Jerusalem the joy of the whole earth

The glow of tinsel and winking Christmas tree lights are already warming many hearts. But as the Western world prepares for Christmas, the God of Israel is quietly engaged on a secret mission. He is turning the hearts of kings and presidents wherever He wishes, like channels of water in the hand of YHVH (Proverbs 21:1). Jerusalem is the hot button. And once again in response, the peoples are in an uproar. Why do the nations rage and the Palestinians call for days of rage (Psalm 2:1-2)?

What is the significance of U.S. President Trump’s recognizing of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital? Does the Bible shed any light on this matter?

Past U.S. positions on Jerusalem

The original American position on Jerusalem goes back to 1947-48 and is based on the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 181, adopted November 29, 1947 (https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/United_Nations_General_Assembly_Resolution_181).

That Resolution calls for the dividing of the Land of Israel into “independent Arab and Jewish States.” It also calls for “the Special International Regime for the City of Jerusalem.” All the residents of the city would automatically become “citizens of the City of Jerusalem” unless they opted for citizenship of the Arab or Jewish State.

The plan was never implemented, so on December 11, 1948 GA Resolution 191 restated “detailed proposals for a permanent international regime for the territory of Jerusalem.” This projected Jerusalem area stretched from Abu Dis (East) to Bethlehem (South) and from Ein Karem/Motza (West) to Shu’afat (North).

The plan was never implemented, so on December 9, 1949 GA Resolution 303 restated “its intention that Jerusalem should be placed under a permanent international regime, … established as a corpus separatum under a special international regime and shall be administered by the United Nations.” Corpus seperatum is a Latin legal term for ‘a separate body.’

This plan was never implemented, but since the UN has never revoked its resolutions 181 and 194, it still maintains the official position that Jerusalem should be placed under a special international regime. On November 30, 2011 General Assembly Resolution 66/18 stated , “Recalling its resolution 181 (II) of 29 November 1947, in particular its provisions regarding the City of Jerusalem… reiterates its determination that any actions taken by Israel, the occupying Power, to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration on the Holy City of Jerusalem are illegal and therefore null and void and have no validity whatsoever.”

The United States has never officially relinquished its original support of the corpus separatum. “The United States has never recognized such unilateral actions by any of the States in the area as governing the international status of Jerusalem” (344. Circular Telegram From the Department of State to All Posts; Washington, July 5, 1967, 8:55 p.m; 1508. Subj: Jerusalem Resolution in UNGA https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1964-68v19/d344).

U.S. foreign policy is not controlled by the U.S. Congress. To this day official U.S. documents and web sites do not refer to Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

What is the Jerusalem Embassy Act?

On 23 October 1995, the United States Congress passed an advisory Act called the Jerusalem Embassy Act (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerusalem_Embassy_Act). It stated that “Jerusalem should be recognized as the capital of the State of Israel; and the United States Embassy in Israel should be established in Jerusalem no later than May 31, 1999.”  Another similar law is the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2003 - Public Law 107-228 – September 30, 2002 (https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-107publ228/html/PLAW-107publ228.htm).

Since 1998, the Congressional suggestion to relocate the Embassy from Tel Aviv has been suspended semi-annually by every sitting President, each time stating that this “is necessary to protect the national security interests of the United States.”

There are two reasons behind the constant and consistent postponements:

Under the U.S. Constitution the President has exclusive authority to recognize foreign sovereignty over territory (see Restatement (3rd) Foreign Relations Law of the United States, American Law Institute, 1986, §§ 203 Recognition or Acceptance of Governments and §§ 204 Recognition and Maintaining Diplomatic Relations Law of the United States). 

In May 1995 the Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel (https://web.archive.org/web/20100209074518/https://www.justice.gov/olc/s770.16.htm) concluded that the expected provisions of the Embassy Relocation Act would inveigh against exclusive presidential authorities in the field of foreign affairs and would therefore be unconstitutional. Since the U.S. Constitution reserves the conduct of foreign policy to the President, any resolutions of Congress in favor of legislating foreign policy have been seen by U.S. administrations as extremely problematic if not arguably invalid for that Constitutional reason.

As long as the acting U.S. President and his State Department were opposed to recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, they could and did argue that Congress was attempting to usurp the Executive's authority or power over matters of foreign affairs.

What is President Trump’s White House proclamation?

When President Donald Trump issued a proclamation from the White House on December 7, 2017 recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel (https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/12/06/statement-president-trump-jerusalem), he broke with a decades-old stance of the State Department, the Intelligence community and the military. But he aligned himself with decades of U.S. Congressional tradition and sentiment.

Regarding the question of the Islamic world’s threats of violence against the national security interests of the United States, President Trump said, “So today, we call for calm, for moderation, and for the voices of tolerance to prevail over the purveyors of hate…The incredible future awaiting this region is held at bay by bloodshed, ignorance, and terror… (It is) our commitment to work with partners throughout the Middle East to defeat radicalism that threatens the hopes and dreams of future generations. It is time for the many who desire peace to expel the extremists from their midst. It is time for all civilized nations, and people, to respond to disagreement with reasoned debate – not violence.”

“A new king arose over Egypt…”

The Jewish people have seen the rise and the fall of many kings and many empires. Mark Twain wryly commented:

Two hundred years ago, when a new Tsar arose in Russia many Jews would hold their breath. Would the new king be good or bad for the Jews? The more tolerant Alexander II was followed by the cruel and anti-Jewish Alexander III. In the same way, one U.S. President can be a breath of fresh air and make a wonderful proclamation, but this does not guarantee that the next President will continue the same course or have the same sympathies.

The vast majority of Israeli Jews and most Jews worldwide are thrilled at President Trump’s proclamation and are very supportive of it. The small minorities of anti-Israel  or ‘leftist progressive’ Jews are opposed to Trump’s declaration, as they are to most pro-Israel moves.

Jewish fears in the Warsaw Ghetto

A well-known Jewish joke describes a fictional tale during the Jewish Warsaw Ghetto Revolt of 1943. Two Jewish ghetto fighters are captured by Nazi S.S. units. As they are brought before a field firing-squad, the fictitious commander asks them if they have any last requests before being shot. The first Jewish fighter says that he would like a last cigarette. The second fighter turns and yells at him, “For Heaven’s sake, don’t make trouble!”

The black humor in this joke is based on the fact that it is understood that both Jews are destined for death. Yet the second Jewish fighter somehow believes against all reality that if they both scrape and bow, perhaps the Nazi Kommandant might spare their lives.

Some Jews who live in the Diaspora are afraid. If Israel proclaims its freedom and sovereignty too boldly, the anti-Semites of the world (be they neo-Nazi, BDS, Antifa, ‘Socialist Progressive,’ Christian or Islamist) may simply rise up and slaughter the Jews once again. Better to avoid angering the anti-Jewish psychopaths of the nations!

Yet when the threat of terror causes its victims to hide and not to fight, it can be concluded that terrorism has succeeded in its aims. The Nazi juggernaut could not be blissfully ignored, as Mahatma Gandhi once suggested. It had to be defeated on the battlefield. The Imperial Japanese Army only sued for peace after terrible weapons were unleashed against its Empire. In order to vanquish a murderous jihadi attempt to re-establish the slavery of a world caliphate, only decisive and repeated victory will do.  

Opening the gates of hell?

The response of the Islamic world to President Trump’s proclamation was expected. Islamist terror groups such as Hamas (www.dailysabah.com/mideast/2017/12/06/trumps-jerusalem-move-opens-gates-of-hell-on-us-interests-hamas-says) declaring that the gate of hell have been opened, presumably allowing the satanic Hamas to kill and destroy Israelis – something they have had no problem doing in the past under more friendly circumstances (www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/12/hamas-leader-jerusalem-decision-war-declaration-171207083427072.html). Islamic Jihad in Gaza declared that Trump’s proclamation was “a declaration of war…on the entire Arab and Islamic nation” (www.israelnationalnews.com/News/Flash.aspx/405059). Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) declared that the proclamation is “a clear challenge to the Muslim world” and encourages its adherents to join in the jihadi struggle on this issue (www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-israel-aqap/al-qaeda-condemns-trumps-jerusalem-move-calls-for-action-idUSKBN1E126H).

World media has raised headlines to a fever pitch, prophesying that the entire Islamic world will nearly immediately break out into violence over this matter, and that Israel herself should get ready for mass violence and casualties. In some cases enterprising newspersons have gone out of their way to film ten Palestinians burning a photograph of President Trump as leading news on their networks. Melanie Phillips explains how Western governments and media are actually catalyzing Islamist violence through their anti-Israel media activism (www.melaniephillips.com/historic-watershed-shames-britain-europe/).

Tell me the old old story

King David once penned a psalm about how the nations of the world would rage against Jerusalem and attempt to frustrate God’s divine strategy for the Jewish people’s capital city.

Why are the nations in an uproar and the peoples devising a vain thing?

The kings of the earth take their stand and the rulers take counsel together

Against YHVH and against His Anointed, saying,

“Let us tear their fetters apart and cast away their cords from us!”

He who sits in the heavens laughs. YHVH scoffs at them.

Then He will speak to them in His anger and terrify them in His fury, saying,

“But as for Me, I have installed My King upon Zion, My holy mountain.”

I will surely tell of the decree of YHVH:

He said to Me, "You are My Son, today I have begotten You.

Ask of Me, and I will surely give the nations as Your inheritance,

and the very ends of the earth as Your possession.

You shall break them with a rod of iron. You shall shatter them like earthenware.”

Now therefore, O kings, show discernment. Take warning, O judges of the earth. (Psalm 2)

Today we watch the sharks of the nations gnashing their teeth about President Trump’s proclamation. We bless the United States of America for their leader’s bold and courageous stand. We pray for other nations to bow to God’s strategic declaration in Psalm 2 regarding His heart for the Jewish people, their homeland and their capital city.

How should we then pray?

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal or credit card) through: www.davidstent.org

The two-edged sword of Replacement Theology

The majority of Christians believe in Replacement Theology – the majority of Evangelicals and charismatics also. It may surprise you to know that many Christians who love Jewish worship music or who staunchly believe in future prophetic events for Israel are also ‘practical Replacement Theology’ adherents.

Can anything good come out of Samaria?

Circa 150 A.D. a Samaritan believer in Yeshua named Justin Martyr was one of the first theologians to push Replacement Theology. The Samaritan community Justin was raised in was shot through with anti-Semitism for many centuries. As the Book of Ezra tells us:

Justin hewed the pillars of Replacement Theology in his “Dialogue With Trypho, A Jew (see The Ante-Nicene Fathers, Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1975; ed. Alexander Roberts & James Donaldson, Vol. I, chapters 29, 120, 123-124, 135):

For more in-depth information on Justin’s teachings, see Israel the Key to World Revival by Avner Boskey, chapter nine, How Have We Robbed God?  Replacement Theology and You (available at https://davidstent.org/books/ ).

Justin believed that, when the majority of Israel’s spiritual leaders rejected Yeshua’s Messiahship, this was the ‘straw that broke the camel’s back’ – and that God then rejected the Jewish people. In spreading this ‘fake news,’ Justin violated the word and heart of God as expressed throughout the Bible:

Justin Martyr and the Replacement theologians who followed him may have delighted in Jesus’ great passion for the Church, but they were blind in not recognizing Messiah’s great passion for His own Jewish people.

By trumpeting an unbalanced focus on Israel’s judgment while ignoring God’s undying commitment to and covenant with His Jewish people, Replacement Theology has missed the heart of God in these matters.

Robbing the God of Israel and the Israel of God

To appropriate Israel’s chosen status is to steal the Jewish people’s God-given promises. To rob the Jewish people is to rob the God of the Jews. This is of course a violation of the Eighth Commandment, “Thou shalt not steal!” (Exodus 20:15). Stealing from the Jewish people brings a curse on the thief according to Genesis 12:3, even if that thief is a Christian thief. Theft, like all sin, needs to be confessed according to 1 John 1:9. But after confession comes restitution – what John the Baptist called “fruits in keeping with repentance” (Luke 3:7-9).

Boasting in the breeze, swinging in the wind

In Romans 11:17-24 the Apostle Paul explains that all non-Jewish believers in Messiah Yeshua are actually grafted into a pre-existing Jewish olive tree of faith. He rings out a prophetic warning to Gentile believers down through the corridors of time, warning them not to boast against the Jewish people, their national and prophetic calling, and their amazing Last Days restoration. To boast against the Jews is to separate oneself from the Jewish tree of faith. It is literally to cut oneself loose from the place of blessing and stability. A tree not connected to its own roots will eventually wither and die. This is Paul’s warning: “Do not be conceited, but fear. For if God did not spare the natural branches, He will not spare you, either. Behold then the kindness and severity of God; to those who fell, severity, but to you, God’s kindness, if you continue in His kindness; otherwise you also will be cut off” (Romans 11:20-22).

Avoiding the Scriptures about Jerusalem’s restoration

Over the past forty years I have watched a growing awareness among some believers that End Times events will have a focus on Jerusalem. I have also seen a blossoming appreciation of God’s passionate love for His bride. Yet I have not always seen these two streams come into a biblical balance regarding the Jewish people’s central place in this jigsaw puzzle. The Scriptures let us know beyond any doubt that:

Most of the teaching I have heard about Israel strays from these central biblical truths.

When there is no awareness of the need to focus on Israel in the here and now, and when the subject of the Jewish people is taught without passion or biblical depth, then one can say that these above-detailed expressions can be called ‘practical Replacement Theology.’

Making room for Jewish roots but having no time to focus on real Jews

I and my Lady Rachel have a deep love and appreciation for music and especially for Jewish music. I grew up immersed in Yiddish culture (theater, choir, literature and folk songs). My whole family loves art and theater, and is actively involved in encouraging such expressions. So we have been encouraged to see Gentile believers embrace Jewish modes of worship. These would include Jewish-sounding music, banners with Jewish themes, Jewish dancing in worship, focus on the Hebrew language, and the perfume and shades of meaning that the study of the Hebrew Scriptures can sometimes bring to biblical studies, etc.

