Israel – hope in the midst of threats

The evening of July 27, 2012, was the 9th day of Av (Tish’a B’Av) according to the Jewish calendar. In 586 BC and in 70 AD, on the 9th of Av, both the First and Second Temples were destroyed. Ensconced in tradition, this day is remembered yearly. Jews in Mumbai, Moscow, Munich, Madrid, Mexico City and Miami all recollect and mourn these events which happened up to 2,600 years ago.

For Jewish people who believe in the existence of the God of Israel and who see His hand in history, these ancient events still speak to us in our day. A recent advertisement in the Jerusalem Post (July 27, 2012) made reference to these two days of destruction, and then applied those events to the present political stand-off with Iran.

The Jewish people have a long historical memory. At times even our enemies are aware of this fact. Julius Streicher, publisher of the Nazi Der Stuermer, ascended the gallows on October 16, 1946 with this declaration as his last words, “Purim-Fest 1946!” Streicher was ironically prophesying how the Jewish people would remember his own hanging in their future history books – in the same way as they remembered the divine victory at the Feast of Purim – the hanging of Haman and his ten sons (Esther 7:9-10). Haman had called for and planned the genocide of the Jewish people (Esther 5:13-14) but in the end he was destroyed on the very gallows he intended to use against Mordecai.

For many Jewish people the Bible continues to be not only a description of history past, but also a guide about both the present and the future. Psalm 121 offers a quiet yet stubborn confidence in YHVH’s power and will to preserve the Jewish people: “He will not allow your foot to slip; He who keeps you will not slumber. Behold, He who keeps Israel will neither slumber nor sleep” (verses 3-4).

At the same time, the prophetic tradition was aware that false or unreliable prophets often plagued Israel, refusing to raise the alarm when danger was fast approaching: “His watchmen are blind; all of them know nothing. All of them are mute dogs unable to bark, dreamers lying down, who love to slumber” (Isaiah 56:10).

Strategic versus existential dangers

Israel’s newly appointed Home Front Defense Minister Avi Dichter gave his first public speech on August 19 2012. In it he contrasted two threats to Israel – strategic threats (like Syria, Lebanon and Gazan Hamas-stan) and existential threats (like Iran).  Jewish history is replete with both kinds of threats.  Egypt’s Pharaoh, Persia’s Haman and Nazi Germany’s Hitler were very much existential threats, while (speaking from an international and historical perspective) the Inquisition, the pogroms and Tsar Alexander III’s edicts were more strategic regional threats than existential dangers, even though they were painful and terrible.

What with the scattering of the Jewish people into the Exile, any attempt to destroy the entire people now had to have a powerful prerequisite – the majority of Jews had to live under one empire’s control. Today Jews are scattered across the face of the globe and live under the oversight of many different countries. Nevertheless the Jewish state of Israel has the highest concentration of Jacob’s children in any one geographical location.

Iran’s President Ahmedinejad declared on August 17, 2012 “The very existence of the Zionist regime is an insult to humanity … The new Middle East will have no memory of the presence of the Americans and Zionists.” Iranian General Jalili declared on August 15, 2012 that “there is no other way but to stand firm and resist until Israel is destroyed.” Iranian declarations unequivocally and vociferously call for existential destruction of the Jewish state.

Some Jewish people who live in the Diaspora/ Exile occasionally feel that it might be safer to remain there, that troubles will only or primarily strike the Jewish state.  Jewish Agency Chairman Natan Sharansky pointed out on Israel Radio (August 19, 2012) that dozens of potential immigrants to Israel have delayed their arrival over fears of war with Iran, and that they are delaying their aliyah until the threat of war passes.

The prophet responds to this worldview in Amos 9:8-10:

Behold, the eyes of YHVH GOD are on the sinful kingdom, and I will destroy it from the face of the earth; Nevertheless, I will not totally destroy the house of Jacob, declares YHVH. For behold, I am commanding, And I will shake the house of Israel among all nations as grain is shaken in a sieve, but not a kernel will fall to the ground. All the sinners of My people will die by the sword – those who say, ‘The calamity will not overtake or confront us.’

The Season of Regathering

The consensus among Messianic Jews is that God is regathering His Jewish people to their Promised Land in our day, and that this is an event of world-shaking prophetic significance. Even though the majority of Jews (and Messianic Jews) have not shaken off the desire for the cucumbers and melons, for the leeks and garlic of Egypt (Numbers 11:5) and remain in Exile, YHVH has patiently been regathering His scattered Hebrew people from the four corners of the earth.

As Jewish believers in Yeshua, we seek not only the physical good and restoration of our people (revival of a Hebrew nation in a Hebrew land speaking a Hebrew language and expressing itself through a Hebrew culture) but with even greater priority and passion, we seek the spiritual revival of our nation, that we might turn to Yeshua our Messiah, Redeemer and King. As the prophet would have us remember (Ezekiel 37:9-10), it is the prophesying to the Breath, to the Ruach, to the Spirit of God that transforms a valley of dry Jewish bones into the most amazing army the world has yet to see:

Then He said to me, “Prophesy to the breath, prophesy, son of man, and say to the breath, ‘Thus says YHVH GOD, “Come from the four winds, O breath, and breathe on these slain, that they come to life.” So I prophesied as He commanded me, and the breath came into them, and they came to life and stood on their feet, an exceedingly great army.”

The Return of the Exiles which the God of Israel is accomplishing in our day, is being catalyzed by the same passion and zeal that YHVH has shown throughout history and in the prophetic word – His burning desire for the restoration and the good of His people. This is the time we are living in. This is season we are moving into.

“There will be no end to the increase of His government or of peace, on the throne of David and over his kingdom – to establish it and to uphold it with justice and righteousness from then on and forevermore. The zeal of YHVH of hosts will accomplish this” (Isaiah 9:7; see also Isaiah 37:32; 42:13; 59:17; Joel 2:18).

Jewish spiritual warfare

Many in the body of Messiah are aware of the reality of spiritual warfare. But not everyone has joined the dots and sees that Satan targets the Jewish people par excellence. This is because he knows and believes the prophetic Scriptures more than do some believers. He knows that the revival and restoration of the Jewish people will bring life from the dead to the entire planet (Romans 11:12, 15).

Revelation 12:3-4, 9 reveal that Satan specifically targets the Jewish people who gave birth to the Messiah – even as he once targeted the Davidic King who will rule all nations from Jerusalem with a rod of iron (see Psalm 2). The Archangel Michael, whose portfolio specifically pertains to the Jewish people (Daniel 10:13, 21; 12:1; Jude 1:9; Revelation 12:7) is the warrior who defends the Jewish nation, putting his own archangelic presence into the thick of the battle. The satanic powers behind the superpowers of Greece and Persia in that day (yes, and behind Iran in our day – Daniel 10:20-21) show that we not only war against spiritual wickedness and powers in the heavenlies (Ephesians 6:11-13), the battle rages on earth as well (Matthew 6:10)!

The Mesopotamian sorcerer Balaam found his mouth overtaken by the Spirit of YHVH, and his prophecies over Israel turned from cursing into blessing for the Jewish people. Though Israel was not exactly a shining example of obedience and holiness at that time, God’s express will in those chronicles shows a divine heart full of great good will and prophetic purpose for His Jewish people. Though Jewish history may certainly have had and will have bumps in the road and a measure of trouble – including even the time of Jacob’s trouble – the intentions of YHVH’s heart toward Israel are overwhelming in kindness and good pleasure:

“How shall I curse whom God has not cursed, and how can I denounce whom YHVH has not denounced? Let me die the death of the upright, and let my end be like his!” (Numbers 23:8, 10)

“God is not a man, that He should lie, nor a son of man, that He should repent. Has He said, and will He not do it? Or has He spoken, and will He not make it good? Behold, I have received a command to bless; when He has blessed, then I cannot revoke it. He has not observed misfortune in Jacob, nor has He seen trouble in Israel. YHVH his God is with him, and the shout of a king is among them” (Number 23:19-21)

Attacks against the Jewish people have been commonplace in Jewish history. The Book of Esther (3:5-15) describes an ancient existential threat against the Jewish people in what is today Iran. We assume that the demonic prince of Persia was involved in instigating this. Yet Mordechai expressed stubborn faith and confidence in the God of Israel as his people’s protector and defender:

“Do not imagine that you in the king’s palace can escape any more than all the Jews. For if you remain silent at this time, relief and deliverance will arise for the Jews from another place and you and your father’s house will perish. And who knows whether you have not attained royalty for such a time as this?” (Esther 4:13-17)

The good grapes

In Isaiah 5 YHVH describes His love for Israel in terms of a vine-dresser who tenderly cares for his own grape vines. God’s desire was to drink the superb and cultivated vine that Israel was to yield – an act that reminds the reader of the romance of the Song of Solomon.

“As the new wine is found in the cluster, and one says, ‘Do not destroy it, for there is benefit in it,’ so I will act on behalf of My servants in order not to destroy all of them” (Isaiah 65:8).

“I change not”

The God of Israel anchors His prophetic promises for the Jewish people in His own perfect nature: “For I, YHVH, do not change; therefore you, O sons of Jacob, are not consumed” (Malachi 3:6). Satan will not succeed in wiping out the Jewish people, whether through Islamist jihad, through Arab weaponry, through terror, boycott, divestment or sanctions, even through the anti-Messiah himself!

YHVH promises to restore the Jewish people to their own homeland and to give them a place of unshakeable protection and honor. “I will establish for them a renowned planting place, and they will not again be victims of famine in the land, and they will not endure the insults of the nations anymore” (Ezekiel 34:29).

“It is because of YHVH’s covenant mercies that we are not consumed, because His compassions fail not” (Lamentations 3:22). Herein lies our confidence. On these promises are based the fire of our prayers. Though the seas roar and though the mountains melt into the sea, God of Jacob is our refuge – an ever-present help in times of trouble! The Lord Almighty is with us. The God of Jacob is our fortress (Psalm 46)!

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do!

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal) through: www.davidstent.org

This article was originally written by Avner Boskey for the German language publication of Stiftung Schleife,  Prophetisches Bulletin, and is published in German on their website www.schleife.ch/de/die-schleife/prophetisches-bulletin.html, 2012/3

“Talkin’ ‘bout My Generation” – The 2012 London Olympics and the heart of God

The world gathered in London this August for the 30th Summer Olympic Games. Athletes from every nation competed for the gold, silver and bronze medals which would crown the planet’s top sportsmen and women. It was the most watched TV event in U.S. history (219.4 million), while the closing ceremony alone had an estimated global audience of 750 million. “One billion watch star-studded finale to greatest Games,” screamed the headlines of the Daily Mirror. Sleepy London Town has planned and hosted a huge world event of global significance.

The Games’ Chairman Lord Sebastian Coe proclaimed at the closing ceremony, “We lit up the flame and we lit up the world … What we have begun will not stop now. The spirit of the Games will inspire a generation.”  Robert Hardman of the Daily Mail declared that the 30th Olympiad “will be one of the defining moments in Britain’s 21st Century history.”

In sunny England, a land given to understatement and fondly self-mocking humor, such superlatives stand out. So what exactly was the significance of the Games – not just for Britain, but for the world – and how will “the spirit of these Games” inspire a new generation?

Running the race

The modern Olympic Games are a relatively new phenomenon (1896) though they draw their inspiration from Greek athletic culture. The famed historic Marathon run of Pheidippides was quite an exploit of physical exertion, but the account was transformed and dramatized somewhat inaccurately through the years (see Robert Browning’s ‘Pheidippides,’ www.online-literature.com/robert-browning/shorter-poems/6/).

The Apostle Paul was not acquainted with the modern form of Olympics (since they only began in 1896 AD), but he did use Greek foot races and wrestling (sports of which all his readers were aware) as illustrations is his teachings:

The commitment, discipline and passion of these sportsmen also speaks of our divine calling to press onward and upward for the prize:

Recalibrating national myths

The 2012 Games were foremost about the athletes themselves – their achievements, efforts and victories. Every move of each contestant was voraciously consumed by media watchers worldwide. Successes and failures were open to the eyes of all. World records were broken. Two individuals in particular drew international amazement – Michael Phelps (the most decorated Olympian ever) and Usain Bolt (considered the best sprinter of all time).

Many commentators believe that these Olympics also had specific significance for England. Phrases were spoken over the past two weeks like “rediscovering a sense of possibility that had been muted,” “a nation relaunched,” “a different Britain,” “a greater sense of inclusion,” and “a recalibration of the national myth.”

Ecclesiastes 7:8 notes that “the end of the matter is better than its beginning, and patience is better than pride.”  The closing ceremony summed up all the hopes, drama and joys of the Games, and it is worth considering what this final message communicated to the world about Britain as well as about the values and beliefs of the international world community.

Cool Britannia

The creative director and choreographer of the closing ceremony Kim Gavin (producer of 2007’s Concert for Diana) explained that this Olympic finale was “a once in a lifetime opportunity.” “Music has been Britain’s strongest cultural export of the last fifty years and we intend to produce an Olympic closing ceremony what will be a unique promotion of great British popular music” (www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-19094398).

Called “A Symphony of British Music,” the closing ceremony involved 4,100 performers (including 3,500 adult volunteers, 380 schoolchildren and 230 professionals). The arena’s stage centerpiece was modeled on the Union Jack, while newspaper clipping became the motifs on the set and on road vehicles – all conveying the theme “A Day in the Life of London”, with apologies to John Lennon. Printed quotes from literary masters from Samuel Butler to William Shakespeare and Rudyard Kipling covered buildings, motorcars and streets across the set. One wag described it as “London landmarks wrapped in newsprint like fish and chips.” But it was the literary heritage that was meant to be the focus here.

Imagining a world without God

Over thirty British pop singers and rock bands led the concert through a medley of hits which Cole Moreton of The Telegraph described as “the Brit-pop equivalent of the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade.”  Over all hovered the memory of John Lennon and the Beatles. From “A Day in The Life” to “Because,” from “Here Comes the Sun” to “I Am the Walrus,” the Fab Four’s verve and word-smithery was saluted.

At one point in the festivities, a face-mask of John Lennon was assembled out of 101 plastic interlocking forms, and then scattered to the stage wings, all done to the music of Lennon’s anthem “Imagine.” The words of that song are deeply significant in themselves, and especially as an anthem of this global community gathering.

“Imagine there’s no heaven – It’s easy if you try.

No hell below us, above us only sky.

Imagine all the people living for today …

Imagine there’s no countries, It isn’t hard to do.

Nothing to kill or die for and no religion too.

Imagine all the people living life in peace.

You, you may say I’m a dreamer, but I’m not the only one.

I hope some day you’ll join us and the world will live as one”

(“Imagine”, words and music John Lennon, © 1971 Lenono Music; administered by EMI Blackwood Music Inc.)

The Daily Mail noted that “there was a definite warm and fuzzy moment when the audience started singing John Lennon’s ‘Imagine.’” “Hearing 80.000 people sing … (is) a globally communal experience” (Robert Hardman, Telegraph) “No amps are needed when you have every voice in the world singing along” (Sarah Robinson, CTV).

In Geoffrey Giuliano’s book Lennon in America (Cooper Square Press, 2000) John Lennon is quoted as stating that the song Imagine was “anti-religious, anti-nationalistic, anti-conventional, anti-capitalistic … but because it’s sugar-coated, it’s accepted.”

Though one commentator described the ceremony as “reverent of the past but hopeful of the future,” we probably need to ask an uncomfortable question here: What does YHVH think about this global experience – a people’s choir of 80,000 voices proclaiming that world peace and unity will be a reality when mankind rejects belief in heaven and hell, in YHVH Himself, and in Yeshua the Messiah of Israel as Savior of the world?

The singing of this world anthem was much more than simply a warm and fuzzy moment.

Defending the Faith?

In the country that birthed Donne, Cranmer, Wycliffe, Tyndale, Fox, Bunyan, Edwards, Wesley, Whitfield, Wilberforce, Shaftesbury, Carey, Booth, Hudson Taylor, Stott and Martin Smith – this “Imagine” choir reveals a different England than the one lauded by Shakespeare in Richard II,

“This royal throne of kings, this sceptred isle ... This other Eden, demi-paradise;

This happy breed of men, this little world;

This precious stone set in the silver sea, this blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England” (Richard II, Act ii, Scene 1)

The journey from “All Hail the Power” to William Blake’s “Jerusalem” has finally ended up at the crossroads – a mass confession in the heart of London, witnessed by 750 million people, which denies the faith and power of God, the truth of the Holy Scriptures and the foundations of the British Reformation. Jarring as it may be to some, this is where John Bull lives today.

One of the titles and offices of the Queen of England is Fidei Defensor or “Defender of the Faith” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fidei_defensor).

(www.princeofwales.gov.uk/faqs/what_religion_do_the_prince_and_the_duchess_practice__1739581824.html).

From Brit-Pop to Gay Rock

Gay and bisexual pop and rock singers took their place center stage in the closing ceremonies.  From George Michael to Jessie J, from Neil Tennant of the Pet Shop Boys to photos and snippets of David Bowie’s Ziggy Stardust days – one homosexual blogger described the roster as “a virtual gay pride parade.”  “London closes 2012 Summer Olympic games with a celebration of British music talent including top gay and bisexual names” said another.

Even Freddie Mercury of Queen was drafted in hologram fashion, “rousing the crowd virtually with a call-and-response routine” (Jasper Rees, www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19195421).

The acceptance and prominence granted to these artists who champion gay lifestyles and values show how drastically the moral consensus in Britain has changed over the past century.

My Generation

The quintessential British rock band The Who ended the ceremony with a bang. “Of all the voices of the Closing Ceremony, The Who was the one the world heard last” (Sarah Robinson, CTV).  They chose three songs, “Baba O’Riley,” “See Me, Feel Me” (the anthem from the rock opera Tommy), and “My Generation.”

Part of the song “Baba O’Riley” was written by Pete Townsend describing what he witnessed during The Who’s set at Woodstock in 1969. The absolute drug-induced desolation of many teenagers (bad LSD trips and assorted psychotic manifestations) profoundly affected him, and his song ruefully declares, “Teenage wasteland, it’s only teenage wasteland – they’re all wasted!” (Guitar World, Vol. 30, number 9, page 76). The tragedy had turned into a farcical celebration, and the artist was lamenting that fact. In the 2012 Olympics version, singer Roger Daltrey subtly altered the words to “Teenage wasteland – there’s more than teenage wasteland” (www.cbsnews.com/8301-31749_162-57491906-10391698/did-roger-daltrey-forget-the-lyrics-to-baba-oriley/).

The next song “See Me, Feel Me” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tommy_(album)) was another rock anthem which had resonated with many youth in the 1960’s and 70’s – young people yearning to have a spiritual touch and a supernatural encounter. The words of the chorus implore “See me, feel me, touch me, heal me!”

The theme of the rock opera Tommy focuses on an abused deaf, dumb and blind boy who becomes the leader of a messianic movement. The spiritual longing of the words comes across openly, “Listening to you, I get the music. Gazing at you, I get the heat. Following you, I climb the mountain. I get excitement at your feet. Right behind you, I see the millions. On you, I see the glory…” In 1998 this song was inducted into the Grammy Hall of Fame for “historical, artistic and significant value.”

