The sixth video is ‘The Prophet Hosea – Part Two’ https://youtu.be/7OF2z8qUIw8

Aleksandr Isayevich Solzhenitsyn was an unlikely Russian hero. Novelist, philosopher, historian and political prisoner, during WWII he had been the commander of a sound-ranging battery in the Red Army involved in major action at the front. He was awarded the Order of the Red Star in 1944. In February 1945, while serving in East Prussia, Solzhenitsyn was arrested by SMERSH for writing a few derogatory comments about Joseph Stalin in private letters to a friend, Nikolai Vitkevich. Accused of anti-Soviet propaganda under Article 58 paragraph 10 of the Soviet criminal code, he was sentenced in absentia on 7 July 1945 by the NKVD to an eight-year term in a labor camp – a normal sentence for Article 58 crimes. He was sent to the Gulag – a Soviet network of prison labor camps for criminals, political prisoners and other ‘undesirables’ of Stalinist cancel-culture. After the completion of his eight year sentence, he was then imprisoned for life (internal exile) at Birlik, South Kazakhstan.


Released during Russia’s leader Nikita Khrushchev’s general amnesty after three years in Birlik, Solzhenitsyn taught secondary school as a day job while secretly writing about his Gulag experiences. His magnum opus The Gulag Archipelago was later smuggled out of Russia. This three-volume history of the 18 million prisoners and three to six million fatalities has been described as the book which “brought down an empire” and “the most powerful single indictment of a political regime ever to be levied in modern times.” Psychologist Jordan Peterson has said that The Gulag Archipelago is the most important book of the twentieth century.
Truth and consequences at Harvard Yard
After Solzhenitsyn was deported from Russia in March 1974, he moved to Cambridge, Vermont where he resided for 16 years before returning to post-Soviet Russia. In 1978 Harvard University granted him an honorary literary degree, also asking him to deliver their yearly Commencement Speech on June 8, 1978. His address “A world split apart” [Расколотый мир] landed like an atom bomb on the happy and soon-to-be-successful crowd. They had been expecting a condemnation of Soviet Communism presented with dry Russian literary flourish, but a different pièce de résistance was served. The shock waves of that speech still echo, and the prophetic challenge which Solzhenitsyn gave continues to resound among all who chew on his words. This newsletter will consider some highlights of Solzhenitsyn’s presentation. His challenges have deep relevance for our world.

A house divided against itself
To paraphrase Pete Seeger’s famous song, Solzhenitsyn had a hammer and a bell, and at Harvard Yard he was ringing out a warning. Though officially speaking to America’s elites, he was also issuing a prophetic warning to his Russian motherland. He was guided by the biblical passage, “If a house is divided against itself, that house will not be able to stand” (Mark 3:25). Solzhenitsyn proclaimed that the world is facing major challenges which cannot be resolved primarily by political or military means. The threats are moral and spiritual, and the solutions are also moral and spiritual. There are not-so-hidden fault lines running under the public square of both the West and the East, and mankind is facing a sharp turn on the highway of history. Will we ascend upward or spiral downward – that is the pressing question.
In the shadow of Harvard’s august buildings, Solzhenitsyn began his address by noting that the university’s seal contains but one word – ‘Veritas’ (Latin for ‘truth’). If, as Yeshua said, “you shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free” (John 8:32), could it be honestly said that Harvard is still pursuing biblical truth? And is America still following its Puritan calling to be a city set on a hill and a light to the world (Matthew 5:14)? Solzhenitsyn wryly concludes that neither present-day America nor Soviet socialism stand up to the challenge of being viable spiritual models worth emulating. The words of John echo here: “Beloved, do not imitate what is evil, but what is good” (3 John 1:11).
Renaissance and Enlightenment have led to death and darkness
Both East and West have built their burgeoning empires on quicksilver foundations, said Solzhenitsyn. Both the Renaissance and the Enlightnment placed their focus on Man as the measure of all things, Man as the center of all values. Political thought, literature and culture have thus developed based on the presupposition that humanity is autonomous from any Higher Power. The result of this is anthropocentricity – man and his material happiness being the central focus and purpose of history. Solzhenitsyn calls these goals “the ossified formulas of the Enlightenment” – the denial of God, the glorification of human beauty and passions, and the pursuit of materialism. The dreams and goals here include endless materialism, freedom from religion and from religious responsibility, and focus on ‘science’ as the solution to humanity’s problem through the manipulation of social structures. Social dogmatism declares that the nature of man is non-spiritual and then proceeds to carry out a dictatorship of social engineering.
Three scriptures uncover how God sees this process:
Solzhenitsyn sadly noted that both Western humanistic materialism and Communist materialism spell ‘man’ with a capital ‘M.’ Both West and East have drunk the secular Kool-Aid of Enlightenment materialism, and are left with the calamity of a de-spiritualized and irreligious seared human consciousness. Humanism without a biblical heritage cannot resist liberalism, which in time transforms itself into radicalism, eventually making way for socialism, and ultimately morphing into dictatorial communism.