The Apostle Paul prophesied about how the Jewish roots of the faith would bring blessing and encouragement to many non-Jews. Gentiles in Messiah have become partakers with the Jewish believers of the rich sap and root of the Jewish olive tree (see Romans 11:17).

But I have also noticed that all too often, for some Gentile believers, these new and Jewish expressions are both the beginning and the end of the story.  These appreciative manifestations for Jewish things often do not cross over the line and lead to activity dedicated to Israel’s restoration. A healthy appreciation for the Jewish roots of our faith should lead to the following:

Connection with Jewish things is not primarily meant to give us a happier and more prosperous life in Gentile suburbia. The priority focus here is meant to enfold our hearts with God’s purposes in blessing and restoring His Jewish people spiritually and physically – and all the more so as we see the Day drawing near.

“Therefore be careful how you walk, not as unwise men but as wise, making the most of your time, because the days are evil. So then do not be foolish, but understand what the will of the Lord is” (Ephesians 5:15-17).

Removing the Jewish people from Jewish promises

The final point to be considered here concerns a way of interpreting the prophetic scriptures. Many of the biggest serial offenders on this point are well-known teachers and leaders. In this form of Replacement Theology, scripture passages which specifically refer to the prophetic future of Israel are reinterpreted, with Gentile believers deftly inserted in place of the Jewish nation. These passages are then presented with gusto as offering a brilliant future for Gentile believers, even though the actual prophecies in question specifically refer to the Jewish people and to their own Promised Land of Israel. This usage is by far the most common example of ‘practical Replacement Theology.’

Here are a few common examples:

The amount of examples here could go on for a long time. Suffice it to say that such ‘practical Replacement Theology’ teaching is widespread, and most people who teach such things may not even be aware of how this approach twists the Scriptures and distorts the heart of God’s message written there about Israel.

It is wonderful and edifying to apply scriptural principles from the Word of God to whatever situation we are facing. At the same time, when the text or passage actually refers to the Jewish people and we avoid that contextual reality in our sharing, there arises a problem called ‘patent infringement.’  It is honorable, indeed essential, that we all should remind our listeners that these promises will find their completeness and essential fulfillment when they are fulfilled for the Jewish people. Let us ‘walk the line’ here, and make the crooked paths straight.

How should we then pray?

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal or credit card) through: www.davidstent.org

The blast of the shofar

I grew up in a Yiddish-speaking home in Montreal, Canada where I attended Yiddish and Hebrew day school, participated in Montreal’s Yiddish theater group and also performed in a Yiddish mandolin orchestra. My memories of the High Holidays (Rosh Hashoneh and Yom Kipper is how we pronounced them) included the traditional foods – apples dipped in honey, an unusually large and sweet braided challah loaf, and of course the ubiquitous shofar (or ram’s horn).

My religious teachers communicated to me that these Days of Awe (yomim noroyim) were a sober season when men’s souls were judged. Rabbinic tradition states: “Rabbi Judah says: All are judged on New Year and the separate dooms are sealed each in its time – on Passover in respect of produce, on Pentecost in respect of fruit, on Tabernacles judgment is passed in respect of rain, and man is judged on New Year and his doom is sealed on the Day of Atonement” (Babylonian Talmud [TB], Tractate Rosh Hashana 16a).

Another Rabbi (Yochanan) declared: “Three books are opened (in heaven) on New Year, one for the thoroughly wicked, one for the thoroughly righteous, and one for the intermediate. The thoroughly righteous are forthwith inscribed definitively in the book of life. The thoroughly wicked are forthwith inscribed definitively in the book of death. The doom of the intermediate is suspended from New Year till the Day of Atonement. If they deserve well, they are inscribed in the book of life. If they do not deserve well, they are inscribed in the book of death” (TB, Tractate Rosh Hashana 16b). This tradition has led to Rosh Hashoneh being described as Yom Ha-Din – the Day of Judgment.

A famous Jewish Montrealer, Leonard Cohen, reflected the theology behind these words in his song ‘Who by fire’ – “And who by fire, who by water, who in the sunshine, who in the night time – who by high ordeal, who by common trial, who in your merry merry month of May, who by very slow decay…And who shall I say is calling?” (“Who by fire”, words & music Leonard Cohen, © Sony/ATV Music Publishing LLC).

Man does not live by apples and honey alone

Moses declared, “You shall remember all the way which YHVH your God has led you in the wilderness these forty years, that He might humble you, testing you, to know what was in your heart, whether you would keep His commandments or not… that He might make you understand that man does not live by bread alone, but man lives by everything that proceeds out of the mouth of YHVH” (Deuteronomy 8:2-3; quoted by Messiah Yeshua in Matthew 4:4).

Throughout history the God of Israel continues to test Jacob’s heart to see whether or not we will follow every word that proceeds out of His mouth. The choosing of the New Year is one of His words, as the Book of Exodus reveals: “Now YHVH said to Moses and Aaron in the land of Egypt, ‘This month shall be the beginning of months for you; it is to be the first month of the year to you’” (Exodus 12:1-2). “On this day in the month of Aviv, you are about to go forth…  Therefore, you shall keep this ordinance at its appointed time from year to year” (Exodus 13:4, 10).

By the rivers of Babylon

When the Jewish people lived in Babylon’s exile, they became accustomed to using the legal Babylonian names for the months of the year After the remnant of the Jewish people returned from Exile, within a short time these Babylonian month-names triumphed in daily usage over the ancient Hebrew names of the month. A similar dynamic has occurred in our day, where most Jewish people use Roman names of the month and Norse names for the days of the week – as does the majority of the Western world.

One of the consequences of Babylonian conquest and cultural imperialism was that the first month in the Hebrew calendar Aviv was renamed Nisan (from the Akkadian nisānu, meaning ‘sanctuary’ or ‘sacrifice’, or possibly from Sumerian nisag meaning ‘firstfruits’). The seventh month of the Hebrew calendar, Eitanim (‘the strong ones’), was renamed Tishrei (from the Akkadian word tašrītu or ‘beginning’). This process of replacement is acknowledged in the Jerusalem Talmud: “For Rabbi Hanina said, ‘The names of the months came up with them from Babylonia’” (TJ, Rosh Hashanah, 1:2, 56d).

But the Jewish people in the Exile continued to faithfully celebrate the Hebrew New Year according to Moses’ calendar, during the Spring month of Aviv/Nisan (modern March/April). In the days of Mordecai the Bible notes that the casting of lots began “in the first month, which is the month Nisan” (or Aviv; Esther 3:7; see also Josiah in 2 Chronicles 35:1). In Queen Esther’s day the Jews of the Persian Empire still celebrated the biblical Jewish New Year in the Spring, fourteen days before the Feast of Passover.

Two Babylonian New Years…

Here is an interesting and surprising fact: The Babylonian calendar (and the Assyrian) actually had two ‘festivals of new beginnings’ or ‘new years’ (the Akitu festivals). These were celebrated on two different occasions every year. The first one was celebrated on the 1st of Nisan (called  rêš šattim/ resh shattim, meaning ‘head of the year’) and the 2nd one was celebrated on the 1st of Tishrei (see The Cultic Calendars of the Ancient Near East, Mark E. Cohen, CDL Press, 1993; also Origin and Transformation of the Ancient Israelite Festival Calendar, Jan A. Wagenaar; Wiesbaden, Harrossowitz Verlag, 2005). These two Babylonian ‘new years’ reflected the seasonal agricultural changes and weather patterns in the Euphrates Valley.

And four Jewish New Years…

By the Second Century AD the rabbinical authorities codified the timing of the Jewish New Year, moving it from the biblical Spring date to an Autumn date in order to better fit in with the politically correct Babylonian social trends. Rabbi Judah the Prince (the editor of the Mishnah) made a valiant attempt at justifying an obvious departure from the biblical New Year date, when he proclaimed circa 200 AD that there are actually a whole bunch of New Years. He explained that there are “four New Years – on the first of Nisan is the New Year for kings and festivals; on the first of Elul is the New Year of the tithe of cattle…; on the first of Tishrei is the New Year for years, for release and for jubilee years, for plantation and for tithing vegetables; on the first of Shevat is the New Year for trees” (TB, Tractate Rosh Hashanah, Mishna 1, 2a).

A crucial fork in the road had been crossed in 33 AD when Messiah Yeshua was rejected by Israel’s spiritual authorities and handed over to the Romans to be crucified. If Jerusalem’s then spiritual leadership could have made such a horrific decision to reject the Messiah, these same leaders could eventually make errant decisions about a host of other issues – including the nature of the New Covenant, the status of the Mosaic covenant, the way of salvation, the authority of the rabbinic leadership, etc.

The authority of the Scriptures and of Messiah Yeshua is very much connected to the issue of the Jewish New Year. Today our spiritual confusion about something as basic about the Jewish New Year is similar to the situation during the Days of the Judges: “In those days there was no king in Israel; everyone did what was right in his own eyes” (Judges 21:25). “For My people have committed two evils. They have forsaken Me, the fountain of living waters, to hew for themselves cisterns, broken cisterns that can hold no water” (Jeremiah 2:13).

Shofar show good

The Feast of the seventh month (which today is called Rosh Hashanah or the Jewish New Year) actually has a biblical name – Yom Teru’ah, the day of blowing/trumpeting/sounding of the shofar or ram’s horn (Numbers 29:1). Psalm 81:3 adds that the ram’s horn was sounded on the Feast of Trumpets, on the Feast of Tabernacles, at the other ordained feasts and also every month at the New Moon celebrations.

The word teru’ah (from the root ru’a) has another secondary meaning in Hebrew – a powerful shout-out of rejoicing – as used in the following passages:

The Feast of Trumpets is called zichron teru’ah in Leviticus 23:24. This term can be translated as ‘a memorial of trumpeting’ or ‘a memorial by shouting out.’

The Talmud has a teaching that one of the purposes of the shofar blast on the Feast of Trumpets is to confuse Satan: “R. Isaac further said: If the shofar is not sounded at the beginning of the year, evil will befall at the end of it. Why so? Because the Accuser (ed. Satan) has not been confused” (TB RH 16b).

The Bible however does not connect the Feast of Trumpets to sadness, mourning or incipient danger. Numbers 10:10 instead refers to it as “the day of your gladness in your appointed convocations.”  These celebrations were actually happy occasions of great joy. Psalm 81:1-3 refers to singing aloud, making a joyful shout, raising up a song by striking the tambourine, harp and lyre – and all this on the Feast of Trumpets!

Holy Fire on Rosh Hashanah

Here’s an interesting note about the biblical New Year – the one that takes place close to Passover. Moses tells us that YHVH commanded him to get the desert Tent of Meeting operational and dedicated by the 1st of Aviv, the Jewish New Year. On that date the fire of the Holy Spirit took up burning residence in the Tabernacle in the wilderness.

“Then YHVH spoke to Moses, saying,  ‘On the first day of the first month you shall set up the tabernacle of the tent of meeting’… Now in the first month of the second year, on the first day of the month, the tabernacle was erected… Thus Moses finished the work…Then the cloud covered the tent of meeting, and the glory of YHVH filled the tabernacle. Moses was not able to enter the tent of meeting because the cloud had settled on it, and the glory of YHVH filled the tabernacle” (Exodus 40:1-2, 17, 33-35).

A little bit of joy on the Day of Atonement?

It may surprise some that the Bible mentions blowing a shofar on Yom Kippur in only one verse. It’s found in the Book of Leviticus as part of a discussion about the Year of Jubilee (a joyous occasion) when once every fifty years each individual Israeli gets all his debts forgiven and wiped off the books:

“And you shall sound the blast of a shofar on the tenth of the month of the seventh month. On the Day of Atonement you shall sound a shofar throughout all your land. You shall thus consecrate the fiftieth year and proclaim a release through the land to all its inhabitants. It shall be a jubilee for you, and each of you shall return to his own property, and each of you shall return to his family” (Leviticus 25:9-10).

Jewish Blues - afflicting one’s soul is part of reason for the season

YHVH spoke to Moses about the Day of Atonement which comes ten days after the Feast of Trumpets. “You shall afflict your souls…For any person who does not afflict his soul on that same day shall be cut off from his people” (Numbers 23:26-29).

Here is a serious commandment which also carries a serious punishment for its violation. These few verses in the Book of Numbers are the main source for the Jewish people’s somber and subdued approach to the shofar and to these two holy convocations. The Feast of Trumpets kicks off a ten-day corridor to the Day of Atonement, when it was hoped that Israel’s national sins would be forgiven. Though there was much joy in the celebration of the Feast of Trumpets, there was an awareness that the Fast of Yom Kippur was on its way.

Every fifty years the Day of Atonement ended with a shofar blast, declaring the wiping away of a nation’s fiscal debt. This was an economic picture of something spiritual – how YHVH had only moments before this, covered, made atonement for and ‘wiped away’ the sin of the Jewish people (see Zechariah 3:1-5). The national response was a sober heart filled with humble thanks to God. After the shofar blast, that heart would now blossom with overflowing joy. The gates of praise swung open as the entire Jewish nation began preparations for the pilgrim feast of Sukkot, the Harvest Feast better known as Tabernacles.

Divine shofars

The Bible connects trumpets and shofars to some powerful contexts – past, present and future:

As the High Holiday season draws near, it encourages our souls to remember all these shofar-related events. The shofar gives voice to our praise and our intercession. It accompanies our request for God to remember Israel in times of war (Numbers 10:9) and to visit our spiritual gatherings (Numbers 10:7). It is His clarion call to the Jewish people, emphasizing that YHVH never forgets a promise.

How should we then pray?

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal or credit card) through: www.davidstent.org

The Gilded Exile

“God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble. Therefore we will not fear even though the earth be removed, and though the mountains be carried into the midst of the sea, though its waters roar and be troubled, though the mountains shake with its swelling…” (Psalm 46:1-3).

When natural destructions surge across the face of the planet, the God of Jacob is our refuge (Psalm 46:7, 11). And His eye is not only on the sparrow; it focuses with special favor on the safety of the Jewish people and on His promises to them:

Many waters cannot quench God’s love for the Jewish people (Song of Solomon 8:15) – whether it be the roaring of flash floods or even the chest-tightening threats of Middle Eastern nations and world superpowers (Jeremiah 51:15).