The Who’s final song, “My Generation” is, to many rockers, the theme song of a generation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Generation). Rolling Stone magazine named it 11th on their list of the “500 Greatest Songs of All Time,” while VH1 placed it 13th on their list of the 100 Greatest Songs of Rock and Roll.

The lyrics reflect the alienation and despair of British Mods in the mid-Sixties, who didn’t fit in and did not want to fit in to normal society (“Why don’t you all fade away and don’t try to dig what we all say?”). The fear of what may await this generation (whether through war, or through economic and social collapse) has caused a loss of hope (“Things they do look awful cold, talkin’ ‘bout my generation. Hope I die before I get old”). These messages resonated well then, and they resonate just as well now.

A generation yet to come

The Who’s rock anthems point beyond the psychedelic fantasies of the Woodstock Generation to a hope which is being birthed from the very heart of God. The psalmist knew of this hope, and prophesied about it in his songs, “Let this be written for a future generation, that a people not yet created may praise YHVH” (Psalm 102:18).

That future generation, David son of Jesse believed, would be one who seeks the face of the God of Jacob: “Such is the generation of those who seek Him, who seek Your face, God of Jacob” (Psalm 24:6)

These Davidic words will find their ultimate fulfillment in a Last Days generation, one whom YHVH is not ashamed to call “My Generation!” (see Hebrews 2:11) – “Posterity will serve Him. Future generations will be told about YHVH. They will proclaim His righteousness, declaring to a people yet unborn, ‘He has done it!’” (Psalm 22:30-31).

The prophets who penned these words knew that there was a priority reference in them to the sons and daughters of Jacob – to the Jewish people.  Ezekiel was able to put these hopes into words when he prophesied about the incredibly mighty army of Jewish dry bones (Ezekiel 37:9-14) which would do exploits at the End of Days.

God’s heart is not for a generation to run after an abused pinball wizard, or for His children to pursue a spiritually blind and dumb guru addicted to video games. His heart is for the youth of the nations to press in to know Him – to come to know Yeshua the Servant of YHVH, and to speak His burning word to a global community with passion, power and creativity!

Silence of the hams

On the evening of September 5, 1972 at the 1972 Olympic Games in Munich the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) terror group sent a Black September squad to torture and murder the Israeli Olympic delegation in its apartments within the Olympic Village (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munich_massacre). Their operation resulted in the deaths of eleven Israeli Olympic athletes.

The operation was set up and planned by Mohammed Daoud Oudeh or “Abu Daoud,” a personal friend of Yasir Arafat and one of the founders of the al-Fatah group within the PLO (www.seattlepi.com/sports/article/Munich-mastermind-has-no-regrets-1196762.php). It had the personal endorsement of Arafat, who saw the team off on their mission with the words, “May Allah protect you, Abu Daoud!” (Mohammed Oudeh, Palestine: From Jerusalem to Munich, 1999).

In an interview with Sports Illustrated Abu Daoud affirmed that funds for the Munich terror attack were provided by Mahmoud Abbas, the present Chairman of the PLO since 11 November 2004 and President of the Palestinian National Authority since 15 January 2005 (“The Mastermind, Alexander Wolff, August 26, 2002; Sports Illustrated).

Abu Daoud believes that, if the Israeli delegation had known of Abbas’ role in that attack, the 1993 Oslo Accords would not have been achieved.  Today, of course, Abbas is the President of the Palestinian Authority in Ramallah. German TV interviewed Abu Daoud in 2006, who declared, “I regret nothing. You can only dream that I would apologize.”

Italian author Giulio Meotti recalls,”Given the supposedly apolitical Olympic backdrop, the sight of Jewish sportsmen, blindfolded and manacled, shuffling to their doom in Germany, stirred international revulsion” (Giulio Meotti, A New Shoah: The Untold Story of Israel’s Victims of Terrorism). The distance between the Munich Olympic Village and the Nazi murder-camp of Dachau is less than ten miles.

On September 5, 1972 the Munich Olympic Games were temporarily suspended. But Avery Brundage, President of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) declared that “the Games must go on.” A short memorial service was held, and the Olympic Flag was flown at half-mast. Ten Arab nations objected to their own flags being lowered to honor the murdered Israeli athletes, and as a result their flags were restored to the tops of their flagpoles almost immediately. Within 24 hours, by September 6, 1972, the Games continued.

Violating the image of God

Sports Illustrated quoted Dutch distance runner Jos Hermens as saying at that time, “You give a party, and someone is killed at the party, you don’t continue the party. I’m going home.” That basic and fundamental human decency was not part of the Olympic Committee’s work ethic.

Since 1972 the IOC has refused to officially acknowledge or commemorate the Israeli victims of the Munich massacre, saying that this could alienate other members of the Olympic community (https://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3581866.stm).

Current IOC President Jacques Rogge declared just before the London 2012 Games that “the opening ceremony is an atmosphere that is not fit to remember such a tragic incident” (https://cnsnews.com/news/article/olympics-opening-ceremony-honored-british-terror-victims-not-israelis-killed-munich).

Nevertheless, there was time given at the opening ceremony to remember the jihadi terror attack of 7/7 (July 7, 2005) in London, where 52 civilians were murdered and over 700 were wounded. When NBC dropped their U.S. coverage of that part of the 2012 opening ceremony to broadcast an interview with Michael Phelps, the response was British outrage at many levels (www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2181011/NBC-coverage-Outrage-claiming-7-7-tribute-Olympic-Opening-Ceremony-wasnt-tailored-U-S-audience.html).

It is unfortunate that British and Olympic outrage was not similarly stirred up regarding Israeli casualties of terror.

“All your allies have forgotten you; they care nothing for you… But all who devour you will be devoured; all your enemies will go into exile. Those who plunder you will be plundered; all who make spoil of you I will despoil. But I will restore you to health and heal your wounds, declares YHVH, because you are called an outcast, ‘Zion for whom no one cares’” (Jeremiah 30:14, 16-17).

Meotti remarks that “the Israeli athletes were the first Jews killed in Germany for being Jewish since 1945. Since then, their murder vanished from international memory.” Because the IOC has refused the few seconds of silence in their honor, “the 11 Israelis died a second time” and this year’s distribution of medals “will be stained in disgrace and shame,” he said.

U.S.  Representative  Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said, “We know why the IOC has refused: Because the murdered Olympians were Israelis, and the IOC does not want to draw the ire of foreign governments who still object to the very existence of a Jewish state in the homeland of the Jewish people. Well, the leadership of the IOC needs to recognize that leadership is about doing the right thing, particularly when it’s not the easy thing. The Olympics are not about taking the path of least resistance,” she said. “The Olympics are about overcoming obstacles and going the extra mile” (https://cnsnews.com/news/article/olympics-opening-ceremony-honored-british-terror-victims-not-israelis-killed-munich).

Crocodile tears versus humble confession

Two interesting responses should be noted regarding these issues.

Jibril Rajoub, Chairman of the Palestinian Olympic Committee and the Palestinian Football Association. sent a letter to IOC President Rogge thanking him for his stance in not permitting a remembrance of the Israeli victims murdered by PLO terror.  “Sport is a bridge for love, unification and for spreading peace among the nations, and it must not be a cause for divisiveness and for the spreading of racism,” he declared (www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/Article.aspx?id=280727). Jibril is a former terrorist, and is well known in the Palestinian community for his cruelty in interrogating fellow Palestinians as Head of Arafat’s Preventative Security Force (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jibril_Rajoub).

On the other hand, Prime Minister David Cameron spoke at a non-IOC event in Guildhall, London organized by the National Olympic Committee of Israel, the Jewish Committee for the London Games and the Embassy of Israel. Here are excerpts of his address:

“This evening we mark the 40th anniversary of one of the darkest days in the history of the Olympic Games. A sickening act of terrorism that betrayed everything the Olympic movement stands for and everything that we in Britain believe in … So as the world comes together in London to celebrate the Games and the values it represents, it is right that we should stop and remember the 11 Israeli athletes who so tragically lost their lives when those values came under attack in Munich 40 years ago. It was a truly shocking act of evil. A crime against the Jewish people. A crime against humanity. A crime the world must never forget. We remember too the six Israeli holiday makers brutally murdered by a suicide bomber in Bulgaria just last month.”

“And let me say that we in Britain will do everything we can in helping to hunt down those responsible for that attack. Britain will always be a staunch friend of Israel. And we will stand with the Jewish people – and with all victims of terror around the world, whoever they are and wherever they are from.”

“The British people know only too well what it is like to suffer at the hands of terrorists. In July 2005 our euphoria at winning the right to host these Olympics was brutally shattered within just 24 hours when terrorists targeted the London transport system and 52 innocent men and women were murdered. But our two countries, Britain and Israel share the same determination to fight terrorism and to ensure that these evil deeds will never win.”

“We remember them today, with you, as fathers, husbands, and athletes. As innocent men. As Olympians. And as members of the People of Israel, murdered doing nothing more and nothing less than representing their country in sport” (www.number10.gov.uk/news/munich-memorial/).

Global celebrations versus Zechariah’s horsemen 

The prophet Zechariah had a night vision which perplexed him. All the world seemed to be at peace and at rest, having a wonderful time. Yet Zechariah’s prophetic spirit was deeply grieved by this false peace and the false sense of celebration.

On the twenty-fourth day of the eleventh month, the month of Shvat, in the second year of Darius, the word of YHVH came to the prophet Zechariah son of Berechiah, the son of Iddo.

During the night I had a vision, and there before me was a man mounted on a red horse. He was standing among the myrtle trees in a ravine. Behind him were red, brown and white horses. I asked, “What are these, my lord?” The Angel who was talking with me answered, “I will show you what they are.” Then the man standing among the myrtle trees explained, “They are the ones YHVH has sent to go throughout the earth.” And they reported to the Angel of YHVH who was standing among the myrtle trees, “We have gone throughout the earth and found the whole world at rest and in peace.”

Then the Angel of YHVH said, “YHVH Almighty, how long will you withhold mercy from Jerusalem and from the towns of Judah, which you have been angry with these seventy years?” So YHVH spoke kind and comforting words to the Angel who talked with me.

Then the Angel who was speaking to me said, “Proclaim this word: This is what YHVH Almighty says: ‘I am very jealous for Jerusalem and Zion, and I am very angry with the nations that feel secure. I was only a little angry, but they went too far with the punishment.’

“Therefore this is what YHVH says: ‘I will return to Jerusalem with mercy, and there My house will be rebuilt. And the measuring line will be stretched out over Jerusalem,’ declares YHVH Almighty. Proclaim further: This is what YHVH Almighty says: ‘My towns will again overflow with prosperity, and YHVH will again comfort Zion and choose Jerusalem.’”  (Zechariah 1:7-17)

How can we pray?

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do!

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal) through: www.davidstent.org

Shattering the gates of Damascus (Amos 1:5)

Damascus is the crown jewel of the Arab world, culturally and historically. It is one of the oldest continuously inhabited cities and capitals on the planet (Ezekiel 27:16), a star member of the United Nations’ World Heritage Sites. Yet at this very moment Damascus is engulfed in the throes of riot, butchery and civil war. The aftershocks of this battle are rippling from Morocco to Medina, and from Jerusalem to the Kremlin and to Langley.

Before and after Abraham

The country known today as Syria has an older Biblical name – Aram. Five regions of this area included Aram Naharayim (“Aram between the Two Rivers,” Hebrew of Genesis 24:10; often translated as Mesopotamia in Greek), Aram Zobah, Aram Maacah (Psalm 60:1; 1 Chronicles 19:6), Aram Rehov and Aram Tov (2 Samuel 10:8).

The Semitic word Aram may be connected to the same root as the second syllable in the word Abramram or lifted up (see Isaiah 6:1) – that is, a mountainous range. The sorcerer Balaam declared that he came “from Aram … from the mountains of the East” (Numbers 23:7).

Another name for part of this region was Paddan Aram (the plain of field of Aram, Genesis 25:10).  Rebekah the daughter of Bethuel lived in that fertile valley, as did her brother Laban (Genesis 25:20).

Though many modern translations call Laban a Syrian, the Hebrew text describes him as an Aramean.  Abraham’s father Terah was not from Aram but from Ur (Genesis 11:28-32), but Terah settled in the region of Aram and became a “landed immigrant” in an Aramean town named Haran. Abraham handed down that memory of his own sojourn in Aram to both Isaac and Jacob, and Jacob described his grandfather to Pharaoh as “a wandering Aramean” (see Deuteronomy 26:5).

The personal name Aram goes back to Noah’s son Shem, who gave birth to five sons – Elam, Asshur, Arpachshad, Lud, and Aram (Genesis 10:22). This Aram was the forefather of the Arameans, while Abraham was descended from a different dynasty, the line of Arpachshad (Genesis 11:11-26).

Abraham’s brother Nahor did not move with Abraham to Beer Sheva in the land of Canaan, but sat tight in Paddan Aram. He fathered eight sons, one of whom was named Haran (like the city they lived in) and one was named Aram (in honor of the country where they had become residents – Genesis 22:19-23).

The Bible teaches that the original Arameans (or Syrians, to use the modern term) are not physical sons of Abraham. They are Semites – they are descendants of Shem – but they are only distantly related to Abraham (eight generations back) and therefore are not an Abrahamic people in origin.

The origin of the term Syria most probably goes back to how an ancient Anatolian people  – the Luwians (www.aina.org/articles/ttaasa.pdf ) who came from the Hittite Cilician region (Adana in modern Turkey) – described the Assyrians and their conquests of Aram in the west using similar sounding words (su+ra/i). The term “Syrian” was later used in Assyrian and Greek days to describe what the Bible calls "the Arameans of Damascus” (2 Samuel 8:5; Amos 9:7; 2 Samuel 10:8,16; 2 Chronicles 28:5).

Warfare, prophets and minefields

The twelve tribes of Israel fought against the Arameans in nearly every generation. The Hebrew Scriptures describe King David’s battles against the Arameans, and his stunning victories over them: “Then David put garrisons in Aram of Damascus; and the Arameans became servants to David, and brought tribute. And YHVH gave victory to David wherever he went” (2 Samuel 8:6).

The prophetic ministry knows no national bounds. In I Kings 19:15, YHVH commissioned the Jewish prophet Elijah to anoint the Gentile Hazael to be king over Aram, though in the end it was actually Elijah’s disciple Elisha who anointed Hazael for that task (2 Kings 8:7-15). The God of Israel gave Elisha prophetic vision to see that Hazael would assassinate Ben Hadad the king of Aram and usurp his throne, eventually bringing savage destruction upon the Jewish people.  Elisha’s anointing of Hazael was accompanied by his own bitter tears.

The armies of Aram were cruel to the Jewish people in war, forcing Jewish prisoners of war in Gilead to lie down on the ground and have threshing sledges of iron dragged over their bodies until they were massacred (Amos 1:3). God’s punishment of the Arameans for their cursing of Israel would include them being temporarily exiled to Kir (Amos 1:5), their original homeland before they had migrated to Aram (Amos 9:7).

One of Aram’s top generals was a valiant warrior of exceptional bravery named Na’aman (2 Kings 5:1, 13). YHVH had granted him a measure of victory even over His own people Israel (2 Kings 5:1-2).  Na’aman’s Aramean armies would often make commando raids on Israelite army positions (see 2 Kings 6:8-17).

The idol worship of the Arameans eventually influenced and brought judgment on Judah through the unfaithful heart of Ahaz. He had his architects make a sketch of the Arameans’ Damascus altar, and his stoneworkers built a virtual copy of that altar in the courts of Solomon’s Temple:

“Then King Ahaz went to Damascus to meet Tiglath-Pileser king of Assyria. He saw an altar in Damascus and sent to Uriah the priest a sketch of the altar, with detailed plans for its construction. So Uriah the priest built an altar in accordance with all the plans that King Ahaz had sent from Damascus. He finished it before King Ahaz returned. When the king came back from Damascus and saw the altar, he approached it and presented offerings on it... (But) the bronze altar that stood before YHVH, he … put on the north side of the new altar. King Ahaz then gave these orders to Uriah the priest: ‘On the large new altar, offer the … offering(s) … Splash against this altar the blood of all the burnt offerings and sacrifices. But I will use the bronze altar for seeking guidance.” So Uriah the priest did just as King Ahaz had ordered’ ” (2 Kings 16:10-16).

“In his time of trouble King Ahaz became even more unfaithful to YHVH. He offered sacrifices to the gods of Damascus, who had defeated him; for he thought, ‘Since the gods of the kings of Aram have helped them, I will sacrifice to them so they will help me.’ But they were his downfall and the downfall of all Israel” (2 Chronicles 28:23-25).

“Therefore YHVH his God delivered Ahaz into the hands of the King of Aram. The Arameans defeated him and took many of his people as prisoners and brought them to Damascus” (2 Chronicles 28:5).

The Muslim Brotherhood in Syria

Throughout its long history the Arab world has been ruled by dictatorships. Sasha Baron Cohen’s risqué comedy “The Dictator” shines the spotlight on this fact. In the modern period two main examples of Arab dictatorships basically come to mind – either military despots or Islamist tyrants.  Though it is true that a few kings and princes still tenuously hold on to power in their last bastions of  Morocco, Jordan and the Gulf States, these rulers are deeply apprehensive about the rise of Islamist revolution, known elsewhere as “the Arab Spring.”

Tunisia, Libya, Egypt and Yemen have all seen secular street riots morph into Islamist takeovers. Secular military dictators have first been assassinated (Libya’s Gaddafi) or imprisoned (Egypt’s Mubarak). Into the chaos steps the jihadi Muslim Brotherhood (MB), taking the reins of power with a seemingly self-effacing shrug of the shoulders.

The MB is committed to Islamist dictatorship through the forced application of shari’a or classical Islamic law, through the re-establishment of a world-wide Islamist Caliphate dictatorship, and through jihad or Islamist terror war as its main goal (see www.davidstent.org; “words’ February 2006).  Its slogan is simple and direct: “Allah is our goal, the Prophet our model, the Qur'an our Constitution, Jihad our path and death for the case of Allah our most sublime belief” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Brotherhood).; www.fas.org/irp/world/para/mb.htm).

Syria’s connection to the MB goes back to the period between 1930 and 1945, when the MB party was established in that country. In 1961 it won 5.8% of the house seats in parliamentary elections, but after the pan-Arabist and secular Arab Socialist Ba’ath Party’s putsch in 1963, the MB was banned in 1964. MB-instigated strikes and demonstrations in 1964-65 were crushed by the army and police, and MB assassinations of prominent Syrian politicians and Alawite leaders occurred regularly between 1976 and 1979.

On June 16, 1979 the MB attacked and killed 83 cadets at the Aleppo Artillery School, and terror attacks became commonplace in Aleppo and northern Syrian cities. On March 8, 1980 most Syrian cities were paralyzed by strikes, street demonstrations and battles with security forces. The MB was one of the major leaders of these riots.

Former Syrian President Hafez al-Assad sent tens of thousands of troops, along with tanks and helicopters against the demonstrators, killing hundreds and arresting 8,000. Within a month the revolt had been crushed. At that time the President’s brother Rifa’at al-Assad declared that the Syrian government was prepared to “sacrifice a million martyrs” (over a tenth of Syria's population at that time) in order to stamp out “the nation's enemies.” In April 1980 the Syrian army executed 400 male inhabitants of the city of Hama over the age of 14 as a reprisal for MB activities.