Solzhenitsyn describes this struggle as a fight of cosmic proportions currently being waged over the spiritual destiny of our planet.
Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness
In the American Declaration of Independence, it is written that all men are endowed “with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” In his Harvard address Solzhenitsyn asks: If this is the true purpose of life, then why do we all die? Does ‘affluenza’ – a surfeit of material goods – actually bring happiness? Or does it often bring unease, a never-ending rat-race of keeping up with the Joneses, and a suppression of spiritual sensitivities? The cult of material well-being revolves around the worship of Man and his material needs.
But surely freedom was not given to simply satisfy instincts and whims, he says. The Founding Fathers concluded that individual human rights were recognized based on the fact that man was created by God and therefore has a constantly renewing spiritual responsibility to choose God, His ways and His values. A generation suckled on materialism grows up weak, without confronting the challenges that strengthen, with no need to overcome threats and as a result having no healthy development. The West may have achieved a higher degree of materialistic success, but when it comes down to brass tacks, both West and East are solidly married to materialism as their priority value and to material abundance as their overwhelming goal.
Four scriptures shed light on this process:
Empire spirit
Solzhenitsyn’s eyes were wide open to the tragedy that Soviet imperialism had visited on the peoples of Russia: “I dare hope that . . . all the peoples who have lived through communism will understand that communism is to blame for the bitter pages of their history.” But he points out that the West is blind about its own pretensions to cultural superiority and colonialistic pride. The West measures other civilizations by the yardstick of how Western they have become. Shining a spotlight on the cracks in the spiritual foundations of both Western and Communist materialism-based societies, Solzhenitsyn warns that if an empire is built on weak foundations, its future success is not guaranteed. “But the one who has heard and has not acted is like a man who built a house on the ground without a foundation. And the river burst against it and it immediately collapsed, and the ruin of that house was great” (Luke 6:49).
Today in the West the wraiths of cultural superiority and sneering pride often try to anathematize those on the other side of the immediate political aisle. But ‘a world split apart’ and ‘a house divided’ are still real dangers. Today’s all-too-visible cracks and threats are moral and spiritual; their solutions are also moral and spiritual. Will we ascend upwards through repentance or spiral downwards through stubborn heart-heartedness?
When courage turns into dust in the wind
In his 1978 Harvard address Solzhenitsyn trumpets out a call to courage:
A timid and mealy-mouthed response seems to be commonplace when facing the threats of Iranian state terrorism and economic warfare, Islamist jihadi movements, or anti-biblical leftist agendas regarding sexual morality and family foundations. These are the days which try men’s courage. At Harvard Solzhenitsyn stated that no weapon can help the West until it overcomes its loss of willpower.
Western shame-based apologies, groveling and ‘pre-emptive cringe’ when faced with real enemies – all show that the West is held hostage by both love and fear: love of wealth and ease, and fear of the loss of these things. Here are four scriptures that hit the hammer on the head:
The opposite of courage is cowardice. The second to last chapter in the Bible hammers out a warning regarding this sin of the heart: “But for the cowardly . . . their part will be in the lake that burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death” (Revelation 21:8).
It may be legal but it ain’t right
Solzhenitsyn raised the question at Harvard: is man basically good and simply in need of help in tweaking the problematic and inefficient social and legal systems he has inherited – or is man inherently evil and in need of healing for his internal corruption? In The Gulag Archipelago, Part I, Chapter 4, the author explains: “If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?”
At Harvard, Solzhenitsyn explained that legal parameters do not stop evil individuals. Laws cannot eradicate moral violence or human decadence. Unrestrained freedom is ultimately irresponsible and destructive. Economic planning, the redistribution of wealth, a more secure social safety net – these will not transform people’s hearts. The solution to sin is not socialism but the gospel – the good news about Messiah Yeshua.
When a person who does evil tries to validate his wicked deeds by pointing out that he has not technically broken the law, this cannot justify his evil ways or impute righteousness to him. In some societies monstrously evil things can be pronounced as legally sound, while mankind’s more noble impulses slowly fade to black.
Sometimes what seems to be a normal and healthy society is only a smooth patina concealing a society tottering on the brink. It only takes a spark to get the fire going, and suddenly the streets run red with riot. The West may be blessed by an over-abundance of lawyers, but human evil is also gathering at Western gates.
True unity in a society is not something that can be conjured up by a press conference. Real unity does not mean accepting, tolerating or ignoring each other’s defects and sins. Instead it involves calling ourselves and each other to repentance and healing works.
Mister Media and Miss-Information
One of Solzhenitsyn’s strongest remarks at Harvard in 1978 centered on ‘the fourth estate’ – also known as the press or the media. He pointed out that the media has moved away from its traditional role of reporting the news, and have instead turned into reality shapers and political power brokers:
Solzhenitsyn laments that moral responsibility and accountability on the part of Western media have disappeared. They have been replaced by hastiness and superficiality. The media have become adept at disinformation, at misleading their audiences, and in using disproportion to bend facts. They have become mis-educators, propagandistic, and manipulators of public opinion. He poetically compared their self-awarded role of shaping a herd mentality, to the placing of petrified armor around people’s minds. That control, he prophesied, “will only be broken by the pitiless crowbar of events.”