 By the rivers of Babylon

“By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat down and wept when we remembered Zion…How can we sing YHVH’s song in a foreign land?” (Psalm 137:1, 4).

The anguish of Jewish captivity in Babylon echoes deep within the belly of the psalmist. It hurt to see his people imprisoned among the nations. The response of God’s heart was to breathe out a prophetic vision – the final return of the Jewish people to YHVH’s Jerusalem and to Zion’s God.

The Exile which so disturbed the psalmist began with the ethnic cleansing of Jewish Samaria by the Assyrians (approximately 722 BC) and of Jewish Judah by the Babylonians (approximately 586 BC). Violent Greek attempts at forced assimilation followed (approximately 168 BC) through Antiochus IV Epiphanes.  A penultimate zenith was the Roman destruction of Jerusalem and her Temple in 70 AD. Mass enslavement and further scattering across the Mediterranean Basin were another segment of the bitter fruit of Exile. Finally, the jihadi invasion, conquest and resettling of the Land of Israel by Muslims (approximately 638 AD) attempted once and for all to cut the historical connection between the Promised Land and God’s Jewish people (see Psalm 105:5-15, 42-44; Ezekiel 36:1-12).

The fullness of the prophet’s vision – the complete regathering of the Jewish people – is yet future (see Ezekiel 39:27-29). To this very day the majority of the Jewish people are living in the Exile, outside of the Land of Israel. Though the gates of Zion did swing open to Jacob’s scattered children nearly seventy years ago, less than one third of the wandering sheep of Israel have made it home so far.

Exile – one can get used to it

“And they wandered about from nation to nation, from one kingdom to another people…” (Psalm 105:13).

The original fear of mankind after Noah’s Flood was that God would dislodge them from the safety of the Plain of Shinar and scatter them across the face of the earth: “Let us make for ourselves a name, otherwise we will be scattered abroad over the face of the whole earth” (Genesis 11:4). Simeon and Levi’s punishment for dishonoring Jacob was to be scattered among the nation of Israel and not have a tribal inheritance (Genesis 49:7). The Jewish people’s disobedience to God’s Mosaic Covenant would lead to worldwide scattering, an Exile of global proportions (Leviticus 26:32-39; Deuteronomy 4:26-28; 28:63-68).

We Jewish people have found ourselves traveling from land to land, across seas and oceans, for the better part of 2,700 years. At times we were able to make it back to our homeland, as in the days of Hillel the Elder, Joseph and Mary, and David Ben-Gurion. But many Jews, often the majority, stayed in the Exile and did not return home to Judah, like Mordecai and Esther.

A total of perhaps 50,000 Jews returned to the Land of Israel (see Ezra 2:64-65) in the first main wave of aliyah led by Zerubbavel, while Ezra and later Nehemiah brought perhaps 5,000 Hebrew returnees (though see Nehemiah 7:66-67). The majority of the Jewish exiles remained in Persia and Babylon (modern Iran and Iraq) for another 2,500 years.

Jeremiah had given short-term instructions for the original Jewish exiles to Babylon – settle in for a longer season than you might have wanted:

Jeremiah’s instructions were not supposed to have a 2,000 year shelf life, however – only for 70 years: “For thus says YHVH, When seventy years have been completed for Babylon, I will visit you and fulfill My good word to you, to bring you back to this place. For I know the plans that I have for you, declares YHVH, plans for welfare and not for calamity to give you a future and a hope” (Jeremiah 29:10-11).

The Jewish community of Babylon got comfortable in Babylon and ending up staying there en masse until 1951-52 AD, when EL AL Israel Airlines conducted Operation Ezra and Nehemiah.  Between 120,000 and 130,000 Iraqi Jews were airlifted in a secret operation back to the Promised Land (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Ezra_and_Nehemiah).  At that time the state of Israel printed and distributed a manifesto calling on Iraq’s Jews to immigrate. The handbill started with the following words: “O, Zion, flee, daughter of Babylon,”  (Isaiah 48:20; Zechariah 12:7) and concluded thus: “Jews! Israel is calling you – come out of Babylon!” (Jeremiah 51:6).

Covenant fears

Moyshe Rabbenu (Yiddish for Moses our Teacher) prophesied that Jewish existence in the Exile would involve constant persecution and insecurity.

Many Jewish people saw our entire Exilic existence as a continual fleeing from one country to another. When Crusaders began to slaughter the Jewish people in medieval France or the Rhine Valley, the Hebrew nation edged its way eastward to Poland, the Ukraine and Russia. When pogroms and massacres broke out in Kiev, Warsaw and Odessa (1881-84), or again in Kishinev, Odessa and 62 other towns and 626 villages between 1903-1906 (mostly in the Ukraine, Bessarabia and Crimea), vast numbers of Jews fled toward the closest or most secure possibilities of shelter – westward in the direction of Western Europe. But even more sons and daughters of Israel held their breath and crossed the Atlantic in steerage to North and South America – di goldeneh medineh (Yiddish for ‘the Golden Land’).

During that period (1880-1920) over two million Jews immigrated to the United States (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_the_United_States#Immigration_of_Central_and_Eastern_European_Jews). At the same time (1882-1914) a total of 75,000 Jews migrated to Turkish-controlled Palestine.  After the British liberated Palestine from the Muslim Turks, the Mandatory authorities did whatever was in Whitehall’s power to crush Jewish immigration and stop Hebrew refugees from arriving in the Land of Israel (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aliyah_Bet; www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/british-restrictions-on-jewish-immigration-to-palestine).

“I’m sure things will get better”

There is a famous quote in the movie Schindler’s List when the Jews of Kraków had been moved by the Nazis into the Plaszow work camp. Some of them are standing around an empty oil barrel/ primitive fire pit, with scrap wood burning to warm their hands. “It can’t get any worse than this. This is as bad as it’s going to get!” says one Jewish man. In the next scene it gets excruciatingly worse.

This scenario underscores how people will often remain in hard or even destructive situations, believing that somehow things will get better. Jewish people have the same hopes. Many stayed in countries where they were being oppressed, tortured or murdered, believing that sunny skies were right around the corner.

Iranian Jews in 1978 watched as the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini ascended to his terror rule over the Islamic Republic of Iran. Many Iranian Jews (like Iraq’s Babylonian Jewish community) spoke of Cyrus (II) the Great as a defender and protector of the Jewish community since 550 BC. Nothing bad could possibly happen in Iran, they thought. It will soon blow over.

Today the Jews of Western Europe (France, Britain, Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, etc.) are feeling the tremors which come prior to the big earthquakes. Anti-Semitic attacks, anti-Zionist attacks, Islamist terror attacks on Jews – they are all growing by leaps and bounds.

An excellent Israeli series on these trends (with a strong prophetic undertone) is available on YouTube:

The Charlottesville Nazi-Antifa clashes have highlighted the rise of fascism in both white supremacist and leftist/anarchist manifestations. Many American Jews are beginning to ask if what happened in Nazi and Communist Europe could happen in the West and especially in North America.

Life is not easy in Israel

It is exciting to see how many Jewish people are making aliyah and moving to Israel. But not all is pink champagne. At same time, over the past years (1949-2015) between 250,000 and 750,00 Israelis have left the Jewish homeland. Some common reasons for emigration include the high cost of living, a desire to escape from the ongoing violence and the Arab–Israeli conflict, professional or academic ambitions, and disappointment with Israeli society.

It has been said that the children of pioneers did not ask to be pioneers. Many of the children or grandchildren of the original Zionist pioneers and idealists do not have a biblical perspective on what God is doing in restoring the Jewish people to their homeland. They do not know of the coming challenges, victories and trials ahead. They have never heard of the mighty army of Ezekiel 37:9-11, or that all Israel will be saved (Romans 11:26-29; Jeremiah 31:31-34).

The gilded call of the Exile is still attractive to many Israelis. And many Jewish people who live in the West still feel that the Jewish homeland is not necessarily their personal destiny or their calling.

As I live, declares YHVH

The God of Jacob, who reached into Egypt to rescue a slave-people, has plans of His own to set up His throne in Jerusalem. The scattering which is known as the Exile or the Diaspora (Greek word meaning dispersion) is coming to an end. God will purify His people. He will cleanse them. He will restore them. It will not be a restoration of a Russian Jewish culture (like Fiddler on the Roof). It will not be a renaissance of a Rabbinic Judaism crafted in Babylon on the banks of the Euphrates and then sprinkled with Messianic holy water. It will be so powerful that one could call it ‘a New Exodus.’

Fishers, hunters and assorted anti-Semites

A Communist revolutionary mother once told her son, “Come the Revolution, there will be a chicken in every pot!” The young boy answered, “But mom, I don’t like chicken!” Unperturbed, the mother declared, “Come the Revolution, you will like chicken!”

In a similar way, though right now some Jewish people don’t like the thought of moving back to Israel, the day will come when all Jews will not only like that thought, but will actually speed their way to their own Promised Homeland. “When I bring them back from the peoples and gather them from the lands of their enemies, then I shall be sanctified through them in the sight of the many nations. Then they will know that I am YHVH their God because I made them go into exile among the nations, and then gathered them again to their own land; and I will leave none of them there any longer” (Ezekiel 39:27-28).

Jeremiah prophesies that YHVH will bring His Jewish people back to their own land and end the Exile. He will also use the nations to complete this process, whether by hook or by crook, with a carrot or with a stick.

Point seven on God’s Richter scale

How should we then pray?

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal) through: www.davidstent.org

Iron and clay, whirlwind and Jews

The leader of the world’s greatest superpower was awakened by a disturbing dream. Nebuchadnezzar’s “spirit was troubled and his sleep left him” (Daniel 2:1).  The dream was burning with significance, but its interpretation was hidden from him. The whole matter filled the king with foreboding. Nebuchadnezzar was going through a meltdown with no one to help him.

The king gave his advisors a choice – get supernatural revelation about the dream and its meaning or be put to death! With a probable sentence of death hanging over Babylon’s political and spiritual counsellors, Daniel and his friends interceded before YHVH. The God of Jacob gave Daniel the revelation he needed in the nick of time. Daniel went to Nebuchadnezzar and declared, “As for the mystery about which the king has inquired, neither wise men, conjurers, magicians nor diviners are able to declare it to the king. However, there is a God in heaven who reveals mysteries, and He has made known … what will take place” (Daniel 2:27-28).

God’s wake-up call to the king of Babylon began with the truth that the God of Israel is sovereign even over the affairs of superpowers and super-kings. “Let the name of God be blessed forever and ever, for wisdom and power belong to Him. It is He who changes the times and the epochs. He removes kings and establishes kings. He gives wisdom to wise men and knowledge to men of understanding. It is He who reveals the profound and hidden things. He knows what is in the darkness, and the light dwells with Him” (Daniel 2:19-22).

Whatever the challenges, whatever the shakings, the God of Jacob already knows the answer. He already has the solution.

A brittle state of the union

The top-secret revelation Daniel had received was future in scope. A list of empires would arise after mighty Babylon’s demise. The fourth in line (verse 40) was described as having toes made of a mixture of iron and clay (verse 33), referring to the partly strong /partly brittle nature of that kingdom (verses 42-43). That empire would suffer from a lack of internal unity and cohesion. At one point this kingdom would even undergo a painful division (verse 41).

But that fourth kingdom would also fade. Only after that would the final kingdom be inaugurated. The Messianic throne of David’s Greater Son would be established in Jerusalem and would reign over all nations. “In the days of those kings the God of heaven will set up a kingdom which will never be destroyed, and that kingdom will not be left for another people. It will crush and put an end to all these kingdoms, but it will itself endure forever” (Daniel 2:44; see also Isaiah 2:1-5).

Inherit the whirlwind

The biblical history of humankind continues to emphasize one consistent point: when mankind abandons God and His principles, the result is the collapse of society. From Cain to the corruption of Noah’s day, from the one-world false unity of Babel’s Tower to Sodom and Gomorrah’s fiery end – the Scriptural record drives home the message that “righteousness exalts a nation but sin is a reproach to any people” (Proverbs 14:34).

In 1190 AD a cleric in the medieval court of Philippe of Alsace (the Count of Flanders) is quoted as having said “Rome ne s’est pas faite en un jour” (Rome was not built in a day). The construction of that mighty city and the zenith of its empire took place over a thousand year period. But Rome’s collapse happened rather quickly, as charted in Edward Gibbon’s masterpiece The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.

One could add other empires to this list – like the British Empire. England had been granted a golden opportunity to bless and protect the Jewish people in 1917. Yet the divine invitation was spurned at the highest levels of its political and military command structure. Britain repeatedly violated Genesis 12:3, which proclaims that the blessing or cursing of the Jewish people is the international key to divine favor or judgment. Within approximately thirty years the British Empire was no longer.

The prophet Hosea spoke a similar warning to his own people. His words have relevance to each of our countries today.

When a country abandons God’s ways and word to establish its own – when materialism, secularism, rebellion, hatred and violence characterize its populace – these sad choices bring on traumatic shaking and agonizing barrenness. When a nation mocks the biblical principles regarding the shedding of innocent blood (Genesis 9:6; Numbers 35:33; Deuteronomy 19:10) or the divine foundations of marriage and sexual identity (Genesis 1:27; Matthew 19:4-6; Leviticus 18:22: 20:13; 1 Corinthians 6:9-10; 1 Timothy 1:9-11), the result is a spiritual ‘termite infestation’ which leads to social and spiritual collapse of a country’s foundations.

A house divided against itself

In civil war, a nation turns on itself. It is similar to how cancerous cells attack and destroy healthy cells in a human body.

Israel’s Messiah Yeshua Son of David once said, “If a kingdom is divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand. If a house is divided against itself, that house will not be able to stand” (Mark 3:24-25).

Many people in the Western world in general, and in the United States of America in particular, are horrified to witness the quickly widening cracks in their national foundations. The bedrock of biblical principles has been mocked and jettisoned. In their place the hydra-like heads of idolatrous materialism, sexual uncleanness, spiritual rebellion and anti-Semitism are rising up in preparation for a fateful battle royal.

A violent spirit of division

In late February 1848 a small booklet by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels was published in London’s Bishopsgate. Destined to become one of the world’s most influential political documents, its German title was Manifest der kommunistischen Partei (‘The Communist Manifesto’).