A failed assassination attempt against President al-Assad on June 26, 1980 resulted in him immediately ordering the execution of 1,200 MB members in their cells in Tadmor Prison, near ancient Palmyra.

On July 7 1980 under Emergency Law 49, membership in Syria’s MB became a capital offence.

Hama rules

In August, September and November 1981 the MB carried out three massive car bombings in Damascus, killing hundreds.  On February 2, 1982 a Syrian army night patrol stumbled upon the Hama hideout of the MB’s main guerilla commander. The patrol was annihilated in the ensuing firefight. This led the MB to call for jihad against the secular Syrian regime. By morning over 70 major Ba’ath (Syrian government) leaders had been killed, and MB declared to the 250,000 people in Hama that it was now a liberated city. The MB urged the population to rise up “against the infidel.”

During the first four days of fighting, the Syrian Air Force conducted aerial bombings of the Old City, after which tanks broke into those areas. Reports were received that hydrogen cyanide gas was used by the army. Fierce resistance halted the army’s incursions, and so for the next three weeks the city was first encircled, and then shelled continuously. After the artillery barrages ceased, Syrian military and secret service personnel went house to house through the ruins, arresting, torturing and conducting mass executions.

Rifa’at al-Assad  (who was in charge of this operation) believed that MB fighters were hiding in a honeycombed network of tunnels. As a result, following strategies used by the Nazis in the Warsaw Ghetto, he had diesel fuel pumped into the tunnels and then set them ablaze. He had already pre-positioned Russian T-72 tanks at the tunnel exits, whose mission was to shell escaping MB fighters.

Journalist Robert Fisk, who was in Hama shortly after the massacre, originally estimated fatalities at 10,000, but has since doubled the estimate to 20,000. The President’s brother Rifa’at al-Assad reportedly boasted of killing 38,000 people. Amnesty International estimated the death toll was between 10,000 and 25,000, the vast majority civilians. The Syrian Human Rights Committee estimated that between 30,000 to 40,000 people were killed. The Syrian Muslim Brotherhood suggests a figure of approximately 40,000 victims.

In 2002 Syrian journalist Subhi Hadidi, wrote that select Syrian army units “under the command of General 'Ali Haydar, besieged the city for 27 days, bombarding it with heavy artillery and tank, before invading it and killing 30,000 or 40,000 of the city's citizens – in addition to the 15,000 missing who have not been found to this day, and the 100,000 expelled” (www.memri.org/report/en/print590.htm).

As a result of the Hama massacre, the Muslim Brotherhood had been broken as a force in Syrian politics. It chose to go underground and bide its time – waiting for the day when its star would again rise over the Land of the Arameans. That time arrived in February 2011, when street demonstrations began to spread throughout Syria (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_2011%E2%80%932012_Syrian_uprising_(January%E2%80%93April_2011); https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_2011%E2%80%932012_Syrian_uprising_(May%E2%80%93August_2011); https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_2011%E2%80%932012_Syrian_uprising_(from_January_2012).

Waiting in the wings

The world’s media is attempting to understand present political developments in Syria without having the ability to discern the spiritual forces and influences involved in the mix. Since the Western world has by and large rejected the determinative role of the Bible or spiritual matters in foreign policy, newspapermen and women find it hard to believe that jihadi groups’ stated goals are actual and real.

Here are examples of news commentators trying to make sense out of Syria’s  boiling cauldron:

www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/06/us-syria-brotherhood-idUSBRE84504R20120506; https://carnegie-mec.org/publications/?fa=48370; www.terrorism-info.org.il/en/article/17924; www.dw.de/dw/article/0,,16131323,00.html.

Hafez al-Assad’s son Bashar is now Syria’s President and leader of Syria’s Alawites. The Alawites are an offshoot from Islam, considered heretical by both Sunnis and Shi’ites. (www.danielpipes.org/191/the-alawi-capture-of-power-in-syria). The Alawite community managed to take the reins of a military coup in Syria between February 1966 and November 1970, establishing themselves as military dictators in a land known for its many despots (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_heads_of_state_of_Syria).

The approximate religious population in Syria today is: Sunni (74%, which includes MB), Alawite (10%), Christian (10%, including Syrian Orthodox, Greek Orthodox, Catholic and Protestant), and Druze (3%) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Syria).  However, among all these groups the Muslim Brotherhood is the most organized and closest to attaining control over the political chaos which has engulfed Syria.

Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qa’eda

The origins of al Qaeda are found within the historical development of the Muslim Brotherhood. Osama bin Laden (https://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1205/05/cp.01.html), Ayman al-Zawahiri (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayman_al-Zawahiri), Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (www.investigativeproject.org/2552/american-policy-toward-the-muslims-brotherhood) – all were involved in or influenced by major teachers and ideologues of the MB.

Whereas the MB at present attempts to arrive at its stated goals (imposition of shari’a law, restoration of the Islamist Caliphate, and jihad) through gradual co-option of the democratic process when possible, al Qaeda has seen military combat and violent acts of terror as the preferred strategies for the same three goals. Similar strategic disagreements occurred in the late 1920’s between Communist Trotskyites and Stalinists, or in the 1950’s between Russian and Chinese Communists.

Islamic news media as well as Western reporters have noticed a rise in al Qaeda-connected military forces infiltrating and influencing facts on the Syrian battlefield: (www.aljazeera.com/video/middleeast/2012/07/201273081149683986.html; https://m.aljazeera.com/SE/201273081149683986; https://english.al-akhbar.com/node/10062; https://english.al-akhbar.com/content/al-qaeda-syria-new-leader-helm; https://english.al-akhbar.com/content/bilad-al-sham-jihads-newest-hot-spot; www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2011/05/egypts-muslim-brotherhood-sticks-with-bin-laden/238218/).

The future of Syria may well depend on the outcome of the wrestling match between MB and al Qaeda for control of this now-radicalized Sunni country. Similar struggles are occurring at this very moment with much the same dynamic in Libya, Egypt, Yemen and Iraq.

In any event, whether the Muslim Brotherhood, al Qaeda or an Alawite military dictatorship wrests decisive control of Syria, the threat to neighboring nations (especially to Israel, Jordan and Lebanon) remains strong and grows stronger with each passing day.

Syrian weapons of mass destruction

Western intelligence agencies (and especially Israel) have been following Syria’s development of nuclear weapons and nerve gas armaments with deep interest and baited breath: (www.ft.com/cms/s/0/83da4c76-d4c2-11e1-bb88-00144feabdc0.html#axzz22oRGU7Wv; www.newenglishreview.org/custpage.cfm/frm/13108/sec_id/13108; www.stratfor.com/weekly/specter-syrian-chemical-weapons).

Chemical (CW) and biological (BW) weapons are sometimes described as “the poor man’s atom bomb.” Since Syria’s nuclear weapons program was suddenly halted by an unforeseen Israeli bombing raid (www.davidstent.org/dthtm/words.htm# ; “words” October 13, 2007), President al-Assad has focused his efforts on honing and refining his CW and BW stores, as well as on his North Korean, Chinese and Iranian missile arsenals.

Ø  Remembering Rifa’at al-Assad’s infamous declaration that the regime would be willing to murder a million Syrians to preserve its hegemony, and considering the long-standing hatred that the Arameans of Damascus have had for the people of Israel, we strongly encourage you to make these issues a matter of prayer.

Ruins on the Highway of Peace

The prophet Isaiah leaves us with two brief snapshots of future events in the region of Aram Naharayim.

The first is in Isaiah 17, where two declarations stand out: “Behold, Damascus is taken away from being a city, and it shall be a ruinous heap” (verse 1); “At eventide, behold, terror; and before the morning they are not. This is the portion of them that despoil us, and the lot of them that rob us” (verse 14).

These scriptures indicate that unspecified yet traumatic disasters will overtake the capital city of Aram, and that these disasters are judgments on the Syrian people because of their cursing the Jewish people, who are the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob (Genesis 12:3).

The second passage is in Isaiah 19:23-25, which actually does not mention Aram, but does mention Ashur or Assyria: “In that day shall there be a highway out of Egypt to Assyria, and the Assyrian shall come into Egypt, and the Egyptian into Assyria; and the Egyptians shall worship with the Assyrians. In that day Israel will be the third with Egypt and with Assyria, a blessing in the midst of the earth. For YHVH of armies has blessed them, saying, ‘Blessed be Egypt My people, and Assyria the work of My hands, and Israel My inheritance.’ ”

This divine word prophesies that a highway of peace will cut across the Middle East in the Days of Messiah, joining the peoples and countries of Egypt, Israel and northern Iraq (today’s Kurdish region near Mosul and Kirkuk) in blessing, worship and the favor of YHVH.

Two points worth mentioning: such a road will need to pass through Aram (Syria) on its way to Assyria (northern Iraq). Is it too much to hope that YHVH’s blessing will also touch those Arameans who live along this divine future superhighway?

And a last thought: while Egypt and Assyria will enter into a wonderful and blessed intimacy with the God of Israel, YHVH still reserves a special term for His own Jewish people – “Israel My inheritance.”   “And He has lifted up the horn of His people, who are the praise of all His saints – the children of Israel, a people who is near to Him. So praise YHVH!” (Psalm 148:14).

How can we pray?

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do!

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal) through: www.davidstent.org

The Changing of the Guards

Two significant Middle Eastern events transpired on June 30, 2012. In Israel former Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir passed away at the age of 96. In Egypt the Muslim Brotherhood candidate Mohamed Morsi became the fifth President of the Arab world’s largest country at the age of 60. In the sovereignty of God, these two personalities and all that they represent had an unintended meeting on this date on the pages of history – one moving off the stage of international politics, the other stepping up to the plate.

From Polish shtetl to Israeli bricklayer

In 1915 Yitzhak Jeziernicki was born to parents Shlomo and Perl in the small Polish town of Ruzhany, then part of the Russian Empire. His father ran a small leather factory in the predominantly Yiddish-speaking municipality. Yitzhak attended a Hebrew high school in Bialystok, joined Vladimir Jabotinsky’s Betar youth scouting movement, and soon after moved to Warsaw to study law (where Menahem Begin was then completing his own law degree).

In 1935 Yitzhak opened up a Warsaw newspaper to see an announcement of the impending visit to Poland of Nazi Minister of Propaganda Josef Goebbels.  Yitzhak asked himself, “What are you doing here? Poland is lost.” So at the age of twenty he cut short his law studies and took a steamer to the British Mandate of Palestine, where he worked first as a bricklayer and then as an accountant.  His family would not be able to follow him a few years later, unable to come up with the £1,000 per head necessary for a visa.

On November 2, 1942 his father, mother and one sister were forced onto a train travelling to the notorious Nazi death camp Treblinka. His father managed to jump off the train, and returned to Ruzhany to seek shelter with Polish friends, who promptly stoned him to death.  Shlomo’s wife and daughter were gassed in Treblinka. The other sister, her husband and children managed to flee the town for a pre-arranged shelter in the woods. They were murdered by a Polish friend who had helped build the shelter, and who then seized the family property.

After these events, Jeziernicki changed his family name to the Hebrew word Shamir, which means either a sharp stone which can cut steel, or a thorn that stabs. He would later comment (in an interview with Ha’aretz newspaper) that “the Poles imbibe anti-Semitism with their mothers’ milk.” Avi Pazner, Shamir’s media advisor and present at the interview, tried to cover for his boss, saying “That was off the record.” “No it wasn’t!” insisted Shamir.

He was talking from his own experience. Though over a million Poles were involved in sheltering Jews during WWII, over three million Poles seized the property of their Jewish neighbors as they were being carted off to Nazi camps. For those interested in greater understanding of these phenomena, the following books by Jan T. Gross are recommended, “Neighbors: the Destruction of the Jewish Community of Jedwabne, Poland” (Penguin, 2001); “Fear: Anti-Semitism in Poland after Auschwitz” (Random House, 2006).

Shamir said that he never missed Poland or dreamed of its countryside. For Shamir, Israel was the homeland he had envisioned as a child. Biblical heroes like Moses and David were the ones who “peopled his dreams.”

Underground warrior during the British Mandate

Shamir quickly joined the Irgun Tzvai Le’umi or Etzel, a Jewish underground group determined to expel the British Empire’s soldiers and to establish a Jewish state in the ancient homeland promised to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. The Irgun saw Britain as a colonialist occupying power, one which had looked with favor upon the establishment of a Jewish state in its Balfour Declaration, but which according to Jewish understanding then had perfidiously backtracked on its international commitments to the League of Nations, betraying the Jewish people’s national aspirations (www.simpletoremember.com/articles/a/the_british_mandate/; www.trumanlibrary.org/whistlestop/study_collections/israel/large/index.php).

During (and also after) WWII British forces refused to allow Jewish refugees fleeing Hitler any access to the Jewish homeland, (www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005459; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aliyah_Bet; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS_Exodus) and British military advisors (like Sir John Glubb; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Bagot_Glubb) armed and trained Arabs armies – both regular and irregular forces – in their moves to wipe out an independent Jewish population in what was then called Mandatory Palestine.

In 1940 the Irgun underwent a split over whether or not to cooperate with the British during WWII. Shamir joined the Stern Gang (later known as Lohamei Herut Israel, Fighters for the freedom of Israel, or Lehi; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lehi_(group)) group which refused under any circumstances to cooperate with His Majesty’s forces, as long as British soldiers were blocking Jewish restoration to their land. Shamir was arrested twice and escaped twice – even from exile to Eritrea, and made his way back to the land of Israel. He became Lehi’s operational leader, taking on the operational code name of “Michael” in honor of anti-British Irish Republican leader Michael Collins.

Lehi believed that the British would only withdraw from their Palestine Mandate when the pain threshold got too high. To this end they targeted high British officials, including Sir Harold MacMichael, High Commissioner for the British Palestine Mandate, in a failed assassination attempt.  They successfully assassinated Lord Moyne, British Minister Resident in the Middle East (the highest British official in the area), in November 1944.

Revolutionary parallels

Shamir later reminisced, “There are those who say that to kill (ed., a British officer) is terrorism, but to attack an army camp is guerrilla warfare and to bomb civilians is professional warfare. But I think it is the same from the moral point of view. Is it better to drop an atomic bomb on a city than to kill a handful of persons? I don’t think so. But nobody says that President Truman was a terrorist. All the men we went for individually … were personally interested in succeeding in the fight against us. So it was more efficient and more moral to go for selected targets. In any case, it was the only way we could operate, because we were so small. For us it was not a question of the professional honor of a soldier, it was the question of an idea, an aim that had to be achieved. We were aiming at a political goal. There are many examples of what we did to be found in the BibleGideon and Samson, for instance. This had an influence on our thinking. And we also learned from the history of other peoples who fought for their freedom – the Russian and Irish revolutionaries, Giuseppe Garibaldi and Josip Broz Tito” (Nicholas Bethell , The Palestine Triangle: The Struggle between British, Jews, and the Arabs, 1935–48 [1979], page 278).

Daniel Gordis (Senior Vice President and Koret Distinguished Fellow at the Shalem Center in Jerusalem) has commented, “Are we foolish enough to imagine that the British relinquished their hold on the colonies because early colonial Americans signed petitions? American Revolutionary heroes knew exactly what Shamir and others knew: The British would leave when the costs became too high. The difference is that the American Revolution has the advantage of having unfolded centuries, rather than decades ago, so many of the disturbing details have been lost. But are we so naïve to imagine that there are not profound parallels and continuities between what unfolded in the 13 colonies in the middle of the 18th century and what happened in Palestine in the middle of the 20th? Ben-Gurion, Begin, Shamir, and their generation, like Washington, Adams, Jefferson, and theirs, believed that freedom would come only with sovereignty and that sovereignty would come only with victory. No matter Labor or Likud, they all shared that belief – and they were all right” (www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/105259/israels-grittiest-founder?all=1).

As the United States of America finishes the celebration of its July 4th  Independence Day, the reminiscences of Shamir the freedom fighter bear serious consideration.

I love Paris in the Springtime

Some years after Israel’s Declaration of Independence in May 1948, Shamir was employed by Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency for ten years at its Paris office, at one point overseeing Operation Damocles – a cloak-and-dagger operation which targeted former Nazi scientists employed in Egypt. These German scientists were engaged in developing improved V2 rockets equipped with poison gas and targeted at Israel’s population centers (www.haaretz.com/print-edition/features/targeted-killings-a-retro-fashion-very-much-in-vogue-1.117714).

Shamir later joined Menahem Begin’s Herut (later Likud) party, eventually becoming Member of Knesset (1973), Speaker of the Knesset (1977), Foreign Minister (1980) and Prime Minister (1983), succeeding Begin when he retired.

During his time as Knesset Speaker, Shamir refused to vote in favor of the Camp David Accords but abstained twice, believing that Begin was acceding too much tangible territory (the whole of the Sinai Peninsula, rich in petroleum resources) to Egypt (a country whose leadership and population harbored deep-seated animosity toward Israel) for an uncertain and intangible declaration of peace.

A recent editorial comment in the Jerusalem Post wryly supports Shamir’s position with the hindsight of history:

Perhaps due to his selfless focus on doing what is right for his people, Shamir’s principled positions have stood the test of time. One example was his opposition to the Camp David Accord with Egypt. Shamir was not against negotiating a peace deal with Egypt. He understood the strategic importance of quiet on the southern border that even a cold peace with Cairo could bring. However, Shamir, like others on the Right at the time, felt the price Israel was paying for such a peace was too high. In light of Israel’s powerlessness to combat the anarchy that has taken hold in Sinai in the past year or so, one cannot help acknowledge Shamir’s well-founded worries regarding a complete Israeli pullout and wonder whether Menahem Begin could have reached a peace agreement with Egypt without compromising so much, thus placing Israel in a better strategic position to combat lawlessness in the peninsula” (www.jpost.com/Opinion/Editorials/Article.aspx?id=275934).

Shamir, Scuds and the Madrid betrayal

As Israeli Prime Minister, Shamir found himself involved in historic events in Israel and the Middle East. He ardently advocated the return of Jewish people from their Exile in Russia and the Ukraine (in spite of harsh opposition from former US Secretary of State James Baker; “A Turkey Hunt in Israel www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/3209), as well as backing Operation Solomon (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Solomon) to the hilt, a Mossad-run operation bringing over 14,000 Ethiopian black skinned Falashas (followers of Judaism) to Israel in a massive and secret airlift.

Shamir once commented to American Jewish youth that they need to understand that “man does live by bread alone” and that Jewish people need to “learn and understand Jewish history (and) the Bible … and reach the only conclusion: to come on aliyah (immigration) to Israel” (Zev Golan, Stern: The Man and His Gang, pp. 219-223).

Shamir cooperated with President George H.R. Bush’s high-pressure request not to respond to 39 Iraqi SCUD rocket attacks on Israel’s civilian population during the First Gulf War (Operation Desert Storm, January and February 1991) in exchange for American promises of political understanding and cooperation that were never kept (see Broken covenant: American foreign policy and the crisis between the U.S. and Israel, Moshe Arens, Simon & Schuster, 1995).

Immediately after the Gulf War, Bush and Baker twisted Israel’s arm to participate in the Madrid Peace Conference. These talks established a U.S.-backed precedent for pressuring Israel to give up concrete physical territories captured in defensive wars in exchange for blithe and unenforceable Arab declarations of peace. Shamir was looking for “peace for peace” – Arab commitments to recognize a Jewish homeland and state, and not to shrink the Jewish state’s borders. Former Israeli Foreign Minister Abba Eban spoke for many in Israel when he once described the 1948 Green Line cease-fire lines as Israel’s “Auschwitz borders” – meaning that a withdrawal to the 1948 lines would mean the death of Israel (www.mefacts.com/outgoing.asp?x_id=10191).