L. Joseph Letendre, Eastern Orthodox author and theologian, shows the burning relevance of Solzhenitsyn’s words in his 2018 article Schism in Harvard Yard, (Touchstone: A Journal of Mere Christianity; May/June 2018). Solzhenitsyn’s observations about the media “should be more alarming today: during the 2016 presidential election, major news organizations abandoned any claim to objectivity or impartiality and openly stated their intent to prevent the election of one of the nominees, Their shock and rage at their failure to do so has not abated.” Subsequent events show that the media’s rage in victory has reached even more fevered proportions.
As we recall Solzhenitsyn’s appeal to remember the spiritual and moral nature of the threats to our planet, let us turn to the ancient weapons of prayer and intercession, asking God to restore sanity to a planet careening out of control. “And even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing” (2 Corinthians 4:3).
How should we then pray?
Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.
In Messiah Yeshua,
Avner Boskey
Donations can be sent to:
FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES
BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA
Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal or credit card) through: www.davidstent.org
Here is the seventh video in our new twelve-part video series – teaching on the Minor Prophets – being released on our YouTube channel. Once a week, we are releasing a new episode from this series. Eight of the Twelve Minor Prophets will be presented by Avner Boskey from a Messianic Jewish and Israeli viewpoint. Four of the prophetic books will have two video sessions each, while the other four books will be covered in one video each.
The seventh video is ‘The Prophet Micah – Part One’ https://youtu.be/Jk21wGXqV3s

We encourage you to subscribe to our YouTube channel – Signet Ring Media – at the link: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCoX5hxSFWLBUANDaQttw0uQ
If you would like to stay notified of these new releases on the Signet Ring Media channel, after subscribing just click the notification bell 🔔.
For more information regarding the E37 Teaching Institute, visit: https://davidstent.org/e37/
Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.
In Messiah Yeshua,
Avner Boskey
Donations can be sent to:
FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES
BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA
Donations can also be made on-line (PayPal or credit card) through: www.davidstent.org
Here is the sixth video in our new twelve-part video series – teaching on the Minor Prophets – being released on our YouTube channel. Once a week, we are releasing a new episode from this series. Eight of the Twelve Minor Prophets will be presented by Avner Boskey from a Messianic Jewish and Israeli viewpoint. Four of the prophetic books will have two video sessions each, while the other four books will be covered in one video each.
The sixth video is ‘The Prophet Hosea – Part Two’ https://youtu.be/7OF2z8qUIw8

We encourage you to subscribe to our YouTube channel – Signet Ring Media – at the link: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCoX5hxSFWLBUANDaQttw0uQ
If you would like to stay notified of these new releases on the Signet Ring Media channel, after subscribing just click the notification bell .
For more information regarding the E37 Teaching Institute, visit: https://davidstent.org/e37/
Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.
In Messiah Yeshua,
Avner Boskey
Donations can be sent to:
FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES
BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA
Donations can also be made on-line (PayPal or credit card) through: www.davidstent.org
We’re excited to present our first teaching video in Hebrew – David Boskey sharing on Daniel 9:20-26.
This video is titled ‘Revelation is the fruit of intimacy’ https://youtu.be/3D2WbjWsNJE
In a time when many are desperate to understand the times we are living in, Daniel 9:20-26 provides us with three helpful keys to position ourselves to be able to receive divine revelation.
![]()
To subscribe to our YouTube channel – Signet Ring Media – go to the link: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCoX5hxSFWLBUANDaQttw0uQ
If you would like to stay notified of these new releases on the Signet Ring Media channel, after subscribing just click the notification bell 🔔.
For more information regarding the E37 Teaching Institute, visit: https://davidstent.org/e37/
Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.
In Messiah Yeshua,
Avner Boskey
Donations can be sent to:
FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES
BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA
Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal or credit card) through: www.davidstent.org
Here is the fifth video in our new twelve-part video series – teaching on the Minor Prophets – being released on our YouTube channel. Once a week, we are releasing a new episode from this series. Eight of the Twelve Minor Prophets will be presented by Avner Boskey from a Messianic Jewish and Israeli viewpoint. Four of the prophetic books will have two video sessions each, while the other four books will be covered in one video each.
The fifth video is ‘The Prophet Hosea – Part One’ https://youtu.be/hAY5f0oGdnk

We encourage you to subscribe to our YouTube channel – Signet Ring Media – at the link: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCoX5hxSFWLBUANDaQttw0uQ
If you would like to stay notified of these new releases on the Signet Ring Media channel, after subscribing just click the notification bell 🔔.
For more information regarding the E37 Teaching Institute, visit: https://davidstent.org/e37/
Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.
