ukraine into a puppet colony of Russia.

De-Nazification means the removal and/or assassination of Ukraine’s leadership, which Putin classifies as neo-Nazi. A senior U.S. defense official who spoke on condition of anonymity said, “It’s our assessment that they have every intention of decapitating the government and installing their own method of governance, which would explain these early moves towards Kyiv.” Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said that Russian “sabotage forces had entered the city to hunt him and his family down.”

Bring to trial” means that Putin is planning to have show trials similar to those hosted by the Soviet Union (the Moscow Trials of the Great Purge period – 1937–38) where guilty verdicts were unanimous and pre-approved.

Putin has made two threats to use nuclear weapons against the West in his speeches. The latest and strongest one was on February 24, 2022: “The consequences will be such as you have never seen in your entire history. No matter how the events unfold, we are ready. All the necessary decisions in this regard have been taken. I hope that my words will be heard.”

On Sunday February 27, 2022 Putin further announced, “I'm ordering the Defense Minister and Chief of the General Staff to switch the Russian army's deterrent forces onto a high alert mode of combat stand-by duty.”  This command was publicly announced, raising missile alert preparedness to Russia’s nuclear forces.

According to a former head of Britain’s MI6 external intelligence agency, Alex Younger, President Putin is “playing poker rather than chess” to create options for himself. “At the moment I cannot see a scenario where he can back down in a way that satisfies the expectations that he has created . . . It feels dangerous and it’s clearly getting more dangerous. It’s hard to see a safe landing zone given the expectations that President Putin has created.” 

Not much has changed since 1944

The observations of George Kennan (former U.S. Ambassador to the Soviet Union) made in Moscow of 1944 are penetrating in their insight. They shed helpful light on the mind, perspectives and strategies of both Russia and President Putin.

“Soviet leaders have never forgotten the weak and vulnerable position in which the Soviet regime found itself in the early days of its power . . .  These left in Soviet minds an indelible and undoubtedly exaggerated impression of the dangers which threatened Soviet power from without. Fed by the traditional Russian mistrust of the stranger . . . this feeling of fear and insecurity lived and flourished and came to underlie almost all Soviet thought about the outside world.”

Russia’s goals focus on “the concrete task of becoming the dominant power of eastern and central Europe.” They involve “new territorial acquisitions designed to strengthen Russia’s strategic and political position, and in the creation of a sphere of influence even beyond these limits. In drawing up this expansionist program, Soviet planners leaned heavily on the latter-day traditions of Tsarist diplomacy . . . The men in the Kremlin have never abandoned their faith in that program of territorial and political expansion which had once commended itself so strongly to Tsarist diplomatists.”

Geographic and military strategic goals include: “the re-establishment of Russian power in Finland and the Baltic states . . .  eastern Poland, a protectorate over western Poland . . . the establishment of dominant Russian influence over all the Slavs of central Europe and the Balkans . . . intended to prevent the formation in central and eastern Europe of any power or coalition of powers capable of challenging Russian security.”

“For the smaller countries of eastern and central Europe, the issue is not one of communism or capitalism. It is one of the independence of national life or of domination by a big power . . . It is not a question of boundaries or of constitutions or of formal independence. It is a question of real power relationships”

On the edge of a cliff

Vladimir Putin is a world-class poker player playing the game of his life here. He is going toe-to-toe with world leaders who are not as able to project similar sang froid – cold-blooded purpose and unflappable intensity. The lives of many are hanging in the balance, as does the balance of nuclear terror and mutually assured destruction. As we speak, the citizens of Ukraine are resolutely withstanding the unsheathed fist of Russia’s military juggernaut, paying dearly in blood and destruction. It is time to be praying with all sobriety.

How should we then pray?

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal) through: www.davidstent.org

Russia’s Empire spirit and the spiritual roots of the Ukrainian war

Russian tanks are rolling across Ukraine’s Eastern European Plains. Moscow’s artillery shells and rockets, missiles and bombs are striking military and civilian targets from the Black Sea lowlands to the Dnieper uplands. The iron fist of the Red Bear is smashing down on the gold-azure trident (the tryzub – a Trinitarian or falcon-like Viking symbol from ancient Kyiv) of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. A major ground war is exploding and the ground is shaking in Eastern Europe.

Yet only twelve days ago on Tuesday February 15, 2022 Russia's Deputy Ambassador to the United Nations Dmitry Polyanskiy declared that Western leaders were foolishly paranoid: “I think they need to have a good doctor, I recommend them to do it. Specialist on such paranoia cases! . . . Our troops are on our territory, [and they] represent a threat to no one.” The Great Soviet Encyclopedia of 1952 defined dezinformatsiya as the dissemination of “false information with the intention to deceive public opinion.” The whole world is watching events in Russia and Ukraine, and we remember Elijah’s words to King Ahab: “Have you murdered and also taken possession?” (1 Kings 21:19).