Peace, peace yet there is no peace

The Arab world was not prepared to recognize a Jewish state no matter what its borders were, and strategically saw the “peace process” as a way to whittle Israel down to size before crushing it in a surprise military attack.  Shamir discerned this and had no interest in making the Arab world’s job any easier.

Noted Middle East expert Professor Gerald Steinberg comments:

Shamir … saw no prospect of any significant agreements with the PLO, or with Syria, Iraq, and the other rejectionist Arabs. In Washington, Bush told Shamir that Israel could not maintain sovereignty over the West Bank indefinitely. In response, Shamir pointedly declared that Israel would never relinquish Judea and Samaria. At the same time, Ben Aharon declared that Israel would never negotiate on the basis of land for peace. For Shamir and the Israelis who supported him, Arab terror and warfare is seen as a continuation of the long history of efforts to destroy the Jewish people. (According to poll data, some 60% of Jewish Israelis believed that the ultimate Arab objective continued to be the destruction of Israel, despite the peace talks).  From this perspective, the silence and even cooperation of the rest of the world in the face of Arab violence is evidence of the continuation of these basic attitudes towards Jews. Nothing Israel could do, short of committing national suicide, would satisfy this hostile world.”

On this basis, Shamir had opposed the peace agreement with Egypt and the return of the Sinai, and now, formal negotiations, particularly in the form of an international conference, would lead to massive pressure from all sides to force Israel to give up more land and make other concessions. If Israel agreed, it would weaken national security, and if Jerusalem refused, Israel would be blamed for the collapse of the process. The Arabs, Shamir was convinced, had no interest in making peace with or accepting the legitimacy of Israel, and each of the proposals and efforts to begin negotiations posed a dangerous trap that could only lead to greater danger. Any process of negotiation was seen as a ‘slippery slope’, and once movement started, Israel would lose control, and be forced to make dangerous concessions. The status quo, in which Israeli maintained control over Judea and Samaria, and the Golan Heights, was least dangerous” (“A Nation That Dwells Alone? Foreign Policy in the 1992 Elections”; Professor Gerald Steinberg;  https://faculty.biu.ac.il/~steing/election/elec92.htm).

A similar perspective is echoed in a recent Jerusalem Post editorial: “The Madrid Conference and the Oslo Accords did not fail solely or principally because of a lack of willingness on Israel’s part. Rather, as Shamir feared, peace has been elusive primarily because Palestinians have consistently opted to turn to terrorism and to cling to extremist, Islamist ideology. The 2006 Palestinian election, won by Hamas, was the culmination of this process” (www.jpost.com/Opinion/Editorials/Article.aspx?id=275934).

In 1994, three years after the Madrid Conference and one year after the Oslo Accords, Shamir pointedly remarked that peace “was not in the picture and it is still not there as I write … while President Bush, President Gorbachev, Secretary Baker and I have all, in the meanwhile, left the stage” (www.timesofisrael.com/yitzhak-shamir-the-stubborn-embodiment-of-jewish-self-reliance/).

Daniel Gordis concludes, “For all the misgivings many now have about Shamir’s intransigence or his specific policies, part of his legacy is that Jews ought not to pretend not to know what, deep down, they know. Yitzhak Shamir knew what he had seen, both in Europe and then in the Arab world, and he knew what it meant. He was no less ambivalent about the Arabs than he was about the Poles and refused to vote for Begin’s peace treaty with Egypt. Presumably in deference to Begin, he abstained, but he made it clear that he thought Israel was paying far too high a price. Today, three and a half decades later, with the Muslim Brotherhood’s rise to power in Cairo and with Israel now missing the Sinai as a buffer, who was wiser?” (www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/105259/israels-grittiest-founder?all=1).

Muslim Brotherhood roots and fruits

Bob Dylan dryly whispers a warning in his song, “The Changing of the Guards” (© 1978, Special Rider Music), “Either brace yourself for elimination or else your hearts must have the courage for the changing of the guards.”

In the words of the British punk band The Clash, the Arab Casbah is rocking, and the changing of the guard is what’s happening across North Africa and the Middle East. Street riots have raged across the Islamic world, and world media originally knighted them with a pop title “The Arab Spring.”  Though initially headed by Facebook and Twitter-blogging young laptop-carrying Arabs, the initial “street fighting men” have given way to Islamist dictatorships in Tunisia, Libya and Egypt. In each case the initial youth protest was subtly subverted, co-opted by Muslim Brotherhood politicians.

The Muslim Brotherhood (MB, or in Arabic al-Ikhwan) is an Islamist organization calling for jihad or holy war against its enemies (which include Israel, America and all Western nations). Its official slogan is “Allah is (the Muslim Brotherhood’s) goal, the Prophet its model, the Qur'an its Constitution, Jihad its path, and death for the case of Allah its most sublime belief” (see “Hurtling Through The Fog of War: A Messianic Perspective On The New Hamastan”; February 2006; www.davidstent.org).

Though spinmeisters in the Western world are desperately attempting to do drastic plastic surgery on MB’s strong jihadi features, al-Ikhwan’s goals are not hidden but are available to anyone with access to a laptop and the internet.

The Muslim Brotherhood, or Society of Muslim Brothers (Jama'at al-Ikhwan al-Muslimin) was founded in Egypt (1928) by Hassan al-Banna, a school teacher. Its original purpose was to unite Muslims against British domination through a return to an Islamic or shari’a state. After the British departed from Egypt, al-Ikhwan proclaimed that it would not compromise either with modern secular Arab societies or with military dictatorships. Egypt and Algeria – even Saudi Arabia – were less than purely Islamic in the Brotherhood's eyes. From the Brotherhood perspective most Arab and Islamic states are diluted and adulterated, evil and in need of being overthrown. Only strict Islamic rule and the re-establishment of the Muslim Caliphate or khilafah is ultimately acceptable, in MB eyes.

Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qa’eda

The Brotherhood attempted to overthrow Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser in 1954. Their revolution failed, and many members were jailed in Egyptian concentration camps and severely tortured.  Sayyad Qutb, a main Brotherhood theologian, was imprisoned, tortured and later executed in 1966. Qutb's brother moved to Saudi Arabia and later became the mentor of Ayman al-Zawahiri. Eventually al-Zawahiri would become Osama Bin Laden's chief deputy.

During the 1930's and 1940's the Muslim Brotherhood had links with the Nazis, including Himmler's man in Jerusalem Haj Amin al-Husseini. It first established a Gaza cell, and in May 1946 set up a Jerusalem cell in the Sheikh Jarrakh neighborhood. Yasser Arafat joined the Muslim Brotherhood in 1952. Brotherhood members in East Jerusalem established a shadow organization in 1953 called Hizb ut-Tahrir al-Islami (Islamic Party of Liberation; www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/para/hizb-ut-tahrir.htm) which today is a worldwide terror organization.

In the late 1970's Brotherhood members established Egyptian Islamic Jihad (Al-Jihad al-Islami; also called the Islamic Jihad or the Jihad Group) led by Ayman al-Zawahiri, and Jama’at al-Islamiyya or al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya (The Islamic Group) led by the blind Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman. Rahman is now serving a life sentence in Florence Colorado for his role in directing the first bombing of the World Trade Center in 1983, as well as for thwarted plans to bomb NY tunnels and bridges as well as FBI and UN headquarters. Both organizations' primary goals have been to overthrow the Egyptian Government, to replace it with an Islamic state, and to attack American and Israeli interests in Egypt and abroad.

Ayman al-Zawahiri was jailed in Egypt for his part in planning and carrying out President Anwar al-Sadat’s 1981 assassination. He was later released and went on to become Bin Laden's deputy in al-Qa'eda. Muhammad Atef followed al-Zawahiri and was involved with him in planning and executing the 1998 attacks on U.S. embassies in East Africa and the 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

Al-Ikhwan remains a force with which to be reckoned. And it has seized power in the Arab world’s strongest and most influential country. And its President Mohamed Morsi is currently seeking the amnesty and release of blind Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, master planner of the first World Trade Center bombing n 1983 (www.nytimes.com/2012/06/30/world/middleeast/morsi-promises-to-work-for-release-of-omar-abdel-rahman.html?pagewanted=all)!

MB strategies for Egypt and Israel

The strategies of the Muslim Brotherhood involve revolution where possible, but where it is not possible then the strategy morphs into a step-by-step process of incremental moves toward a shari’a state, a Muslim dictatorship (www.youtube.com/watch?v=reLigeHGKzE; www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/egypt/9367022/Nazir-Ali-How-Mohammed-Morsi-Egypts-first-Islamist-president-interprets-Sharia-law-will-be-a-crucial-test.html; www.theblaze.com/stories/the-koran-is-our-constitution-egyptian-president-promises-to-ignore-egyptian-constitution-for-the-sake-of-sharia-in-chilling-speech/).

When influence has grown to the point where enough Islamist consolidation has happened, persecution of dhimmi (second-class) Christians and Jews can be carried out openly, and jihad against non-Muslims becomes government policy. This is what has happened in varying degrees in Sudan, in Saudi Arabia, in Nigeria, in Indonesia, in Iran and in Afghanistan under the Taliban. This is the Islamist vision of a New Middle East, and what is happening this very day in Egypt is the initial fulfillment of many jihadi dreams.

Gaza’s Hamas is a self-declared arm of the Muslim Brotherhood.  Hamas’ 1987 charter proclaims that “the Islamic Resistance Movement is one of the wings of the Muslim Brothers (al-Ikhwan al-Muslimin) …the largest Islamic Movement in the modern era” (Hamas Charter, Article Two; in www.acpr.org.il/resources/hamascharter.html and Raphael Israeli, “The Charter of Allah: The Platform of the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas),” Y. Alexander and A. M. Foxman (eds.), The 1988-1989 Annual on Terrorism (Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990), pp. 99-134).

Now Muslim Brotherhood forces control both Egypt and Gaza. The smuggling of advanced weaponry between the two forces, the coordination of intelligence and war strategy, the movement of Gazan terrorists into the Sinai from where they can attack Israel from Egyptian territory – all of these options have become present reality. The Egyptian front facing Israel is now buzzing with new activity and foreboding preparation.

Bob Dylan again reminds us in his same song, that “peace … will bring us no reward when her false idols fall.” Yitzhak Shamir’s concerns are fast becoming the concerns of the entire nation of Israel. Concerned friends of Israel throughout the world are also pricking up their ears and moving into an activist intercessory mode.

How can we pray?

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do!

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal) through: www.davidstent.org

“He being dead still speaks” – A perspective on the eschatological teaching of Art Katz

The Book of Hebrews describes Abel as a righteous man whose sacrifices were approved of by God (Hebrews 11:4). Though he was murdered by his own brother Cain (who was the first child born on this planet), Abel’s righteous testimony speaks volumes – even after his death.

As the blossoming revival known as the Messianic Jewish movement moves into the 21st century, we look back at various leaders who have passed into the presence of God, having left behind lifetimes of ministry (pastoral and evangelistic) as well as lifetimes of teaching. Stellar lights like Rachmiel Frydland and Jacob Jocz come to mind –  men who blended scholarship, sensitivity to their people, an evangelistic heart, and personal experience of both pre-Holocaust Europe and the horrors of Hitler’s genocidal murder of the Jewish people.

In every generation

In the Passover Haggadah (the recounting of the Exodus story), there is a beloved song (and one of my favorites) called V’hi she’amda (The covenant still stands):

‫וְהִיא שֶׁעָמְדָה לַאֲבוֹתֵינוּ וְלָנוּ שֶׁלֹּא אֶחָד בִּלְבַד עָמַד עָלֵינו לְכַלּוֹתֵנוּ אֵלָא שֶׁבְּכָל דּוֹר וָדוֹר עוֹמְדִים עָלֵינו לְכַלּוֹתֵנוּ וְהַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא מַצִּילֵנו מִיָּדָם

The covenant still stands that God made with both the Patriarchs and us. For not only one enemy has risen up in history to destroy us, but actually in every generation they arise in their attempt to destroy us. But the Holy One, blessed be He, rescues us from their hand.

In every generation the God of Jacob has rescued Israel from destruction. YHVH has continually raised up leaders and deliverers for the Jewish people, and for this we are thankful. The heroes of the Messianic faith are our heroes, and we remember their battles and victories, their challenges and struggles with appreciation.

Of course not every contribution from previous generations of Messianic Jewish leaders has been stellar. Even in the days of the Exodus, the Bible tells us that there was both a Moses and a Korah (Numbers 16). Both were Jewish, but each one had a very different purpose and behavior. If we zoom in even more closely, we would discern differences of righteous response even between Moses and his siblings Aaron and Miriam. In the same way, in every generation not every utterance by every Messianic Jewish figure is automatically kosher, and not every strong Jewish leader is inerrant in his temperament or his teaching.

Art Katz’s teachings on Israel and the Last Days – ‘fartaytcht un farbessert’

There is a Yiddish story told of a man of letters who translated the entire works of Shakespeare into the Yiddish language. On the frontispiece he wrote the following words “Shakespeare  fartaytcht un farbessert” (Shakespeare translated and improved)!

The recent release of Dalton Thomas Lifsey’s book “The Controversy of Zion and the Time of Jacob’s Trouble” (Maskilim Publishing, 2011) is a reworking of the eschatological teachings of Arthur Katz, a well-known Messianic Jewish figure from the late 20th century.  Lifsey has openly explained on public internet forums “Art Katz has had a very deep and lasting impact on my life;” “Katz’s contribution to the Body concerning the mystery of Israel was a precious gift from the Lord to us;” “Art Katz was a precious man with a very important message;” Art “carried … a profoundly Biblical message about Israel and the Last Days.”

Inasmuch as most readers of Lifsey’s book might not know much about Katz’s teaching, this newsletter presents some of Katz’s background and teaching as an aid in weighing these matters. It is a follow-up to my May 19, 2012 newsletter, “Prophesying the destruction of Zion?” (https://davidstent.com/prophesying-the-destruction-of-zion/).

Katz’s method of biblical interpretation

In the 1970’s cult-like religious groups rose to some measure of public notoriety, especially in America. Some of their benchmarks included an unhealthy belief in the ‘nearly infallible’ pronouncements of a strong or manipulative leader, a tendency to defensive withdrawal from normal social interaction into a closed group which ‘draws the covered wagons into a tight circle,’ and (in Christian forms of this abuse) an insistence on both interpreting portions of the Bible in extreme ways and making an acceptance of that extreme teaching a test of community or spirituality. Some of these three markers were occasionally evident in certain aspects of the teaching ministry of Art Katz. Art was not a cult leader, or was his group a cult. Yet sympathetic vibrations with some of these dynamics were found here and there in his teachings.

In two small sentences of one article (https://artkatzministries.org/category/articles/israel-and-the-church-articles/; Israel In Flight, abbreviated as IIF) Katz acknowledged that his theological perspective is not easily understood from a simple reading of the Bible: “There are no systematic line-upon-line statements to make it easy for us to understand them.  We need, therefore, to be apprehended by the implicit pattern rather than by a methodical, chronological approach.”

Katz is saying quite a lot here, for those who have ears to hear. He is admitting that he did not employ clear, plain, systematic Bible study methods in his study, interpretation and teaching of Scripture regarding Israel. On the contrary, Katz used Scripture selectively to bolster his own peculiar eschatological views regarding the Jewish people’s destiny. His distinctive perspectives of Jewish history were fixated on judgment and punishment of Israel, neglecting to emphasize or teach on God’s continuing grace. love and covenant faithfulness as demonstrated in the present regathering of the Jewish people.

A major focus of his teaching (which will be shown in this article) is that Israel’s return to her homeland in our day is not a gracious move of a loving God, but merely an assembling of a disobedient people in order for them to be judged and nearly totally destroyed. Therefore, Katz would say, all scriptures which describe a positive return of Jews to the Land of Israel at the End of Days cannot possibly be speaking of our day. These positive prophecies can only happen, Katz believed, after Israel is nearly wiped out and all her cities are destroyed. That was Katz’s hermeneutical grid.

The next step in Katz’s methodology was to interpret most biblical passages dealing with judgment on Israel (each one in a different place with its own different context) as referring only to the coming destruction of the Jewish people’s state – even if other biblical interpretations of those passages are the more likely choice!

From Manhattan to Minnesota

Art Katz was born to Jewish parents in Brooklyn in 1929. He is the author of the testimonial autobiography Ben Israel: Odyssey of a modern Jew (co-authored with Jamie Buckingham). He worked briefly with the American Board of Missions to the Jews in the New York area under Moishe Rosen, was one of the keynote speakers at the World Conference on the Holy Spirit in Jerusalem (March 1974), and was the spiritual founder and leader of Ben Israel Ministries (founded in Kansas City, 1974) and Ben Israel Fellowship (founded in 1975 in Laporte, Minnesota) at Dominion Farms. Matt Schwartz, a Messianic Jewish believer, initially became the Ben Israel administrator and Art’s travelling companion, but moved on within a year, joining the leadership of Agape Fellowship in Kansas City.

The initial vision of Katz’s community was challenging: “a rugged discipleship training camp for end-time ministries (particularly to the Jewish people); a year-round convocation center for the preparation of God’s people; a permanent community of committed believers out of which ministries will be nurtured and sent forth and finally, a refuge for entire Jewish families whom we expect to be swept into the Kingdom at a soon-coming time (largely out of Orthodox ranks)” (Ben Israel newsletter, Summer 1975; see Katz: Ben Israel, the Early Years from Flatbush to the Burning Bush By Peter Brock, Mill City Press, 2008, abbreviated as BIEY).

Katz’s publically expressed perspective on Jewish culture

At a conference “The Jews and the Church in the End-Time” in the San Francisco Bay area in the late 1970’s (where Katz was the keynote speaker), a group of young people gave a presentation combining Israeli folk dance and Jewish music. Katz’s response was “a scathing criticism from the pulpit, saying that to imitate Jews and to ‘emulate Jewish dance and things Hebraic’ while they were in the ‘Diaspora estrangement from God’ amounted to approval of their ‘apostate condition while being cast out from the land and rejected’“ (BIEY, p. 128).

At the 1977 Conference on Messianic Judaism and the Holy Spirit in Kansas City, Katz spoke sarcastically to his fellow Messianic Jewish believers in Yeshua, “You know what one of the brilliant contributions we Jewish believers can make to the body of Christ? We, whose reputation is so well-established, so known to all for cleverness, for being intellectual. We Jacobs, who have lived by our own strivings and own connivance?”

He continued, “I wonder how many of you who squealed with delight at the various aspects of Jewish culture, mentioned or demonstrated in this conference, realize that much if not all is the more recent expression of Jewish culture since the Dispersion, since the Diaspora. It’s ghetto culture, folks! And, it hearkens back to what should be a remembrance of our shame – having been banished from God and banished from the land. This culture which we so much exalt is a testimony to our shame and not to our glory…” “… (Consider) the swagger and esteem by which the Jewish community continues to hold itself…” “Is not our most serious mistake revealed in reference to ‘completed Jews’?” “We don’t have to slap ourselves on the back that we’re Brooklyn Jews who know how to play stickball and love pastrami – it is a statement unto our shame!”