In Messiah Yeshua,
Avner Boskey
Donations can be sent to:
FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES
BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA
Donations can also be made on-line (PayPal or credit card) through: www.davidstent.org
God’s “purpose is unchangeable . . . It is impossible for God to lie; (Therefore) we who have taken refuge” under His wings “have strong encouragement to hold firmly to the hope set before us” (Hebrews 6:17-18). “This is the message we have heard from Him and announce to you, that God is Light, and in Him there is no darkness at all” (1 John 1:5).
God’s word is our rock-solid foundation. As Bob Dylan says, “God don’t make promises that He don’t keep” (Slow Train Coming, 1979). We who turn to the word of God have full assurance that it is 100% accurate and reliable, because it is breathed out from the lungs of God (2 Timothy 3:16). “You shall have accurate balances, accurate weights, an accurate ephah, and an accurate hin; I am YHVH your God, who brought you out from the land of Egypt” (Leviticus 19:36). Pastors are exhorted to rise to the higher calling of accuracy in their Scripture teachings: “Be diligent to present yourself approved to God as a worker who does not need to be ashamed, accurately handling the word of truth” (2 Timothy 2:15).
A good prophet is an accurate prophet
When the God of Jacob shared His heart with Moses about prophetic ministry, He also homed in on accuracy: “And if you say in your heart, ‘How will we recognize the word which YHVH has not spoken?’ When the prophet speaks in the name of YHVH, and the thing does not happen or come true, that is the thing which YHVH has not spoken. The prophet has spoken it presumptuously; you are not to be afraid of him” (Deuteronomy 18:21-22).
This high bar is our spiritual inheritance as Yeshua’s followers as well, “Do not quench the Spirit. Do not reject prophetic words, but examine everything. Hold firmly to that which is good, abstain from every form of evil” (1 Thessalonians 5:19-22). The Apostle Paul presents a wonderful balance for our consideration: he wishes and earnestly desires that all believers would prophesy (1 Corinthians 14:1-5), and at the same time he calls us to be accurate, to judge accurately and to give no place to confusion: “Have two or three prophets speak, and have the others pass judgment . . . God is not a God of confusion, but of peace” (1 Corinthians 14:29-32).
An accurate journalist is a dependable journalist
We know that all prophecies which made it into the Bible are accurate ones. And I still remember a time when reporters needed to be accurate in journalism in order to made it into the papers. In the classic The Elements of Journalism by Bill Kovach and Tom Rosenstiel, it is stated, “Journalism’s first obligation is to the truth, Good decision-making depends on people having reliable, accurate facts . . . Its essence is a discipline of verification . . . This discipline of verification is what separates journalism from other forms of communication such as propaganda, advertising, fiction or entertainment.” Someone has added that “journalism is the production and distribution of reports on current events based on facts and supported with proof or evidence.”
We live at a time when “many travel back and forth, and knowledge increases” daily by leaps and bounds (see Daniel 12:4). The sterling reputation of investigative journalists (like Gareth Jones who reported during the horrendous Ukrainian Holodomir enforced Stalinist famines) has given way to the non-stop droning of 24/7 cable news networks. But this media glut comes at a price – we are all witnesses to the blowback of increased trivialization, entertainment and propagandistic spin. Anyone who wants to find out what is really going on about any specific world event today needs to do due diligence and consult many media streams, not merely to nurse at the baby-bottle of one’s favorite news channel.
Lessons from the burning of the Reichstag
In 1933 the Nazi leader Adolph Hitler had his sights set on taking over Germany and transforming it into a fascist dictatorship. The two main political parties in Germany at that time – the left-wing Communists and the right-wing National Socialists (Nazis) – were struggling for control of the Reichstag (equivalent to the U.S. Congress). Hitler had a plurality in the German parliament, but he needed an absolute majority to move his vision forward. Three steps were needed – to acquire a solid Nazi majority and thus become dictator (Führer); to secure that position; to weaken and crush his opposition.
His strategy involved the passage of the Enabling Act (Gesetz zur Behebung der Not von Volk und Reich), which would allow him to bypass any objections raised by the Reichstag legislative body. Hitler would instead rule by executive order. He needed a two-thirds majority vote in the Reichstag, but as of January 1933, the Nazis had only 32% of the seats. How to increase the number of Nazi seats? The Führer’s plan was to outlaw the Communist Part of Germany (the KPD, Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands, which had 17% of the seats) immediately after the elections and before the legislature convened.
Shortly after 2100 hours on 27 February, 1933, the Berlin Fire Department received a message that the Reichstag was on fire. Despite the best efforts of the firefighters, most of the building was gutted by the blaze and by 2330 the fire was extinguished. Hitler called the fire a “sign from God” and claimed it was a secret beacon-signal (Fanal) meant to mark the beginning of a Communist Putsch (revolt). By the next day, the Preussische Pressedienst (Prussian Press Service) reported that “this act of incendiarism is the most monstrous act of terrorism carried out by Bolshevism in Germany.” The Vossische Zeitung newspaper warned its readers that “the government is of the opinion that the situation is such that a danger to the state and nation existed and still exists.”