Its two opening sentences were riveting: “A specter is haunting Europe – the specter of communism. All the powers of old Europe have entered into a holy alliance to exorcise this specter” (“Ein Gespenst geht um in Europa  ‐ das Gespenst des Kommunismus. Alle Mächte des alten Europa haben sich zu einer heiligen Hetzjagd gegen dies Gespenst verbündet”). Marx and Engels presented their German revolutionary proposal following on the heels of the French Revolution’s Reign of Terror  – “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.” This small manifesto would create earthquakes of division in both Europe and in Russia.

Classical Marxism (Communist political theory) prophesied that European nations would eventually be ripped in two, divided by the revolutionary spirit of Communism.

Violence was seen by these political architects as a foreordained means of establishing a Communist society.

Fascist violence in Germany

Street violence in pursuit of revolutionary social change was to become a very European phenomenon. The rise of violent gangs whose goal was to ‘reclaim the streets’ was one of the main expressions of the mounting struggle between Communists and Nazis for the soul of Germany.

Here are quotes from Hitler himself and from the official pamphlet of the SA (Sturmabteilung – storm troopers, often known as ‘brownshirts’) along with the Nuremberg Trials file numbers (https://archive.org/stream/naziconspiracyag02unit/naziconspiracyag02unit_djvu.txt; https://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/chap15_part04.asp):

The present-day torch processions, thuggish marching and anti-Jewish/anti-Black threats of Nazis, neo-Nazis, KKK white supremacists and alt-right supporters in Charlottesville, Virginia shows that Hitler’s vision of fascist revolution through control of the streets lives on in the evil thoughts of these movements’ activists.

Communist violence in Germany

At the same time as the Nazis were rising to dictatorial power in Germany, the Communists also saw street fighting as a key to the triumph of their own cause. Under the leadership of Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg, the KPD (Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands – the Communist Party of Germany) was committed to spearheading a violent revolution in Germany, and during 1919 and 1920 violent attempts were made to seize control of the government.

The Roter Frontkämpferbund (Alliance of Red Front Fighters, also known as Rotfront – www.dhm.de/lemo/kapitel/weimarer-republik/innenpolitik/roter-frontkaempferbund.html) was formed in 1923 and was active until 1933 when it was banned (https://libcom.org/history/beating-fascists-german-communists-political-violence-1929-1933-eve-rosenhaft; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roter_Frontk%C3%A4mpferbund). The Communist youth street fighting Roter Jungsturm (Red Youth Storm) was renamed as Rote Jungfront (Red Youth Front) in 1925. These groups provided security for Communist events and also participated in active agitation. But since the Nazis’ street violence was more brutal and their movement more popular, most of the Red Fighters’ work involved fighting off Nazi and police attacks.  Street clashes between Communists and Nazis were commonplace during that time, when Nazi flags clashed with red flags on the streets of Germany.

Violent clashes erupted when Nazi shock troops and Communist shock troops fought for control of the German streets.

The most popular slogan of the Roter Frontkämpferbund was “Beat the fascists wherever you encounter them!” The SA would chant, “The red front – break them to pieces!” or “The red front - beat them to a pulp!” After the Nazis completed their takeover of Germany, the Red Front Fighters were jailed, tortured and many were murdered. Others escaped to fight in the Spanish Civil War or in the Soviet Army.

Modern radical violence in Europe

Street fighting received a PR boost through Mick Jagger and Keith Richard’s hit song “Street Fighting Man” of 1968. The song was inspired by violence Jagger had seen while attending the anti-Vietnam War demonstration at London’s Grosvenor Square across from the US Embassy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protests_of_1968; www.theguardian.com/world/2008/may/21/1968theyearofrevolt.antiwar) as well as by media reports concerning the Paris Student riots (www.nytimes.com/2008/05/11/world/europe/11iht-paris.4.12777919.html?mcubz=3; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/May_1968_events_in_France). The Rolling Stones’ catalytic anthem reflected the return of street riots to the Western world.

Anarchist-led riots at the G7, G8 and G20 summit meetings like Genoa in 2001 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/27th_G8_summit) and Hamburg in 2017 (www.dw.com/en/hamburg-g20-riot-damages-run-into-millions/a-39745157; https://edition.cnn.com/2017/07/08/europe/g20-protests/index.html) as well as other major world cities are one of the metastasized results of these expressions. Up to 200,000 participants were involved in these demonstrations. Rioters threw Molotov bombs, attacked police and armed forces, destroyed property as well as other acts of violence. The anarchistic and Communist nature of these riots and demonstrations shows no sign of letting up in days to come.

Modern radical violence in the USA

Americans have witnessed anarchist/leftist riots at the World Trade Organization and ‘G’ summits (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_bloc; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_Seattle_WTO_protests). Recent anarchist attacks have focused on the President of the United States (www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/20/anti-donald-trump-activists-try-block-access-inauguration/; https://edition.cnn.com/2017/01/19/politics/trump-inauguration-protests-womens-march/; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DisruptJ20).

One striking manifestation of violent civil unrest is connected to the movement known as Antifa (www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2017/08/economist-explains-11). Its name refers to its self-designation as anti-fascistic. This amorphous movement attacks targets which they define as connected to capitalism, racism, authoritarianism, patriarchal organizations, ‘heteronormals’ and white supremacists. Their loose self-definition seeks “the elimination of racism, sexism, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, homophobia, transphobia, and discrimination against disabled people, the oldest, the youngest, and the most oppressed people” as well as the creation of “a free [and] classless society.”

Though Antifa tends to be strongly against fascist and anti-Semitic public events, Mark Bray (a lecturer on human rights and politics at Dartmouth College and author of the forthcoming book “Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook”) notes in a recent Jewish Telegraph Agency article:

“The threat posed by the ‘alt-right’ in the context of empowerment through Trump made a lot of people concerned about fascist, neo-Nazi, white supremacist violence, They turned to the Antifa model as one option to resist it. The option of physically confronting these groups has spread among the left and been normalized” … “Bray said that while anti-Zionism is not a focus of Antifa, many members tend to be anti-Zionist as part of their far-left activism. Anti-Racist Action groups, he said, had taken part in anti-Zionist events in the past” (www.jta.org/2017/08/16/news-opinion/united-states/what-you-need-to-know-about-antifa-the-group-that-fought-white-supremacists-in-charlottesville)

The Berlin Jewish branch of Antifa would actually be classified as within the anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist stream:

“We believe that anti-Zionism … has no anti-Semitic aspects…We see the ‘Jewish State’ as a racist and discriminatory term…We express solidarity with the BDS movement…We express solidarity with For Palestine. Their uncompromising stand and vision for the decolonization of Palestine and toward a democratic and secular one state solution which includes the right of return for all Palestinian refugees and their families is an inspiration for us…The Palestinian struggle for liberation, freedom and justice should be the center of discussion in the Left around the world and in Germany specifically” (https://jewishantifaberlin.wordpress.com/about-us/)

Summing up street violence in the USA

Street violence in recent American history include events related to:

The widening cracks and growing fault-lines within American society show potential for civil war. We live in sobering times.

“Then I saw when the Lamb broke one of the seven seals, and I heard one of the four living creatures saying as with a voice of thunder, “Come.” I looked, and behold… (w)hen He broke the second seal, I heard the second living creature saying, “Come.” And another, a red horse, went out. And to him who sat on it, it was granted to take peace from the earth, and that men would slay one another. And a great sword was given to him” (Revelation 6:1-4)

Satanic strategies and anti-Semitism

“I have come to cast fire upon the earth; and how I wish it were already kindled! But I have a baptism to undergo, and how distressed I am until it is accomplished! Do you suppose that I came to grant peace on earth? I tell you, no, but rather division; for from now on five members in one household will be divided, three against two and two against three. They will be divided, father against son and son against father, mother against daughter and daughter against mother, mother-in-law against daughter-in-law and daughter-in-law against mother-in-law” (Luke 12:49-53).

The quickly approaching day of Yeshua’s return will not be accompanied by an amazing outbreak of world peace, rose-colored glasses and positive confession. Yeshua Himself speaks of division reaching even into the sacrosanct family unit. The Day of His Coming will not be a day of peace but a day of war. And most followers of Yeshua are spiritually not yet prepared.

The Jewish people have a heightened sense of history and an attenuated sensitivity to anti-Semitic manifestations. The 20th century has made it clear to the Jewish nation that the greatest sources of anti-Jewish actions and atrocities have come from three wellsprings – Nazism, Communism and Islamism.

In 1993 my wife Rachel had a troubling dream. The scene of the dream was in rural Kansas, in the dark of night. Rachel found herself standing in a convenience store whose shelves were nearly empty of food. There was the feeling that great evil was afoot, that economic collapse had happened, and that it was not safe to wander around. Many people had guns, and heavily-armed gangs roamed through the land. There was no government. The atmosphere was full of danger and death. A dark shadowy figure said to Rachel, “All this chaos, breakdown and no food in the stores is because of the Jews. They are the ones to blame.”  In her dream Rachel needed to find me (I am of course a Jewish man) and get me away from there. In that dream it was not safe to be a Jew in America.

Intense intercession to counteract the curse of Genesis 12:3

The Nazi and KKK marched through the streets of Charlottesville, Virginia, cursing and threatening the Jewish people. Their smirks conjured up images from Hitler’s Europe. Anti-Jewish words and deeds trigger the powerful protective blessing and cursing which YHVH spoke over Abraham and his Jewish descendants in Genesis 12:3. “Those who bless you, I will bless” says YHVH. “And the one who mocks/disdains you, him I will curse.” The Hebrew verb here meqalelecha refers to mocking, disdaining or treating the people in question (i.e., the Jewish people) as insignificant. Speaking curses, mockery and condemnation of the Jewish people by any group activates this covenantal clause.

How should we then pray?

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal) through: www.davidstent.org

Pickin’ up the pieces on the Temple Mount

Jerusalem’s Temple Mount is once again in the headlines.

On July 14 a four-man Islamist terror squad smuggled sub-machine guns and knives onto the Mountain where Solomon’s and Herod’s Temple once stood – a religious site holy to Judaism and Islam. Three of the four then attacked and murdered two Israeli police officers of Arab Druze origin who had been guarding the entrance gates and insuring safe passage for Muslim, Christian and Jewish pilgrims. The terrorists were Arab Muslims from the Jabarin family in Umm al-Fahm, an Arab municipality within Israel located between Haifa and Jenin. They had been radicalized by virulent anti-Israeli Islamist agitation in their home-town madrasa (Islamic religious school). The three terrorists who carried out the attack were taken down by an IDF rapid response team.

The smuggling of weapons onto a religious site and the murder of peace officers would be considered  a severe terror attack for any country – unless (from the jihadi perspective) the smugglers are jihadi and those being attacked are Jewish or Israeli citizens. Such a double standard is par for the course in fundamentalist Islamist circles (like Taliban, ISIS and Hamas) but it is also de rigeur in what are considered ‘moderate’ and pro-Western Muslim states like Jordan.

The Speaker of the Jordanian House of Representatives Atef Tarawneh spoke of the three terrorists in the July 16 session: “We pray for our martyrs, who have watered the pure soil of Palestine [with their blood]. We can raise our heads high because of the sacrifices of the Palestinian youths, who still struggle on behalf of our nation…Behold, the Palestinian youth form the necklace of martyrdom out of the beads of their lives and their great sacrifices. They are alive, sustained by their Lord. May Allah have mercy upon our youths from the Jabarin family, whose relatives are worthy of pride and glory, even if the occupation hates it and its oppression runs amok. My colleagues, the attacks by the Israeli occupation against the most holy place in Jerusalem – against al-Aqsa and against the holy Haram of Jerusalem – will remain cause for the continuation of the resistance, which will not subside in the face of injustice and tyranny” (https://www.memri.org/tv/jordan-parliament-prays-for-souls-jerusalem-terror-attack-perpetrators; footage from this session was posted on the Jordanian Parliament's YouTube channel on July 16, 2017 though later removed).

Terrorists against counter-terrorism

Israeli law enforcement’s rapid response included setting up surveillance cameras (CCTVs) and metal detectors close to the major entrances of the Temple Mount.

Such cameras and detectors are commonly found outside of many mosques in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Dubai, India and some areas of Russia. In Mecca all pilgrims to the hajj pass through metal detectors as well as past the watchful eyes of over 5,000 CCTV cameras. In Jerusalem all Jewish and Christian visitors to the Western Wall plaza, and all visitors in Hebron’s Tomb of the Patriarchs have been subject to metal detector and CCTV examination for years. The same is true for most airport travelers worldwide since 9/11.

But within a few hours of Israel’s counter-terrorism responses, Islamist terror spinmeisters kidnapped the world’s media: “Israel is violating the status quo and defiling the sacrosanct nature of an Islamic holy site,” they declared. “This is part of a sinister Zionist strategy to destroy Islam.”

These talking points instantly became the cause célèbre of the Muslim world and of media outlets from Al Jazeera to CNN. Attention was quickly turned away from the mosque-based jihadi murders of Israeli policemen. Instead the subject morphed into how Israel was supposedly violating sacrosanct Islamic grounds. This swift manipulation of mass media echoes a famous Arabic proverb, “First he hits me and then he cries!”

Never wasting an opportunity to waste an opportunity, the Hamas branch of the Muslim Brotherhood called on all Muslims to launch an intifada, a ‘day of rage’ against all Israelis everywhere in the world.

“May you be forever - Islamic!”

From the classic Muslim viewpoint, any territory once conquered by jihadi forces is considered forever Islamic, whether it be Jerusalem, Spain, Serbia or southern Russia. The jihadi take is that such areas must be controlled by Islam in perpetuity, and it is a religious travesty for non-Muslims to exercise any sovereignty over those regions. Osama bin Laden’s al Qa’eda descriptions of the 9/11 attacks as a justified Islamist response to the presence of American troops in the Arabian Peninsula is one of the better-known expressions of this mindset.