Katz would later write down his own unique and alternative perspective about that meeting, “There were gasps and sobs and convulsions and people literally falling out of their seats with such repentance that broke into their deepest consciousness from the revelation of the Holocaust as judgment!” He added in his comments, “Higher criticism, the ‘God is dead’ myth… contemporary ‘rationalism’... all of these things had their origins in Germany and with Jews…”

Not long after the 1977 Conference in Kansas City, Katz explained, “I took that cassette from Kansas City back home with me to the community in northern Minnesota, carrying it like a palpitating thing, knowing somehow that we had a key to God’s real thrust to the Jews for the End-Times. It wasn’t going to be with cutesy evangelism and wearing Stars of David around our necks and yarmulkes, or imitating and feigning the synagogue culture that was born in judgment and in being cast out of the land. It’s not to be celebrated, let alone imitated or emulated or used to appeal to the Jews. It is to his disgrace and infamy.” As Brock says, “The Katzian oracles for the next three decades would weave in and out from what he’d spoke at Kansas City” (BIEY, p. 145).

What is astounding here is that, whether in the pulpit or at his writing desk, Katz appropriated spiritual authority to himself as would a Messianic dictator, publically disallowing Jewish forms of behavior. He declared a commonly accepted Jewish lifestyle as a “disgrace, shame and infamy.” Were his teachings to have been carried out, all Jews (and Messianic Jews too!) would need to come to Katz, asking for his imprimatur regarding permitted expressions of “kosher Jewish culture.” Though Jewish people for the most part do not live in a cultural vacuum, it seems that Katz believed he could successfully do so – at least concerning his own attitudes about his own Jewish people.

“A little more than kin, and less than kind” (‘Hamlet’, William Shakespeare; 1.2.65)

Katz was fond of quoting Hamlet to explain his rather harsh behavior “toward the community, church/conference audiences, and even family – ‘One must be cruel in order to be kind;” (BIEY, p. 159).

By 1979 the Ben Israel community dwindled down to four families. It was eventually disbanded in late 1986, and Camp Dominion was sold in 1998.

“The Time of Jacob’s Trouble has commenced”

In 1985 in California Katz released a series of seven messages titled “Holocaust, the Jew and the Gentile in the Last Days” as well as a teaching on martyrdom. In that series, Art says, “The kind of church which can move the Jews at the end of the age to jealousy of such a kind as will provoke them to consider the gospel can be answered in one word: Martyrdom. The church that will move Jews to jealousy is a martyr church” (BIEY, p. 180).

As a messenger of fast-approaching doom, Katz prophesied, “New York will no longer be habitable for Jews…” In the Philippines Art declared, “The Time of Jacob’s Trouble has commenced” (BIEY, p. 185).

Roots and fruits

Though the experience may be painful, and though some of us would shy away from examining not only a leader’s teachings but also his public persona, it is biblically necessary to understand the theological and spiritual roots at the heart of some of Katz’s teaching. Yeshua explained that great teachers need to look unflinchingly at their own deeds, and that their followers also need to have a discerning eye about such matters: “The scribes and the Pharisees have seated themselves in the chair of Moses; therefore all that they tell you, do and observe, but do not do according to their deeds; for they say things and do not do them (Matthew 23:2-3).

Though Samson was divinely chosen to be a judge in Israel (Judges 13), and though he actually was a divine scourge against the Philistines, his own character flaws led to years of unproductive activity and shameful captivity. Yeshua warns His followers to examine not only the ‘biblicity’ of someone’s prophetic teaching, but also the ‘biblicity’ of that person’s life and relationships. The ‘test of fruit’ is a valid one for prophetic ministry.

“Beware of the false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits. Grapes are not gathered from thorn bushes nor figs from thistles, are they? So every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot produce bad fruit, nor can a bad tree produce good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. So then, you will know them by their fruits” (Matthew 7:15-20).

The writer of the Book of Hebrews has a relevant warning for us all in this regard: “See to it that no one comes short of the grace of God; that no root of bitterness springing up causes trouble, and by it many be defiled” (Hebrews 12:15).

Preaching the death of Israel

In his teachings now available on-line (http://artkatzministries.org/category/articles/israel-and-the-church-articles/), Katz taught that the nation of Israel will be ‘justifiably destroyed,’ and that what is now the modern state of Israel will basically be wiped out for covenant violations by a righteous God.

“How are we going to respond when we see God destroy this sinful nation, especially when we have an inadequate understanding of what we think God’s nature to be?” (Israel In Flight, and following as IIF).

“Many are opposed to the view that present Israel must come into death” (IIF).

“The ruined cities … in the literal land of Israel … the cities of today: Haifa, Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, Tiberias, etc, will be made waste.  That means that there is a history or an experience of destruction, devastation and calamity right up to the inauguration of the millennial age.  The last thing in the experience of Israel is devastation and ruined cities…” (IIF).

The Scriptures speak of a future Time of Jacob’s Trouble, and most Messianic Jews sadly accept this future reality, as do all students of the Bible who take God’s word literally. However, even among these leaders there is some diversity of opinion concerning whether or not the Holocaust was part of that time, whether or not the troubles are world-wide or limited to the Land of Israel or basically limited to Israel among the nations, etc.

Katz goes beyond the texts which describe a measure of destruction in Israel, force-feeding interpretations of total destruction for Jacob.  Katz moves far beyond the plain text as he dramatically extrapolates and intensifies the extent, the severity and the ‘exact time-line’ of specific physical damage in the Jewish state. He ‘fills in the blanks’ about issues that God Himself has chosen deliberately and intentionally to leave vague. In doing this, Katz has gone beyond Scripture, teaching with harsh dogmatism about subjects that the Bible treads on with great care.

“What we call present Israel is only the preliminary for the desolations that must immediately precede” (IIF).

“Surely what has distinguished Israel’s prophets, namely, a Deuteronomic view of Divine causation (a covenantal blessing/curse perception of Israel’s history) needs to shape our own prophetic understanding of the nation’s present and future afflictions as judgment” (IIF).

“Our mistake, and indeed, tragic in its implications, is to interpret that preliminary presence [i.e., present political Israel] as constituting already the redeemed nation rather than the necessary remnant that ‘shall be eaten’ [Isa.6:13, i.e., ‘given, up to destruction’ or as it is rendered in the NIV, ‘again be laid waste’] (Some Comments on Netanyahu’s Election in Israel: A Prelude to Coming Disaster?, and following as SCNEI).

End-time destruction, “in my opinion, does not refer to the cities of antiquity but present Haifa, Tel Aviv, Jerusalem and all the cities of contemporary Israel… This violence concludes with Israel’s millennial blessings” (SCNEI).

“When God’s servants ‘find pleasure in her stones and feel pity for her dust’ (See Psalm 102:13-14).  I believe the stones and dust are not the ruins of antiquity but the ruins of modern-day Haifa, Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, Tiberias, etc… God will not be arbitrary in bringing those judgments; but those judgments will be, as they have always been, in exact proportion to our sins” (SCNEI).

“Israel will be reduced to a place of utter destitution.  We Jews are the epitome of human self-reliance and self-assurance; therefore, whatever comes to us has got to come to us from outside ourselves” (SCNEI).

“There are passages … that foretell a future time of distress for Israel … describ(ing) something more than a minor military defeat, even suggesting a humiliation, whereby those inflicting the defeat want to relish and luxuriate in Israel’s humbling … ‘Your sons have fainted, they lie helpless at the head of every street, like an antelope in a net.  Full of the wrath of the LORD, the rebuke of your God’ (Isaiah 51:18-20)… Every time I read this, in my mind’s eye I imagine the Israeli Defense Force helpless, frustrated, confused and defeated.  Israel’s sons, the strength of Israel, will be caught up in a net like a helpless animal, choked, stupefied, and unable to get out.  If this is future, and God is saying it, then who are we to gainsay it?  If there is a humiliating defeat that is imminent and must come, then what ought we to anticipate as believers, both in Israel and in the nations?”   (“Summary of Israel’s Present Plight and Her Future Glory”, and following as SIPP).

“When one sees increasing Islamic hatred expressed against Israel and against the Jew, … they will not be content with Israel’s defeat; they will want to see her uttermost humiliation.  God will allow that kind of humiliation if it serves His redemptive purposes and glory” (SIPP).

The passages to which Katz refers (like Isaiah 51) may or may not specifically be describing the Last Days. They may be describing any number of calamities in Jewish history – either in Assyria’s day or Babylon’s invasion or something else. On the other hand, there are other clearly Last Days passages (like Isaiah 41:14-16) whose emphases about Israel’s victorious destiny in battle are strongly positive. But these encouraging Scriptures are shunted aside in Katz’s eschatological scenario.

The Holocaust and anti-Semitism as God’s righteous punishment

One of Katz’s main teaching points is chilling – the Jews had it coming to them. The Holocaust was their “just desserts.”

“Jews complain of revisionism, the denial of the historicity of the Holocaust; but few of us have considered that this might well be a chastening judgment upon us for our denial of the historicity of the crucifixion of Jesus” (SIPP).

“The failure to rightly interpret the past Holocaust as judgment has robbed us of that knowledge, and needs, therefore, to be repeated again” (IIF).

“What we construe as a global anti-Semitism, may well be the action of God that ‘assembles all the wild animals…to devour [us].’ While this unpalatable thought might be dismissed as irresponsible conjecture… I am suggesting, on the basis of this and other biblical texts, that what we construe as anti-Semitism, and attribute to negative references to the Jews in the New Testament and to other sociological and historical factors, may have their root in our own failed call… The fact is that even truth can be used for incendiary purposes … For all our clever analysis and critique, only prophetic insight and prophetic proclamation offer the prospect of hope” (Anti-Semitism: a little considered root).

“Nazi Germany was the rod of God’s chastisement, but the cause was Jewish sin itself both historically and presently… The Holocaust was judgment in exact proportion to Jewish sin  … The Scriptures admonish us that our sins will assuredly find us out. It found us Jews out in the Holocaust … We need to make known that the Holocaust was not some momentary, historical aberration but the calculated judgment of God. It had been promised in Scripture in Deuteronomy and Leviticus of what would befall us in the Last Days if we would not acknowledge our transgressions and that of our fathers. .. We have experienced two thousand years of accumulated Jewish sin, open and naked … Only those who have the courage to speak to us the truth can save them from the judgment that is to come both in time and eternity” (IIF).

The focus of Katz’s message was now becoming Israel’s responsibility for the Nazi Holocaust, and Israel’s responsibility for a future Holocaust. The language Katz used in describing his pet hypotheses is coldly anti-Jewish.  There is a lack of pastoral wisdom and a counselor’s heart in his above-quoted words . Though Katz saw himself as a prophet, there were no warm tears (like those Jeremiah cried) in Katz’s above-quoted rebukes, no agonies (like the ones Amos felt) in Art’s above-quoted condemning words.

Among Jewish people there is an understood term – the “self-hating Jew.” These above-quoted teachings from Katz certainly fit into that category, and have the potential to match the historical records of some Jewish converts to Christianity who caused great damage to the Jewish people (see Nicholas Donin, Abner of Burgos, Solomon Levi of Burgos/Paul de Santa Maria, Joshua Ben Hazan/dei Cantori, Joseph Pfefferkorn, etc.). Personal affection for Katz should not blind the reader to the potentially damaging effects of his above-quoted statements.

Squelching intercession for Israel

Katz challenged believers not to pray that Israel’s enemies (like those described in Psalm 83 and Ezekiel 36) might be stymied or removed. He declared that these enemies are God’s means to destroy the Jewish homeland, God’s way of laying waste to the Jewish people. He expressed his hope that the ‘deceived’ charismatics who believe that God is restoring Israel to her homeland would also find their hopes dashed.

“To pray for the ‘elimination’ of that which now vexes and threatens Israel, however humanly it is to be desired, is to find us perhaps praying against the very instrumentalities raised up by God to obtain that very death of Zionist and charismatic hopes by which alone the prophetic and enduring glory is birthed” (IIF).

Disagreeing with Prophet Art is disagreeing with God

Katz exhibited classic abusive behavior in his deriding of those who disagreed with his interpretation of Scripture. As the following quotes show, he ‘circled the wagon trains,’ accusing those not in agreement with him of being spiritually blind and evil, on the brink of apostasy, heretical, and disobedient to God and His prophet.

“The greatest obstruction to our being a mouthpiece for God is, ironically, our own unwillingness to relinquish our present sentimental attachment to Israel.  Sentiment is that soulish element in our natural inner life.  It is in the carnal realm, disguising itself as love, and is revealed by the way it condescends to the Jewish people and confirms them in their own thinking.  The love of God chastens, is unsparing, and will not withhold judgment” (SIPP).

“Such a view is cross-avoiding ... A Church that shrinks from such an apocalyptic view makes itself a candidate for apostasy … (Katz’s message is) God’s provision to wake the Church from its own escapist sleep and unpreparedness” (SCNE).

“To see present Israel romantically as anything other than a ‘Jacob’ is simply not to see. Such a projection is more the statement of our own unrealistic spiritual condition” (SCNE).

When believers see Israel’s regathering as a positive work of God, that (according to Art) “is a statement of a condition that perhaps borders upon willful deception (and if in that, what then in anything?) (SCNE).

Referring to believers who delight in God’s restoration of Israel to their Promised Homeland, Katz described these people as “those whose celebration of the nation and her people is extravagant to the point of near idolatry …” (“The necessary death and resurrection of Israel”, and following as NDRI).

And again, “How assuredly is a prophetic mouth disqualified when it speaks a false word, however well-meaning!” (NDRI).

“The reason many are opposed to the view that present Israel must come into death in order to be raised up, is because it is a reflection of our own unwillingness to see” (IIF).

One of Katz’s long-term friends, Reggie Kelly, has had an influence on Dalton Lifsey which is markedly acknowledged in Lifsey’s book. On Kelly’s own website (https://the.mysteryofisrael.org/category/israel-and-the-church/) Reggie states, “Many of the key leaders in the Land today subscribe to the ancient heresy of Israel’s ‘inviolability.’…  There is much more to this issue than meets the eye, but it is an end-time deception of the first magnitude that has ironically infected the messianic leaders in the Land more than anywhere else, except parts of Europe and Russia where these leaders exercise their greatest influence” (“Israel’s Inviolability – Truth or Myth?”).

Some of Katz’s teaching and influence (in this case his teachings on Israel and the Time of Jacob’s Trouble) still speak through his disciples, even though Art himself has moved off the scene.

A word of exhortation

In light of the above, an exhortation is due.

According the prophetic challenge of Ezekiel 18, the sins of the fathers are only visited on the children when the children insist on walking in their fathers’ sins. If they turn from the errors of a previous generation (even a previous Messianic Jewish leader of the previous generation), they will not share in the “punishment for the father’s iniquity” (Ezekiel 18:14, 17, 20, 32).

There is a new challenge in this generation to forsake the sins described in this article, and to no longer walk in these errors from a previous generation. Caveat lector. Caveat emptor.

How can we pray?

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do!

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal) through: www.davidstent.org

A postscript regarding the eschatological teaching of Art Katz

I would like to add a brief postscript regarding the June 21 newsletter dealing with the background and teachings of Art Katz.

Katz was a man with many facets to his personality. Someone who knew him well once said that he was a complex and larger character.

This newsletter deals with only one area of Katz’s life and ministry – his teachings and activities concerning Israel. Quotations from Katz’s articles, letters and sermons are presented in some detail in my newsletter, most of them quoted from the website dedicated to spreading his teachings.

Some of those who knew Art personally have communicated to me that there are other whole chapters of his life and heart that were quite different from the on-the-record quotations from his sermons, writings and public declarations. I am glad for any and all positive testimony about Art, and I very much want for readers to understand that Katz was not a one-dimensional figure, and that in other areas of ministry his contribution and stature were different and positive.

Art was not a cult leader. There certainly were occasional aspects of his behavior and teaching, which involved similar dynamics to those often described in sociological analyses of cult-like leaders and communities. But tendencies in that direction are not the same as being either a cult leader or being a cult community.

Katz’s teaching on Israel and the Time of Jacob’s Trouble – that the state and its cities would be destroyed, and that the Jewish people’s return to the land in our day is a not a positive fulfillment of biblical prophecy but only a regathering for violent judgment – these teachings are potentially damaging on many levels, and have the potential of chilling intercessory compassion, of inadvertently fostering anti-Semitism, and of separating the hearts of believers from an active role and interaction in the restoration of Zion in our day.

Our role as watchmen on the walls of Jerusalem is to call out when potential dangers to the Jewish people approach. Please be in prayer about the challenges raised in the June 21 and May 19 newsletters – for the benefit of the Jewish people, the state of Israel, all those who carry an intercessory burden for Jerusalem, and for the rest of the body of Messiah.

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Booster rocket theology

It’s a high calling to intercede for Zion’s sake, to “not be silent” concerning the welfare and destiny of Jerusalem.  Most people who intercede for the coming restoration of the Jewish people know that Israel’s place in God’s heart and in biblical strategy has not been usurped or replaced by the primarily Gentile body of Messiah. They would classify themselves as opposing Replacement Theology.

Yet quiet waters are said to run deep. Over the years one occasionally runs into certain comments that surface like dorsal-fins – comments that reveal what can be called a “Practical Replacement Theology” lurking just below the water level, even among Christians with a ‘kosher’ attitude to Israel.

What are manifestations of this “Practical Replacement Theology”? What light can the word of God shine on these issues?

Rocket Man and the Jews

In the 1960’s a generation was transfixed to watch the lift-off of space rockets from Cape Canaveral – Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo. The white blasting clouds of rocket exhaust, the hurtling bright javelin of metal, the booster rockets burning out and falling off – it made for great TV.

A booster rocket is the first stage of a multi-stage rocket or launch vehicle. Its engine is used to increase thrust and payload capability – to get the spacecraft on its way out of Planet Earth’s atmosphere and heavy gravitational pull. When the booster rocket’s fuel is expended, it is released from the spacecraft and dropped into the ocean (a point known as booster engine cut-off – BECO). The rest of the launch vehicle continues on its mission with its core or upper-stage engines.

What does this have to do with Christian attitudes toward the Jewish people? A lot.

Many believers see the Hebrew Scriptures and the Jewish people as a booster rocket. They were helpful in bringing Jesus to the Gentiles, these people say, but now that we have the New Testament, now that Christianity has taken root and become a major world religion, there is no need for the original Jewish nature and context of the gospel. And there will certainly be no literal fulfillment of God’s promises to Abraham, to Jacob and to David.

As a snake sheds its old skin, so the Church (it is claimed) needs to forget about Old Testament ways and hopes. Jesus was the Jewish Messiah; He is now Christ the Savior of the world. Though we may feel some regret for the booster rocket which falls backward into earth’s blue oceans, our focus should be on the continuing flight of the core, the basically Gentile body of Christ. The booster rocket is not the main issue; the Gentile spacecraft is. To twist Paul’s turn of phrase in 1 Corinthians 13 (according to booster theology perspective), now that the Church has become a man, it is time to put away childish (i.e., Jewish) things!

Rocket science and the Apostle Paul

In Romans 11, Paul challenges his Gentile readers with four commands, meant to test the health and integrity of their attitudes toward the Jewish people:

Paul is teaching the nations with apostolic authority, that Gentile believers have a spiritual obligation to make sure their own hearts are right vis-à-vis the Jewish people.