Any journalist worth his salt would have begun an investigation. But the day after the fire, at Hitler's request, President Hindenburg signed the Reichstag Fire Decree into law, based on Article 48 of the Weimar Constitution. The Reichstag Fire Decree suspended most civil liberties in Germany, including habeas corpus, freedom of expression, freedom of the press, the right of free association and public assembly, and the secrecy of the post and telephone. These rights were never reinstated during the Nazi reign. This decree was also used by the Nazis to ban publications considered not sufficiently ‘friendly’ to the Nazi cause.
Marinus van der Lubbe, a half-blind Dutch Communist, was arrested as the culprit and, after torture, claimed to have acted alone in setting the Reichstag fire. Nevertheless Hitler publicly blamed the fire on Communist agitators, announcing that it was the start of a Communist insurrection to take over Germany. Nazi Party newspapers dutifully published this fabricated 'news,' which sent the German population into a panic and isolated the Communists further. In days following, thousands of Communists were imprisoned (including leaders of the Communist Party of Germany) on the charge that the Communist Party was preparing to stage a coup d'état.
The Enabling Act passed easily on 23 March, 1933 with the support of the right-wing German National People's Party, the Centre Party, and several fragmented middle-class parties. The measure went into force on 27 March, effectively making Hitler dictator of Germany. Media spin on who was responsible for the Reichstag Fire played a pivotal role in helping to establish Nazi Germany.
The rest of the news
Walter Gempp, head of the Berlin fire department at that time, personally directed operations at the Reichstag. On 25 March he was dismissed for presenting evidence that suggested Nazi involvement in the fire. In 1937, he was arrested for abuse of office and was imprisoned. On 2 May 1939 Gempp was strangled to death in prison.
In July 2019, Germany's Hannoversche Allgemeine Zeitung published a 1955 affidavit of former investigator Fritz Tobias validating the testimony of Hans-Martin Lennings (1904–1962), a former member of the Nazis' paramilitary SA unit. Lennings stated that on the night of the fire, he and his SA group drove van der Lubbe from an infirmary to the Reichstag, where they noticed “a strange smell of burning and there were clouds of smoke billowing through the rooms.” This was clear evidence that the fire had already started before van der Lubbe had arrived at the Reichstag.
Lennings stated in his account that he and other members of his squad had protested the arrest of van der Lubbe “because we were convinced that van der Lubbe could not possibly have been the arsonist – according to our observation, the Reichstag had already been burning when we dropped him off there.” He and the other witnesses were detained and forced to sign a paper that denied any knowledge of the incident. Later, nearly all of those with this knowledge of the Reichstag fire were executed. Lennings escaped to Czechoslovakia after a tip-off.
In The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, William L. Shirer conveyed General Franz Halder's testimony at the Nuremberg Trials that Hermann Göring had boasted about setting the fire: “On the occasion of a lunch on the Führer's birthday in 1943, the people around the Führer turned the conversation to the Reichstag building and its artistic value. I heard with my own ears how Göring broke into the conversation and shouted: ‘The only one who really knows about the Reichstag building is I, for I set fire to it.’ And saying this he slapped his thigh.”
Those responsible for the attack on the Reichstag – Germany’s equivalent of America’s Capitol Hill – were quietly ignored by a prejudiced media. The entire subject was then propagandized by the Nazis (one side in the German body politic) to weaken and crush its primary political opponent. Of course, at that time there was no possibility of doing proper investigative journalism. Nevertheless, there are lessons to be drawn from what took place 87 years ago.
Some helpful journalistic questions
Four questions regarding the January 6, 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol might help to clarify some of those shocking events.
One, how many people were involved in the pro-Trump rally that day, and of those, how many were later physically present on the steps of the Capitol? Was the pro-Trump rally basically a peaceful one up to that point and everywhere else except at the Capitol? Was the outbreak of violence limited to events surrounding Capitol Hill and, if so, what might that mean?
Two, based on televised evidence showing extensive pre-planned preparations for an attack on the Capitol (ropes, Molotov cocktails, improvised explosive devices, plastic riot shields, megaphones, prior coordination by the cadre of riot leaders), is it accurate journalism to write that the rioting was simply a spontaneous expression of primitive pro-Trumpers worked up into a frenzy by the President’s rally speech? Or was it instead a hostile riot by domestic terror cells? If so, how many were leading that takeover and what groups were they representing, if that information can be uncovered? At this point, various leaders of the rioters connected to the QAnon movement have been identified and their photo IDs broadcast on public media. But would it then be accurate journalism to declare that QAnon actually speaks in the name of the Republican party?
Three, was there any strategic aspect to the timing of the riot, which interrupted the legal proceedings and the legal objections being presented regarding possible election fraud? Did the riot significantly alter the dynamics of those discussions and the proceedings which continued later that evening? Did the riots alter the entire tenor of the political debate on the Hill, including media-expressed attitudes toward the President of the United States? Were these results simply an unintended consequence not planned by the rioters, or were they their deliberately planned goal? I am unaware up to this point in time of media discussions about these staggering issues.