According to the Quran, the waqf principle is not limited only to Israel’s Temple Mount or Spain’s Toledo. The jihadi army must conquer the entire world and force it to bow the knee to Allah: “Fight then against them until there is no strife and the religion is entirely Allah’s” (see Quran, Surah 8:39-42). Though the flashpoint of the battle may today be Jerusalem’s Temple Mount, from a classical Islamic End of Days perspective the jihadi battle will spread to the whole world (America and Europe included) before coming back full circle to triumph in the Middle East.

Jihad, Jews and the Temple Mount

A brief historical background about Islamist perspectives concerning the Jewish Temple Mount:

Muhammad actually never set foot on the soil of the Promised Land, dying in Medina in 632 AD.  Sixty years later in 691-692 AD the now-golden Dome of the Rock came ‘on-line’ in Jerusalem, while the black-domed al-Aqsa mosque was completed in 701 AD.

During the centuries of Islamist rule in the Land of Israel (637-1099, 1187-1917), Jews were forbidden from going up onto the Temple Mount, but were allowed to gather in a small area near one of the retaining walls of the compound which later became known as the Wailing Wall (today, the Western Wall). The cramped area granted for Jewish prayer was to be physical proof of how totally the sons of Jacob had been vanquished by the army of Muhammad.

In later years an Islamist tradition developed that Muhammad rode a mythical horse named al-Buraq (which had wings and a beautiful female face) in the year 620 AD, taking his legendary ‘night journey and ascension’ (in Arabic  al-’Isrā’ wal-Mi‘rāj) to the ‘distant masjid or mosque’ (in Arabic  al-Masjidi 'l-’Aqṣá); Quran 17:1, Surat al-Isrā’).

But in 620 AD (the year of Muhammad’s purported flying visit to the Temple Mount), Islamist jihadi forces had not yet invaded any country. The initial jihadi battles were exploding in the region currently called Saudi Arabia. Only in 633 AD was Syria invaded. The land of Israel was not conquered until 638 AD. At that time the local population was not Arab, but made up of Jews and Byzantine Christians.  There were no Muslims in Israel and no mosques either. So the al-Aqsa mosque referred to in Quran 17:1 referred to a site perhaps in the Medina area. As to whether or not a mythological horse actually flew Muhammad to that location in Medina – this is a matter of Islamic belief.

According to this later Islamic legend, Muhammad flew to Jerusalem and tied his horse to the area beside where the Jewish people prayed – the Wailing or Western Wall. That small alcove was ‘christened’ al-Buraq by later Muslims.

Islamist jurors eventually requisitioned that whole area as waqf as part of their attempt to replace and invalidate Jewish connections with the Temple Mount. The first historical description of the al-Buraq mosque on the Temple Mount comes from 1689 in the writings of Sufi scholar Abd al-Ghani al-Nabulsi after his visit to Jerusalem.

During the era of the Turkish Caliphate (1517-1917 AD) an absolute ban on non-Muslim access to the Temple Mount was in force.

After the British armies marched in to Jerusalem on December 9, 1917, General Allenby cabled the British War Cabinet stating, “The Mosque of Omar and the area round it has been placed under Moslem control…Orders have been issued that no non-Moslem is to pass this cordon without permission of the Military Governor and the Moslems in charge of the mosque” (https://filestore.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pdfs/small/cab-23-4-wc-296-70.pdf).

England established a Supreme Muslim Council (al-Majlis al-Islami al-A'ala) to administer the waqf and the Shari’a religious courts. But no revolutionary thoughts of religious ‘liberty for the Jewish captives’ would be drawn up by Whitehall, in stark contrast to what Napoleon I declared as he approached the Land of Israel in 1799:

Au contraire, Article 13 of the League of Nations Mandatory Charter given to Britain in 1922 denied the United Kingdom’s right to interfere with the Temple Mount site or with the administration of ‘purely Muslim holy places:’ “Nothing in this mandate shall be construed as conferring upon the Mandatory authority to interfere with the fabric or the management of purely Moslem sacred shrines, the immunities of which are guaranteed”  (https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/palmanda.asp#art13). The King's Order-in-Council issued by the government authorities of Mandatory Palestine in 1934 also confirmed the Ottoman religious status quo. Jews were forbidden from accessing the Temple Mount, which was now considered by Christians to be an exclusively Muslim holy place.

“Britain captured this holy site from the Ottoman Empire in World War I and received an international mandate to manage it and the rest of Palestine on behalf of its inhabitants. Britain’s goal in this overwhelmingly Arab land was to create both a self-governing state and a national home for the Jewish people. The inherent contradictions underlying this regime led to its ultimate collapse in 1948, when the British fled the country ‘amid bloodshed, chaos, recrimination and ignominy’” (Bernard Wasserstein, Divided Jerusalem: The Struggle for the Holy City, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008, page 82).

A contemporaneous British Christian writer expressed his anger at Britain’s realpolitik submissiveness to Islam. “To permit a false religion to hold sway in ‘the city of the Lord’ (Matt. 5:35), or any other portion of the Holy Land, would be to thwart and countermine God’s set purpose, and be altogether contrary to His plans regarding the earth and man upon it” (Frank G. Jannaway, Palestine and the World; London: Maranatha Press, 1922; pages 232-233).

Stampeding Islamist riots on the Temple Mount

Haj Amin al-Husseini had been a teacher at the Rashidiya school, near Herod's Gate in East Jerusalem, He was one of the instigators of the April 1920 Nebi Musa riots outside of Jerusalem, virulently renouncing the 1917 Balfour Declaration (which was favorable to the establishment of a Jewish national home).  That riot saw six Jews murdered and 216 Jews injured (of them 18 critically) by Arab mobs. About 300 Jews were evacuated from the Old City of Jerusalem at that time. Al-Husseini was charged by the British with inciting Jerusalem’s Arab crowds and was sentenced in absentia to 10-years imprisonment by a military court. He fled to Syria after the riots, but was welcomed back by the British and appointed as Grand Mufti of Jerusalem in 1921.

Here is a quotation from a 1922 Arabic leaflet penned by Sheikh Abd al-Qadir al-Muzaffar entitled Public Call to the Muslim People from your Brethren, the Muslims of Jerusalem and the Rest of Palestine: “The Zionist body which is trying to create a Jewish kingdom in Palestine, dreams of taking from us the al-Aqsa Mosque, built upon the ruins of Solomon’s temple, and of reconstructing their temple...”  (An Aesthetic Occupation: The Immediacy of Architecture and the Palestine Conflict, by Daniel Bertand Monk, Duke University Press, 2002, page 83).

On Yom Kippur, September 1928, the makeshift prayer area abutting the Western Wall was being used by religious Jews as an informal synagogue. The mushrooming Islamist movement insisted to the British that aged Jews were forbidden from bringing in folding chairs to sit on during times of prayer, that a mechitza or provisional dividing screen between Jewish men and women was not also allowed, and that the shofar or ram’s horn could not be blown at the Jewish High Holidays.

Islamist authorities described the screens as violating the Ottoman status quo that forbade Jews from making any ‘construction’ at the Western Wall area. British Commissioner for Jerusalem Edward Keith-Roach insisted on the screen’s removal due to these Muslim demands. When the Jewish shamash (beadle)  failed to remove the screen quickly enough, ten armed thugs were dispatched by Islamist leadership to attack the worshippers and destroy the screen. During that hooligan attack local Arab residents shouted out “Death to the Jewish dogs!” and “Strike, strike!”

In September and October 1928 al-Husseini began to distribute leaflets throughout Mandatory Palestine and the Arab world claimed that the Jews were planning to take over the al-Aqsa Mosque. The leaflet stated that the British Mandatory Government was “responsible for any consequences of any measures which the Moslems may adopt for the purpose of defending the holy Buraq themselves in the event of the failure of the Government...to prevent any such intrusion on the part of the Jews.” A memorandum issued by the Moslem Supreme Council stated, “Having realized by bitter experience the unlimited greedy aspirations of the Jews in this respect, Moslems believe that the Jews’ aim is to take possession of the Mosque of al-Aqsa gradually on the pretense that it is the Temple.” and it advised the Jews “to stop this hostile propaganda which will naturally engender a parallel action in the whole Moslem world, the responsibility for which will rest with the Jews.”

In October 1928, the Grand Mufti began a provocative construction project on the Temple Mount platform, directly above and adjoining the Wailing Wall prayer area. Mules were deliberately driven through the Jewish area of prayer, often dropping excrement. Waste water was thrown down onto Jewish worshippers from the Temple Mount platform above. A muezzin (Muslim cantor) stationed himself straight above the Jewish prayer area to perform the Islamic call to prayer, timed to coincide exactly with Jewish prayers. These provocations increased tensions. According to Graham Harman (The Mufti and the Wailing Wall: A History of Palestine, Princeton University Press, page 230), “From 1929 onward, the Supreme Muslim Council intensified construction work on the Haram al-Sharif in order to demonstrate their exclusive claims to the Temple Mount… Not without reason, Jewish believers felt disturbed in their prayer.”

On Thursday August 15 1929, a commemoration of the Jewish Fast of the Ninth of Av occurred at the Wailing Wall, where declarations were made that the Wall was part of the history and birthright of the Jewish people. On Friday August 16 (the Islamic day of prayer), the mawlid (Arabic for the birth) or mawsin an-nabi (Arabic for ‘the feast of the prophet’) – that is, the birth of Muhammad – was celebrated on the esplanade of the Temple Mount, As the crowd came down from the Mount, they attacked the Jewish prayer area, burning prayer books, Torah scroll arks and cupboards, and destroying paper prayer notes left in the cracks of the Wall. Rioting quickly spread to the Jewish commercial area of town.

Starting on Friday August 23 (the Islamic day of prayer), thousands of Arab villagers who had been incited by bloodthirsty preaching in local mosques streamed into Jerusalem from the surrounding countryside to pray on the Temple Mount, many armed with sticks and knives. For five days violent Muslim mobs attacked Jewish communities in Jerusalem, Motza, Jaffa, Haifa and Safed. Approximately 135 Jews were murdered and 340 wounded during that period.

On Saturday August 24 Arab mobs attacked the ancient Jewish Quarter of Hebron killing and raping men, women and children and looting Jewish property. Over 65 Jews were killed and 58 were wounded. Many of the victims were mutilated, others were tortured. Most of the 116 Arab fatalities and 232 wounded throughout the British Mandate during those five days were as a result of military confrontation with British security forces.

The British Shaw Commission of Enquiry concluded, “The outbreak in Jerusalem on the 23rd of August was from the beginning an attack by Arabs on Jews for which no excuse in the form of earlier murders by Jews has been established…The fundamental cause, without which in our opinion disturbances either would not occurred or would not have been little more than a local riot, is the Arab feeling of animosity and hostility towards the Jews…” (Report of the Commission on the disturbances of August 1929, Command paper 3530; Shaw Commission report; 1930).

Islamists and Nazis – birds of a feather

Haj Amin al-Husseini later spearheaded the Arab Revolt (1936-39) which led to the death of over 300 Jews and the destruction of many Jewish farms and orchards. From the very beginning of his public life al-Husseini collaborated with:

On 30 June 1946, the Muslim Brotherhood paper al-Ikhwan al-Muslimin spoke glowingly of al-Husseini’s visit to Cairo, "The Arab hero and symbol of jihad and patience and struggle is here in Egypt.”

Haj Amin al-Husseini was a personal friend of some top Nazis:

Al-Husseini met Adolf  Hitler on November 28, 1941 (www.timesofisrael.com/full-official-record-what-the-mufti-said-to-hitler/). During that meeting Hitler clearly stated that “Germany’s objective would then be solely the destruction of the Jewish element residing in the Arab sphere under the protection of British power” (“Das deutsche Ziel würde dann lediglich die Vernichtung des im arabischen Raum unter der Protektion der britischen Macht lebenden Judentums sein”).

Assisted by Nazi Minister of Propaganda and Public Enlightenment Josef Goebbels, al-Husseini began Berlin-based Arabic-language radio broadcasts to the Middle  East in December, 1941, calling for acts of sabotage against the British as well as jihadi murder against the Jews. In one such broadcast al-Husseini urged his listeners, “Arabs! Rise as one and fight for your sacred rights. Kill the Jews wherever you find them. This pleases Allah, history and religion. This saves your honor. God is with you.”

This revealing quote is from the March 1, 1944 broadcast of Radio Berlin, quoted in Robert Wistrich, Muslim Anti-Semitism: A Clear and Present Danger. It is sourced from US Government Archives:

On June 1, 1941, during the Jewish Feast of Weeks, a pogrom (farhud – ‘violent dispossession’ in Arabic) broke out against the Jews of Baghdad, resulting in 200 Jews murdered and over 1,000 wounded. A joint Iraqi-British Commission of Enquiry concluded that al-Husseini and his Nazi propaganda radio broadcasts were the prime mover and instigator behind the slaughter.

An Islamist Auschwitz

In 1942, the same year that the Nazi High Command held its Wannsee Conference to implement the Final Solution, al-Husseini was readying Arab participation for the expected slaughter of the Jews that would accompany German victory. In close cooperation with Adolf Eichmann and an Einsatzkommando (Special Operations force and mobile killing squad) under the control of SS Obersturmbannführer Walther Rauff,  the Mufti planned to build crematoriums for the Jews in the Dothan Valley of Samaria. The testimony of Faiz Bay Idrisi, a senior Arab officer in the British Mandatory police, stated, “I remember what was said in police circles and among supporters of the Mufti in those months …Haj Amin al-Husseini’s master plan was to establish in the Dothan Valley, close to Shechem, giant crematoriums like Auschwitz, into which would be brought the Jews of Palestine, Iraq, Egypt, Yemen, Syria, Lebanon, and even North Africa, in order to slaughter them with the methods of the S.S. who operated in the death camps in Europe” (www.thetower.org/article/how-the-mufti-of-jerusalem-created-the-permanent-problem-of-palestinian-violence/).

“The Temple Mount is in our hands – kind of!”

For 19 years (May 1948 to June 1967), the Temple Mount was occupied by the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan. All Jews were exiled from Jordanian-controlled Jerusalem, while Arabs were settled in their place. Fifty-eight synagogues in the Old City were desecrated or demolished. 38,000 ancient Jewish graves on the Mount of Olives were systematically destroyed, and no Jewish burials were permitted there. The Old City of Jerusalem was now Judenrein (a Nazi term meaning ‘cleansed of Jews’). Last but not least, the Western Wall was transferred into an exclusively Islamic holy site associated with the al-Buraq legend. For more information see Jerusalem Divided: the Armistice Regime, 1947-1967, by Raphael Israeli, Psychology Press, 2002,  page 24.