God offends the mind to reveal the heart (see Luke 2:34-35). The breaking out of war in Eastern Europe is exposing the secrets of men’s hearts (see 1 Corinthians14:25; Proverbs 25:2). Here are some insights into the strategic worldviews of Russia, President Vladimir Putin and Western leaders.

Moscow the Third Rome

History sheds light on a paradigm underpinning Russia’s worldview regarding its own calling and spiritual role.

In 1492 the Orthodox Metropolitan of Moscow Zosimus stated in the foreword to his book Presentation of the Paschalion that Tsar Ivan III was “the new Tsar Constantine of the new city of Constantine – Moscow.” The monk Philotheus of Pskov declared in the early 16th century: “So know, pious king, that all the Christian kingdoms came to an end and came together in a single kingdom of yours. Two Romes have fallen, the third stands, and there will be no fourth. No one shall replace your Christian Tsardom according to the great Theologian!”

‘Moscow the third Rome’ (Москва — Третий Рим) is a theological-imperialist concept stating that:

According to this Replacement Theology worldview, God’s Messianic kingdom finds its greatest and final expression not in Jerusalem but in Russia.

Like Constantine the Great, Putin sees Christianity as the spiritual glue that will unify and strengthen his empire. Since becoming President of Russia, Putin has cast himself as the true defender of Christians throughout the world, the leader of the Third Rome. He wants people to recognize his spiritual calling as the rebuilder of a Moscow-based Christendom.

In a September 2013 speech at the Valdai Club Putin declared: “We see many of the Euro-Atlantic countries are actually rejecting their roots, including the Christian values that constitute the basis of Western civilization. They are denying moral principles and all traditional identities: national, cultural, religious and even sexual. They are implementing policies that equate large families with same-sex partnerships, belief in God with the belief in Satan.”

In a March 2014 speech given at the Kremlin just after Russia annexed Crimea, Putin pointed to Russia’s spiritual authority over Ukraine and Belarus, based on Vladimir the Great’s mass baptism of Kyiv in 988 A.D.:

On July 12, 2021 Putin again proclaimed Russia’s Third Rome perspective, that Moscow alone must rule over Kyiv:

As British journalist and Rector Giles Davis points out: “At the heart of this post-Soviet revival of Christianity is another Vladimir. Vladimir Putin. Many people don’t appreciate the extent to which the invasion of Ukraine is a spiritual quest for him. The Baptism of Rus is the founding event of the formation of the Russian religious psyche, the Russian Orthodox church traces its origins back here. That’s why Putin is not so much interested in a few Russian-leaning districts to the east of Ukraine. His goal, terrifyingly, is Kyiv itself.”

Putin declared to the Kremlin on February 21, 2022 that “Ukraine is an inalienable part of our own history, culture and spiritual space.” This phrase has deep resonance for those who are steeped in over a thousand years of Russian religious history. Herein lies a key to his imperialistically-based invasion of Ukraine which began on February 23, 2022.

The Ukrainian response to Putin’s narrative can be seen when, in 2019, the Ukrainian Orthodox churches declared their independence from the Russian Orthodox Church, with Ecumenical Patriarch and Archbishop Bartholomew I of Constantinople supporting the Ukrainian move. Former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko described this as “a great victory for the devout Ukrainian nation over the Moscow demons, a victory of good over evil, light over darkness.”

Paranoia strikes deep

“In every tyrant's heart there springs in the end this poison, that he cannot trust a friend” (Aeschylus, Prometheus Bound, line 224).

Russian history reveals the murderous role of paranoid megalomania in some of its most outstanding leaders. While it is true that paranoia is the bane of many dictators, Moscow seems to have had more than its fair share of these. A cursory study of these manifestations may help us to make sense of current events in Eastern Europe.

King Saul’s fears of losing his crown led to the growth of malignant suspicion and murderous paranoia against David, his loyal servant:

Saul’s toxic fears left his heart wide open to demonic influence and murder. He began to suspect his loyal diplomats and courtiers of siding with his ‘enemy’ David:

Ivan the Terrible and his Black Riders

The first Tsar of All Russia (‘Tsar’ is the Russian pronunciation of the Latin word ‘Caesar’ or emperor) was Ivan IV  (1547-1584), known as Grozny (‘formidable’ or ‘fearful’). Severely cruel treatment he suffered as a child left a hard residue of extreme mistrust, blinding hatred and anger – especially toward those he felt had betrayed him. As a teenager, Ivan took his resentment out on animals, pulling the feathers off live birds and throwing dogs and cats out of windows.