Four, was the narrative quickly adopted by most media outlets (that the President was guilty of catalyzing these riots and that he and other Republicans should resign or be removed from public office) and the steps taken by most social media (that the President should be blocked from communicating) – were these informed by accurate reporting as to the identity of the rioters? Was due diligence exercised regarding the media’s and the Democratic leadership’s decision to publicly charge the Commander in Chief of the United States as guilty of treason and sedition? If these rioters hijacked a peaceful gathering of Americans supportive of legislative investigation and dialogue and did a violent end-run on it, why have most media ended up disseminating propaganda here instead of verifying and engaging in accurate journalistic reportage? Have these rioters truly succeeded in hijacking and shutting down the public square of debate?
The mainstream media’s well-known anti-Republican perspective and their religious adherence to their own politically correct narrative-dogma have been around for some time. Yale University Professor Timothy Snyder remarked in July 2017 in an interview on the Chauncy DeVega Show podcast, that it was ‘pretty much inevitable’ that President Trump would stage a coup and overthrow democracy. In September 2020 Op-ed writers Will Bunch and Dana Millbank warned that Trump’s strategy is similar to Hitler’s at the Reichstag. “America, this is not a drill,” wrote Milbank, noting that he and most mainstream commentators have spent five years trying to avoid Nazi comparisons, but that Trump’s recent statements and actions have made it unavoidable.
These propagandistic perspectives are a journalism accident waiting to happen. A few hundred domestic terrorist were not able to trigger an insurrection, but they certainly have been able to control the talking points and agendas of most of American media networks.
Journalistic blood libels
African-American Civil Rights attorney Leo Terrell slammed Democrats for using the tragic events that unfolded at the Capitol to form the basis of talking points meant to blame President Trump for the riot. Terrell criticized President-elect Biden for saying earlier in the day that Trump was guilty of “inciting a mob to attack the Capitol” when he never told anyone to be violent or destructive. “All Donald Trump said yesterday was go down to the Capitol building . . . I listened to the Democratic Kool-Aid, you heard Joe Biden today, [Washington D.C. Mayor] Muriel Bowser, they are using this for Democratic talking points . . . All President Trump did, and he has the First Amendment right . . . is to express his disappointment. He did not order those individuals to go down there and destroy that Capitol . . . There were criminals who invaded the Capitol building and they should be prosecuted, but the Democrats sat on their hands during the summer when rioters destroyed Democratic cities. For Joe Biden to play the race card today and say that there would have been different treatment for Black protestors . . . Criminals should be treated one way . . . I’m a lawyer for 30 years. If you go down and say, ‘Go down to the Capitol building and express your disappointment,’ that is not a criminal act . . . Donald Trump never recommended, suggested or told those people to go in and break into the Capitol building.”
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi joined Presumptive Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., in urging Vice President Mike Pence and the Cabinet to invoke the 25th Amendment and remove Trump from office immediately, calling him “a very dangerous person” who committed an “act of sedition” on Wednesday. “What happened at the U.S. Capitol yesterday was an insurrection against the United States, incited by the president. This president should not hold office one day longer,” said Schumer in a statement on Thursday.
Democratic New York Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez called for Republican Senators Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley to resign: “Senator Cruz, you must accept responsibility for how your craven, self-serving actions contributed to the death of four people yesterday. And how you fundraised off this riot. Both you and Senator Hawley must resign. If you do not, the Senate should move for your expulsion.”
Setting the journalistic record straight
Both Democrats and Republicans should be on the same side of the barricades here, standing firm for the defense of the U.S.A. against domestic terrorism. Instead, the tragedy of Capitol Hill is being used to further divide the American people. Is it possible for the media to actually have a redemptive role here and help focus world attention on the glaringly ignored fact that a peaceful Republican gathering was hijacked by those who mean to do evil against all Americans?
The Reichstag Fire was planned, catalyzed and spun by the Nazis for Nazi goals. The assault on the American Capitol was planned, catalyzed and spun by domestic American terrorists in order to hijack America’s government and shut down its discussion about election results. Evil people can still make political hay of this crisis – “Never let a good crisis go to waste,” it has been said. The need for prayer, soft-spoken dialogue focusing on discovering the truth here, and repentance for America’s many departures from God’s truth has never been greater.
How should we then pray?
Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.
In Messiah Yeshua,
Avner Boskey
Donations can be sent to:
FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES
BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA
Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal or credit card) through: www.davidstent.org
Here is the third video in our new twelve-part video series – teaching on the Minor Prophets – being released on our YouTube channel. Once a week, we are releasing a new episode from this series. Eight of the Twelve Minor Prophets will be presented by Avner Boskey from a Messianic Jewish and Israeli viewpoint. Four of the prophetic books will have two video sessions each, while the other four books will be covered in one video each.
The third video is ‘The Prophet Amos – Part One’

We encourage you to subscribe to our YouTube channel – Signet Ring Media – at the link: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCoX5hxSFWLBUANDaQttw0uQ
If you would like to stay notified of these new releases on the Signet Ring Media channel, after subscribing just click the notification bell 🔔.