On June 7, 1967 the IDF captured the Old City of Jerusalem. The Temple Mount was once again in Jewish hands after a hiatus of nearly 2,000 years. At a June 17 meeting on the Temple Mount between the then-Minister of Defense Moshe Dayan and Islamic religious authorities in Jerusalem, it was decided to permit the Jordanian Awqaf  (waqf) Ministry to continue to administer the site.

Jews and Christians were given the right to visit the Temple Mount provided that they respected Muslims' religious sensibilities, but they were not allowed to pray there. The Western Wall was to be recognized as the Jewish place of prayer. ‘Religious sovereignty’ within the Islamic compound was to remain with the Muslims while ‘overall sovereignty’ became Israel’s.  The status quo now meant that Israel would be responsible for security around the perimeter of the site, while the Jordanian-controlled Jerusalem Waqf would be responsible for events within the compound. Today, the Jerusalem Waqf controls the Temple Mount, schools, orphanages, Islamic libraries and museums, mosques, the Shari’a courts as well as many residential and commercial properties in greater Jerusalem.

In early October 1990 an announcement by a small Jewish extremist religious group (the ‘Temple Mount Faithful’) stated that the group was going to lay a cornerstone for a Third Jewish Temple on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.  On 8 October 1990, mosque loudspeakers in the Kidron Valley and on the Mount of Olives proclaimed that “al-Aqsa was in danger.” The immediate result was an Islamic riot where 17-20 Palestinians were killed and over 100 others injured (after they attacked Israeli Border Police on the Temple Mount).

According to the Israeli Report of the Commission of Inquiry into the Events on Temple Mount on 8 October 1990, “The members of the Waqf knew that the High Court had refused the Temple Mount Faithful petition to lay the cornerstone of the Third Temple, and did not respond to requests by Israel Police officers on the morning of the incident to calm the crowd. This, even after the police informed the Waqf that they would also prevent the Temple Mount Faithful, and anyone else, from visiting the area, though such visits are allowed by law… The incident itself began when, suddenly, violent and threatening calls were sounded over the loudspeakers "Allahu Akbar" [Allah is Greater], "Jihad" [Holy War], "Itbah al-Yahud" [Slaughter the Jews]). Immediately afterwards, enormous amounts of rocks, construction materials and metal objects were thrown at Israeli policemen who were present at the site. Many in the incited, rioting mob threw stones and metal objects from a very short range, and some even wielded knives. The actions of the rioters, and certainly the inciters, constituted a threat to the lives of the police, the thousands of worshippers at the Western Wall and to themselves. This was a serious criminal offense committed by masses who were incited by preachers over loudspeakers, and this is what led to the tragic chain of events ... Nineteen policemen were injured as well as nine Western Wall worshippers. According to Police statistics, 20 people were killed and 52 injured on the Temple Mount” (www.mfa.gov.il/mfa/foreignpolicy/mfadocuments/yearbook8/pages/165%20summary%20of%20a%20report%20of%20the%20commission%20of%20inqui.aspx).

Tunnel vision under the Temple Mount

On September 24, 1996 a new archeological exhibit called ‘the Rabbinic tunnel’ was opened to both the Israeli public and international tourists. It was the culmination of nearly 30 years of archeological excavations outside of the Temple Mount’s external buttress walls. A tunnel was dug outside of these supporting walls which had been constructed by Herod the Great in order to expand the workable surface of the Temple Mount. The tunnel and the retaining walls were not part of any Temple at any period in history.

Even though the tunnel was more than two football fields away from the al-Aqsa mosque and totally outside the Islamic precincts, the head of the PLO Yasser Arafat declared that the opening of the tunnel was a “big crime against our religious and holy places.” Palestinian Authority spokesman Sa’eb Erekat declared, “Well, the thing is … it was the Israelis who announced that they will open this tunnel in order to build ... a new temple now in the place of the Al-Aqsa Mosque” (CNN, September 29, 1996).

On September 24, 1996 Voice of Palestine radio urged listeners to “move immediately and effectively to face this serious criminal scheme. We appeal to them all to shoulder their religious and national responsibilities in these serious circumstances and to confront these painful incidents and tragic dangers facing holy Jerusalem” (Voice of Palestine radio from Jericho monitored by BBC, September 24, 1996, 1050 GMT).

On September 25, the Palestinian Authority and Arafat's Fatah faction brought busloads of Bir Zeit University students to attack Israeli soldiers at a checkpoint outside Ramallah. Molotov cocktails and rocks were thrown at the IDF who initially repulsed them with rubber bullets and tear gas. Whereas at other times PA police had previously prevented crowds from approaching Israeli checkpoints, this time they stood aside. As the rioting spiraled out of control, PA police joined in, firing on Israeli soldiers.

In a speech in Gaza at that time, Arafat invoked Islamic references to war, reminding the crowd that “to the believers who fight for Allah, kill and are killed, heaven is promised” (quoted in The New York Times, Oct. 4, 1996).

The rise of Sharon

On September 28, 2000, then-opposition leader of Israel Ariel Sharon visited the al-Aqsa compound accompanied by a large number of armed security guards. After Sharon left, a violent Palestinian demonstration erupted with people throwing stones and other projectiles at Israeli riot police. Police fired tear gas and rubber bullets at the crowd, injuring 24 people.

On September 29, 2000, Israel deployed 2,000 riot police to the mosque. After Friday prayers Muslims hurled stones at the police and at Jewish worshippers gathered at the Western Wall. The police then stormed the compound, firing both rubber bullets and live ammunition at the rioting Palestinians (4 killed and 200 wounded).

Israeli Arab journalist Khaled Abu Toameh reported on September 19, 2002, that the rioting and the official reason behind it were planned and fabricated in advance by the Palestinian leadership:

“Imad Faluji, the PA Communications Minister, admitted on October 11, 2001, that the violence had been planned in July, far in advance of Sharon's ‘provocation.’ He said: ‘Whoever thinks that the intifada broke out because of the despised Sharon's visit to Al-Aksa Mosque, is wrong, even if this visit was the straw that broke the back of the Palestinian people. This intifada was planned in advance, ever since President Arafat's return from the Camp David negotiations…’

More than a year later, on the first anniversary of the intifada, West Bank Fatah leader Marwan Barghouti gave an interview on October 22, 2001 to the London-based Arabic newspaper al-Sharq al-Awsat in which he admitted that he had played a direct role in igniting the intifada. He said: ‘I knew that … when Sharon reached al-Aksa Mosque, this was the most appropriate moment for the outbreak of the intifada... The night prior to Sharon's visit, I participated in a panel on a local television station and I seized the opportunity to call on the public to go to al-Aksa Mosque in the morning ... We tried to create clashes without success because of the differences of opinion that emerged with others in al-Aksa compound at the time.... After Sharon left, I remained for two hours in the presence of other people, we discussed the manner of response and how it was possible to react in all the cities and not just in Jerusalem. We contacted all [the Palestinian] factions’” (How the war began, Khaled Abu Toameh, September 19, 2002; www.mafhoum.com/press3/111P55.htm).

Close to 3,000 Palestinians and 1,000 Israelis were killed in these clashes, which lasted five years.

To view how Islamists perceive these events, see: www.aljazeera.com/programmes/aljazeeraworld/2015/11/jerusalem-dividing-al-aqsa-151110154741523.html

In light of all the above…

The recent Islamist terror attack of July 14, 2017 occurred at the conclusion of the Muslim holiday of Ramadan and close to the Jewish fast of the Ninth of Av. Murder came out of the mosque compound, and two Israeli policemen were felled in the line of duty. Israel’s robust counter-terrorist responses were then parried by massive international Islamist threats and political pressure. The false charge of a ‘Jewish attack on the sanctity of al-Aqsa mosque’ was dusted off from the ash heap of history. It exploded like fireworks throughout the world’s media outlets. And once again the Islamist sleight-of-hand worked. Israel backed down from increased confrontation for reasons known only to her top decision-makers.

Those who love Israel and believe in God’s divine hand accomplishing her restoration in our day – need to be aware of these dark machinations on the part of those who oversee the waqf of al-Aqsa and those who stir up violence among Palestinian and Muslims worldwide.

As this newsletter was going to press, I received an excellent article by a favorite writer of ours, Melanie Phillips, considering the above subject from a complementary and helpful angle. It’s titled “Incitement, lies and the strange eclipse of the Dome of the Rock.” Check it out at:

https://www.melaniephillips.com/incitement-lies-strange-eclipse-dome-rock/

How should we then pray?

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal) through: www.davidstent.org

When the thief meets the Judge

“No reason to get excited,” the thief he kindly spoke.
“There are many here among us who feel that life is but a joke.
But you and I, we've been through that and this is not our fate.
So let us not talk falsely, now. The hour is getting late.”

                (Bob Dylan, “All Along The Watchtower”, Dwarf Music © 1968, 1996)

In Malachi 3:8 the God of Israel thunders, “Will a man rob God?”… Man’s defiant response is “How have we robbed You?” This verbal interchange reminds us of the Garden of Eden, when the approach of God in the cool of the day caused mankind to run for cover. But fig leaves don’t do a good job of concealing sin and shame – never have, never will.

The Apostle Paul rang out a warning to Gentile believers in Romans 11:18, “Do not boast against the (Jewish) branches!” Yet for nearly two millennia many Gentiles in Messiah’s body have often responded with defiance, “How have we boasted against the Jewish branches?”

The robbery of the Jewish people by the nations can be distilled and defined into just a few words:

Raiding and pillaging the irrevocable gifts and callings given by YHVH to the Jewish people (see Romans 11:28-29; 3:1-2). This robbery is both physical and spiritual. It manifests in the following areas:

Stealing the Jewish homeland

The Samaritans were the first to occupy Jewish territory and claim that they were the true inheritors of the Land of Israel (see John 4:12, 20). Standing next to Samaria’s largest city, Yeshua re-affirmed the priority of Jewish calling and rejected Samaritan claims as false (John 4:21-22).

The Roman Empire conquered Judea and captured Jerusalem in 63 BC. After the Empire became officially Christian (between 313-380 A.D.), Byzantine theology and Imperial politics embraced, declaring that the Land of Israel now belonged to the Gentile-led Christian church (see Jeremiah 30:16-17).

When Islamic jihadi forces conquered Israel circa 638 A.D., the Land was declared waqf – belonging in perpetuity to Islam. This, by the way, is the spiritual root hiding behind Palestinian claims of heritage and ownership over the entire land of Israel.

The modern political momentum of the United Nations to recognize and establish a Palestinian-Islamist state on the ashes of the Jewish state is a partly secular hybrid offspring of these prior movements. UNESCO’s recent declarations that Jerusalem’s Temple Mount and Hebron’s Tomb of the Jewish Patriarchs are of exclusively Palestinian heritage are the latest chess moves in a prophetic Last Days struggle.

Stealing the Jewish people’s priority status

The Samaritan Church Father Justin Martyr was one of the first to declare that God preferred Gentile worship to Jewish worship, and that the gift of the Scriptures was now transferred from the Jewish people to Gentile Christians. Saint Augustine declared that the Jewish people were indeed chosen, but he defined that chosenness as negative – chosen to be an ongoing witness people who exemplify disobedience and God’s resulting judgment. The Islamic Quran and Hadith retroactively declare that all the Jewish Patriarchs and prophets were really pre-Quranic Muslims. Even the majority of the Protestant Reformation’s leaders denied the continuity of God’s gifts and calling on the Jewish nation.

Robbing the Scriptures of their Jewish emphasis

In 70 A.D. the Jerusalem Temple was destroyed. The Hebrew nation was scattered in Exile. The majority of the Jewish people still did not accept Yeshua’s Messiahship and atonement. Within a few short centuries Gentile Christian theologians completed a ‘cut and paste’ identity theft on the Jewish Scriptures. All positive prophecies of Jewish restoration, salvation and future prominence were now to be re-interpreted as meaning ‘the Gentile church.’ Only the prophecies describing divine judgment on the Jewish people were still interpreted as applying to the Jewish nation.

This Replacement Theology perspective is the presuppositional foundation for most preaching and teaching in the worldwide Body of Messiah – whether the streams be Catholic, Protestant or Charismatic.

There is a widespread and stubborn refusal in many streams of the body of Messiah to teach what the Bible says about Israel and about the Jewish role at the End of Days. Instead, a default setting is at work, one which interprets the Scriptures allegorically as applying only to the Church. Most preachers and teachers today want to comfort their people (which is a very good thing) but they achieve this for the most part through robbing the Jewish people of their place in the Scriptures. This thievery robs the Jewish people not only of their calling and gifts in the past and present; they are also pillaged of their amazing prophetic destiny.

But there is better way to interpret the Jewish Scriptures, one which is more balanced and accurate as well. One can teach the Bible, explaining how its words apply originally and contextually to the Jewish people. Then one can explain how Jewish and Gentile believers today both serve this same God of the Jews. Because of who this God is and because of how His covenant faithfulness and justice have been proved time and again throughout Jewish history, nations and individuals can totally trust Him today.

Some spiritual leaders are afraid to teach what the Scriptures say about Israel’s calling, gifts and restoration. They are worried that their own congregants might reject their leadership or accuse them of taking a politically incorrect stand. One day, these leaders say, they will get around to teaching about these matters more openly. But in the meantime they believe that it is too dangerous to clearly teach what the Scriptures actually say about the Jewish people’s calling and restoration.

Yeshua has called His followers to embrace the way of the cross, and that path has no shortcuts. Let those who want to follow Yeshua pick up their cross daily and follow Him (Luke 9:23).