Ivan created a thousand strong group of fanatically loyal secret police, known as the Oprichniki. They were akin to the Nazgûl, the ringwraiths or Black Riders of Tolkein’s Lord of the Rings. Dressed totally in black, they rode around in solid black carriages pulled by black horses. Severed dogs’ heads were tied to their saddles, symbolizing resolve in sniffing out traitors, as well as brooms (symbolizing a murderously clean sweep of traitors). Anyone suspected of treason or betrayal was tortured and/or murdered. Methods included boiling alive, impalement, being roasted in huge frying pans over an open fire, or being torn limb from limb by horses. In 1570 the entire civil, religious and business leadership of Novgorod (12,000 people) was rounded up, tortured, beaten to death. Their wives and children were bound and thrown into the icy Volkhov river. Ivan ended up killing his own son Ivan Ivanovich in a fit of paranoid rage.

Michael Khodarkovsky, Professor of Russian History at Loyola University in Chicago, notes that the Russian dictator Joseph Stalin justified both his own mass murders and “his claim that Russia needed a strong leader” by referring to Ivan the Terrible’s behavior. In our day, he added, “President Vladimir Putin relies on the images of Ivan IV and Stalin to convey the same message and validate his own dictatorial rule.”

In 2016, the first ever monument to Ivan the Terrible was unveiled in Oryol, about 200 miles south-west of Moscow, to mark 450 years since he founded the town in 1566. Alexander Prokhanov, editor of the extreme-right Russian newspaper Zavtra declared in honor of the event: “Weak leaders have ruined our country. Alexander II freed the serfs and they came to the city and caused a revolution. Nicholas II was a weak tsar and look what happened. Gorbachev was weak and as a result a great state collapsed.”

Local Governor of Oryol, Vadim Potomsky added: “Look at the size of [our] country. How else would you rule it? Trying to do it calmly and tolerantly is never going to work. We need a strong leader. And people here respect strong authority. They don’t fear it, they respect it. Remember how Russia was treated 15 years ago? Nobody asked us anything. And now thanks to Putin we have recovered our position in the world.”

Peter the Great’s murderous paranoia

Peter the Great transformed his country (at the loss of many lives) into a major European super-power. He was well known for his extreme cruelty and paranoia. Two of his strongest motivations were: a fear for his personal safety, a hatred and need to revenge himself against an ‘old Russia’; and a desire for total independence in his actions and control over his environment.

Peter oversaw the death of 30,000 to 100,000 workers in his construction of St Petersburg. He put his son Alexei on trial, had him tortured and whipped to the point where he died of his wounds. No other European monarchs oversaw the torture and death of their own children.

Peter oversaw savage reprisals and tortures to crush the leaders of the Streltsy infantry rebellion. Between September 1698 and February 1699, 1,182 Streltsy were executed and 601 were whipped, branded with irons or sent into exile. The investigation and executions continued up until 1707.

The paranoid uncle 

Joseph Stalin, the infamous dictator of the Soviet Union (or ‘Uncle Joe’ as he was nicknamed by FDR)  had the blood of between six to nine million people directly on his hands, with the possibility of tens of millions more following in quick succession. Between the summer of 1936 and 1938, Stalin’s regime summarily executed over 750,000 Soviet citizens without trial. In the same period, more than a million Soviet citizens were sent to the labor camps of the Gulag, and many would not return.  Stalin also engineered two forced famines (1921-23) and the infamous Ukrainian Holodomor [Ukrainian for ‘death hunger’] of 1932-33, in which between 8 and 10 million Ukrainians died.

In 1951 Nikita Khrushchev and Anastas Mikoyan, members of Stalin’s inner circle, were his guests at the Black Sea mansion of Novy Afon. One evening, Stalin walked out of his vacation home and addressed Khrushchev: “I’m a rotten person. I don’t trust anybody. I don’t even trust myself.” As Khrushchev recalled in his 1970 memoirs: Stalin “instilled in … us all the suspicion that we were all surrounded by enemies.” The destructive influence of Stalin’s paranoia on generations of Russians, especially on members of the KGB, needs to be factored into any consideration of what motivates Vladimir Putin’s worldview and strategies.

Non-Russian paranoia

Iraq’s dictator Saddam Hussein once told a guest: “I know that there are scores of people plotting to kill me, and this is not difficult to understand. After all, did we not seize power by plotting against our predecessors? However, I am far cleverer than they are. I know that they are conspiring to kill me long before they actually start planning to do so. This enables me to get them before they have the faintest chance of striking at me.”  This striking vignette reveals something about how the leadership of Russia views the West, NATO and Ukraine, and why Putin has engaged in what is for him a pre-emptive strike against Ukraine.

Karl Marx’s take on Russian world domination

In a speech delivered in London on 22 January 1867, Karl Marx stated that Russia’s “methods, its tactics, its manoeuvers may change, but the polar star of its policy – world domination – is a fixed star.” Marx spoke of pre-Communist Russia at that time. Years later, the Marxist-Leninist doctrine of world revolution as a historical necessity added fuel to the fire of this political dynamic during the 20th century.