To those non-Jewish believers in Yeshua who have a “booster rocket theology” toward Israel, Paul explains, “You will say, ‘Branches were broken off so that I might be grafted in’” (Romans 11:19). Paul labels the heart-attitude behind this last statement as ‘conceit’ (verse 20). Rather than conceit, he suggests that the new believers from among the nations adopt a new and different heart-attitude – that of holy fear (verse 20).

Paul’s perspective is not booster rocket theology. One could even say that it does not take a rocket scientist to understand it! His outlook would better be described as “olive tree theology.” God and His covenants are the root and trunk of the Romans 11 olive tree, while the Jewish people are the natural branches and the prototype of believers. Some Jewish people who turned their backs on Yeshua’s call were broken off from the place of salvation and obedience, while those Gentiles who followed Yeshua were grafted in (albeit as wild olive branches) to the Jewish olive tree. The tree remains Jewish, the natural Jewish branches remain Jewish, the covenants remain Jewish, and Messiah Yeshua Son of David also remains Jewish. What we have is a basically Jewish tree, with a vast majority of Gentile wild olive branches! This is what Paul describes as the current state of the “Commonwealth of Israel” in Ephesians 2:12-13; 3:5-6.

“Spiritual Israel”

Nearly two thousand years ago Paul wrote a letter to believers living in what today is modern Turkey. That country, originally inhabited in King Solomon’s day by the Hittite Empire, was later overrun by Celtic tribes from France-Switzerland-Germany known as the Gauls – hence the area’s name became Galatia, and Paul’s Epistle to the Galatians was sent to them.

The Galatian believers were struggling with a false teaching coming out from a non-kosher and non-authorized Messianic Jewish stream based in Jerusalem, which taught that Gentile believers in Messiah Yeshua needed to ‘go all the way’ and convert to Pharisaic Judaism, taking on the obligation of keeping the Mosaic Torah (law, covenant or teaching of Moses) by solemn oath.

Paul’s immediate concern was to let these Gentile Galatian believers know that they had received full standing as Gentiles through the Good News of Yeshua the Messiah. They had been justified, set apart for God and were recipients of salvation and the Holy Spirit. Nothing more needed to be added to that finished work. It was not God’s intention to transform their Gentile DNA into Jewish DNA, nor was it Yeshua’s intention to make Gentiles (who were already partakers of the New Covenant) into followers of the Mosaic Covenant. Paul calls those false brethren (Galatians 2:4) the purveyors of “a different gospel” (Galatians 1:6). They were hypocrites who were bringing Gentiles into bondage by compelling them to be circumcised (in order to follow the Mosaic Covenant; Galatians 2:13, 3-4).

Gentiles who believe in Yeshua do not become Jews and are not under the Law of Moses (Galatians 4:21, 31), but can now be described as “Gentiles justified by faith” (Galatians 3:8).

From Paul’s perspective, Jews who believe in Yeshua become Messianic Jews or spiritual Jews; while Gentiles who believe in Yeshua become Messianic Gentiles or spiritual Gentiles.

With this background in place, we can now address the habit that some have of calling Gentiles who believe in Yeshua by the name ‘spiritual Israel.’ The presupposition behind this term is that being a spiritual Gentile is not enough; one has to ‘go all the way’ and somehow become Jewish in order to have God’s favor. It was precisely this type of confused thinking that moved Paul to focus so strongly on the liberating truth of the gospel for Gentile believers qua Gentiles.

It is true that Gentiles become part of the spiritual Commonwealth of Israel (Ephesians 2:12-13). But this does not mean that Gentiles become Jews. To take a current illustration from the British Commonwealth (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_of_Nations): though the Commonwealth’s main office is found in Marlborough House, London, England, its members come in all shapes, sizes and colors – 54 nations, to be exact. Africans, Canadians, Cypriots, Tongans and Zambians – a veritable rainbow of cultures and hues!

It would be preposterous to declare that every member of the British Commonwealth has to dye their hair blond and apply blue contact lenses! In the same way, though the Commonwealth of Israel contains Jews and many, many Gentiles, it does not require participating males to become females, or for Gentiles to become Jews.

The Bible nowhere uses the term ‘spiritual Israel’ to describe Gentile believers, but it does use the term “Commonwealth of Israel” to describe the entity to which Gentile believers are joined. In light of the many problems associated with the term ‘spiritual Israel,’ clarity and accuracy would be best served by using biblical terms to describe biblical truths.

“Origen”-al thinking

One of the elephants hiding in the broom closet regarding this issue has to do with how historical Christian anti-Semitism has created the term ‘spiritual Israel.’ Two of the original Church Fathers, the Samaritan Justin Martyr (of Flavia Neapolis, modern Nablus; 100-165 A.D.) and Origen Adamantius (of Alexandria and Caesarea Maritima; 184-254 A.D.), both taught that Gentile believers had replaced the Jewish people (Replacement Theology) and that now Jews were un-chosen. According to Justin and especially to Origen, the term Israel could now only be rightfully applied to Gentile believers in Jesus. They were the ‘Verus Israel’, the True Israel, the spiritual Israel.

Justin Martyr’s definition of spiritual Israel (in Dialogue with Trypho; www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/justinmartyr-dialoguetrypho.html):

Origen’s definition of spiritual Israel:

These tragic historical examples of arrogance toward the Jewish people and of boasting against the branches show that the term ‘spiritual Israel’ has a non-kosher and intensely anti-Semitic origin.  Believers who love Israel and respect her divine gifts and calling should stay far away from these terms lest they be inadvertently tarred with the same brush.

 “This is that”

The majority of sermons preached in the world today take their message from the Bible, a book written overwhelmingly by Jews, and which describes the Jewish people in over 90% of its texts.  Yet the surprising thing is that much of the time it is rare to hear about the Jewish people in most sermons, unless the reference is negative.

I remember being taught in a Pentecostal church a long time back that one can never lose the gift of tongues, because “the gifts and calling of God are irrevocable.” It took me a few years to realize that the Apostle Paul was focusing on God’s irrevocable gifts and callings on Israel in Romans 11, and not on glossolalia! In a similar way, many Christians do not see that Jerusalem and Judea are referring to real places where real Jews live, since they have grown up hearing their teachers re-interpret Jewish places and people into non-Jewish generic Christian symbols.

This habit of subconsciously using a ‘Replacement theology’ hermeneutic is so strong, that sometimes even intercessors who love Israel find themselves re-interpreting clear prophecies about Jewish revival (like Isaiah 60) and morphing them into descriptions of the primarily Gentile church in revival. Even dead bones (and Jewish ones at that in Ezekiel 37) are pressed into service, and reinterpreted to mean a revival of the Gentile church – though the prophetic passage is strikingly clear in being ascribed to the Jewish people alone (Ezekiel 37:11-14).

The healthiest and most accurate way of interpreting Scriptures which deal with the Jewish people and their destiny, is to apply the passages to the Jews first and with priority.

That may sound revolutionary to some, but it is in exegetical accordance with God’s way, His heart and His word.  Then, having honored God’s original intentions, one is free to apply the lessons of that passage to any and all situations in life – without violating copyright or authorial intent!

Caricaturing the Chosen People

The Bible says a lot about the Jewish people – their triumphs and tragedies, their poetry and their sins. No history book of any people is as ruthlessly honest as is the Bible. King David’s sins are not covered up, but detailed and dissected. The Ten Tribes’ unfaithfulness is categorized. At the same time, David’s victories and worship are also spotlighted, and the Jewish people’s faith and intercessory cries are documented throughout Scriptural history (Exodus 2:23-25; Hosea 12:3-4). One of the reasons this exhaustive biblical record is given by God, is in order to test the reader’s heart.

If a reader from among the nations concludes that Jews are worse than any other nation, he has come away with a distorted message, with a perverse interpretation. For the fact is that Jews are as human as any other nation. Jews sin as much as Gentiles; they triumph as much as Gentiles; they cry as much as Gentiles; and they laugh at least as much as Gentiles! Some Jewish people may have killed the prophets, but don’t forget that all of the prophets were Jewish people!

Since Jewish people have a priority status with God as His firstborn nation (see Genesis 49:3; Deuteronomy 21:15-17; Exodus 4:22; Isaiah 40:2; Amos 3:22 etc.), they are punished twice as severely for their sins. But they are also blessed twice as much for their obedience (Romans 1:16; 2:8, 10; Isaiah 61:6-7 etc.).

Yet it happens all too often that some believers obsess on a negative caricature of the Jewish people. One recent book aimed at intercessors describes the Jewish people in exclusively negative terms – as hostile to their Maker, having a historic unfaithfulness to the Covenant, as an undeserving and obstinate people who by and large resist and reject both God and His Messiah.

Such intemperate language is a negative caricature of God’s Chosen People, typecasting Jews as unbelievers and Christians as believers. Such language ignores the fact that there have been many Jewish people throughout biblical and post-biblical history who have been faithful and exemplary servants of God and of His Messiah.  Such language glosses over the fact that today there is a thriving and growing community of Messianic Jews across the face of the globe. Indeed, in the last fifty years there has been a major and unprecedented revival of Jewish people coming to know their Messiah.

As the same time, there are many people who are labeled Christians, who have never accepted Yeshua’s atonement for their own personal sins. The Bible actually teaches that it is a remnant that believes, both from among the Jews and among the Gentiles (see Romans 11:4-5; 9:24, 27). Greater sensitivity must be used here in talking about Israel’s failures, and greater balance must be brought by remembering Israel’s mighty calling and stellar achievements both in the Bible and in history.

How can we pray?

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do!

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal) through: www.davidstent.org

The restoration of David’s throne

Every believer in King Yeshua is looking forward to His soon return to this earth. In that day the knowledge of YHVH will cover the earth as the waters cover the sea (Isaiah 11:9; Habakkuk 2:14).  Messiah’s teaching will flow from Jerusalem (Isaiah 2:3; Micah 4:2), and He will instruct all nations concerning His ways.

For many, it is a joy to think about the future day when Christ will rule over the nations. Yet so many followers of Yeshua are unaware that the nature of Messiah’s person, kingdom and dynasty will be strikingly Jewish. So many believers are unaware of the Jewish nature of the future kingdom because so many Christian leaders shy away from equipping their people on these issues.

Here are a few thoughts on biblical passages regarding the restoration of David’s throne – the rebuilding of what Amos describes as the “shanty (or hut, hovel or tabernacle; see Isaiah 1:7-8) of David which is fallen” (Amos 9:11ff; see also the 40 page article “A Messianic Perspective on the Restoration of David’s Tabernaclehttps://davidstent.com/words/).

Dying to see a plan come together

Sometimes, before God’s prophetic promise can be fulfilled in that person’s life, the main recipient of the covenant promise has to die first.  On some occasions the key to unlock the door of God’s promise can only be grasped on the other side of death.

Some of the most significant covenants made between God and Jewish men (the Abrahamic and Davidic Covenants) have aspects that will only be fulfilled after the future physical resurrections of Abraham and David. When one considers the New Covenant (which required Yeshua’s death and resurrection to be activated), its future fulfillment will flower only when the Jewish people become spiritually resurrected (see Jeremiah 31:33-34; Romans 11:12, 15, 23-27).

Isaiah the prophet described that Messiah Yeshua would see the good pleasure of YHVH prospering in His hand – but only after Yeshua would render Himself an asham (Hebrew, a guilt offering) and be buried with a rich man in His death (Isaiah 53:9,10). Only after His death and resurrection would YHVH’s Servant justify many through bearing their sins and iniquities (Isaiah 53:11-12).

The same is true for Abraham. The divine promises regarding the Promised Land of Israel include borders that Abraham has never possessed (see Genesis 12:1, 7; 13:14-17; 15:18-21; 17:8, 21; 18:19; 22:15-18; 24:7; 25:5-6; 26:1-5; 27:27-29, 37; 28:3-4, 12-16; 32:12; 35:9-12; 46:1-4; 48:1-4, 21-22; 49:10; 50:24-25). Abraham’s promised seed through Isaac and Jacob never possessed the land in fullness either. Indeed, even up to our own day this promise has not been totally fulfilled.

The long wait of faith

Hebrew 11:8-12 describes Abraham’s life in Canaan 4,000 years ago – living like a stranger in the Promised Land, waiting for YHVH’s promised inheritance in the land of Canaan (Hebrews 11: 9-10). The writer says, “All these died in faith, without receiving the promises, but having seen them and having welcomed them from a distance…” (Hebrews 11:13).

Joseph prophesied the return of the Jewish people from Egypt by faith, trusting in God’s power to accomplish what He had promised concerning the Land of Israel (Hebrews 11:22).

Even King David did not receive the fullness of the kingdom promised to him (Hebrews 11:32, 39), “And all these, having gained approval through their faith, did not receive what was promised.”

A prophetic key is concealed in Hebrews 11:17-18, “By faith Abraham, when he was tested, offered up Isaac, and he who had received the promises was offering up his only begotten son; it was he to whom it was said, ‘In Isaac your descendants shall be called.’ He considered that God is able to raise people even from the dead, from which he also received him back as a type.”

Abraham believed that God would keep His promises, even if he would have to wait until after the death of his son Isaac.

He knew, believed and trusted that God could raise Isaac from the dead.  It was Abraham’s belief in the resurrection that saw him through the trial of sacrifice in the region of Mount Moriah.

In the same way, Abraham believed God when YHVH promised to give him the entire Land of Canaan as his physical inheritance – even if he had to die before fully receiving it. He knew that with God, a promise is a promise. God could and would raise Abraham from the dead if need be!

On the Day of Resurrection, Abraham will stand to his feet, beholding the face of God in righteous satisfaction (see Psalm 17:15).  He will then receive the keys to the land of Israel, the Land of Promise.  He (along with his chosen descendants the Jewish people) will become (as an amazing verse tells us in Romans 4:13) “the heir of the world” (see also Luke 1:54-55, 70-74).

Dem bones gonna rise again

When the God of Israel established His covenant with David son of Jesse (2 Samuel 7; 1 Chronicles 17; Psalm 89) He promised David many things, only some of which have been fulfilled.

In the same way that Abraham will only receive the fullness of the promise when he will be resurrected, King David will receive the fullness of God’s promise to him in the Davidic Covenant at his own physical resurrection.

The Apostle Paul in his Shabbat sermon at the synagogue in Pisidian Antioch, emphasized that “David, after he had served the purpose of God in his own generation, fell asleep, and was laid among his fathers and underwent decay” (Acts 13:36).

Yet the word of God promises that David himself will one day receive the fullness of the promise: he will rule over the Jewish people forever, something that can only be possible after David’s resurrection: “They will live on the land that I gave to Jacob My servant, in which your fathers lived; and they will live on it, they, and their sons and their sons’ sons, forever; and David My servant will be their prince forever” (Ezekiel 37:25; see also Ezekiel 34:23-24; 37:24; Hosea 3:5 etc.).

When Yeshua returns as King of kings and Lord of all the earth, He will reign from Jerusalem as David's Greater Son (Matthew 22:41-46; Romans 1:3; 2 Timothy 2:8). David will be raised from the dead, and he will reign as viceroy under Messiah Yeshua's supreme command. The Davidic dynasty will reign under the tutelage of King David himself, as it was in ancient days (see Psalm 122:4-5; Amos 9:11; Jeremiah 30:9; 33:21-22, 26).

The New Covenant teaches us that God’s promised gift (the Messiah Son of David) needed to die and be resurrected for that covenant to be birthed. In Romans 1:1-4, Paul teaches that even though God’s Good News had long been prophesied in the Holy Scriptures, its realization involved the fact that His own Son – “born of a descendant of David according to the flesh – was declared the Son of God with power by the resurrection from the dead, according to the Spirit of holiness, Messiah Yeshua our Lord.”

Here comes the sun

We can have absolute confidence that these Davidic events will come to pass with certainty, because YHVH has given us an iron-clad promise in Jeremiah 33:19-21: “The word of the Lord came to Jeremiah, saying, ‘Thus says YHVH, If you can break My covenant for the day and My covenant for the night, so that day and night will not be at their appointed time, then My covenant may also be broken with David My servant…’ ”

Since no human being will ever have the power to stop day and night (which would necessitate stopping the turning of the earth and the sun), YHVH used this figure of speech to communicate overwhelming encouragement to us that His covenant to David and to his house is unshakable and eternal.

Guess who’s coming to dinner

Persian Sufis have a proverb, “Do not invite an elephant trainer into your living room unless you have room for an elephant.” In other words, be aware that actions have ramifications. God made certain theological declarations; we can count on it that there will be practical consequences!

Some of the clauses of the Davidic Covenant include:

These are some ramifications of the fullness of the Davidic covenant.  There will be wonderfully practical consequences for the entire Jewish people and for the whole Land of Israel.

As well, it’s worth remembering that YHVH promised three blessings to David personally:

When we pray, “even so, come Lord Yeshua!”, remember that He is not coming back to this earth with no backup . He is bringing with Him a whole Davidic entourage. From God’s perspective Biblical Restoration is not a generic term; it has strong Jewish ramifications as well!

Prophetic ramifications of Davidic restoration

When the full restoration of David’s governmental rule comes to pass, some of the future benefits described in Scripture include:

The full restoration of David’s Covenant will bring overflowing physical blessings for Israel and the world (see Isaiah 27:6, 55:3, 12-13).

The return of the Jewish Messiah will be accompanied by the restoration of His family dynasty, the Royal Family of the House of David.  That restored dynasty will rule over both the Jewish people and the world from the capitol city of a Jewish land which will be experiencing the fullness of YHVH’s blessings.

The promise of Jewish physical restoration to the entire land of Israel (Jeremiah 31:5-6, 50:19), the spiritual salvation of the entire Jewish nation (Jeremiah 31:31-34; 50:20), and governmental restoration of the Davidic dynasty (Amos 9:11-12, Isaiah 2:1-5, Jeremiah 33:19-26), will all be fulfilled prophecy for Israel in that day, because the zeal of YHVH of armies will perform this (Isaiah 9:7).

Some of this teaching, though profoundly biblical, may be new to you. If that is so, I encourage you not to stumble over God’s marvelous plans for His Jewish people, but to treasure these and meditate on them in your heart. And remember the apostolic declaration in Romans 11:18, 20, 25, 29: “Don’t be arrogant towards the Jewish people, don’t be conceited towards them, and don’t be ignorant of their calling.  The calling and the gifts given to the Jewish people (by the Messiah of Israel) are irrevocable.”

Living in a political world

Bob Dylan once said, “We live in a political world, where courage is a thing of the past.” As believers grasp that the God of all creation is restoring His people to the Land of Israel, resituating them on the chessboard of the nations – we also realize that (from Satan’s perspective) Israel has now become a stationary target.

In the 1930’s and 40’s, believers who stood with Israel and who tried to save Jewish lives, speedily came to the realization that these endeavors required taking a stand against Hitler’s genocidal fury. And that had definite political consequences. Rees Howell’s intercessory prayer meetings took what could be seen as a political stand – they prayed for the defeat of Nazi Germany, the victory of the Allied armies, and the protection, physical restoration and spiritual salvation of the Jewish people to their own Promised Land. Their stand for a return to Zion meant that they were intercessory Zionists – believers, encouragers and advocates of the prophesied return of the Jewish people to Zion, their capitol city and their God-given homeland.

Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s Christian convictions led him to help smuggle Jews out of Germany, and to support a band of brave military and political leaders who tried to assassinate Adolf Hitler. They saw no conflict between their actions and their Messianic faith. Neither did Corrie ten Boom and her extended family in the Netherlands.

Court etiquette

As we meditate on these Scriptures, as they begin to inform our dreams and our prayers, we look forward to the soon re-establishment of Messiah’s rule and reign in Jerusalem.

We expectantly peer through the fog of history present into history future, longing for day when we will more clearly understand and embrace the fullness of YHVH’s strategic plan and court order on earth.

And part of that will involve the re-establishment of the Royal Family of the House of David as the greatest and grandest of all the royal lineages on the face of Planet Earth!

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do!

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal) through: www.davidstent.org

Ma-wij

In the classic film “The Princess Bride”, Cambridge-trained actor Peter Cook plays the Impressive Clergyman, presiding at the almost official wedding of Prince Humperdinck and Buttercup.  His famous lines are known and loved by many moviegoers: “Ma-wij! Ma-wij is wot bwings us togevah today! Ma-wij – that bwessed awangement, that dweam wifin a dweam …”  The contrast between the solemnity and pomp of a High Church of England Royal Wedding ceremony and the comic antics of the actors makes for a droll and humorous scene.

The disparity between a loveless wedding and “twu wuv” (true love), however, is no joke. There have always been and still are many broken and lifeless homes from where passion and joy have long departed, leaving a grey existence and a jaded reality in their stead.

It is thought-provoking that the God of Jacob has used the institution of marriage to reflect the burning center of His love for the human race, for believers in Yeshua, and in a challenging way for the entire people of Israel. Yet though some excellent works have been written about God’s love for the bride of Christ, less has been written and grasped among Christian believers about God’s blazing passion and tender marital love for Israel, Messiah’s own Jewish people. Indeed, the relationship between Israel and YHVH is described by some in a way that lacks passion. Others describe that relationship as being full of hair-trigger anger and toxic silence on both sides.

A marriage covenant between YHVH and Israel

The Hebrew prophets did not blush to describe the relationship between the Jewish people and their God as a passionate connection between a man and his bride on their wedding night: “Then you grew up and became tall. You reached the age for fine ornaments … You were exceedingly beautiful” (Ezekiel 16:7, 13).  The attraction between God and Israel is so powerful that the air fairly crackles on the pages of Scripture. Passages such as Hosea 2:1-13, 14-23, Isaiah 50:1; 54:4-12; Jeremiah 3:1-3; Ezekiel 16:1-6, 7-14, 15-59; 60-63; Song of Solomon 8:6-7 all describe aspects of God’s passionate embrace of His beloved Jewish bride.

Mark Twain once said. “It ain’t the parts of the Bible I can’t understand that bother me.  It is the parts that I do understand” (The Wit and Wisdom of Mark Twain). There can sometimes be aspects of theology that are hard to grasp, like how God’s love for the Church and for Israel all balance out in the end.

Sometimes theologians try to play down God’s love for Israel or try to elevate God’s love for the Gentiles to be the main issue. Perhaps we can have the grace to allow for both to co-exist simultaneously as we try to delve into the depths of God’s heart about the matter. “For God has revealed these things to us through His Spirit. For the Spirit searches all things, even the deep things of God” (1 Corinthians 2:10-11).

What is clear is that YHVH is not an uninvolved bystander. He’s passionately caught up with the Jewish people. He is their passionate Pursuer and Lover.

YHVH is a jilted Lover

The prophets tell us that God has not only fallen head over heels in love with Israel. He has also had His heart broken by the fact that His beloved wife has had ‘a case of the straying eyes.’ Her willingness to give her heart over to other passions, to be consumed with other loves, to pour her affections, time and energies into other activities – all these have meant that YHVH is the “owner of a broken heart.”

The prophets convey God’s deep grief at this tragic turn of events, “How can I give you up, Ephraim? How can I surrender you, Israel? … My heart is turned upside down within Me, and all My compassions are kindled!” (Hosea 11:8).

Holy grief, holy anger

YHVH the Consummate Husband and Lover sent His own express delivery messengers to His beloved wife Israel for centuries, pleading with her to return to her First Love. “Since the day that your fathers came out of the land of Egypt until this day, I have sent you all My servants the prophets, daily rising up early and sending them. Yet they didn’t obey Me or incline their ear, but instead stiffened their neck” (Jeremiah 7:25).

YHVH brought military invasion, famine, wild beasts and plagues and even exile to His beloved wife (Ezekiel 14:21) in order to shock her into repentance (2 Kings 17:23; 1 Chronicles 9:1).  Though YHVH expressed His righteous anger, fury and jealousy (Ezekiel 16:38-43) through these judgments, He also expressed His own deep anguish, grief and horror at what He was doing. “I will not execute My fierce anger, nor will I destroy Ephraim again. For I am God and not man, Holy in your midst, and I will not come in burning wrath” (Hosea 11:9).

Empathy --  not just sympathy

The God of Jacob testifies that whenever the Jewish people suffer or are struck in judgment, He also feels their pain – and in ways far beyond that of President William Clinton. “In all their (the Jewish people’s) afflictions He was afflicted” (Isaiah 63:9). God not only sorrowfully brings judgment; He cries out with His own beloved Jewish wife as she goes through that suffering, because He feels every blow, every slash, every bullet, every drop of poison gas.

In a very similar dynamic, both the Holy Spirit and the Apostle Paul feel agony at the majority of Israel’s turning away from their God and from David’s Greater Son. Paul testifies that the Ruach HaKodesh also feels the unceasing grief and anguish that is in Paul’s heart (Romans 9:1-2) over the current spiritual status of the majority of Jacob’s children.

Tenderness in the midst of trouble

The prophet Hosea conveys some exquisite jewels in his descriptions of God’s heart. Whereas Ezekiel will later describe a time of purification in the desert in aggressive terms, Hosea describes this same process from a different angle – that of a Husband who is attempting to woo His wife back into a tender love relationship: “Therefore, behold, I will allure her, bring her into the wilderness and speak kindly to her” (Hosea 2:14).

Singing in the vineyards

The entire scenario of this re-marriage is one of singing, of romance in the vineyards and of tenderness: “Then I will give her the vineyards from there that were hers, and the valley of Achor as a door of hope. And she will sing there as in the days of her youth, as in the day when she came up from the land of Egypt” (Hosea 2:15).

The language of this encounter between YHVH and His Jewish bride is enscripturated with great tenderness and marital affection. “I will betroth you to Me forever; Yes, I will betroth you to Me in righteousness and in justice, in loving kindness and in compassion, and I will betroth you to Me in faithfulness. Then you will know YHVH” (Hosea 2:19-20). As many are already aware, the Hebrew word for “to know” is the same wonderful word used of Adam and Eve’s first intimate encounter (see Genesis 2:24; 4:1).

YHVH declares with great tenderness at the close of this song, that His wife Israel will no longer whisper intimacies to Him using the name “Lord” (in Hebrew, Ba’al). That would remind her and Him both of her prior unfaithfulness to other lords, including to Baal Zaphon of the Canaanite pantheon.  Instead, Israel will have the privilege of calling YHVH “my man” (in Hebrew “Ishi”), signifying renewed intimacy and tenderness at a new level. “It will come about in that day, declares YHVH, that you will call Me Ishi, and will no longer call Me Ba’ali” (Hosea 2:16).

Yeshua never asked us to be rage-aholics

Family counselors use the term ‘rage-aholic’ to describe a person who slips quickly into a violent rage, and who uses that strong anger to keep his or her family in check. Of course, any family member can play that addicting role, although many husbands and fathers in modern society find themselves glitching down the playground slide of rage all too often.

Theologians can have the same problem vis-à-vis interpreting the Scriptures.  It is not an easy challenge to keep Scriptural equilibrium when processing the length and breadth of the Bible, especially when trying to balance God’s love for His Jewish bride with His righteous anger, His grief with His tenderness.

This is why the community of saints, the interaction of believers, is so important in these matters.  Yeshua intended that we each help to balance out the other. When youthful zeal results in washing people’s feet in boiling water, then more seasoned saints can help bring balance (and help avoid medical bills too!). When courage has given way to fear of man in the hearts of some older battle-scarred leaders, sometimes it is the younger saints who can encourage through their fighting spirit and feelings of ‘invincibility.’

Rabbi Sha’ul (known in Latin as the Apostle Paul) put it elegantly: “Speaking the truth in love, we are to grow up in all aspects into Him who is the head, even Messiah, from whom the whole body, being fitted and held together by what every joint supplies, according to the proper working of each individual part, causes the growth of the body for the building up of itself in love” (Ephesians 4:15-17).

How can we pray?

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do!

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal) through: www.davidstent.org

Prophesying the destruction of Zion?

From time to time I am asked to review a book or a musical project. This has occasionally led to some pleasant discoveries. Recently some acquaintances have asked me to analyze and respond to the teachings of Dalton Lifsey’s recent “The Controversy of Zion and the Time of Jacob’s Trouble” (Maskilim Publishing, 2011). The author himself had asked for my feedback just prior to the publishing, but since the book was already at the printer’s, initially I was only able to give a cursory response.

Lifsey’s book raises some important issues. In my mind one of the most important is his forceful attempt to get believers to consider those prophetic passages in Scripture which describe military invasion of the land of Israel, subsequent havoc, and Israel’s cry to Messiah Yeshua for deliverance. I am confident that some beneficial debate will result from these discussions.

However, along with this, some of the book’s teaching has the potential to create prophetic confusion, weaken intercessory passion for Israel, estrange the hearts of believers from what God is doing today in restoring the Jewish people, and even possibly catalyze a pathological fixation, an unbalanced fascination and a cold-hearted attitude about Israel’s most intense period of suffering in history future.

A summary of three main points

Lifsey expounds on three main themes:

An initial response to these three points

A full response to this book’s arguments would require at least half a book. Here are my responses in capsule form:

Though the book quotes many biblical passages, it does not present a balanced weighing of both negative and positive passages. There is nearly an exclusive focus on passages of destruction.

The rest of this newsletter examines various aspects of this book’s teaching in greater detail.

Horsing around with a balanced gospel

Many years ago Martin Luther described the world as a drunken peasant. “If you lift him into the saddle on one side, he will fall off again on the other side.” The history of the Christian Church has often illustrated Luther’s proverb with sad accuracy.

The original and entirely Jewish apostolic community of faith in the Book of Acts spoke to their own Hebrew people with a heart of tenderness and compassion (see Isaiah 40:1-2). Yet within less than two hundred years an in-house argument between Jews had given way to the strident accents of baptized anti-Semitism.  The good news of Israel’s Messiah had become the bad news of condemnation, legal discrimination and murderous riot – those were now the definitive voice of Christian theology.

The gospel is a binary message – for it to be balanced, it must contain both the crucifixion and the resurrection. Neither is complete without the other. Neither is balanced without the other. Some believers focus on the sufferings of Messiah to the exclusion or detriment of the resurrection. Other trends focus on resurrection power as if there were no call to take up one’s cross and follow Messiah. Each aspect is important, and each one must be in balance.

Over the past millennia many believers have ignored the irrevocable gifts and calling of Israel. In recent years a healthy stream is re-embracing the biblical realities of Israel as God’s firstborn son. This stream is a healthy antidote to the ‘Theology of Contempt’ (see Jules Isaac’s The Teaching of Contempt: Christian roots of anti-Semitism; (https://jcs.oxfordjournals.org/content/6/3/382.extract).

A balanced portrayal of the heart of the prophetic scriptures means that both the amazing calling and the heartrending stumbling of the Jewish people must be addressed. Last Days events regarding the Jewish people must also be subject to the same balance: some biblical passages describe Israel’s trials and troubles, others describe Israel’s mighty prophetic army, its defeat of its enemies, and its continued tenacious hold on Jerusalem even in the worst of days.

A balanced biblical perspective will not attempt to champion either Jewish victories or Jewish defeats at the expense of the other. It will attempt to create a synthesis – a systematic theology – which allows both streams to flow in one mighty river.

Such a book which manages to discuss these subjects in a balanced way is needed, and it could be of real help to the body of Messiah. Unfortunately, this is not that book.  Lifsey’s book has failed to strike that necessary biblical balance.

He who does not learn from history …

George Santayana once said that he who does not learn from history is doomed to repeat it.  The book being considered occasionally shows a glib and careless hand as it approaches Jewish and Christian history.

The entire scope of Jewish history is described in this book as condensed into “the most significant events in two millennia of Jewish history” –

Speaking from the perspective of one who both has a degree in Jewish History and is a life-long student of that subject, I am surprised by the unprofessional nature of Lifsey's statements. There is a distinct lack of awareness and appreciation for all that God has done in guiding and preserving His Jewish people through the period of Exile.

The fast-food McDonald’s approach has spread across the world from Downey, California to New Zealand. But what works for hamburgers does not always carry the same weight in theology or history. The riches of Jewish history and of God's watch care for His exiled people demand far more honor and respect than this book has managed to extend.

Lifsey’s book categorically states on a number of occasions that the return of Jewish people to the Land of Israel began in 1948. This would probably come as a surprise to the following Jewish people movements: the 300 English Tosafists of 1211; Rabbi Yehiel of Paris who moved with many followers to Acre in 1260; the Sephardic Jews of Spain led by Don Joseph Nasi after 1492; over 1,500 Polish Jews who moved to Israel in 1700 led by Rabbi Yehudah he-Hasid; the Hasidic waves in the 1770’s and the Misnaged waves in the 1830’s. Of course, one would have to include the First through Fifth Aliyahs (1882-1939), as well as the Aliyah Bet (1932-1948) which together brought nearly a half a million Jews home.

Such historical inaccuracies show that the author has not done sufficient homework to be able to speak authoritatively on significant events of Jewish history, whether past, present or future. The book has also not grasped the intimate, prayerful bond between the Jewish people and the Jewish homeland – something that Isaiah’s mystic words convey in his description of the Land of Israel being married (beulah) to her own Jewish people – a cause of great rejoicing in Isaiah 62:1-7. The Bible sees the connection between the Jewish people and their land as something good, healthy and righteous, and not as a divine mousetrap. Exile is described in the Scriptures as "eating unclean bread among the nations" (Ezekiel 4:13) who are "the enemies of God" (Leviticus 26:41. 44; Psalm 83:1-5). Lifsey nowhere grapples with this biblical worldview.

Speaking as an Israeli Messianic Jew, I found this book lacking in at least three areas – little to no awareness of events taking place today in Israel; no expressed understanding concerning the pulse of the country and people of Israel (including what is going on among Messianic Jews here); and the use of language and thought which reflects a considerable tactlessness regarding Jewish sensitivities. The author has much to learn about how to talk to the very people he writes about.

One striking example of this insensitivity to Jewish hearts is the author’s arcane use of the strange phrase “an ethnic Jew.” What exactly is an ‘ethnic Jew?’ Is it something like being ‘an ethnic Afro-American,’ an ‘ethnic Hispanic’ or an ‘ethnic Maori?’ The very phrasing shows estrangement, and it reveals a marked dislocation from interaction with living Jews, who would interpret Lifsey's term to be a convoluted cryptic Christian buzzword best left ignored in polite company.

Sour grapes

Those who have walked the paths of the Messianic Jewish world for the last four or five decades will probably recognize a hidden voice echoing throughout the pages of this book – that of Art Katz, who is now with the Lord. Lifsey states at one point, “I agree with Art Katz who said, ‘The State of Israel exists not for its success but for its necessary failure’” (p. 127).

Art Katz was an outspoken and courageous figure, not known to back down from an argument. His groundbreaking book Ben Israel demonstrated that he was one of the rising prophetic voices of a new Messianic generation – Messianic lions of Judah in the 20th century.

At the same time, Art was known throughout the Messianic movement for espousing some extreme positions that at times appeared to be anti-Jewish.

Art and I were acquaintances, although we did not have much common personal history. Years ago Art came to Israel, wanting to spread his message of the coming destruction of the Jewish State among the Messianic congregations. At a gathering of some of the country’s leaders (including those most sympathetic to him), his message was judged as imbalanced and doors were closed to his message. Art (unsurprisingly) saw these closed doors as another justification of his own prophetic calling.

It concerns me that a similar message to Art’s is again being propagated, this time not by a Jewish high school teacher from New York, but by other voices at the uttermost parts of the earth.  But the song remains the same. A prophet who rails against the Jewish people without divine commissioning and without Jeremiah's tears can end up polluting waters and causing good grapes to sour on the vine (see Jeremiah 31:29-30; Isaiah 5:20; James 3:11; Hebrews 12:15). Such things could poison a new generation all over again. May it never be (μὴ γένοιτο – Romans 11:1b)!

Handling the word accurately (2 Timothy 2:15)

The hypothesis of Lifsey’s book is bold – it is asking believers to reject the present return of Israel as an expression of God’s goodness, and to see it instead as a “probational gathering” of rebellious Jewish people who are being led into a divinely crafted slaughterhouse, out of which a small number alone will be saved when they turn to Jesus as a totally shattered people.

The book’s claims need to be judged on how the author uses Scripture – is he fair, is he careful, is his exegesis grounded, etc. In most of these areas the book comes out sorely lacking.

The author repeatedly refers to the importance of exegesis (drawing or leading the meaning out of the text in the original languages). Here are some quotes which indicate his appreciation for exegetical accuracy:

Yet the rub is that in this book the author never conveys any exegetical argumentation which is based on the original Hebrew or Greek etymologies. He never appeals to the original meanings of biblical words in the original languages. His arguments are logical constructs based on his own understanding of the English text. This is praiseworthy in itself, but it cannot fairly be defined as exegesis. Therefore his stress on the importance of exegesis to his theologizing seems to be overstated.

Twisting on the Bed of Procrustes

In actuality, the author has made a category error, confusing the two terms ‘exegesis’ and ‘exposition.’ In one place Lifsey states that “‘Exegetical’ means ‘expository’” (p. 15). But these two terms are not synonymous, and the author’s theological teachings cannot be accurately described as based on exegesis.

Lifsey engages in the cherry picking of negative scriptures. Foreboding passages describing ‘the Time of Jacob's Trouble’ definitely do exist. They must be reckoned with, and are sobering in the extreme. Yet simultaneously the author studiously avoids those scriptures which present a differing and positive slant on Israel in the Last Days (e.g., Psalm 110:3; Ezekiel 37:9-14; Isaiah 11:14; 41:14-16; Zechariah 12:6-9 et al). The author does not welcome or offer Middle Eastern hospitality to these positive evidences, for their presence at the table would force a drastic reconsideration of his primarily negative message. More care, accuracy and intellectual honesty are needed here on the author's part.

Another striking example affects one of the author’s main hypotheses. Lifsey posits a total destruction of the Jewish State and of its capitol city Jerusalem, as well as a near total abandonment of Jerusalem. He bases his hypotheses on Zechariah 14. Yet a more careful reading of that passage reveals that Lifsey is not reflecting all that Zechariah is saying.

While Zechariah 14:1, 2a describe Jews being exiled from half of Jerusalem, verse 2b states that Jewish people will continue to live in the other half of Jerusalem. The author downplays this and other scriptures which do not fit into his larger eschatological scheme. The literary term for this hermeneutical process is “Procrustes’ bed” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procrustes).