“They have pulled Deep Heaven on their heads”

In the last volume of C.S. Lewis’ science-fiction Perelandra trilogy, evil men are described as breaking down society’s God-ordained walls of protection. As a result divine judgment is about to descend on them. Satan’s rebellious strategies (from the Tower of Babel in Genesis 11 to the present) are termed ‘that hideous strength’ (that is also the name of Lewis’ book). In chapter 13 the hero Ransom declares, “The Hideous Strength holds all this Earth in its fist. If of their own evil will they had not broken the frontier…this would be their moment of victory. Their own strength has betrayed them. They have …pulled down Deep Heaven on their heads. Therefore they will die.”

Moses describes a similar dynamic in Exodus 15:7, 11 where the judgment of Deep Heaven descends onto the heads of God’s enemies: “In the greatness of Your majesty You overthrow Your adversaries. You send out Your fury; it consumes them like stubble…Who is like You, YHVH, among the gods? Who is like You, majestic in holiness, awesome in glorious deeds, doing wonders?”

The judgment of YHVH on the nations who boast against the Jewish people has been a long time coming. Whether these attacks involve sidestepping or denying the calling of Israel in the Scriptures, Islamist terror attempts to exile the Jewish people from their homeland or simply to destroy them, or UNESCO and UN legal warfare (‘lawfare’) against the Jewish state, the divine verdict is on its way. The God of Deep Heaven is about to come down with ‘garments of vengeance’ and will repay His enemies with fury and anger (see Isaiah 59:15-20; 63:2-6; Psalm 83:2-4, 9-18).

Pitying the Nazis in the Day of God’s wrath

Corrie ten Boom, the brave Netherlands believer whose family sheltered Jews from the Nazis, describes an event in Occupied Haarlem during World War II. She and her father Caspar were returning from a walk, and “found the Grote Markt cordoned off by a double ring of police and soldiers. A truck was parked in front of the fish mart; into the back were climbing (Jewish) men, women, and children, all wearing the yellow star.” Corrie cried out in horror. Then “she saw that her father was looking at the soldiers now forming into ranks to march away. ‘I pity the poor Germans, Corrie. They have touched the apple of God's eye’” (The Hiding Place, page 64).

Caspar ten Boom was reflecting on the words of the prophet Zechariah who had proclaimed God’s judgment over Babylon, “This is what YHVH of armies says, He sent Me for the purpose of glory against the Gentiles who plunder you all. For the one who lays his hand on you lays his hand on the apple of His eye. For I will wave My hand against them, and they will become plunder for their slaves. And you all will know that YHVH of armies has sent Me” (Zechariah 2:8-9).

The UN, UNESCO, advocates of Replacement Theology and BDS (anti-Semitic Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement against the Jewish state) and all those who work for and call for Israel’s weakening and destruction – these people not only need to be opposed. They also need to be pitied, for they are calling down the fiery judgment of Deep Heaven upon themselves.

How should we then pray?

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES
BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal) through: www.davidstent.org

Strange bedfellows in the Middle East

“The longer a blind man lives, the more he sees,” said Yiddish author Sholem Aleichem. Grandiose plans can lead to folly, and the blindness of politicians and kings may lead to disaster.

The recent peace agreement between Israel and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) surprised the world’s media. Only the third country to enter into a political pact with the Jewish state, UAE is the first which has no contiguous borders with Israel. Two other countries – Egypt (1979) and Jordan (1994) – have U.S.-brokered peace deals with Israel, but those treaties are tenuous, dependent on the political and social stability of both Islamic countries. Egypt’s Camp David accords and Jordan’s Wadi Araba Treaty are labeled by political scientists as classic examples of what is ‘cold peace.’

Here is a pertinent example of this ‘tenuous cold peace’: When Muslim Brotherhood Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi came to power in 2012, Israel rapidly discovered that its ally was transforming into a jihadi Frankenstein’s monster. The same movement that birthed 9/11 and Osama bin Laden was now in charge next door. So peace treaties in the Middle East between Israel and her enemies are in the end only documents written on paper. Their staying power hangs on a very fragile balance of factors.  What are the factors involved in this latest peace agreement?

 

Rule Britannia!

 

Britannia rules the waves” – words from the British Navy’s famous patriotic song reflect her imperialist strategies in the 1700’s, when it set its lion’s paw on a handful of small sheikdoms in Northern Arabia bordering the Arabian Gulf.  England’s ‘Divide and Rule’ policy homed in on the smallest possible political entities on the Gulf Coast and made a  truce with each one in 1820. The original name for the British Protectorate established in that strip of Gulf territory (which included present-day Oman as well) was ‘Trucial Oman’ (Rosemarie Said Zahlan, The Origin of the United Arab Emirates, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1978). Rulers were set on thrones in each emirate: from the Bani Yas tribe – the Nahyan family in Abu Dhabi, and the Maktoum family in Dubai; and from the Qawasim tribe, the rulers of Sharjah and Ra’as al-Khaimah (Ono Motohiro, Reconsideration of the Meanings of the Tribal Ties in the United Arab Emirates: Abu Dhabi Emirate in Early ʼ90s; Kyoto Bulletin of Islamic Area Studies, 4-1&2; March 2011). The goal was to establish British centers of influence and control in an impoverished region whose main exports up to that time were pearling, fishing and date farming. The discovery of petroleum in Bahrain (1932) led to exporting abilities in Qatar (1949), Kuwait (1953) and Abu Dhabi (1962). Britain had literally ‘struck oil’ in its Gulf colonies.

In the 1960’s, in an effort to solidify UK access to intelligence, petroleum and political clout, the British secret service (SAS/MI6) replaced Abu Dhabi’s then Sheik Shakhbut bin Sultan Al Nahyan with his brother Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan. In 1970 Timothy Landon (SAS) oversaw a bloodless coup replacing Sultan Said bin Taimur with his son Sultan Qaboos bin Said Al Said. The British GCHQ and later the NSA established sigint listening posts in the Gulf States. The UAE was now a strategically significant hub for geopolitics in general, and for Middle East events in particular.

Another example of ‘strange bedfellows’ is the neighboring Gulf State of Qatar, where the United States Central Command (USCENTCOM) has a forward HQ since 2002, now situated at Al Udeid Air Base. At the same time as serving the Americans, Qatar is the chief bankroller of much of the Middle East’s anti-American terror groups, including the Muslim Brotherhood and its offshoot Hamas, Al-Qaeda, Syrian Jabhat Al-Nusra and ISIS/Da'esh, Lebanon’s Hezbollah, extremist groups in Iraq and in Libya. U.S. official policy continues, ostrich-like, to hide its head in the sand about these matters.

Anti-Jewish roots

The Emirate of Abu Dhabi is the capitol of the UAE. The previous Sheik Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan (died in 2004) held aggressively anti-Israel views.  He founded the Zayed Center for Coordination and Follow-Up (1999), a ritzy think-tank for the Arab League. The list of speakers included political glitterati like U.S. former U.S. Presidents Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter, former Vice-President Al Gore, former Secretary of State James Baker, and former French President Jacques Chirac. Simultaneously the Center was a virulent platform for the dissemination of anti-American, anti-Semitic and extreme anti-Israel views. Here is a partial list of speakers and lecture topics at the Center:

In 2003 after Western protests, Sheikh Zayed himself shut down the Center, one year before he passed away in 2004.

This deep anti-Jewish heart attitude is wrapped around UAE’s spiritual roots. It has never been acknowledged, repented of or publicly forsaken. Investigative reporting stays far away from this subject, especially when peace deals are being trotted out. But anti-Semitism in the UAE is something that should trigger intercession in the hearts of those who love the Jewish people and their state.

 

Tribes with flags

“Tribes With Flags” is a phrase attributed to Egyptian diplomat Tahseen Bashir: “Egypt is the only nation-state in the Arab world. All the rest – forgive me – are just tribes with flags.” Bashir’s pride in his country Egypt shines through, though it is worth remembering that the Bible describes Egypt as a Hamitic country and not as a Semitic or Arab one (Psalm 78:12, 43, 51; 105:23, 27; 106:21-22).

The history of the UAE’s inhabitants is living proof of this ‘tribes with flags’ proverb. UAE has a total population of 9,890,402, of which only 11.6% are Emiratis. The majority of the working population are expatriates – South Asian 59.4% (Indian 38.2%, Bangladeshi 9.5%, Pakistani 9.4%, other 2.3%), Egyptian 10.2%, Philippine 6.1%, and other backgrounds12.8%.

Today’s Arab Emiratis come from an original mix of 44 migrating tribes (today 67 in number) who moved in successive waves of population movement from Yemen and southern Nejd [Al Yamamah and Riyadh regions in modern Saudi Arabia] into Oman and what is today called UAE. The predominant tribe in modern UAE is Banu Yas, an Arab but non-Abrahamic tribe whose Qaḥṭāni forefather was Elhaf bin Quda’a. Since many people assume that all Muslims (or all Arabs, or all Bedouin) are descended from Ishmael, a clarification of this matter is in order.

Scholars of Arab genealogy recognize that the majority of the Arab peoples predate Ishmael, and that those descended from Ishmael are a minority. Arabs are usually divided into two groups:

These ‘Surviving Arabs’ are furthered divided into two groups – those whose historical origins traditionally begin with Shem, and those whose appearance traditionally begins with Ishmael:

Al-‘arab al-‘āriba – ‘the Arab Arabs’/‘pure Arabs’ from Yemen, traditionally descended from Ya‘rub bin Qahtan, are called the Qaḥṭāni (or ‘Yamānī’) group

Al-‘arab al-mustaʿribah or al-mutaʿrribah – ‘the Arabicized Arabs’ or ‘those who learned to speak Arabic’ or ‘those making themselves/seeking to be Arab’ – from central and northern Arabia, are called the ‘Adnāni’ group, traditionally descended from Ishmael

The majority of those who are Muslims in the world today are not Arabs. The majority of Arabs today are not related to Ishmael. And the majority of Emiratis see themselves as ‘Qaḥṭāni’ (‘pure Arabs’ of Yemenite background) – not descended from Ishmael. Nevertheless, the U.S.-brokered peace agreement between Israel and the UAE has been labeled ‘the Abraham Accords.” This goes over well in the West, where conjuring up the name ‘Abraham’ grants biblical patina and prophetic perfume to the agreement. A more accurate title for the treaty would be ‘The Isaac-Shem Accords.’

 

Who catalyzed this deal?

Politically correct wisdom is that the Arab world hates Israel and will remain at war with the Jewish state until the Palestinians raise Mohammed’s black jihadi flag over Jerusalem. This statement may be true of many Muslims, but there are some shades of gray here. It’s true that the Islamist roots of Jew-hatred are deeply embedded in religious texts, and these teachings are ardently believed by many in the Muslim world. Yet a popular proverb in the Middle East still notes that “the enemy of my enemy is my friend.” Others add a dry postscript, “The enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend.”

So what has pushed UAE to the negotiating table, considering that Israel and UAE have had thriving clandestine relations for many years in areas of intelligence, military cooperation, trade, hi-tech and medical research?   The answers are eminently clear.

Ebtesam Al-Ketbi, Founder and President of the Emirates Policy Center and Professor of Political Science at United Arab Emirates University, gets right to the point: “The United Arab Emirates and its partners . . . Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Bahrain, Egypt, Kuwait, Jordan, and Morocco have formed an alliance to counter the challenges that Iran and the Muslim Brotherhood pose . . . The UAE fears that Tehran interpreted the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) on its nuclear programme as a signal that world powers would accept Iranian regional hegemony . . . As the nucleus of this alliance, the UAE and Saudi Arabia have the opportunity to create a new regional order . . .  The UAE faces a dilemma in that it wants to push back against Tehran’s regional expansion but also recognizes that Iran is its second-largest trading partner.”

The Sunni UAE sheep are deeply troubled by the ever-louder growling coming from the Shi’ite Iran wolf. Iranian nuclear weapons are a direct threat to UAE’s independence and survival. Former President Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran truly frightened America’s allies, be they Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt or Israel.

UAE still feels the need to walk gingerly regarding Iran. Their Minister of State for Foreign Affairs recently took pains to stress that “the UAE-Israeli peace treaty is a sovereign decision not directed at Iran. We say this and repeat this.” Official Iranian media responded that Iran threatens to attack UAE over the Israel deal.    

A popular Arab newspaper brings added insight that “the UAE wants to build a concrete axis against Turkey and Qatar” – both are major bankrollers of the Muslim Brotherhood and jihadi terror. Turkey, Qatar and Iran are conspiring together against UAE, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Egypt, Cyprus and pro-Western Libyan forces, using military proxies and threatening international shipping lanes and commercial activities.

Meir Dagan, Israeli Mossad Director from 2002 to 2011, said in an interview before his death in 2016: “There is an intersection of interests, not a small one, between us and many of the Arab states . . . The interests of most of those states – Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf emirates, Morocco, and so on – did not correspond with those of radical Shiite revolutionaries or their allies in Damascus, let alone their heavily armed proxy militias. Those Arab states mostly feared the thought of Iran with a nuclear weapon, maybe more so than Israel.” The motivations for UAE to sign a peace treaty with Israel are existential and not emotional. And U.S. Presidential hopeful Joe Biden’s declaration that he will re-institute Obama’s pro-Iranian JCPOA has set the fuses burning again for Gulf Arabs.

Israeli commentator Moshe Dann adds that “the UN Security Council’s recent decision not to extend sanctions on Iran and the inability of UNIFIL to prevent, or at least contain Hezbollah’s hegemony are indications that the international community does not care about the danger to Sunni Arab states, and will empower Iran. Supporting Israel, therefore, as a bulwark against Iran and Hezbollah, makes sense.”

 

Political world

Bob Dylan sings that “we live in a political world, turning and a-thrashing about. As soon as you’re awake, you’re trained to take what looks like the easy way out.” Israel is an intensely political country. We have had three elections within 12 months and the possibility of a fourth is looming. November sees a U.S. election which still looks too close to call. Pulling off the first Middle East peace treaty in over 25 years looks good on anyone’s CV. At a recent rally held at an airport in Oshkosh, Wisconsin, US President Donald Trump declared, “And we moved the capital of Israel to Jerusalem. That’s for the evangelicals!” Along with biblical principles and geopolitical strategizing, domestic politics in both countries remain a priority in the whole equation.