The sword, the shield and Alexander Nevsky

The symbolic icon of the KGB (Russia’s former equivalent to the American CIA) was a sword and a shield – the shield to defend the revolution, and the sword to smite its foes.

Kyiven Prince Alexander Nevsky (one of the historical founders of ancient Russia) traditionally made a declaration in 1242 A.D. which sums up Russian perspectives on how it sees the West as an existential threat: “Those who come to us in peace will be welcome as guests. But those who come to us with a sword in hand will die with that very sword!”

Emperor Alexander III (the father of Russia’s last tsar, Nicholas II) used to say that Russia has only two allies – the army and the navy.

Maxim Litvinov, former Soviet Ambassador to the USA (1941-43) noted that, from his perspective, the root cause of the clash between the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. is “the ideological conception prevailing here [in Moscow] that conflict between the Communist and capitalist worlds is inevitable.” In “Soviet Foreign Policy: Mental Alienation or Universal Revolution,” John Hodgson agrees.

Dr. Robert E. Berls Jr., doyen analyst of Russian strategic studies, has noted that many believe that “Russia will never abandon its vision of itself as a great power and must strive to attain this status . . . Russia cannot survive other than as a great power . . . A conflict with the West as inevitable because neither side is willing to compromise. Although many Russians view some elements of the West as a model to be emulated, they consider that the West remains a threat to Russia.”

Vladislav Surkov, a former ideological advisor to President Putin . . . has stated that Russia has abandoned its centuries-long hope of integrating with the West and is bracing for “100 years of geopolitical solitude.” This “solitude” does not mean complete isolation, but it does mean that Russia’s openness to the West will be limited in the future.

According to Michael Kimmage and Liana Fix of the German Marshall Fund, a Washington, D.C.-based research organization, “Putin has begun exploring coercive options beyond the annexation of Crimea and occupation of the Donbass, neither of which has given him what he wants . . .  A minimal objective would be to topple the Ukrainian government . . . and to install a puppet leader. A more ambitious objective would be to divide the country in two, with the line between Russia and a rump Ukrainian state one of Putin's choosing. The most expansive goal would be to conquer Ukraine entirely and then either to occupy it or to demand that its independence be negotiated on Putin's terms.”

The dying of the light?

In Tolkein’s The Two Towers, Théoden’s delivers a sobering soliloquy before the Battle of Helm’s Deep: “The days have gone down in the West, behind the hills, into shadow. How did it come to this?”

In the days of Hitler, the West was asleep at the wheel. Chamberlain’s indecisive stutter greeted the Nazi belligerent annexation of Czech Sudetenland, where more than three million people (including many ethnic Germans) lived. Most of Europe applauded the Munich Agreement, believing that this was the best chance to prevent a major war on the European Continent. Hitler announced that this was his last territorial claim in Europe. Europe’s enabling of Hitler actually opened the door to a full-blown WWII.

A question needs to be asked: Is the West ready and willing to stop Putin by responding militarily and check-mating Russia’s expansion westward, its Drang nach Westen (‘push to the west’), before it becomes unstoppable? We seem to be living in days which have strong parallels to those just prior to WWII, days when the Berlin Wall still stood unblinking, when Russia still stretched its gnarled hand across Eastern Europe. Could we be witnessing the rise of an evil manifestation – something like unto what Daniel the prophet described as ‘the fourth beast’ – “a fourth beast, dreadful and terrible, and extremely strong; and it had large iron teeth” (Daniel 7:7).  It bears remembering that Russia – Putin’s ‘Third Rome’ – is, historically speaking, a modern flowering of one aspect of the revived Roman Empire.

But rather than recognizing the immediacy of the threat, many in the West are responding with agonizing slowness. A spiritual narcissism is revealing itself with questions like: how would the spread of hostilities affect Western pocketbooks, or raise the price of gas, or affect inflation. But would such a timid Western response have been sufficient to stop Hitler in his tracks back in the day? And what about the agonies that Ukrainians are facing as they face the Russian juggernaut with Molotov cocktails and anti-tank shoulder-fired rockets? Some are stating that, as long as Russia does not cross into NATO-affiliated countries, there is no need to respond militarily to the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Had this sort of response been the reaction to Hitler’s blitzkriegs, WWII would have been decisively lost. Should the West wait until Poland or the Baltic Countries or Hungary are overrun? As long as the West refuses to move toward energy self-sufficiency and balks at keeping up its military deterrent, Russian bullying and military threats will more than win the day.

Putin in his own words

Our next newsletter in a few days’ time will look at Putin’s battle plans in his own words – his Kremlin speeches just prior to the Ukraine invasion on February 21 and 24, 2022. Stay tuned!

How should we then pray?

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal) through: www.davidstent.org

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close