For more information regarding the E37 Teaching Institute, visit: https://davidstent.org/e37/
Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.
In Messiah Yeshua,
Avner Boskey
Donations can be sent to:
FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES
BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA
Donations can also be made on-line (PayPal or credit card) through: www.davidstent.org
A new Israeli TV series making international media waves is called ‘Valley of Tears’ (in Hebrew, שְׁעַת נְעִילָה / Sha’at Ne'ila – a poetic reference to the final Yom Kippur prayer which traditionally influences one’s physical and spiritual destiny for the coming year). The series focuses on the 1973 Yom Kippur War’s Golan Heights (northern front) battle. The most expensive television series in Israel to date, each episode involved an outlay of over one million dollars.
Called the Ramadan or October War by the Arab world, the Yom Kippur War began with strategic thrusts by the Syrian and Egyptian armies which had been carefully cloaked in deception (see Proverbs 24:6). These sneak attacks were timed to fall on the Jewish people’s holiest day of the year (the Day of Atonement). Hostilities were initiated by a combination of massive artillery barrages and devastating aerial bombing.
Clash of the titans
At the outset of the war, Israel was overwhelmed 10 to 1 on the Golan and 11 to 1 in the Sinai. On the Egyptian front approximately 200,000 Egyptian troops charged against 18,000 Israeli soldiers. Over 2,400 Egyptian tanks hurled themselves at 300 Israeli tanks, while 2,300 Egyptian artillery pieces faced off against 90 Israeli artillery pieces. In the north on the Golan Heights, 45,000 Syrian soldiers confronted 6,000 Israeli forces, approximately 2,000 Syrian tanks faced 188 IDF tanks, and 655 Syrian artillery pieces came against 60 Israeli artillery pieces.
At exactly 1400 hours on October 6, 1973, 250 Egyptian aircraft overflew the Suez Canal on their way to attack Israeli airbases, command centers, artillery positions, radar installations and anti-aircraft batteries. More than 2,000 Egyptian artillery cannons fired some 10,500 shells and bombs at Israeli targets for 53 long minutes, at the rate of 175 shells per minute (Abouseada, Hamdy Sobhy (1980. The Crossing of the Suez Canal, October 6, 1973 (The Ramadan War) (PDF). USAWC strategy research project. U.S. Army War College. p. 9.). Similar Syrian moves involved 100 jet fighters striking targets on the Golan, as well as a 50 minute long creeping artillery barrage against Israeli tanks, APCs and bases.
These maneuvers were based on classic Soviet military doctrine – a brief but intense barrage along a broad front by all available artillery, aircraft, mortars and tanks (“Antiarmor Operations on the Golan Heights, October 1973;” Major George E. Knapp; U.S. Army Command and General Staff College Press Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 1992).

What’s the goal of an artillery barrage?
A barrage is the aiming of massed, sustained artillery fire at a series of points along a line. It is intended to suppress enemy movement and actions. When an attacking force lays down an earth-shaking blanket of explosion, the defending army cannot see, cannot hear, cannot discern, cannot react. The defenders are blinded, confused and panicked. It is at that point when invading commandos, massed armored forces and regular infantry break through.
These tactics have been used throughout military history. Some trenchant examples would include:

Job and the artillery barrages of Satan
In the Scroll of Job, we are allowed to look into the world of the spirit and observe a discussion between YHVH and Satan:
Job was an unusual man, blameless and upright, fearing God and turning away from evil. He would even regularly sacrifice sin offerings for his grown children in case any one of them “had sinned and cursed God in their hearts” (Job 1:5).
Yet Satan (who continually cursed God is his heart) believed that he could get Job to do the same – to curse God or at least to blame Him (see Job 1:22; 2:5, 10). He attempted to do this by bringing stunning tragedy into Job’s life – by destroying his possessions, his privileges and his family. These destructive attacks cascaded down like an artillery barrage, one quickly following the other. Yet still Job did not curse or blame God. Even when the permitted attacks moved to include painful and debilitating disease, Job did not curse God, but he did “curse the day of his birth” (Job 3:1).
The rising toll of ‘mini-catastrophes’ in 2020 has convinced some that this year could be designated “The Year of Job.” Of course, most of us have not experienced the intensities that Job experienced. But the crescendoing litany of social, economic and medical blows (like a massive artillery barrage) has caused many of us to wonder how to respond. Some indeed have cursed God, others have cursed the year 2020 itself, and others still have spoken evil against their own governing leaders.
The goal of an artillery barrage is “to suppress our movement and action.” If this present darkness - this ongoing satanic barrage - is robbing our ability to see, to hear, to discern and to react in godly ways; if this artillery barrage is making us blind, confused and panicked – then it’s a good time to recognize the fact that we are at war. We really are confronting a demonic ‘artillery barrage.’ Those whistling sounds and the crump of ‘shells’ landing close by are not due to an overactive imagination. We’re on the battlefield, and it would be a wise move to stay awake!