 

The spirit of the century

There’s a line from a song by Al Stewart ‘On the border’: “Late last night the rain was knocking at my window . . . I thought I saw down in the street the spirit of the century telling us that we're all standing on the border.” And another line from the Eagles: “I'm stuck on the border. All I wanted was some peace of mind. Don't you tell me ‘bout your law and order. I'm trying to change this water to wine!”

One of the pillars of the deal between Israel and the UAE is set on sinking sand – connecting the Abraham Accords treaty to Israel stepping back from applying sovereignty to portions of the Land promised by YHVH to Jacob. This pillar buttresses goals which run afoul of biblical teaching, perspective and prophecy. Many in the world will either ignore or mock these biblical principles. Nevertheless, “the word of God is living and active and sharper than any two-edged sword, and piercing as far as the division of soul and spirit, of both joints and marrow, and able to judge the thoughts and intentions of the heart” (Hebrews 4:12).

The third and most recent Israeli election saw both major parties campaigning on record to extend sovereignty over 30% of the West Bank. This was in accordance with President Trump’s ‘Deal of the Century.’ Some big bumps in the road (COVID-19 pandemic, international economic shuddering, domestic U.S. and Israeli politics) have dialed down present White House appetite for such an Israeli step. And of course Trump’s deal involves the establishment of a Palestinian state on 70% of the territory promised by the God of Israel to the people of Israel. Though some (including some in Israel) feel that such an action would be a short-term step in the right direction, others are concerned that this move runs counter to God’s clear declarations in Scripture.

The sobering reality of this End of Days prophecy is a stark warning to all comers, “Stay far away from dividing up any part of the Land of Israel!”

From the geo-strategic angle, the United Arab Emirates have no common border with Israel. The native population of that country (apart from the 88% who are short-term workers) consists of desert Bedouin who migrated to that area of the Gulf Coast over the past millennium to engage in pearling, fishing and date farming. They are relative newcomers to the region now called the UAE. Why should they have been given a decisive say in determining Israel’s borders, and in causing Israel to step back from embracing the Land that YHVH promised to the sons and daughters of Jacob through the real ‘Abraham Accord’ – the Abrahamic covenant?

YHVH said to Abram, after Lot had separated from him, “Now lift up your eyes and look from the place where you are, northward and southward and eastward and westward. For all the land which you see, I will give it to you and to your descendants forever. I will make your descendants as the dust of the earth, so that if anyone can number the dust of the earth, then your descendants can also be numbered. Arise, walk about the land through its length and breadth; for I will give it to you” (Genesis 13:14-17)

And He said to him, “I am YHVH who brought you out of Ur of the Chaldeans, to give you this land to possess it.” It came about when the sun had set, that it was very dark, and behold, there appeared a smoking oven and a flaming torch which passed between these pieces. On that day YHVH made a covenant with Abram, saying, “To your descendants I have given this land, from the river of Egypt as far as the great river, the river Euphrates: the Kenite and the Kenizzite and the Kadmonite and the Hittite and the Perizzite and the Rephaim and the Amorite and the Canaanite and the Girgashite and the Jebusite” (Genesis 15:7, 17-21)

Some ambitious politicians (to paraphrase the Eagles’ lyrics) are “trying to change this Middle Eastern water into wine” – trying to strengthen temporary military and intelligence connections between the Gulf States and Israel, thereby blocking the expansionist jihad of Iran, Turkey and Qatar. But at the same time these politicians are brushing aside God’s burning promises to the Jewish people; they are ignoring His sober threats against anyone who would lend a hand to dividing up the Promised Land.

In the meantime UAE is hoping that Iran will now think twice before attacking it with an army of swarming drones. And many Israelis are excited about taking their next vacation (whenever that may be!) in Dubai . . .

There is an old Yiddish tale about an old beggar trudging along the country road with a heavy pack on his shoulders. A merchant came by with a wagonload of produce bound for the county market. He saw the old beggar, felt sorry for him and invited him to get into the wagon. After a few minutes of traveling together in silence, the merchant saw that the beggar was sitting quietly with the pack still on his shoulders. “Why don’t you put the pack down?” he exclaimed in surprise. The old beggar replied, “May the Highly Exalted One bless you! It’s enough that you’re carrying me! Do I have to burden you with my pack besides?”

When you offer a ride to the Jewish people, you need to be also ready to help them carry their ‘backpack’ – their covenantal promises. Israel has been carrying the blessed ‘backpack’ of these gifts and calling (one of these gifts is the Land of Israel; see Romans 9:1-5; 11:28-29) for millennia across the face of this planet. But be careful: the burden of the Land must be correctly carried! If not, the stone of Jerusalem (see Zechariah 12:2-3) can cause a painful hernia and bring damaging pain to any nation who picks up this burden carelessly.

In Deuteronomy 32:8-10 YHVH declares that He alone establishes the borders of all nations, and His decisions are based on His priority of heart for Israel. The complete opposite of this divine principle occurs when the nations of the world attempt to define Israel’s borders according to their own wisdom. And that is exactly what the ‘Abraham Accords’ are attempting to do. The Bible makes this point crystal clear: God is not at all pleased.  Psalm 2 reveals His reactions and His coming responses: He laughs. He scoffs. He speaks to the nations in His anger and terrifies them in His fury. He will break them with a rod of iron and shatter them like earthenware (Psalm 2:4-9). We need to get ready for serious days ahead.

How should we then pray?

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal or credit card) through: www.davidstent.org

Holy Spirit, ‘fake news’ and the heart of Ruth

The Feast of Shavuot/Weeks is upon us (Deuteronomy 16:10). Fifty days have now passed between Pesach/Passover and Shavuot (Leviticus 23:16  – the counting of the Omer, a peck measurement and first-fruits prophetic promise of a coming full harvest). The crest of those calculations has been reached, and now the wave of fulfillment crashes down onto this fourth celebration of God’s seven divine Feasts (Leviticus 23:2).

Most Israeli Jews know about the traditional dairy foods associated with the holiday, about wearing white garments and going on a kibbutz tractor ride replete with wagons full of fruit and produce. This festival is also called Hag haKatzir (Harvest Festival) and Hag Habikurim (First fruits Festival – see Numbers 28:26).

Religious Jews are taught that Shavuot is the date of Matan Torah (the giving of the Sinai Covenant), and they remember Ruth the famous Moabite woman who ‘converted to Judaism.’

It may come as a surprise for some of us to find out that the Bible’s take on these events is somewhat different. Let’s dig in and take a look.

In search of the lost date

The Scriptures do not give an exact date for the Giving of the Mosaic Covenant. The event happened somewhere within a two month period, but the Bible does not specify when (Exodus 19:1, 16; 24:4, 16; 34:28; 40:17). It’s a little like Christmas: the reason December 24/25 was chosen has nothing to do with specific dates in the Gospel records, and everything to do with freshly baptized Roman and Constantine traditions. People like dates and, when the Bible is silent about such things, folks tend to choose dates anyway – ‘everyone does what’s right in his own eyes’ (see Judges 21:25).

The focus in Leviticus/ Numbers and Deuteronomy is threefold:

The Bible is silent in all these passages about a date for the Giving of the Mosaic Covenant, or about any connection between the Feast of Shavuot and the Giving of the Mosaic Torah.

A side note: Paul the Apostle’s personal calendar was marked as wanting to come up to Jerusalem in time to celebrate the Day of Shavuot/Pentecost (Acts 20:16). His apostolic faith expressed itself in recognizably Jewish ways (Acts 21:24; 28:17).

Why the “Fake News”?

Traditions are not created in a vacuum. They are often a response to significant historical and national events. Since a connection between Shavuot/Pentecost and the giving of the Law of Moses was not a tradition practiced in the days of Messiah Yeshua, what happened historically that made the Rabbis bind the celebration of Shavuot to the Covenant of Sinai?

The answer is strikingly clear. When the New Covenant was inaugurated, it was the day of Shavuot/Pentecost.

Acts 2:1 says that “When the Day of Shavuot/Pentecost had fully come, they were all with one accord in one place.”  Tongues of fire accompanied by the heavenly sound of a mighty and rushing wind filled the house wherein the disciples were praying. The inauguration of the New Covenant was kicked into gear by the Holy Spirit of Israel, with signs following in a very Jewish context.

Jeremiah had prophesied that the New Covenant would be characterized by the active and widespread presence of the Ruach HaKodesh – the Holy Spirit (Jeremiah 31:31-34). This New Covenant “would not be like the covenant” that YHVH ratified with the Hebrew patriarchs in the day when God took us out of the Land of Egypt. It would be different and new.

Rejecting the Good News

The majority of Israel’s spiritual leaders spurned Yeshua and the ‘quiet waters of the Shiloah spring’ (see Isaiah 8:6). They despised and rejected Messiah the Son of David. We as a nation followed our leaders, turning our faces from Him and not esteeming Him (Isaiah 53:3).  Abandoning the Fountain of living waters, we hewed for ourselves “cisterns, broken cisterns that can hold no water” (Jeremiah 2:13). These ‘broken cisterns’ are another term for the rabbinic system which insists on blind obedience to their interpretation of Moses, while rejecting the New Covenant of which Moses spoke.

The New Covenant was rejected. Its amazing offer of salvation to both Israel and the nations was trashed. Now that the Way and the Truth were banned, the time had come to develop a new rabbinic tradition – we can call it “fake news.” The glorious and flame-tongued New Covenant was replaced, and in its place a skewed rabbinic interpretation of the Mosaic covenant was substituted. Instead of the gospel offer of salvation to Gentiles, the rabbinic stress was on Gentile conversion to the Law of Moses and the nations’ submission to rabbinic authority. Ruth the Moabite found herself being transformed by the rabbis into a ‘poster girl’ for the conversion process – even though the Bible has no conversion process for Gentiles and the Book of Ruth continues (to the very end of the book) to refer to Ruth as a Moabite (see Ruth 4:10).

Many Jews and Gentiles, unaware of the Biblical and historical facts here, have embraced this rabbinic ‘fake news’ hook, line and sinker. As the season of Shavuot/Pentecost draws near, it is also not unusual to see many dear believing brothers and sisters unknowingly repeating this rabbinic propaganda.

The heart of Ruth

Though the rabbis say that the Book of Ruth is connected to Shavuot/Pentecost, once again the Scriptures do not mention any dates in the entire Book, referring only in general terms to the season of the barley harvest. The rabbinic focus on Ruth is simply another attempt to create an alternative that flies in the face of Acts 2.

But there is a wonderful non-rabbinic message in the Book of Ruth that is greatly encouraging.

Ruth is descended from the Lot’s incestuous union with his daughters after the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah (Genesis 19:36-37). Deuteronomy 23:3 forbids male Moabites (the ‘seed’) from entering even the outer courtyards of the House of YHVH. This proscription lasted for ten full generations after possible intermarriage. Ruth of course was not a Moabite male, and as such was not under this ban. Yet few Jewish men would have wanted to take a Moabite woman as a bride.

What was so special about Ruth? What caused her to stand in God’s spotlight and to be joyously included into the destiny of the Jewish people – without changing her Moabite origins?

1. She had a heart of faith. She recognized God’s heart for Israel and His covenant connections with the Jewish people. She understood that the calling of Israel was a ‘done deal’ – and that to follow the God of the Jews meant to be forever linked with the Jewish people.

2. She had the heart of a servant. She poured out her life and strength to bless her Jewish mother-in-law Naomi, and willingly bound her destiny to that of Judah’s descendant Boaz. Her reward included being the great-grandmother of King David as well as being found in the precious lineage of Messiah Yeshua!

As we celebrate this fourth Biblical feast, Shavuot/ Pentecost, what a wonderful host of things there are to pray about!

How should we then pray?

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal) through: www.davidstent.org

One day, one battle, one Lord, one name

Matthew Miller (better known as Chasidic/reggae beatboxer/rapster Matisyahu) released an April 2008 recording called ‘One Day.’ Speaking about this monster hit Matisyahu said that “it is an anthem of hope with a big beat, the kind of song that makes you bob your head and open your heart at the same time.” The song expresses a confidence that God has put us on this earth for a reason and vocalizes a deep yearning for Messianic days (“All my life I’ve been waiting for, I’ve been praying for...”) which will put an end to war.

The Hebrew prophet Zechariah describes that ‘One Day’ in a heavenly vision describing Messiah’s return. But in the paraphrased words of Inigo Montoya (from the movie ‘The Princess Bride’), “This word ‘One Day’ – I do not think it means what some people think it means!” What does Zechariah’s prophecy of that soon-approaching Day reveal?

The Day is near

On Passover an ancient melody is chanted in many Jewish households, “Karev yom asher hu lo yom v’lo laila!” (‘The Day is near which is neither day nor night’), a song based on Zechariah 14:7: “ For it will be a unique Day which is known to YHVH, neither day nor night.”  The term “that Day” is used at least seven times in this passage to describe many astounding future events:

One King, one YHVH, one city

Zechariah declares that in that Messianic Day “YHVH will be king over all the earth. In that day YHVH will be the only one, and His name the only one” (14:9). A Jewish King will reign in a Jewish city overflowing with Jewish people. His reign will extend over the entire planet, and all nations will be obedient to Him (Psalm 89:23-28; 2:8-12; Genesis 49:10).

The prophet spotlights God’s centrality and priority in three future areas:

You can’t get there from here

The majority of today’s Christian church would be utterly flummoxed if Zechariah’s prophecy were to come to pass since most Christians don’t believe that God’s gifts and calling to Israel are still valid. Today many followers of Jesus would have difficulty accepting that Jesus will reign from a Jewish Jerusalem. At present most Gentile believers in Jesus would be severely disoriented were they required to switch over to using the names ‘YHVH’ and ‘Yeshua.’ Yet Zechariah’s End of Days prophetic word remains true.

Upcoming prophetic changes will also include a radical shift away from present traditional Christian calendars whose origins lie in solar-based pagan calendars (whether Roman or Greek). Instead there will be a return to God’s lunar-based biblical Hebrew calendar:

Many of these changes will transform traditional Christianity and the results will be earth-shaking. This future prophetic expression of the body of Messiah will be nearly unrecognizable for some. It will certainly look a lot more friendly to Jews than much of what is called ‘Christianity’ today.  A new Jewish Reformation is on the way.

How should we then pray?

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal) through: www.davidstent.org

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close