The author twists scripture frequently in order to avoid clear biblical statements which would cause his hypotheses to disintegrate. Coming to Joel, Isaiah and Jeremiah (some examples) with his own preconceptions (that God cannot initiate an ultimate Jewish restoration to the Land before Israel repents), he twists the clear words of Scripture to mean the opposite of what they actually say (Isaiah 11:11 – pp. 161-65; Amos 9:15 – pp. 144-46 and 113-14; Jeremiah 30-31 – pp.191-202; Joel 3:1 – pp.203-6).

In these above examples Lifsey is using the opposite of exegesis (leading the correct meaning out of the text). What he is doing is actually called eisegesis (leading a non-original meaning into the text, which overwhelms and blocks what the text itself is communicating).

Weakness in interfacing with a biblical theology of Israel’s calling

Lifsey’s book does not base its theological constructions on the solid foundation of biblical teaching regarding Israel’s priority calling (as revealed in such scriptures as Genesis 12:3; Deuteronomy 21:15-17; Number 23:7-9; Romans 1:16 and 2:5-11 etc.). One could call this the heart of the matter, for what is being discussed is not a game of Russian chess but the heart of God. Years ago I taught a series at the Anaheim Vineyard titled “Touching the Father's Heart for Israel.” I have found that apart from a revelation about God’s tender heart for His people, all theologizing on Israel ends up losing the stamp of passion and authority.

It would be accurate to say that this book views the Jewish people’s history and destiny not through the primary lens of God’s loving strategy and heart attitudes, but through the monolithic prism of the covenantal judgments and curses of Deuteronomy 28.

Were the biblical foundations of God’s bridegroom love for Israel in proper place in this book, its superstructure might have had a better chance of standing firm.

An obsessive-compulsive hermeneutic

Four of the book’s philosophical underpinnings are:

These strongly asserted philosophical presuppositions are all slightly off kilter. Let’s consider the matter.

Theology makes for strange bedfellows

Lifsey has adopted an “all or nothing” approach to Last Days’ prophetic scriptures. From his perspective, no return to the Land has the imprimatur of God unless Israel repents before that return.

Of course, there are a few logical problems with this position. Do the Jews repent first in Exile and only then return to Israel? But if they have to repent before they can return to Israel, what do we make of the biblical passages that talk about a Last Days’ repentance in Israel? That means that Jews are living in Israel and also repent in Israel.

And what about the biblical passages that describe a Jewish repentance in the Diaspora? Evidently the matter has various shades of subtlety here, many more than Lifsey might have led us to believe. One must be careful to avoid the temptation which an Old Testament professor of world renown once described for me, “Cutting the baloney so thin that there is only one side!” For more help, read chapter 17 in my book “Israel the Key to World Revival” (available at www.davidstent.com), especially the sub-section titled “Which comes first – the chicken or the Teshuvah”

Interestingly, and for the purposes of this discussion, two groups can be considered in this regard which insist on a dogmatic “all or nothing” approach to the fulfillment of Messianic prophecy. One group is Rabbinic Judaism, which refuses to accept a process of fulfillment in Isaiah 53 (especially as it pertains to Yeshua). A second group is the ultra-Orthodox sect Neturei Karta (“the guardians of the city” of Jerusalem, in Aramaic), which refuses to accept the theological validity of the modern State of Israel (for most of the same reasons as Katz and Lifsey, by the way!).

Nothing less than a Messianic kingdom descending deus ex machina would be acceptable to these rigid guardians. Neturei Karta refuse to acknowledge the authority of secular Jews in the State of Israel, but are quite willing to accept the oversight of cruel and murderous terror taskmasters like Yasser Arafat and his PLO/PA, Hamas and the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Neturei Karta believe that Islamic and Arab hatred of Israel is deserved, and is due to the Jewish people’s lack of repentance. According to their own beliefs, they strongly believe that the Jewish people should never have set up a secular state. They should have instead become ultra-Orthodox Jews. They refuse to accept the validity of the State of Israel due to the same reasoning.

Note the similarities between Neturei Karta’s views and Lifsey’s positions:

To sum up, this book invalidates the modern Jewish State as a positive work of God because, according to the author's logic, secular Israel refuses to wholeheartedly embrace Yeshua.

However, most secular Jews in Israel do not often think about Yeshua, and are not even sure that there is a God, or if He cares. Most have never heard the gospel, and some are quite open to the claims of Yeshua's Messiahship. It is actually the followers of Rabbinic Judaism who live for the most part in a cloistered community hermetically sealed (mostly!) against the Good News.

Ironically, it seems that Lifsey is proclaiming that secular Israel is guilty because the Rabbinic community refuses to accept Yeshua! This is another significant category error.

One of the book’s endorsers writes, “With the two-fold danger of replacement theology and what I would call ‘un-sanctified Zionism’ in the Church we need voices of truth to emerge” (p. iii). The position advocated by this man is that simple-minded lovers of Israel are as much of a danger to the cause of Christ and His kingdom, as are those Christians who deny the Jewish people’s gifts, calling and election. This is a skewed emphasis of significant proportions.

Double standards lead to double vision

Lifsey's book harps vociferously on Israel’s sin and rebellion, while the ungodly nations of the world are referred to in far less strident terms. Lifsey nowhere proclaims the burning judgments of God on New Zealand or America with the same passion as he targets Israel. This is what is known as a double standard. Jewish people would label it an anti-Semitic tendency.

A more balanced treatment of the whole subject would not only refer to Israel’s sins but also refer to Israel’s victories. A more balanced treatment would not only mention the rebels within the Jewish people, but would also mention her outstanding Jewish prophets and apostles. A fair treatment would do better at honoring Israel, and would stress that being Jewish does not equal being a reprobate sinner! It would make sure to strike a balance in reminding its readers that Gentiles can also be outstanding sinners in both quality and quality. In that this book gives a quite unbalanced impression on these matters, it would be fair to ask if the tone of this work could lead readers to mistake this book for anti-Jewish propaganda.

The book's focus on “Israel's deserved judgment” is hard to blend with Lifsey's declaration that believers are mandated to stand with this “disobedient” people in their suffering. I suggest that more foundational work needs to be done in this area, because the logical, ethical and emotional inconsistencies between the two above-mentioned issues create the need for exceptionally sensitive pastoral counsel. When Jews get typecast as hostile infidels, one cannot simply issue a “mandate” (p. 210) to sacrifice yourself for them, and expect people to embrace that teaching with their full heart and mind.

I dreamed I saw Saint Augustine

Some of the theological presuppositions in the book are strikingly reminiscent of Saint Augustine’s less than positive declarations about the Jewish people. Augustine of Hippo was the first who recast the Jewish people’s “chosen people” status into the status of being chosen for persecution, conquest and exile. According to this North African Church Father, the Jewish people’s present role on earth is that of an unrepentant infidel groaning under the punishment and discipline of God.

“So to the end of the seven days of time, the continued preservation of the Jews will be proof to believing Christians of the subjection merited by those who, in the pride of their kingdom, put the Lord to death” (St. Augustine, Contra Faustum, 12.12, www.newadvent.org/fathers/140601.htm)

“But of the enemies themselves what? ... The Jews nevertheless remain with a mark ... Not without reason is there that Cain, on whom, when he had slain his brother, God set a mark in order that no one should slay him. This is the mark which the Jews have: they hold fast by the remnant of their law, they are circumcised, they keep Sabbaths, they sacrifice the Passover; they eat unleavened bread. These are therefore Jews, they have not been slain, they are necessary to believing nations” (Homilies on the Psalms, 59, 18).

One scholar has said, “It’s difficult for a modern reader to see (Augustine’s) doctrine as anything less than dehumanizing, reducing the Jews to little more than God’s pawns for furthering Christianity” (www.patheos.com/blogs/godandthemachine/2012/05/unwilling-witnesses-st-augustine-and-the-witness-doctrine/).

“Augustine’s purpose (...was...) to remind (the Jews) of just how evil they were in their past history and that their existence at large today has nothing to do with their claims to personal virtue or religious merit ... Augustine was very clear that the Jews’ present existence was tolerated by God for the purpose of authenticating the Christian religion and serving as a sign of His continuing judgment against the Jews” (Robert Sungenis, The Bellarmine Report; www.catholicintl.com/index.php/component/content/article/34-conversion/258-a-review-of-paula-fredriksens-qaugustin-and-the-jewsq).

Compare Augustine’s above-quoted words and views with selected quotes from Lifsey’s book:

Note in this regard a quote from Robert Baer, former CIA case officer in the Directorate of Operations from 1976 to 1997 (www.chronogram.com/issue/2006/02/news/index.php):

In light of the murderous consequences of anti-Semitic language on the part of the Church Fathers, every follower of Messiah Yeshua must exercise (at the very least) a modicum of discernment, gentleness, humility and love in discussing the Jewish people, their gifts and calling, and God’s unswerving heart of a Lover for them. The above quotes, while not exhaustive, show that the tenor of this book falls rather short of conveying God’s compassion and passion for Israel as described in Deuteronomy 7:7-8, in Hosea 11:1-4, 8-9 and in Hosea 14. The author has much to learn about how to engage in normal human conversation with real Jews on these subjects.

The reader of this book comes away having read precious little of God’s tender love for Israel. Au contraire, he has received a barrelful of tainted verbiage (like “gruesome judgment” and “vengeful anger”) which leave a toxic residue. The reader reads page after page of descriptions characterizing the Jews as the enemies of God, but he would be hard-pressed to find a truly tender call in this book to intercede for Jacob's progeny with tears (though a few attempts to do so are made in passing, scattered like the occasional used tissue in a handful of places throughout the book).

As a Jew I was offended and angered by the condescending and strident tone of the book. Though I believe and have always taught that God will purify His beloved people through both wooing and judgment, reading Lifsey's book was somewhat similar to peering through a distorted looking-glass into a hostile and unfriendly corner of a bizarre parallel universe.

Ramifications of this teaching – chilling the intercessory heart

The harsh and rebuking tone of this book has the potential to chill the hearts of intercessors who love and pray for Israel. Since (according to this book) the present State is merely a divine setup for God’s aktion against His own people, then why pray for Israel’s physical protection or spiritual benefit? If the Jews are simply a rebellious people and there is no spiritual awakening going on of any significant value with them (according to this book), then why pray for them?

The prophet Isaiah can help in restoring hope, heart and vision, “In all their (the Jewish people's) afflictions He was afflicted” (Isaiah 63:9). When we understand that God suffers with His people as they go through suffering, we will approach the subject of ‘the Time of Jacob's trouble’ with far gentler hands and with more tender words (see Isaiah 40:1-2“Comfort, comfort My people, … Speak to the heart of Jerusalem”).

Ramifications of this teaching – jamming the watchman’s radar

The confusion set loose by some of this book’s teachings could cause doubt to enter into the spirits of some prophetic watchmen, and make them wonder if they have really heard from God regarding His love and purposes for His people Israel.

A case in point can be illustrated by a prophetic word from Bob Jones, who in December 2006 declared that there are two issues that are holding back judgment from falling on America, and that if and when these positions change, judgment will be instant. The two issues are – standing with Israel, and love for the poor.

Yet if the central hypotheses of Lifsey's book are true, then standing with Israel today could be potentially “arrogant”  and “ignorant” (p. 69). It could even lead to “deception,” says Lifsey, because a pro-Israel position is fraught with “disastrous consequences in the generation of the Lord’s return” (p. 69).

In this matter, if Lifsey is right, then Bob Jones’ prophetic word is wrong.

But the converse is actually true here. Lifsey is off-course, and Bob Jones has delivered the word of the Lord to America.

Stop using Israel as a prophetic chess piece

Shunning Israel

Here is an extended quote from our February 2, 2010 newsletter. It still rings true today, and especially in this context:

“I regret to say that some believers have a detached heart regarding Israel. Their thought (and heart) processes would unfold something like this: they correctly observe that many in Israel turned away from following the Davidic dynasty (1 Kings 12:16-19), or turned away from honoring the prophets (Jeremiah 7:25-26), or again turned away from embracing King Messiah Yeshua when He came at His first appearing (Matthew 23:37-39).

As a result, these believers relate to Israel with a sense of offense, turning a cold shoulder and an even colder heart away from the Jewish people. This attitude is often blended with a false sense of spiritual superiority, ‘We Christians are not like these bad Jews. We follow Christ and we obey the truth. But as for these people, they obviously don't!’

From this skewed perspective, when tragedies happen to the Jewish people – like the Holocaust, pogroms, or Arab wars of annihilation waged against Israel – these brothers and sisters often respond, saying that we can be assured that such evils were prophesied against Israel in Deuteronomy 28, and that these events demonstrate that Israel is still not redeemed – that we are not yet in the decisive period of God's favor for the Jewish people.

As well, many would add that God cannot allow Himself to show any real favor to Israel until He has totally ‘broken the power’ of His own set-apart yet stubborn people (Daniel 12:7). Such believers would be hesitant about openly admitting that God is in the process of restoring His Jewish people to Zion. The present State of Israel, for these believers, might or might not have any theological significance or divine value.

For these believers it seems easier to theologically explain attacks against the Jewish people and their state, than to support the Jewish people and their state against such attacks. When anti-Semitic assaults are more easily justified than pro-Jewish restoration efforts, something is definitely wrong with this picture.”

Ramifications of this teaching – serious consequences

Any teaching that fosters a cold heart regarding the restoration of Israel in our day; any teaching that typecasts the Jewish people as calves to the slaughter awaiting divine destruction; any teaching that detaches intercessory and prophetic hearts from engaging with the Jewish people and the Jewish state in the here and now – I must confess that I have great concern for the spiritual blowback that attends such teachings, and for the spiritual wellbeing of those who disseminate such things. Let us pray for these people and about these matters!

Stirring up unbalanced controversy

As I said at the outset, the benefit of this book lies mainly in that it may get more believers to become aware of some of the deep challenges confronting Israel. This in turn could lead some into deeper intercession.

The liabilities (which potentially are many) have been explained throughout the body of this newsletter and do not need to be repeated here.

How can we pray?

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do!

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal) through: www.davidstent.org

When I’m sixty-four

In 1958 at the tender age of sixteen Paul McCartney penned a catchy tune called “When I’m sixty-four.” Recorded in December 1966 in the key of C major for the Sgt. Pepper album, it was speeded up on Abbey Road’s Studer J37 multi-track recorder to play in the key of D-flat, making Paul’s voice sound younger and the arrangement “more rooty tooty.”

The Beatles made use of the tune in their Cavern days, especially when the club’s electricity blew a fuse. The song penned by this sixteen-year old imagines what life will be like with the love of his life forty-eight years down the road. The delightful quality of the recording still touches listeners half a century later.

In less than a week’s time the Jewish state will turn sixty-four. When David Ben-Gurion proclaimed Israel’s national resurrection in May 1948, very few people could imagine how the Jewish state would look in 2012. Yet the numinous aspect of God restoring the Jewish people to their homeland still touches believers more than half a century later. Let’s take a quick look at some of the highlights of the last sixty-four years of this precocious, old-new nation.

Born in battle

Surrounded by Islamic and Arab countries committed to strangling the Jewish state before it could be birthed, the Jewish leadership was attacked on all fronts by five of the seven Arab League countries – Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon and Syria, as well as contingents from Saudi Arabia and Yemen.

The Secretary of the Arab League Abdul Rahman Azzam Pasha declared at the time, “I personally wish that the Jews do not drive us to this war, as this will be a war of extermination and a momentous massacre which will be spoken of like the Mongolian massacres and the Crusades” (www.meforum.org/3082/azzam-genocide-threat).

The Arab League’s stated goal of destruction and genocide against the Jews brings to mind the words of Bob Marley in his hit “I Shot the Sheriff,” “Sheriff John Brown always hated me, for what, I don’t know. Every time I plant a seed, he said kill it before it grow - he said kill them before they grow.”

The seven nations which attacked the fledgling State of Israel were not trying to recapture the West Bank, East Jerusalem or Gaza – for none of these areas were under Israeli control. The Arab League wanted to conquer Tel Aviv, Haifa and West Jerusalem – in short, any area that had a Jewish population. Their stated military goal was the crushing of any Jewish presence in the Promised Land – to make those territories Judenrein (a Nazi term meaning ‘cleansed of Jews’) – the destruction of Abraham’s promised seed.

Against all odds the newborn Israel Defense Forces won that war. The State of Israel withstood that first round of combat. The baby was born.

Ingathering of the exiles

One of the first prophetic tasks that lay before the new Jewish state was the immediate ingathering of over one million Jewish people from over 100 countries. Many were Holocaust survivors who had managed to survive Hitler’s genocidal plans. Hundreds of thousands were Jews who had lived for centuries in Arab and Muslim lands, now being attacked and murdered by crazed mobs furious about a re-born Jewish national homeland. Many Muslims were livid that the combined military might of the Islamic Arab League’s strongest armies were soundly defeated by a ‘puny’ and rag-tag army of Jewish ‘infidels.’ The very survival of the Jewish state was seen as an unforgiveable insult to both Islam and Mohammed’s cause.

Unusual medical, scientific, military and creative achievements

The world’s post-1948 generation is beholding a divine drama. As Abraham’s chosen seed is being restored to Abraham’s land, the result is a creative flowering that is riveting the attention of the planet.  Israeli accomplishments in medicine, science and technology are cutting-edge achievements for mankind, as the following links briefly explain:

A recent best-seller “Start-Up Nation: The Story of Israel’s Economic Miracle,” by Dan Senor and Saul Singer describes some of the historical and sociological factors that have contributed to these attainments (www.startupnationbook.com/; www.cfr.org/israel/start-up-nation/p20356; https://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704779704574553884271802474.html).

Israel’s restoration has no parallel with any other culture or people (Numbers 23:7-12 NASB). There has been no other example of a nation who has been scattered twice by brutal exile, has returned to its ancestral homeland after 2,700 years of banishment, has restored its ancient language (biblical Hebrew), and has made the most profound per-capita contribution of any people on earth through world-shaking advances in science, medicine, technology and the humanities.

Living out biblical prophecy

When God acted as the divine midwife to Israel’s birth as a nation-state in 1948, He threw down the gauntlet in the international arena. Jerusalem became a divided city for nineteen years and, for the first time in two millennia, biblical passages dealing with Jerusalem and the End of Days suddenly came into sharper focus. The land, borders and people of Israel now have become energized by a living, breathing prophetic dynamic – a magnet drawing the blundering and darkened focus of super powers, the United Nations, the Quartet, the EU and anyone else who cares to get involved.

Today the headlines of major newspapers and the leading stories on all major TV networks zoom in with a negative spin on any news concerning Israel, usually justifying its enemies’ attempts to weaken and destroy her.

World leaders regularly home in on Israel as “the biggest impediment to world peace” (www.commentarymagazine.com/article/israel-today-the-west-tomorrow/). One striking and current example paints Israel’s attempts to thwart Iran’s megalomaniac drive to obtain nuclear weapons as the greatest danger to the world, rather than truthfully stating that the Islamic Republic’s brazen public declaration of genocidal intent against the Jewish state (and threats against Sunni, European and American interests) is the main menace in the Middle East.

Prepare for world galvanization

Prayer points

Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do!

In Messiah Yeshua,

Avner Boskey

Donations can be sent to:

FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES

BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA

Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal) through: www.davidstent.org

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close