The divine comb
Six years ago, during a season of elections in Israel, Rachel was deeply grieved at the nasty polarization that was taking place in Israel, even between followers of Messiah Yeshua. As she was praying about that, she received a vision of a comb and she felt that the Lord saying to her, “I am combing humanity.” The Scriptures talk about God threshing the hearts of individuals and nations (Matthew 3:12; Micah 4:12-13; Isaiah 27:12; 28:27-28, etc.). The City of Jerusalem’s Temple Mount was originally a threshing floor (1 Chronicles 21), and it is in Jerusalem of the End of Days that YHVH will thresh the nations in judgment (Isaiah 41:15; Micah 4:12-13, etc.).
The events of 2020, this rising tally of Job-like blows, are part of God’s divine combing of the hearts of humanity. Will we curse and blame God (the advice of Job’s wife), or will we humble our own hearts and seek His face in these trials? As the world becomes even more polarized, will we be able to hold fast to God, His heart, His perspectives, His character, His ways and His love?
Obsessing in the light
The rapid machine-gun fire of fears and ‘bad news’ oozes out of our iPhones and computer screens on a daily basis. Our hearts are weighed down by the artillery barrage of bad news. Some of us are being driven crazy by gnawing uncertainties. We’re obsessing in the light of our TV’s (see our oh-so-relevant music video ‘All Hands on Deck’). We need to turn to a better light: “YHVH is my light and my salvation! Whom then shall I fear?” (Psalm 27:1). Let’s press forward to seek the Lord while He may be found (Isaiah 55:6-13; Hosea 6:3). Let’s continue to seek Yeshua’s face and worship Him. God will restore peace and clarity to our troubled minds. He will grant us new vision and strategies to press forward on the battlefield.
Truth is sweeter than fiction
The Western world was raised on a belief that there are unchanging biblical truths, and that a life worth living must be based on those truths. “Therefore, everyone who hears these words of Mine, and acts on them, will be like a wise man who built his house on the rock” (Matthew 7:24). Messiah Yeshua says that our faithfulness to God’s word (even in times of trial) is what opens our spiritual eyes and ears. As a result, we’ll be able to know what is real and true, and then we’ll be able to walk in God’s freedom: “If you continue in My word, then you are truly My disciples, and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free” (John 8:31-32).
We live in a culture which is rapidly abandoning God and His truth. Most of the information overload coming at us is no longer truth-based but is ‘Op-Ed’ – based on opinions and editorial perspectives. ‘The News’ used to mean real facts; today it describes a cholent, a bouillabaisse of truth mixed with lies. Let’s renew our heart-commitment to clear thinking and truth speaking. But let’s not be surprised at the probable result – we may find ourselves swimming against the stream:
How should we then pray?
Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.
In Messiah Yeshua,
Avner Boskey
Donations can be sent to:
FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES
BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA
Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal or credit card) through: www.davidstent.org
Here is the second video in our new twelve-part video series – teaching on the Minor Prophets –being released on our YouTube channel. Once a week, we are releasing a new episode from this series. Eight of the Twelve Minor Prophets will be presented by Avner Boskey from a Messianic Jewish and Israeli viewpoint. Four of the prophetic books will have two video sessions each, while the other four books will be covered in one video each.
The second video is ‘The Prophet Jonah – Part Two’ https://youtu.be/T1qcwhjinws
We encourage you to subscribe to our YouTube channel – Signet Ring Media – at the link: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCoX5hxSFWLBUANDaQttw0uQ
If you would like to stay notified of these new releases on the Signet Ring Media channel, after subscribing just click the notification bell 🔔.
For more information regarding the E37 Teaching Institute, visit: https://davidstent.org/e37/
Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.
In Messiah Yeshua,
Avner Boskey
Donations can be sent to:
FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES
BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA
Donations can also be made on-line (by PayPal or credit card) through: www.davidstent.org
We’re delighted to announce that a new twelve-part video series – teaching on the Minor Prophets – is being released on our YouTube channel. Once a week, we will be releasing a new episode from this series. Eight of the Twelve Minor Prophets will be presented by Avner Boskey from a Messianic Jewish and Israeli viewpoint. Four of the prophetic books will have two video sessions each, while the other four books will be covered in one video each.
The first video is ‘The Prophet Jonah – Part One’ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-GCylTHgwU

We encourage you to subscribe to our YouTube channel – Signet Ring Media – at the link: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCoX5hxSFWLBUANDaQttw0uQ
If you would like to stay notified of these new releases on the Signet Ring Media channel, after subscribing just click the notification bell 🔔.
For more information regarding the E37 Teaching Institute, visit: https://davidstent.org/e37/
Your prayers and support hold up our arms and are the very practical enablement of God to us in the work He has called us to do.
In Messiah Yeshua,
Avner Boskey
Donations can be sent to:
FINAL FRONTIER MINISTRIES
BOX 121971 NASHVILLE TN 37212-1971 USA
Donations can also be made on-line (PayPal or credit card) through: www.davidstent.org
By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information
The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.